Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bimal Nepal, Texas A&M University; Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Amarnath Banerjee, Texas A&M University; Glen Miller

), 2235–2254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948- 020-00216-2[4] Stelios, S., & Christodoulou, A. (2020). “Teaching professional integrity: An empirical study on engineering students.” International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (IJEP), 10(3), 98. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v10i3.12013[5] Hess, J. L., Beever, J., Zoltowski, C. B., Kisselburgh, L., & Brightman, A. O. (2019). “Enhancing engineering students' ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the Sira framework.” Journal of Engineering Education, 108(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20249[6] Martin, D. A., Conlon, E., & Bowe, B. (2021). “A multi-level review of Engineering Ethics Education: Towards a socio-technical orientation of

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Raymond Smith, East Carolina University; James Etheridge; Ricky Castles, East Carolina University

University. I am the PI on a multi- institutional track 3 S-STEM grant designed to support low-income students in eastern NC at East Carolina University and 3 partnering community colleges. My disciplinary scholarship focuses on sensor networks for improvement of health. My educational scholarship focuses on curricular innovations and support to improve student outcomes. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comLessons Learned from a Portfolio of Community-Engaged Capstone Projects Related to Engineering EconomicsAbstractThis paper examines a portfolio of community-engaged capstone projects with teams ofinterdisciplinary

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (CoE); Rabiatu Bonku; Mercy Fash; Jennifer Richmond-Bryant, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Alesia Ferguson

orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] A. Aristovnik, D. Keržič, D. Ravšelj, N. Tomaževič, and L. Umek, “Impacts of the COVID- 19 pandemic on life of Higher Education Students: A global perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 8438, pp. 1 – 34, Oct. 2020.[2] A. N. Ofori-Boadu, A. Ferguson, & A. White, “Mitigating our Diminishing STEM- SELF SYNDROME (DS CUBED): The voices of STEM students during COVID- 19 pandemic. 2021 Virtual National Science Foundation – HBCU – UP/ CREST PI/PD Meeting, February 2021. [Online[ Available: https://emerging-researchers.org/2021-hbcu-up-crest- pi-pd-presentation-videos

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 8: Effective Teaching and Learning in Post-Pandemic Classrooms and Other Curricular Innovations

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asad Azemi, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; Xiaoguang Ma, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; Fang Yang, University of Wisconsin - Plattevile; John Goomey, University of Wisconsin - Platteville; David Andersen, University of Wisconsin - Platteville

for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging.[2] Rassudov, L, and A Kornuets, “COVID-19 Pandemic Challenges for Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 2020 XI International Conference on Electrical Power Drive Systems (ICEPDS), Saint-Petersburg, Russia.[3] Choi, Back-Young, S. Song, and R. Zaman, “Smart Education: Opportunities and Challenges Inducted by COVID-19 Pandemic,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).[4] Gill, A, D. Irwin1, R. Yuk-kwan Ng, D. Towey1, T. Wang, and Y. Zhang, “The Future of Teaching Post-COVID-19: Microlearning in Product Design Education,” Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE).[5

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lance White, Texas A&M University; Larry Powell, Texas A&M University; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University; Dilma Da Silva, Texas A&M University; Santana Gonzales, Texas A&M University; Sara Amani, Texas A&M University

statistics from the current population survey. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm [2] N. C. of Education Statistics. (2020) Race/ethnicity of college faculty. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=61 [3] U. S. C. Bureau. (2021) Acs demographic and housing estimates. [Online]. Available: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=United%20States&tid=ACSDP1Y2019.DP05 [4] ——. (2021) Quick facts texas. [Online]. Available: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/TX/POP010210 [5] N. S. Foundation. (2017) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/digest/occupation/overall.cfm [6

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary Timko; Natalie Shaheen; Wade Goodridge, Utah State University; Theresa Green, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Daniel Kane, Utah State University

, which lasted betweenthree and ten minutes.interview so it could be transcribed later for analysis. Participants were asked questions such as,used in the activity made sense to you and were easy to understData AnalysisField notes from the observations and transcripts from the interviews were analyzed using firstand second cycle coding procedures [23] in MAXQDA, a qualitative data analysis software [24].Two members of the research team independently analyzed the field notes and interviewtranscripts to identify codes relating to spatial language. The research team also used the origami s as a priori codes [23] to serve as astarting point for the first cycle of coding. After coding

Conference Session

ERM: Conceptualizations of Engineering and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

isused loosely by the public. Often it is used to describe a repair person, of for example,television or washing machines.The two pathways had their origins in the industrial revolution. The first two universitydepartments of engineering were created in the 1830’s [3]. The importance of applied scienceseems to have been recognised from the beginning. Indeed, it was Humphrey Lloyd, theProfessor of Natural Philosophy, who in 1841 proposed that Trinity College Dublin shouldestablish training in engineering, the teaching of which would be supported by professors(scientists and mathematicians) already in the university [4].In parallel, in Scotland, there developed from 1821 a system of voluntary MechanicsInstitutes which spread across England and

Conference Session

ETD - ET Curriculum and Programs I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Kelley, The Ohio State University; Camryn Reitz, The Ohio State University; Winifred Opoku, The Ohio State University

“successful” in terms of student enrollment, degrees awarded, and jobplacements. Ultimately, our intent is to determine how IABs can have more direct influence andinput into engineering technologies, for the benefit of both parties.References[1] Fran Stewart and Kathryn Kelley, “Connecting hands and heads: retooling for the ‘smart’ manufacturingworkplace,” Economic Development Quarterly, Feb. 2020.[2] National Academy of Engineering, Understanding the Educational and Career Pathways of Engineers.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018.[3] S. Matos, D. Riley, and A. Akera, “WannABET? Historical and organizational perspectives on governance inengineering education,” In Proc. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[4] K

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Nelson, Texas A&M University; Brent Donham, Texas A&M University - Commerce

Job with a Huge Skills Gap: Cyber Security," Forbes Media LLC, March 2017. [Online]. Available: Forbes.com.[3] S. Snitkin, "IT-OT Cybersecurity Convergence," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.arcweb.com/blog/it-ot-cybersecurity-convergence.[4] J. Manyika and et. al., "Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things," McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey and Company, June 2015.[5] M. Montgomery and S. F. Ravich, "Opinion: The Cybersecurity Risk to Our Water Supply is Real. We Need to Prepare.," Washington Post, 3 January 2022.[6] Texas A&M University-Commerce, Human Subject Protection, Policy 15.99.01.R1, 2019.[7] K. Zurkus, "How Can Industry Leaders and Academic Help Improve Cybersecurity Education?," Available online

Conference Session

ERM: Teamwork makes the dream work!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Kaushali Patel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Devang Patel, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Alejandra Magana, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

and R. Munoz-Luna, “Scrum Methodology in Higher Education: Innovation in Teaching, Learning and Assessment.,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1– 18, 2017.[9] A. Jaiswal, T. Karabiyik, P. Thomas, and A. J. Magana, “Characterizing Team Orientations and Academic Performance in Cooperative Project-Based Learning Environments,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11090520.[10] S. A. Wheelan, B. Davidson, and F. Tilin, “Group development across time: Reality or illusion?,” Small Group Res., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 223–245, 2003.[11] D. W. Johnson, R. T. Johnson, and K. A. Smith, “Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory,” J. Excell. Univ

Conference Session

ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caitlin Wylie, University of Virginia; Natalie Evans, University of Virginia; Jamie Jirout, University of Virginia; Jessica Scoville, University of Virginia; Elizabeth Opila, University of Virginia

. 116, no. 1, pp. 75–98, 1994, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75.[2] J. J. Jirout, V. E. Vitiello, and S. K. Zumbrunn, “Curiosity in schools,” in The new science of curiosity, Hauppauge, NY, US: Nova Science Publishers, 2018, pp. 243–265.[3] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.[4] D. A. Sabatini, “Teaching and research synergism: The undergraduate research experience,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 23, pp. 98–102, 1997, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052- 3928(1997)123:3(98).[5] D. Lopatto, “Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings,” Cell Biol

Conference Session

ERM: Let's Continue the Conversation about Tests! Part 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Catherine Kenyon; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; William Bridges, Clemson University

survey included items from the Math Anxiety Ratings Scale(MARS-30) to measure levels of student math test anxiety. Students were also given a surveyabout their future-oriented motivation in their FYE course that uses a 7-point Likert scale to as-sess factors including students’ perceptions, connectedness, value, clarity, and alignment of theirfuture(s). These two survey data sets were combined to allow the simultaneous exploration ofboth their perceptions of Calculus exams and perceptions of the future.After collecting and cleaning the data on students’ perception of Calculus exams, we performedan Exploratory Factor Analysis. We found that students see the purpose of Calculus exams infour ways: with a future oriented purpose, with a performance

Conference Session

Utilizing Technology to Train Chemical Engineering Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark Burns, University of Michigan; Valerie Johnson, University of Michigan; Kaylee Smith, University of Michigan

Canvas quizz:Quiz_A1 1 = Point value per question:Basic concepts covered::Understanding units # Question Answer Another answer Another answer Another answer Another answer 1 Slugs are units of ___. mass 2 kg/(m*s^2) are units of ___. pressure normal stress shear stress 3 ___ has units of kg/(m*s^2). pressure normal stress shear stress

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Student Success Boot Camps, Summer Bridge Programs, and Living Learning Communities

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Noe Vargas Hernandez, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Arturo Fuentes, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

study.REFERENCES[1] US News, 2022, "U.S. News Education Rankings Colleges," [Online]. Available: https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings [Accessed Feb. 13, 2022].[2] IDEO, 2022, “What is Design Thinking?” [Online]. Available: https://www.ideou.com/blogs/inspiration/what-is-design-thinking [Accessed Feb. 13,2022].[3] Vargas Hernandez, N., Fuentes, A., & Crown, S. (2018, October). Effectively Transforming Students through First Year Engineering Student Experiences. In 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-5

Conference Session

LEES 7: Experiments in Experiential and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Cao; Jennifer Case, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jingshen Wu; Bingzhuo Liang

. Nendaz and A. Tekian, “Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Medical Schools: A Literature Review,” Teach. Learn. Med., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 232–243, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1207/S15328015TLM110408.[7] J. Baggini, “What professionalism means for teachers today.,” Educ. Rev., vol. 18, no. 2, 2005.[8] R. L. Blake, M. C. Hosokawa, and S. L. Riley, “Student Performances on Step 1 and Step 2 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Following Implementation of a Problem-based Learning Curriculum:,” Acad. Med., vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 66–70, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1097/00001888- 200001000-00017.[9] D. Gijbels, F. Dochy, P. Van den Bossche, and M. Segers, “Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis From the Angle of Assessment

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Fluids, Heat Transfer

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Drenth, US Air Force Academy; George Sidebotham, The Cooper Union; Phillip Cornwell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Ioan Feier, US Air Force Academy

= � � 𝑑𝑑𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑The results from the shakedown test are shown in Figure 9, along with a plot of the prediction ofinviscid theory (Bernoulli’s equation) which is not developed here formally. The result is that thevelocity of the exit jet is the same as what would be obtained from an object dropped in free fallfrom a height h. The main experimental result here is obtained from mass principles only. 6 5 Inviscid Theory Vexit = (2gH)0.5 4 Exit Velocity (m/s) 3 Experimental Data 2

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Assorted Topics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University; Daniel Barb; George Roskovich, Florida Atlantic University

desired by students. 8. References[1] D. Raviv, “Visual Explanations of First Order Differential Equations,” in 16th LACCEIInternational Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, 2018.[2] T. Goldfinch, A. L. Carew, and T.J. McCarthy, “Improving Learning in EngineeringMechanics: The Significance of Understanding Causes of Poor Performance,” in Proceedings ofthe AAEE Conference, 2008.[3] S. Baker and L. Talley, “The Relationship of Visualization Skills to Achievement inFreshman Chemistry,” in Journal of Chemistry Education, 1972.[4] J. Velazquez-Iturbide, I. Hernan-Losada, and M. Paredes-Velasco, “Evaluating the Effectof Program Visualization on Student Motivation,” in IEEE Transactions on Education, 2017.[5] R

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Matthew Lamparter, Bucknell University

, and detailed fabrication files on theDAMNED project with interested faculty members. Please contact us using the information inthe title block of the article. This material is based upon work supported by the National ScienceFoundation under Grant No. EEC-2022271. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Citations[1] J. E. Froyd, P. C. Wankat, and K. A. Smith, “Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 100, pp. 1344–1360, 2012.[2] C. R. Mann and M. Press, “A Study of Engineering Education,” Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Boston

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Electrical and Computer Engineering

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alejandro H Espera Jr, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University; Nicole Pitterson, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

of Participant, Gender of Participant b. Predictors: (Constant), Number of courses taken (students) or taught (faculty), Type of Participant, Gender of Participant c. Predictors: (Constant), Type of Participant, Gender of Participant d. Predictors: (Constant), Type of Participant e. Dependent Variable: Total score in the concept test out of 20The ANOVA results of the four models created from the auto linear regression using a backwardalgorithm showed that although Models 2 and 3 were significant at p<0.05, Model 4 wassignificant at p<0.001, and it has an F-statistic>4, which is twice the Model 3’s. Thus, Model 4performed best among the

Conference Session

Computers in Education 8 - Video Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jianyu Dong, California State University, Los Angeles; Jim Kuo; Pearl Chen, California State University, Los Angeles; John Bachman, California State University, Los Angeles

ensure the accessibility and functionality of the video modules. Theproject team plans to carry over the learned experiences and skill set to simplify the video designand development process in the future.AcknowledgementThis work is sponsored by CSU STEM-NET program.References 1. Kim, J. (2021). 11 Takeaways from the 2021 CHLOE Report. Inside Higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/learning-innovation/11-takeaways-2021-chloe- report 2. Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., Cruz, B., and Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video Improves Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review, Review of Educational Research, 91(2): 204–236. 3. Månsson, J., Löfgreen, J., and Warfvinge P. (2017

Conference Session

Architectural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Solnosky, Pennsylvania State University; Moses Ling, Pennsylvania State University

study skills and/orstudents struggling to adapt the correct learning technique(s) best associated for a certain topic. Masteringthe content in ordered sequence is particularly critical as students in AE are a non-controlled enrollmentstatus, that is, students with lower than 3.0 GPA may enter the major. Anecdotal evidence indicates thatstudents at lower GPA levels have greater difficulties with these challenging courses. In many instances,the difficulties can be attributed to underdeveloped learning skills and their cognitive processing abilities.Failure to successfully complete these courses unwittingly results in setbacks, such as, on-time entrance tomajor and academic progress in subsequence major courses for a significant number of

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Demos and Interactives

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aminul Islam Khan, Washington State University; Olivia Reynolds, Washington State University; Mohammad Hossan, University of Central Oklahoma; David Thiessen, Washington State University; Bernard Van Wie, Washington State University; Prashanta Dutta, Washington State University

Paper ID #37442Design, Fabrication, and Testing of Next Generation DesktopLearning Modules for Chemical and Mechanical EngineeringEducationAminul Islam Khan (Mr.) Aminul Islam Khan Received his B.S. and M. S. from the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology where he also served as a Lecturer and Assistant Professor. Currently, Khan is a Ph.D. candidate at Washington State University. He has been involved in multidisciplinary research including hands-on learning for STEM education, transport modeling in micro/nanoscale devices, and various inverse techniques including Bayesian inference, Monte Carlo

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Djedjiga Belfadel, Fairfield University; Elif Kongar, Fairfield University; John Drazan, Fairfield University; Isaac Macwan, Fairfield University; Michael Zabinski

EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition.[3] Fabien, Brian and Vereen, Keona. Implementing a Freshman Engineering Design Experience at theUniversity of Washington. 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances, HEAd’17,Valencia, 2017.[4] J. Kellar, W. Hovey, M. Langerman, S. Howard, L. Simonson, L. Kjerengtroen, L. Sttler, H.Heilhecker, L. Ameson-Meyer, and S. Kellogg, A problem-based learning approach for freshmanengineering, in 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Feb. 2000.[5] H. Lei, F. Ganjeizadeh, D. Nordmeyer, and J. Phung, Student learning trends in a freshman-levelintroductory engineering course, in 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON),April 2017, pp. 152–156.[6] L. A. Meadows, R. Fowler, and

Conference Session

Centering Black Experiences in STEM: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fantasi Nicole, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus

Instruction, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 265–289, Oct. 2017, doi:10.1080/07370008.2017.1355211.[3] V. Borum and E. Walker, “What Makes the Difference? Black Women’s Undergraduateand Graduate Experiences in Mathematics,” The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 81, no. 4, pp.366–378, 2012, doi: 10.7709/jnegroeducation.81.4.0366.[4] M. S. Ross, B. M. Capobianco, and A. Godwin, “REPOSITIONING RACE, GENDER,AND ROLE IDENTITY FORMATION FOR BLACK WOMEN IN ENGINEERING,” JWomen Minor Scien Eng, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 37–52, 2017, doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2017016424.[5] S. J. Robinson, “Spoke tokenism : Black women talking back about graduate schoolexperiences,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 155–181, 2012, doi:10.1080/13613324.2011.645567

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Rita Caso; Kristi J. Shryock; Jo Howze; Jeffrey Froyd; Arun R. Srinivasa

the above specifications. Hopefully, a stream of projects cancontinue to be generated. AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.0336591. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References1. Caso, R., Clark, C., Froyd, J.E., Inam, A., Kenimer, A.L., Morgan, J.R., and Rinehart, J., “A Systemic Change Model in Engineering Education and Its Relevance for Women,” Proceedings, 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Kenneth Van Treuren

Letter, Spring 20059. http://journaltool.asme.org/Content/AuthorResources.cfm10. ASME Writing Guide for Baylor University – (Student handout developed for EGR 4335, Mechanical Engineering Laboratory.)KEN VAN TREURENKen Van Treuren is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at Baylor University. Hereceived his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy and his M. S. in Engineering fromPrinceton University. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, UK. AtBaylor he teaches courses in laboratory techniques, fluid mechanics, energy systems, propulsion, andfreshman engineering. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference

Collection

2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Yazmine Berenice Rincon, Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation; Sheena M. Reeves, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

project has proven that designing, creating, and printing 3D molds using the TinkerCAD softwareand 3D printers is feasible. The new push system design will eliminate the granule removal issue seenin Prototype 2. The future goal is to scale up the current Prototype 3 design to produce more tabletswith a single mold. By creating the ideal prototype, the creation of tablets made from non-syntheticexcipients will be achieved and potentially allow tailoring of a new and effective drug formulations. References 1. Byrn, S., Futran, M., Thomas, H., Jayjock, E., Maron, N., Meyer, R.F., Myerson, A.S., Thien, M.P., and Trout, B.L. (2015). Achieving continuous manufacturing for final dosage formation

Collection

2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Darius Miles Gatson, Houston Baptist University; Ryan Duane Barnes, Houston Baptist University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

for all pins is identified, the pins can beconfigured as output pins by writing the word value to the GPIO_OUTPUT_EN memory address asshown in the sample code in Figure 2 (Lines 1-3).All of the obtained word values for all of the pins we used are defined in our source code filememorymap.inc as shown in Figure 3. This configuration file is also used to store the base address foraccessing the pins (GPIO_CTRL_ADDRESS), and the offsets used for enabling output(GPIO_OUPTUT_EN) and changing pin state (GPIO_OUTPUT_VAL) which are found in FE310-G002 manual5. This configuration file is included in all of our .S assembly files. 1 li t0, GPIO_CTRL_ADDRESS # Store into t0 GPIO BASE address 2 li t1, GPIO_PINS

Collection

2022 ASEE Gulf Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Zsamia Barnes, Prairie View A&M; Ramalingam Radhakrishnan

interruptions. 8 References 1. Moeini, R., Zare, M. R., & karimian, F. (2021). Reduce repair cost of wastewater pipelines for using trenchless and open cut technology. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.016 2. Arifin, H. H., Zardasti, L., Lim, K. S., Md. Noor, N., Yahaya, N., Mazlan, A. N., & Mohd. Sam, A. R. (2021). Stress distribution analysis of composite repair with carbon nanotubes reinforced putty for damaged steel pipeline. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 194, 104537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2021.104537 3. Castiglia, M., Santucci de Magistris

Collection

2005 GSW

Authors

Dr. Saleh M. Sbenaty; Chad Lloyd

. MethodologyThis project is divided into two main sections, hardware and software. The hardwarediscussion will detail the microcontroller, the development environment and allrequirements necessary to recreate a working model. The software section will brieflyillustrate the Keil C IDE and JavaKit applications as well as the firmware written for themicrocontroller.HardwareThe DS80C400 is a microcontroller with onboard network support. In addition, themicrocontroller has seven bidirectional parallel ports, four counters/timers and threeserial ports with onboard UARTs (3). The instruction execution speed has beendramatically increased with a maximum input clock speed of 75 MHz and the original8051’s 12 clocks-per-instruction cycle has been reduced to four