slowlyincreased (Cunninghame et al., 2016), this group still remains largely underrepresented in STEMdisciplines (Moon et al., 2012). This discrepancy in representation reflects larger issues ofmarginalization in STEM fields and higher education at large. Current support structures fordisabled people remain ineffective, as accessing necessary resources requires navigatingphysical, cultural, and bureaucratic barriers (Groen-McCall et al., 2018). These barriers onlycontinue to widen for disabled students planning to pursue engineering careers (Prema & Dhand,2019), as seen in the high unemployment rate for disabled scientists and engineers, which isgreater than that of the entire U.S. labor force (Lee, 2010; NSF, 2017). Yet, disability is rarelyincluded
most impactful time toenergize students about careers in STEM is in K-12 settings. To emphasize and spotlight the importance ofbuildings on humans, along with providing an interactive learning experience for potential future STEMstudents, a five-day summer camp focused on multi-disciplinary building design was held at (insertuniversity name). The camp curriculum included hands-on, design-oriented projects from severaldisciplines: architecture, mechanical, structural, construction, sustainability, acoustics, and lighting. Inaddition, tours of several buildings on campus were conducted along with after-hours relaxation time forcampers. The implementation of activities and the well-designed hands-on projects not only increased thestudents
racialidentity. Collins [10] defines the external environment as the institution of schooling, the workspace, andthe career space in which a Black student in STEM is situated. This environment influences a Blackstudent’s STEM identity because it houses the academic interactions Collins [10] defines as themicrocosms that develop a STEM identity. The external environment should also reinforce a Blackstudent’s gender-based racial identity. However, Collins [10] identifies how external environmentstraditionally threaten a Black student’s gender-based racial identity by perpetuating a chilly STEMclimate through stereotypes and gender biases. Nevertheless, she points out the need for Black studentsto cultivate STEM identities in external environments that are
with axis of what and how: individual to group activities, and “domainspecific content knowledge” to “key design qualities.”Research MethodsTo identify common features and distinguish elements across courses, studied three designcourse sequences at [university]. Methods involved in the research included documentationanalysis (course syllabi, course descriptions in academic course catalog) [28, 29] as well asstudent and alumni feedback obtained through structured qualitative interviews. This qualitativeset of descriptions are augments to a larger research project surveying alumni of each course [31-33] with respect to its short- and long-term effectiveness such as impact on career andprofessional development, and big takeaways on effectiveness
to do with research outcomes, and the difficulty of “playing thegame” or “following the money,” aligning our research goals with those we know would havethe best chance of receiving recognition, funding, and career mobility. In our experience, wenoticed that this approach could limit how we frame the work in which we engage. I find myselfperpetuating and acting within this system regularly as an engineering education researcher,often questioning the “so what” of work I do, attempting to frame any work I do to the NSF’sgoal of developing a diverse, innovative body of engineers for U.S. global competitiveness.There are tangible benefits that are gained from these endeavors, but these underlying valuesdirectly or indirectly influence any
that provide a foundation for the career. As a newgraduate, this person could not perform many designs quickly and required the guidance of asenior engineer. In this thought experiment, the person is not asked immediately upon graduationto stamp engineering drawings or provide recommendations to clients alone. On the contrary, inthe office, the person is placed in a diverse group of peers and experts. The person is tasked toperform a set of activities. The results are then reviewed by more senior and experiencedengineers, who provide comment and instruction for revision and iteration. Revision anditeration are part of the engineering process [5]. The person revises the work until it issatisfactory for providing to the client as judged by the
aremainly academic degrees and professional degrees. In terms of the research on connotation, somescholars have explored the difference between the training objectives of professional degree andacademic degree in engineering. Different from academic degrees, which emphasize advancedknowledge and top-notch research, professional degrees attach more importance to the closeconnection with engineering practice7. The professional degree is a kind of degree that takes Intoaccount academic, career-oriented and practical elements of training. From the perspective ofknowledge production mode, the knowledge production of academic degree is more centered ondisciplines and universities, that is, it is adapted to the traditional knowledge production mode I
Paper ID #39783What If They Choose: Surfacing Insights Associated with a Pedagogy forDoctoral EducationDr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Dr. Jennifer Turns is a full professor in the Human Centered Design & Engineering Department in the College of Engineering at the University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the
, Srihari must take thepath of least resistance to protect her mental and physical health by requesting accommodationsfor her and her group. This is not a choice she would make on her own volition, which is also atheme she experiences when making decisions regarding her engineering career path as aninternational student. And another big part with the international status is I started off as an aerospace major. And when I was trying to make connections, talking about how I would, you know, go get a co-op or an internship, I was told I probably wouldn't because most aerospace engineering jobs are defense based. And since I don't have like, a green card or something like that in the country, it would be very difficult
top four career competencies most valued by employers,as reported by the National Academy of Colleges and Employers (NACE). In a 2019 job outlooksurvey, oral and written communication was rated consistently high in the past three years. Also,proficient communication is essential for engineers in the 21st Century to create an inclusiveenvironment and engage multiple stakeholders, as indicated by the National Academy ofEngineering. In particular, the ability to communicate effectively to various audiences across theSTEM disciplines and the public is a great need. The engineering program at the University ofSouth Florida (USF) aims to fulfill the NACE’s professional competencies for career readiness bydevising new methodologies for communication
it beyond the classroom. As a teaching center, ourjob is to provide support or problem solving where needed and provide pointers to new tools,ideas and papers, and share opportunities to disseminate their teaching. For those interested inscaling their teaching further, assistance with applying for grants is valuable. Supportdepartments in nominating these teachers for university level teaching awards and teachingawards at a regional or national level. These are the courses that impact career choices andsuccess well beyond the classroom.Results - assessing the reach of the teaching centerAs a complement to assessing whether individual teaching center programs are effective, it isimportant to assess whether the overall suite of programs is
, user-centered design principles and multidisciplinaryteamwork. It is expected that students will increase in understanding about how social andemotional competencies impact user-centered design. With increased understanding, students willintegrate these principles into their class projects and other learning activities. It is also anticipatedthat students will positively reflect on the contributions of their team members and betterappreciate the impact of multidisciplinary teams on the design process. Students from bothengineering and non-engineering programs will correctly identify how these same principles canapply to their specific career field and in context of their communities, enriching the professionalformation not only of engineers
Curitiba, Brazil; native communities in the Amazon in Villavicencio, Colombia; and underserved communities in Piura, Per´u. Dr. Santiago is passionate about providing experiential learning opportunities to both undergraduate and graduate students with a focus on Hispanic and female students. She is currently Co-PI of UTEP’s NSF-AGEP program focusing on foster- ing Hispanic doctoral students for academic careers; the Department of Education’s (DoE) STEMGROW Program to encourage students Latino(a) students and students with disabilities to pursue STEM careers; and DoE’s Program YES SHE CAN that provides support and mentoring to female pre-college students. She is also a member of two advisory committees to the UTEP’s
. Waidzunas, “Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM,” Sci. Adv., vol. 7, no. 3, p. eabe0933, 2021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.[11] J. B. Yoder and A. Mattheis, “Queer in STEM: Workplace Experiences Reported in a National Survey of LGBTQA Individuals in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Careers,” J. Homosex., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2015.1078632.[12] E. A. Cech, “The (Mis)Framing of Social Justice: Why Ideologies of Depoliticization and Meritocracy Hinder Engineers’ Ability to Think About Social Injustices,” in Engineering Education for Social Justice: Critical Explorations and Opportunities, J. Lucena, Ed., in Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Dordrecht
information that may be directly applicable to my career or academic goals.While all increases in student ratings for the PBL version of the course as compared to the exam-based instructional model were found to be statistically significant, the largest increases werenoted in the questions elucidating perceived relevance of assessment to content covered in thecourse, and impacts on critical thinking and communication (bolded rows in Table 1). Graphicaldata showing each course section individually is presented in Figure 2 for visual comparison.Figure 2. Student learning experience evaluation data from exam-based sections of the course(gray) and project-based offerings (dark red
: everyday experiences,designed settings, and programmed settings [5]. Informal learning environments can supportchildren’s interest, engagement, and understanding through self-directed learning experiences[25]. Moreover, informal learning experiences that focus on developing children’s knowledge,skills, and positive attitudes can also impact children’s development [26]; [27]. As Vela et al. [4]assert, informal settings can act as a “catalyst for students to become interested in STEM-relatedfields and motivate them to pursue STEM-related careers” [p. 105].In pre-college education, studies have explored children's engagement in CT and engineering ininformal settings [20]; [28; [29]. Consistent with the global movement referred to as “InformalComputer
Preferences and/or interests (n = 9) STEM Family members (n = 4) Career path (n = 3) 8 Information before College preparation course (n = 3) coming to college Confidence in choosing a major (n = 2) Short videos regarding important topics and resources in college (n = 1)Results and Discussion(1) Challenges/StrugglesWhen students were asked to identify personal challenges and struggles they faced in the firsthalf of the fall semester, students discussed academic, personal, and
- personal behaviors and leadership for early-career engineers. She teaches engineering leadership and an engineering leader coaching course. Her research focuses on coaching skills, inclusive leadership, and career development.Ms. Jessica Dolores Menold, Pennsylvania State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Imperfect Interventions for Speaking Up and Supporting Women in STEMKristen R. Moore, University at BuffaloMeg Handley, Penn State UniversityJessica Menold, Penn State UniversityIntroductionDespite numerous calls within engineering to broaden participation of racially and ethnically minoritized(REM) people in the field, racial diversity remains a systemic problem. Many engineering
itself — a key macro-objective of the course. Indications of this appear in suchcomments as: I really enjoyed it! Definitely an engineering discipline for me to think about possibly exploring! I didn't think I would be good at geotech but I'm glad I took the class because I love it and can see myself doing geotech as part of my career. I know so much about soil now! I go around thinking about all the soils I step on, what type they are, how saturated they are, how strong they are, and how they would drain or consolidate. Especially at the barn because it’s so muddy, I’m trying to think of ways to drain it better. Maybe installing wick drains would help
?” Results from the surveys werereported by Hopkins and Dong [10] and Kam-Biron et al. [7] and are synthesized here, in thecontext of preparing students for a career in structural engineering. ● Considering both surveys, 90% of practitioners considered 9 of the 12 core courses as necessary for students to complete; courses on structural analysis III: matrix analysis (85%), prestressed concrete (70%), and masonry design (87%) were viewed as necessary by fewer than 90% of respondents. ● The three most important subjects identified by practitioners were structural analysis I, reinforced concrete I, and steel I. In addition to the top three, practitioners stated that the list of the top five most important topics included two
University in NewJersey by the authors in oral presentation and senior seminar courses offered by the Humanitiesand Social Science department for engineers. To provide a coherent instructional design thatcan function in Face-to-face and online courses equally effectively, the ‘General, ParticularSpecific’ model1 was piloted and is now fully integrated. This scaffolding for students enhancestheir critical thinking about content and alignment with the audience when examining content tobe delivered orally to diverse groups. The students are taught to effectively communicatetechnical information as responsible experts.Introduction Communication is essential in all career paths but many STEM students discount thevalue and avoid practice rather
U.S. She arrived in Clemson University in 2017 and currently works in the Office of Global Engagement (OGE) in the Global Learning, Partnerships, and Initiative (GPLI) where she oversees and processes International Agreements in coordination with partners and campus stakeholders, as well as the logistics for different initiatives within OGE. She is also part of a select group in Clemson University who are Qualified Administrator of the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI), a well-recognized tool to assess intercultural development. Before coming to Clemson, Maggie was a Diplomat for Guatemala. She began her Diplomat career at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) of Guatemala in 2006 where she served for 6 years in
Paper ID #37282Professional Shame amid Faculty-Student InteractionsJames L. Huff (Associate Professor) Dr. James Huff is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Honors College Faculty Fellow at Harding University. He conducts transdisciplinary research on identity that lies at the nexus of applied psychology and engineering education. A recipient of the NSF CAREER grant (No. 2045392) and the director of the Beyond Professional Identity (BPI) lab, Dr. Huff has mentored numerous undergraduate students, doctoral students, and academic professionals from more than 10 academic disciplines in using
, students were promptedto consider the following: “Discuss why ethics and sustainability are important to civilengineering” and “How do ethics and sustainability relate to your future career goals?” Thus,sustainability was introduced in the course and reinforced.Although the SDGs were not explicitly discussed, content in the course related somewhat to:SDG 3 Good Health and Wellbeing (health impacts of civil engineering infrastructure andwellbeing requirement in the Code of Ethics), SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation (focus areas ofcivil engineering, ASCE Infrastructure Report Card for these areas), SDG 9 Infrastructure (focusof civil engineering), SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities (equity topic during one week includingweekly assignment), and SDG 11
, Springfield, MA 01119AbstractAdditive manufacturing (AM) is widely used in various industries and has transformed the wayproducts are designed and manufactured. Training workshops in conjunction with a partassessment framework encourage designers to use design for additive manufacturing (DfAM)considerations during the process of idea generation. In this respect, a training framework willassist researchers, educators, and students to evaluate and improve designs and encourageexploration of changes that need to be made during the design process. Successfulimplementation of DfAM considerations in engineering design classes are an important step inpreparing students for professional careers. This research investigates the effect of DfAMintegration in
, sensors and machine learning journals. Dr. Chauhan has received undergraduate and graduate engineering degree in Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering from India and PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from Queen’s University, Canada. He is a Professional Engineer (P.Eng.) license holder, Canada. During his research career, he has worked at universities in India, Canada and USA at various positions. He has worked as an Assistant Professor at G. H. Patel College of Engineering & Technology, India, Adjunct Assistant Professor at Queen’s University, Canada, Instructor at St. Lawrence College, Canada and Assistant Professor at WNE, USA. Dr. Chauhan has also worked at industries in India (Elecon Engineering Company) and Canada
is a wealth of research thathighlights the various verbal and non-verbal representations that caregivers employ to engagetheir child(ren) in STEM concepts, skills, and practices [22], [26]. In addition, recent researchhighlights the influence of caregiver STEM talk and interactions on their children’s STEMidentity and career decisions as an adult [32], [33]. These researchers found informal learningexperiences involving STEM media and clubs/camps, for example, to have less of an influence.Results from research question one builds upon this research to highlight the complex nature ofthese interactions through multiple representations and translations between representations. Forexample, gesture-language and concrete-language translations were
industry demand and academic fulfillment. A global engineer and researcher, Tahsin is an advocate and ally for better inclusion in STEM and beyond.Juan David Ortega-Alvarez (Collegiate Assistant Professor) For several years after earning my engineering degree in 2001, my professional duties included working full-time as a process engineer at a chemical company and teaching engineering courses as an adjunct instructor. In 2009 I left a seven- year long career in industry—interrupted only by my time abroad earning a master’s in engineering—to become a full- time faculty member, mostly in pursuit of one goal: professional and personal fulfillment. To be sure, the most gratifying experience I have had in my career is
for significant contributions to reach the SustainableDevelopment Goals while educating their engineering students. As an example of partnershipbetween academia, communities, industry, and individuals this model may serve as an effectiveway for universities to translate new knowledge into practice for international scenariosProject Description and ContextThe project is part of the capstone course for senior students in chemical engineering on ProcessControl. Certainly, it would be part of some other course. However, the choice for this course isbased on several advantages. It is taken by all the senior students once a year, so all of them canshare the same learning experience. Students reach this point in their career where they know
. The case studies represented by student perspectives shared herein will help todevelop a framework for structuring future projects and entrepreneurship programs.MotivationThis article demonstrates via three cases studies the successful long-term outcomes of institutional effortsinitiated with the founding of HMRCOE. Multidisciplinary, student-initiated ventures are concurrentlysupporting hands-on, experiential engineering education within collaborative teams. The student co-authors identify different faculty and staff who instigate their entrepreneurial experiences, and yet theyexpress a shared drive, motivated by some personal trait. Herein, we capture facets of their early journeysin ideation, toward creating value, along career paths full