ImmersionProgram. Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014. Page 26.1584.16[12] Brown, S. and Poor, C. Ranking Tasks for Mechanics of Materials. Prentice Hall. 2011.[13] Diez, D.M., Barr, C.D., and Cetinkaya-Rundel, M. OpenIntro Statistics. Available online for free and releasedby Open-Intro under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.URL: https://www.openintro.org/stat/textbook.php?stat_book=os. Retrieved January 28, 2015,.[14] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L, and Cocking, R.R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School:Expanded Edition. National Academies Press. Available online for
education requirements) states that students will be able to demonstrate ability toassess personal strengths and interests in a manner relevant to career alternatives and/or choices.To provide assessment evidence for this competency, students complete guided reflectionspapers on their personal experiences applying their KGI skill(s) to engineering teams and/orgroup situations occurring in their daily lives on campus. With a usual enrollment of 120-180students, the Freshman Seminar Assistants (FSAs) instruct groups of 20-24 students in‘breakout’ rooms, and then all come together in the main lecture hall for the seminar orworkshop of the week. This course also employs an active virtual classroom for news,assignments, homework collection, grading, and
Page 26.1599.13licensing board Supplementary Experience Record form typically used for PE applications, (2) asurvey for students to provide likert-style evaluation of progress in achieving the BOK2 programoutcomes, and (3) a reflective writing document focusing on the student’s choice of outcomes tohave students consider what she/he learned in the experience, the importance of this learning,and how this learning is important for the future.Cooperation Outside the DepartmentMany of the BOK2’s foundational outcomes are necessarily met through university corecurriculum classes (a.k.a., “general education requirements” at other institutions). Texas statelaw and Texas A&M policies combined lead to a curriculum where 50 out of 128 credit
. As far as the amount of interaction and mentoring that I expected from my faculty research advisor, I did not know what to expect. From my experience in research, mentors vary significantly in their styles and approach of conducting their research and interacting with their students. At the beginning of the project, I second guessed almost every idea that I came up with and did not trust my judgment to do anything correctly or efficiently. I always ran whatever idea that I came up with by either David S. or Justin B. prior to acting on it, no matter how minor it seemed. About half-way into the research program I began to feel far more comfortable with the whole design process
., . . . Rabadi, G. (2008). System of systems Page 26.1271.19 engineering. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 36; 33(4), 62-62. doi:10.1109/EMR.2008.4778760.4. Jamshidi, M., & Jamshidi, M. (2008). System of systems engineering - new challenges for the 21st century. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 23(5), 4-19. doi:10.1109/MAES.2008.4523909.5. Dimario, M., Boardman, J., & Sauser, B. (2009). System of Systems Collaborative Formation. IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 3, 360-368.6. Eusgeld, I., Nan, C., & Dietz, S. (2011). “System-of-systems” approach for interdependent critical infrastructures
courseworkCons: A ton of readiing; semesteer seems reallly long com mpared to quaarters and ovverlaps 7 weeksin to spriing quarter; a lot more material, m havee to learn terrminology thhat other law w studentsalready know; k grade almost comp pletely based d on essay fi finalOverall I would take this course again just beecause I founnd the conteent interestinng and usefull. Iam consiidering law school s over engineering e grad school . If someonee knows theyy don't want togo to law
time might be allocated for introducing those software to enhance learning process.Figure 7. Moldflow Analysis (a) Fill time (b) Circuit Coolant Temperature – Preparation inrogress for the next semesterReferences[1] Lee, K. (1999). Principles of cad/cam/cae systems. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Company.[2] Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 38(3), 7.[3] De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308.[4] Corter, J. E., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Process and
studies, Studies in Higher Education, 2012, pp.656-666.9. Schauss, N.A., and Peuker, S. Improving student success and retention rates in engineering: one year after implementation, Proceedings of the 6th First Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference, College Station, Texas, 2014. Page 26.199.15
Effective Marketing of Technical Innovation: A Frameworkfor Implementation.” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 17, No. 5, 240-247.11 Stead, J.G. Stead, W.E. (2014). “Management for a Small Planet,” Third Edition, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY.12 Timmons, J. and Spinelli, S. (2008). New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21 st Century, 8th Edition.McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-338155-1.13 Small Business Drives the U.S. Economy; Represent 99.7 Percent of all Businesses, Employ 57.4 Million (2006,Sep 28). PR Newswire. Retrieved fromhttps://login.ezproxy.etsu.edu:3443/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/446855777?accountid=1077114 Gödel, K. (1929). Completeness Theorem from his Dissertation (Gödel 1929) summarized in The
Page 26.349.12 global community”, 119th American Society of Engineering Education Conference, San Antonio, USA, June 20124. Davis, R., Krishnan, S., Nilsson, T., & Fylling Rimland, P., “IDEAS: Interdisciplinary Design Engineering and Service”, International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship, Special Issue: University Engineering Programs That Impact Communities: Critical Analyses and Reflection, January 2015, pp. 165-1795. Guadalupe River Park Conservancy, http://www.grpg.org/the-conservancy/mission6. City of San Jose’s Public Works Department, http://www.sanjoseca.gov/publicworks7. 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design, Department of Justice
Matters”Conference on April 24th, 2015.The impact this project has had reaches far beyond the experience the students had, and the wallsof the University.References:1. Guvench, M.G., Gurcan, C., Durgin, K., and MacDonald, D., “Solar Simulator and I-V Measurement System For Large Area Solar Cell Testing," Proc. A.S.E.E, AC 2004, s 2659.2. "Concentrator Photovoltaic (CPV) Solar Systems" SolFocus, http://www.SolFocus.com3. "Parabola." Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parabola4. "Standard Test Conditions vs
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEeTLopLkEo) 39. Kickstarter Goldieblox: The Engineering Toy for Girls. Retrieved December 9th, 2014, (https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/16029337/goldieblox-the-engineering-toy-for-girls). 40. Hyde, J. S. and Linn M.C.. 1988. "Gender Differences in Verbal Abilities: A Meta-Analysis." Pyschological Bulletin 104:53-69. 41. Hanson, Sandra 2009. Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education. Temple University Press. 42. National Academy of Engineering. 2008. "Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering." Vol. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press. 43. Ceci, Stephen J
available.team for examinations, colleagues within the project.The following table describes a model curriculum draft for the qualification of a changeagent´s profile. It is derived from the draft of the recent exemplary curriculum we haveoffered to the first group of change agents. It has been developed in cooperation with theparticipants’ demands and curricular needs and the trainers’ teaching purposes.Table 2. Model curriculum for (teaching) change agentsTime Continuing education Tailor-made offers Support program coaching, peer observation of teaching
Thomas Goldfinch, “The Influence of University Entry Scores on Performance in Engineering Mechanics”, 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, Adelaide, SA, Dec 6-9, 20094. Sarah Tumen, Boaz Shulruf, and John Hattie, “Student pathways at the university: patterns and predictors of completion”, Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 233-252, 20085. Nancy J. McCormick and Marva S. Lucas, “Exploring mathematics college readiness in the United States”, Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 20116. Eileen Goold and Frank Devitt, “The role of mathematics in engineering practice and in formation of engineers”, SEFI 40th annual conference: Mathematics and Engineering Education, Thessaloniki, 20127
for STEM graduate programs, and presented the information in Panama.The information was well-received and the PROMISE AGEP was invited to continue toreplicate their U.S.-based student development model to contribute content to programming forstudents at LACCEI in subsequent years.Table 1. Seminars, workshops and panels geared toward undergraduate and graduate studentaudiences, where students and faculty from UMBC have developed international collaborations. Year Location Event Speaker(s) 2011 UMBC Workshop: Preparing for Panel of UMBC faculty Global Leadership: and students from different Cultural
Page 19.38.15American Society for EngineeringEducation,Atlanta,GA.http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/27/papers/8365/view2 National Science Foundation. (1995). Restructuring engineering education: A focus on change.Division of Undergraduate Education, Directorate for Education and Human Resources.3 Almgren, R. (2008). Perspectives from industry. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), p.241-244.4 Grasso, D. &Martinelli, D. (2007). Holistic engineering. The Chronicle of Higher Education,53(28),B8.5 Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers. SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.6 Tryggvason, G. &Apelian, D. (2006). Re -engineering engineering education for the challenges of the21st
username, password and SSN. All of theconfidential information collected by the “Phisher” can be used to damage Internet business.4.3.2 Threats of 2014As Internet service industry is expanding, new threats are surfacing regularly. In an article titled“10 top security threats of 2014 (so far)”, author [7] reported that top three threats of the year are(i) 2014's threat theme: White-knuckle flaws in TLS/SSL protocols: Goto Fail, Heartbleed,POODLE, WinShock, (ii) Mega Retail Breaches, and (iii) Shellshocks. Experts are developingpreventive measures of these threats, however, they are not fully implemented as of today, also,outcome of the implementation is not yet verified, and discussion of some of these measures area bit more technical.5. Protecting
Engineering Education Pipeline. Proceedings: 2011 American Society of Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, June 26-29, 2011.7. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).8. Baldwin, J. A., Ebert-May, D., & Burns, D. J. (1999). The development of a college biology self-efficacy instrument for nonmajors. Science Education, 83(4), 397-40.9. George, K. (2013) Evaluating the Impact of ECS Academic Catalyst for Excellence (ACE) Scholarship Program. Proceedings: 2013 American Society of
codecategories that emerged from this analysis are listed in Table 1, along with the number ofexcerpts coded within each category. Each code category has numerous sub codes, called ‘child’codes that further discretize the data. A total of 572 excerpts from the 16 interviews were codedfor this analysis. Table 1: Total Number of Code Instances Top-Level Code Category Codes Interviewees 1. Personal & Professional Motivations to Undertake Int’l 17 (2.4%) 8 (50%) Work 2. Preparation for International Work 119 (16.9%) 16 (100%) 3. Challenges and Observations During International 229 (32.5%) 16 (100%) Experience(s
, 2014.4. Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.5. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2015-2016 (http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2015-2016/). ABET, 2014.6. BOK-Accreditation Strategic Planning Committee. Final Report. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.7. Ressler, S. J. and D.R. Lynch. The Civil Engineering Body for Knowledge and the Accreditation Criteria: A plan for Long-term Management of Change. American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2011. Appendices Appendix 1: Student Learning Outcome Levels of
/index.aspx22. EIG. (2011b). Where we operate [online]. Retrieved 25 August 2011, from http://www.employers.com/about_us/Where_Employers_Operates.aspx23. Talley, T. (08 September 2009). Oklahoma considers privatizing state-backed workers' comp insurer [online]. Retrieved 25 August 2011, from http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southcentral/2009/09/08/103589.htm24. Gilroy, L. C., Robert W. Poole, J., Randazzo, A., Snell, L., Staley, S. R., Summers, A. B., . . . Young, C. (2009). Annual privatization report: Reason Foundation.25. Insurance-Journal. ( 07 July 2009). West Virginia touts switch to private workers' compensation system [online]. from http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southeast/2009/07/07/102008.htm