evaluation findings, unexpected challenges,and planned modifications to continue to improve the program. I will share a bitabout our model and impact to date, including how that model has evolvedover time to best serve our community. Throughout this discussion, we’llengage in a few of the community-building activities we utilize within LATTICE. 3This program developed through two earlier iterations:WEBS: women in biological sciences, with an emphasis on ecology and evolutionarybiology. Five cohorts, 2007-2013BRAINS: for individuals belonging to racial/ethnic groups underrepresented withinNeuroscience and/or individuals with disabilities. Running biennially
computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Dr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and
Paper ID #24879The Effectiveness of Engineering Camps as Pre-College Recruitment ToolsMalle Schilling, University of Dayton Malle Schilling is planning to pursue a PhD in Engineering Education. As an undergraduate mechanical engineering student at the University of Dayton, she explored the effects of engineering camps on par- ticipants’ self-efficacy in engineering and other issues of diversity and inclusion in engineering. She is interested in engineering education, diversity in engineering, outreach and policy.Dr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is the Associate Dean for Faculty and Staff
Poshtan, Cal Poly Dr. Majid Poshtan obtained his PhD in EECE from Tulane University, New Orleans, USA in 2000. Dr. Poshtan has over 20 years of wide-ranging experience in EE academic and industry. He is an expert in electric power systems, transmission planning, short circuits studies and protection, condition monitoring of generators, induction motors, transformers and power cables, substation design, power system com- puter simulators, and Real Time simulator. Dr. Poshtan is currently an associate professor at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, CA, USA. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Development of Versatile Buck Converter Module for
five female undergraduate students who have hadengineering internship experiences and are currently enrolled at a Large Public Southwestern R1Institution. The research project described in this work-in-progress paper details the plans toaccomplish the following research objective: to document and describe the industry experiencesof female engineering undergraduate students in relation to their learning experiences back in theclassroom. The narrative stories, which have not yet been constructed until the IRB is approvedfor data collection, are guided thematically by examining the female students’ perspectivesbefore, during, and after their internship experience. This paper serves to explore how thediffering experiences of classwork and
teams that exist inworkplaces within the United States and abroad. As such, the purpose of this paper is to describethe process of creating and subsequent plans for implementation of an interdisciplinary capstonecourse at a large research-intensive institution in the Southeast US. The challenges associatedwith developing a course that meets the need of each disciplinary capstone experience and spansthe boundary of different approaches to pedagogy, knowledge structure and learning will beexplored as well.Background and ObjectivesOne of the most common complaints among recruiters of engineering graduates is a failure ofuniversities to properly prepare their students to collaborate within a diverse workplaceenvironment [1], [2]. Students typically
sought to identify what features if any were consistent throughout all thedocuments. The features identified in the summaries from the semesters of the interventionwere used to review the summaries from the previous year(s). Once the structural features ofthe summaries were identified, one of the second authors read the summaries looking for thesame structural elements to confirm the structural patterns. Then the board comments/scores were also collected for the semesters used to identifyany patterns of improvement. This strategy did not work out as planned due to a few anomaliesinvolved in the semesters included in the study. There was no clear evidence of improvementbetween the semesters studied. As a result, word counts of the
institution wide efforts being made to positively impact the entire engineering collegeand university. As the grant enters its final years, the poster will also discuss plans on engagingthe broader engineering academic community in order to establish best practices forimplementing diversity and inclusion initiatives in other programs.IntroductionRowan University’s Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department was awarded theNational Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering and computer science Departments(RED) grant back in 2016. The purpose of the grant is to change the department’s ability to serveunderrepresented minorities (URMs) and underserved groups over the course of the next fiveyears. The grant provides funding over those
on effective interventions that will promote studentlearning and positive grade outcomes in first year engineering courses. This historically difficultcourse (EE 306) has warranted multiple forms of academic support, including undergraduate TAoffice hours, tutoring and Supplemental Instruction (SI). Careful attention has been paid toindividualize these programs to emphasize the content and study skills students need to besuccessful in these specific courses. Encouraged by Shew et al’s findings [2], we wanted toimplement the collaborative mock exam reviews as a new and innovative option to assiststudents in their planning, preparation and overall actual exam performance.Limitations of StudyLimitations of assessing correlations between grade
the MET 4100 curriculum. The subject of this newly developed project is todesign (start-to-finish) an HVAC system to satisfy the heating load requirements for the twoMET laboratories in the ET Department. This course is a senior level course, and at this level,the students already have prior general knowledge of technical drawing and drafting, heattransfer, psychometric chart, and duct design. To better facilitate the access to the technicalinformation, a lesson plan discussing the benefits of using the University’s library resources andan online LibGuide webpage (https://libguides.utoledo.edu/MET4100) were created and added tothe course’s Blackboard platform. The webpage lists some of the resources required for theHVAC design project, like e
PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. He previously earned his MS in Systems Engineering from the University of Saint Thomas and his BS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Minnesota.Ms. Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University Lauren Singelmann is a Masters Student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Her research interests are innovation-based-learning, educational data mining, and K-12 Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University
, whois a senior faculty member, this mentoring program has been evolved and expanded over many years upto a point where it has become a very effective and helpful system for both the incoming and the outgoingundergraduate students [7].School of Engineering, Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico (PUPR), Puerto RicoSeven (7) fulltime faculty members offer mentoring. Each mentor is assigned certain number of studentsand receives compensation for up to two (2) credit hours per semester. Students with eighty (80) or moreapproved credit hours are assigned a mentor for discussing their career plans, progress in the academicprograms, optimal or alternative choices for course selection, and so on [8]. In addition, the office ofStudent Development and
initialimplementation in an IEG has been discussed and is shared at our course websitehttps://hub.wsu.edu/me-116/pdm/ to promote further implementation across academic institutionsand provide reasonable insight into implementation.Our university will be sharing our implementation with a club shortly, and we also plan to utilizethe data mining capabilities associated with SWPDMS in future educational research.References[1] E. Wiebe, "Impact of Product Data Management (PDM) trends on Engineering Graphics Instruction," 1998.[2] D. S. Kelley, "Product Lifecycle Management Philosophies Within a Computer-Aided Design Program of Study," 2003.[3] R. T. Frame, C. Pezeshki, and M. Grant Norton, "Integrating PLM Methods into the Undergraduate
example, the emergent of industrial 4.0 or smart factory comes with a very complicatedinformation flow and man-machine system [2]. This necessitates to rethink the way of educatingengineers for the future. Considering this fact, this paper investigates an approach of integratingthe simulation-based activities in the classroom to bring changes in the learning outcomes ofmanufacturing course.Over the last few decades, traditional manufacturing/production engineering educational programshave long depended on curricula based on concurrent engineering methodologies covering productand process designs, functional design development, concept selection for product design,materials and process selection, process planning including assembly analysis, etc
the beams. Despite this,prompting the students to think about shear failure in this context improved their understandingof this topic. It should also be noted that a few students commented in the survey that theywished lecture had provided more guidance as to how to layout reinforcing prior to beamfabrication. While the request is understandable, the variety in reinforcing configurations alsoadded a creative component and a wider sample of results. This would not be the case iflectures had a more prescriptive approach to reinforcement for the lab. The individuals thatrequested this may have brought down the score for lecture preparedness slightly, but the overallscore was still strong and there are no plans to modify this approach in future
self-efficacy surveys before andafter giving students the AR application and also gathered their feedback on the engagement andusability aspects.The majority of students gave positive response in terms of being interested in AR andrecognizing its value. AR helped students to be more engaged in solving the problems. However,several students indicated that the activity was “exhausting” and they were “lost” during theactivity. The authors believe that this can be improved by streamlining the practice and trainingstudents in the use of the tool.The responses of students to the self-efficacy questions showed that there was no statisticaldifference in assisting students in understanding the problems. We plan to continue to use AR inthe same course
professional engineer in Construction and Structural Engineering. Her masters and doctoral degrees are from the University of Oklahoma in Construction Administration and Engineering respectively.Dr. Sandeep Langar, The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Sandeep Langar is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Construction Science in College of Architecture, Construction, and Planning at The University of Texas at San Antonio. He received his Ph.D. in Environmental Design and Planning from College of Architecture and Urban Studies at Virginia Tech. He is also a licensed architect in India. Dr. Langar has authored multiple publications analyzing the implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and its impact
structured onboarding program (i.e., initial InstructorSummer Workshop); 2) strong leader emphasis on department-internal faculty developmentevents; 3) faculty development seminars; 4) strong emphasis on completing the Master TeacherProgram; 5) formalized developmental plans; 6) classroom observation programs.As stated, faculty development programs in both departments have several similarities. Identifiedstrengths for each department’s program included: a structured onboarding program, leaderemphasis on faculty development, one-on-one mentorship opportunities, course directorship, andclassroom observation programs. Identified areas for improvement included the need for refinedfaculty development goals, outcomes, or objectives at a department-level
will first complete the standard operating procedure tutorial problem and correspondingVR challenge. They will be split into two groups and a cross-over study approach will beemployed as seen in Figure 3, one group will complete the paper-based problem first, and thengo through the VR challenge, while the other group will complete the VR challenge first. Thisprocess will take place a second time when the students complete the tutorial problem and VRplant troubleshooting challenge. An assessment will be made for each of the four activities andthe grades of the research study participants will be collected.Figure 3: Session plans for the paper tutorial and VR tutorial in phase two for participant groupsA and BParticipants will be invited to an
forthe internship, attitudes towards company-sponsored events, as well as additional items relatingto innovation and engineering self-efficacy and their views of the company and their workassignment, their interactions with co-workers and supervisors, and future plans. It should benoted that several changes were made in the two post-internship survey instruments across thetwo administrations in 2017 and 2018 and as a result, there is no direct parity in several of thesurvey items and constructs.3.1 Key Measures Across DatasetsThis study focuses on four scales that were included in the Engineering Majors survey as well asthe two Post-Internship Surveys. The scales are described in greater detail in [11]. A Cronbach’sAlpha was calculated for each
make electric vehiclesmore efficient in terms of investigating novel methods for increasing energy recovery for therecharging of the battery or power accessories such as a radio. The plan entailed capturing aportion of drag in the engine compartment and using it to generate additional electrical energy byplacing a rotating fan blade in the compartment of a vehicle and attaching it to a generator. Thefan blade would spin as the car was driving, and the student would calculate how muchadditional power it could generate. At the beginning of the first semester of the project, the student and two engineeringfaculty mentors with expertise in energy recovery met and developed a timeline for the study.The first semester would focus on planning
problem [4].A number of rubrics have been developed to assess problem solving skills in students.Parematasari and colleagues implemented a 4 indicator problem solving rubric based on:Identification of the Problem, Planning a Solution, Implementing a Solution, and Evaluation [5].The rubric, which implemented a 1-4 scoring scale, was tested in a Physics class with senior highschool students. Another rubric implemented in Physics uses 44 sub-skills split in threecategories: knowledge, beliefs, expectations and motivations, and processes [6]. That rubric wasused to evaluate problem solving skills in students enrolled in courses College Algebra toIntroductory Calculus. Many other problem solving rubrics are available [7]. B. Assessment of Problem
initiated and/or promoted by theME S-STEM program. Typically, all ME undergraduate students receive advisement by staff members in theDean’s office during the 1st year and later by a faculty member in ME. Undergraduate studentsmay talk to their advisor once a semester to get clearance on their registration for the nextsemester. “Extra faculty mentoring” refers to the mentoring from a faculty mentor assigned toeach scholar in our scholarship program. The ME S-STEM scholars are encouraged to meet theirfaculty mentors when needed to discuss not only their academic progress, but also their futurecareer plan and personal issues. Most of the scholars had talked to their faculty mentors morethan three times each semester, suggesting that they felt
executive board member, ASEE NE Section; the co-chair of TASME Conference (Technological Ad- vances in Science, Medicine and Engineering, Toronto, Canada), Academic Member and the Unit Head, Electrical Engineering, ATINER (Athens Institute for Education and Research, Athens, Greece).Ms. Alya Abd Aziz, Northeastern University 2nd year Bioengineering student at Northeastern University.Mr. Evan Alexander,Ms. Laura Brigandi, Northeastern University Laura Brigandi is currently pursing her B.S. in bioengineering with a minor in mathematics at Northeast- ern University. She plans to concentrate in biomedical devices. In July, she will begin her first co-op working at Cam Med Inc., as a biomedical engineer, helping with their
monitor Test Create a test protocol Create a test protocol for 9 protocol home security systemThe first few activity lessons were designed to facilitate planning for and designing a system. Thissub-module incorporated lessons on system architecture, how to solicit requirements, and thenhow to design a platform that addresses those requirements. The later lessons are focused oncreating system prototypes for simple tasks and the basics of programming and hardware. Lessonswere technical, but approachable for new students. The activities in each lesson allowed teams tocreate and make mistakes without having to fear broken components or harming themselves
,mechanical, or other disciplines. Undergraduate engineering students may take the FE exam intheir senior year. For many civil engineering seniors, passing the FE exam is a requirement forgraduation and often a condition of employment. For other disciplines, the FE exam is optionalbut recommended for students interested in pursuing an engineering career where protection ofpublic health and safety are of concern.Background/Literature ReviewClean water, reliable energy, safe transportation, and life-saving medical equipment are just afew ways that engineers make the world better and safer for all of us. By law, only a licensedengineer may prepare, sign and seal, and submit engineering plans and drawings to a publicauthority for approval. Professional
1 Understanding the problem: givens, 5 required, and clear plan 2 Correct Free body diagram of the rods 10 and rigid bar 3 Correctly obtained forces in each rod 6 4 Obtained the safe load correctly 10 5 Determined the deformations in each rod 10 correctly 6 Solution has flow and neat, clear sketches 5
cooperationagreements with the university will assign these projects to engineers, and the HR assistantswill coordinate the tasks, ensuring the effective support from engineers. 3.2 Basic procedure The reformed capstone design course in SJTU is consisted of 5 stages (See Fig.4).Project selection begins at the 7th semester and it requires the mutual selection betweenproject supervisor, industry sponsor and the students. The team members need to come upwith a preliminary plan and clear each one’s work in the whole project. At the end of the7th semester, students will attend a dissertation proposal in the form of team defense. Thenthe project officially begins as an one-week-loop: The team members will meet with theirproject supervisor and industry mentor each
biomasspower 5. A bachelor's degree with a specialization in renewable energy offers focusedengineering technology coursework, preparing students with technology skills that can put towork future in green technologies across three areas: Engineering Technology, InformationTechnology, and Software and Information Systems.As student pursue a bachelor’s degree with a specialization in renewable energy, will learn aboutalternative energy generation and the complex factors behind green technology. This includeshow economics, sociology and environmental science are connected, and the design processesused in today’s leading renewable energy initiatives. From planning and project management toenergy production and storage.In the following, courses for this
study had anticipated a greater turnout of students for the session. Unfortunately, theschool program was completely optional and students had a variety of overlapping sessions tochoose from which resulted in low attendance. A second session was planned with an additionalschool, but was postponed due to the breakout of COVID 19. Future work will look to addressthe limited sample size.2.3. Gameplay During the irrigation management simulation, students were tasked with producing themost corn with limited water resources and a varied climate. Inputs beyond irrigation were autoapplied for the students to ensure only irrigation practices influenced the results. This includedfertilizer, seed type, and planting date. There were two Non