its attempts to foster interdependency, and thatthis can result in maladaptive team behaviors like specialization and attentional narrowing.In response to these observations, this paper seeks to articulate features of laboratories that cantrigger this cognitive-load-based loss of learning. It suggests future experimental and theoreticalwork to refine the features that have been articulated.1 IntroductionLaboratory activities, defined here as “instructor-led, hands-on experiences in which studentscharacterize or prototype an engineering artifact or measure natural phenomena,” are acornerstone of engineering pedagogy, with some estimates predicting that as many as 50% ofengineering classes include a laboratory activity [1]. Other work shows
continueto develop and evolve. But while the field of cybersecurity is expanding, only certain populationsare entering the field. As illustrated in Table 1 [1], only 9% of Blacks and 4% of Hispanics holdcybersecurity jobs, even though they comprise 13% and 19% of the population, respectively.Furthermore, while women make up half the population, only one-fourth are employed in thecybersecurity field. Table 1. Race/Ethnicity and Gender of Population and Cybersecurity Workforce Race/Ethnicity and Gender of Percentage of Cybersecurity Percentage of Population Employees Workforce Asian
a new type of learning whereknowledge is gained and must be able to apply any information and concepts learned fromdifferent viewpoints (Tan, 2021). To meet the drastic changes in the world, many countrieshave released educational policies to promote innovation. Western countries, such as U.S.and Australia, have paid much attention to curriculum reform that allocates a massive amountof money to promote STEM curriculum and teachers’ training [1, 2]. In the Asian context,China launched a Strategy of Invigorating the Country through Science and Education knownas Kejiao Xingguo, which identified science and technology as the essential subjects todevelop nations’ 21st-century skills [3]. Since 1997, the Ministry of Education of Singaporehas
, in the aftermath of COVID-19, two events occurred at the South Dakota School ofMines and Technology (SD Mines) that significantly impacted each other: the institution wasawarded an NSF ADVANCE Adaptation Grant (NSF EES 2121601), and the Office of FacultyDevelopment and Advancement (OFDA) was created. While they had different paths tocreation, they share common goals and a synergy that are beneficial to the success of each. Theway in which these two programs developed, overlap, and ultimately strengthen each other isdescribed in this paper, a work-in-progress demonstrating the synergy between these twoserendipitous events in creating support for a more diverse and engaged faculty.A Tale of Two InitiativesPart 1: Campus Culture and Gender
, and ability to function effectively on a team, with the latter twolearning outcomes scoring lowest in the pre-surveys. In addition to the survey analysis,lessons learned and recommendations for effective online education are discussed. Asonline education becomes more popular and in some cases more necessary, it is importantto understand the impact on engineering education, particularly in situations of forceddistance education. This study provides insight into the challenges that come withemergency online instruction and could drive decisions on priorities for in-personlearning environments.IntroductionHigher education in an online learning environment has been shown to be at least as effective asface-to-face, is appreciated by students [1, 2
and that are in metropolitan regions that have significant racially- and economically-marginalized populations (Table 1). Many of the non-profit and community partnersparticipating in RECIPES’s projects work in marginalized Black neighborhoods. This diversitywas deemed imperative for a robust research program, outreach, and educational activities.In the early phases of the project, the network leadership held a workshop aimed at discussinghow they might enable or ensure a culture of inclusion within their collective work. Theworkshop was a platform for discourse and brainstorming to identify and characterize themesthat could impact the DEI culture of the network. Some topics covered in detail at the networkmeeting included: rethinking
Learning Community. He has offered a variety of high-school and first-year introductory and professional development courses over the last two decades. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student Persistence Factors for Engineering and Computing Undergraduates Robert Petrulis2, Sona Gholizadeh1 , Ed Gatzke1 (1) University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC (2) EPRE Consulting, Columbia, SCAbstractThe research and evaluation team of an S-STEM project at a large, research-intensiveSoutheastern public university conducted a cross-sectional survey as a first step to comparefactors which may influence undergraduate student persistence in
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 1 Work in Progress: Moving Beyond Research: Supporting Engineering and Computing Identity Development for Latina StudentsLatina students are entering institutions of higher education at greater rates than ever, yet they remainunderrepresented in engineering and computing. In particular, Latina students attained fewer bachelor’sdegrees in engineering and computing in comparison to other STEM fields (NCSES, 2021). Latinasearned more bachelor’s degrees in psychology, social sciences, and biological and agricultural sciencesthan in other STEM fields. In engineering
Center for SMART Health, where she focused on wireless health monitor- ing for stroke and pediatric asthma. Her current research is on engineering education and women’s health, specializing in pedagogy strategies to promote learning and innovation in design-build-test courses, in- cluding senior design, computer programming, and computer-aided-design courses, as well as pre-partum and partum medical devices.Kit Roy FeeneyQuangminh TangMilan DasDalton Salvo ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Introduction:The National Academy of Engineering has identified personalized learning as one of the 14 GrandChallenges for engineering in the 21st century [1]. Education is now shifting to a
team and sufficiency of online-only teams. In general,the results indicated that the teacher occupied an educative and mediating role in facilitatingteamwork, especially in the current context and prevalence of online and hybrid teams.We conclude by making recommendations for teachers on the implementation of team-basedactivities that will provide their students with positive and effective learning experiences forthe development of teamwork skills.IntroductionThe practice of chemical engineering has always involved solving problems centred on theefficient use of natural resources, process optimisation and ensuring sustainable operations tomeet human ends [1]. Today, the challenges faced are increasingly complex, requiringmultidisciplinary
effectively in teams, and produce desired results has beenrecognized as an essential skill set that college graduates should possess [1]. The importance ofthis skill is even more highlighted in construction and engineering programs in which most of theproducts or work is usually performed in teams. The overarching goal of this study was toinvestigate various aspects of teamwork perceived by construction and engineering students.These features were investigated through research questions: 1) how do participants report theirteamwork experiences in different settings? 2) what factors do participants consider important todevelop teamwork skills? This paper reports on the data obtained and covers similarities anddifferences between students based on their
, 2023 Writing in Discipline-Appropriate Ways: An Approach to Teaching Multilingual Graduate Students in Mechanical EngineeringIntroductionWritten communication is frequently addressed in talks on how to best prepare students forengineering practice. In surveys of employers and graduates [1]-[3], we witness a growingneed for enhancing writing abilities of future engineers. Naturally, research on engineeringwriting has explored ways to provide course-level writing support for engineering students,especially for undergraduates [4]. Given that in U.S., students graduating with a bachelor’sdegree in engineering are mostly domestic-born native speakers of English [5], the currentscholarship in Engineering Education has
technologies, they need people with particular kindsof competencies (Aldrich, 1979). In this paper, we draw from our experiences to provide an1 Authors listed in alphabetical order with equal contribution. Corresponding author: Marina Dias mvbdias@amazon.com2 All authors are affiliated with Amazon.com, Inc.example of a multi-disciplinary team conducting talent management research within the techworkforce of the 21st century, and describe some of the typical roles one may find at similar techteams that engineers and engineering educators may join.Talent management research refers to research on the people that make up organizations. Atypical employee life cycle is illustrated in Figure 1 below. An employee journey begins whenthey are recruited and
share findings that are significant for engineering educators. Their stories can helpreaders empathize with underrepresented students, and better understand the joys, challenges,and realities these students face. Our Kuwaiti protagonist chose to leave engineering, but thestory she told can help break through existing cultural stereotypes and help us realize how muchmore there is to any student’s experience than first meets the eye.KeywordsEngineering education research; Research methodology; Theoretical framework; Hero’s Journey;Student experience; DiversityIntroductionPrior research on students’ trajectories in STEM has investigated engineering students from lowsocio-economic contexts [1], women of color majoring in a STEM course [2
study to investigate how 5 students in a nanoelectronicscourse utilized this virtual reality cleanroom prototype and what changes they recommend toimprove its user interface and learner experience. The study population for this work-in-progressconsisted of students enrolled in a nanoelectronics course at GWU during the 2022-2023 schoolyear. Students taking this course can be undergraduate (junior or senior) or graduate (masters orPhD). The research questions for this study were 1) what is the user experience with the virtualreality cleanroom prototype, 2) what challenges, if any, did students experience, and 3) whatchanges did students recommend to improve the virtual reality cleanroom prototype learnerexperience? Preliminary results indicate
estimating course, with the goal of providing knowledge for construction programs and theeffectiveness of flipped learning.Literature Foundation:Research indicates an increased interest in using a flipped learning model at the universityundergraduate level to foster student academic achievement. The flipped learning approach isdefined as student-centered where students “take an active role in their learning” and instructorsare “learning facilitators” [1]. This differs from traditional classroom instruction which focuseson a lecturer-centered model. A flipped classroom is an inversion or reversal of the traditionallecture followed by homework assignment model, it moves the lecture content before class andassignments or hands-on activities during
computing. This paper discusses the summer program and curriculum, culturally-responsive teaching strategies deployed, student learning outcomes, and perceptions of culturalresponsiveness assessed in the Females are Cyber Starssummer programs.IntroductionMeeting the future cybersecurity challenges requires the United States to utilize all of its availableworkforce talents. There is a shortage of nearly three million cybersecurity professionals and staff. Almost60% of organizations report that they are at an extreme or moderate cyber risk due to the high staff shortage[1]. Although women are a significant resource pool, historically the technology industry has done a poorjob recruiting women in
Founding Department Head of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University (USA). Prior to 2016 she was a faculty member in Chemical Engineering at Rowan. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Using EFA to Determine Factor Structure of a Computer-Based Version of thePurdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations (PSVT:R)Savanna Dautle 1 & Stephanie Farrell 11 Department of Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd), Rowan University, Glassboro, NJAbstract Literature shows that spatial skills, and in particular, mental rotation skills, are predictorsof success in STEM. Students who have strong spatial visualization skills are more likely todemonstrate better academic performance and
begins with anintroduction to the topic and the research question guiding the study. Next, the Literature Reviewsection examines previous research on the topic, while the Methods section details the process ofselecting studies and analyzing results. The Analysis and Results section presents findings in threethemes, followed by the Discussion section, which provides an interpretation of the findings,recommendations, and implications for addressing these challenges. Finally, the Conclusionsummarizes the key findings of the paper.Introduction Despite women comprising 50% of the global workforce, they remain significantlyunderrepresented in STEM fields, which is a concerning trend that persists worldwide [1]. Whilewomen make up an estimated
with the Flipped Classroom ModelI. Introduction Modern students are increasingly non-traditional. Definitions vary, but it generally refersto postsecondary students who meet some of the following criteria: being older than 25 years old,having a gap between post-secondary education and high school graduation, being financiallyindependent from their parents and having dependents. These conditions require them to workfull or part-time while pursuing their degree. This presents a significant challenge, as balancingwork and school lead to increased stress, fatigue, and a reduced ability to focus on academics [1].In some cases, students may drop out due to the demands of their job. According to the
public schools comprising students with varying backgrounds,experiences, strengths, and needs, STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)educators are key to integrating student interests with their lived experiences. In the currenttechnology-rich era, where every teenager has a phone glued to their hands, it has becomepertinent to design school-based educational activities that stimulate and build upon thoseinterests. Students’ motivation levels increase when they combine their experiences with learningactivities. Similarly, research indicates that integrating science, math, and engineering conceptspositively impacts student engagement with engineering design and skills [1]. Furthermore,students who receive authentic STEM
non-IVE teams from An-Najah.The evaluation in this study focused on (1) global competencies, (2) value of the experience, and(3) team dynamics.The influence of the experience on the global competencies of the students in IVE and non-IVEteams was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively using pre- and post-program surveys basedon the Stevens Initiative and RTI International’s Common Survey Items as well as survey itemsdeveloped for this IVE to measure whether the program promotes gender equity. The value ofthe project experience for all students (i.e., IVE and non-IVE) was evaluated using a mixedmethods assessment based on the “value-creation framework” of Wenger-Trayner et al. Fourcycles of the value-creation framework were included in this
Paper ID #37415”Studies in the Strategies of Overcomers”: Literature Review of theExperiences of High-achieving Black Male Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsDr. Royce A. Francis, The George Washington University Dr. Royce Francis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Sys- tems Engineering. His overall research vision is to conduct research, teaching, and service that facilitates sustainable habitation of the built environment. This vision involves three thrusts: 1.) infrastructure management, including sustainability, resilience, and risk analysis; 2.) regulatory risk assessment and
to support the use of multiple strategies to facilitate asense of community, comfort with active participation and knowledge of course material.However, there was variation in student perceptions by activity (socialization, GSRS, smallgroup collaboration) and by gender. Given their ease of use and potential to impact communitybuilding, learning, and comfort with active participation, a multi-pronged approach meritsconsideration in all graduate courses.IntroductionStudies of active learning in both graduate and undergraduate STEM courses have demonstrateda reduction of failure rates [1], [2], increased academic performance [3], [4], increased coursesatisfaction [5], and narrowed achievement gaps for students from minoritized groups in STEM[2
. PurposeThe work in progress paper presents the engineering design projects from e4usa that engagedSWDs as the stakeholders, and specifically focuses on the observations and experiences of e4usateachers, e4usa student teams, and the SWDs who served as the stakeholders and the educatorsthat support them. The logic model in Figure 1 further presents the desired outcomes ofeducators and students participating in design projects that engage SWDs. As mentioned, themission of e4usa is to increase engineering literacy for all and expand opportunities for thosetraditionally underserved and marginalized in engineering. Showcasing these unique engineeringdesign projects may help increase interest in engineering by all students, including those withdisabilities
form meaning for students. Thismethod allows for a nuanced narrative that breaches the traditional concerns ofresearch from generalization across cases to generalization within a case [1]. Creswelland Creswell describe autoethnography as a research methodology that analyzes aphenomenon through the use of self-narratives, which would otherwise remain “privateor buried [2].” Autoethnography has allowed me to use my personal experience inteaching, providing professional development, and mentoring teachers to provide aframework that can one day be the subject of more data-driven research [3]. As an educator with a decade of STEM curriculum writing and teachingexperience, I have had the opportunity to work in urban Title I schools as well
, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Oral Engineering ExamsIntroductionWhile it is commonly known that verbal communication and presentation skills are highlydesirable by employers, many engineering students’ technical learning is assessed primarilythrough written examination means. In the department of Integrated Engineering (IE) atMinnesota State University, Mankato, verbal exams are a fundamental formative and summativeassessment method of checking students’ understanding [1]. While the goals for verbalexamination are common throughout the program, this paper aims to compile the individualphilosophies, approaches, attitudes, and perceptions of faculty within the department who giveverbal examinations on a regular basis
tools for assessing engineering learning inweekly summer engineering experiences. North Carolina State University’s College of Engineering’s (with 18 engineering majors)K12 outreach office, The Engineering Place, offers approximately twenty-five 1-week longsummer engineering programs for rising kindergarten through twelve grade students. The rising11th and 12th graders attend residential camp during their week, living in student dorms andexperiencing life on a college campus. It is within this context the research will be conducted.Theoretical Frameworks for Tools A literature review identified resources to guide the development of the assessment toolkit. These theoretical frameworks are research-based in engineering conceptual
Teaching Assistants (TAs) are often fundamental to the function of many academicdepartments. Whether serving as course aides, graders, or primary instructors, graduate TAs playa vital role in teaching and building a community of belonging in the classroom [1]–[4]. Well-prepared graduate TAs with strong pedagogical training have the potential to ease the burden onteaching faculty and may even see improvements in their own development as scientists [5], [6].Many studies have illustrated the benefits of graduate TA training for increasing graduate TAunderstanding of pedagogical techniques and self-efficacy as educators [1], [7]–[9]. However,graduate TA preparation varies widely across schools and often focuses on policies overpedagogy [10], [11]. For
review of existing engineering curriculum options, the authors selectedrelevant modules from the Engineering is Elementary (EiE) [1] program. Modules were selectedbased on alignment with CS&E, math, science, and literacy learning objectives and with theschool’s mission to cultivate confident, intellectual, and ethical girls who advance the world.This paper will report on one particular unit on chemical engineering that was used with the 2ndgrade class.In particular, we were interested in assessing the feasibility of adapting the EiE curricularresources to meet CS&E learning objectives, understanding the impact this type of lesson wouldhave on our students, and identifying connections with math, science, and literacy. The