consider it my motivation to become an engineer. I think those are sort of like 2 separate spheres of my life. Sort of what I want to do academically and career-wise and what I want to do on a philanthropic and personal level.”SR Type 4 – These students had thought little about social responsibility or helping othersthrough their professions beyond safety and legal professional obligations at the time of theinterview. Many were focused on their studies and helping those closest to them. Brandon: “I think it kind of moves me towards it because, I don't know what to call it, the engineering code of ethics. Your job, first and foremost, is safety above everything else, it's a good job or at least that's the way it should be. Safety is
Paper ID #37156First-Year Engineering Student Perceptions of CalculusExams and Future-Oriented MotivationCatherine Mary Kenyon Catherine Kenyon (she/her) is a PhD Candidate in the department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University under the guidance of Dr. Lisa Benson as well as a faculty member for the School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences serving as a lecturer and course coordinator for Calculus I. She received her B.S. (2017) and M.S. (2019) in Mathematical and Statistical Sciences from Clemson University. Her research interests are future time perspective, student motivation
-education requirement at a sister institution (Portland StateUniversity) where the present author co-taught for several years with three faculty members fromthe Philosophy Department. The title of the original course was “Knowledge, Rationality andUnderstanding.” It was initially designed by a faculty member from the Psychology Department,and had a strong emphasis on decision-making.The present author was hired in 2005 as a “quantitative person” at the graduate-assistant level tohandle the Statistics content as well as the three hour-long weekly discussion sessions. Duringthe next three years, the primary instructors either retired or passed away, with the present author(graduate assistant) as the main constant and an increasingly central role in
training programs or identifying existing training available at partner collegelocations.In our research, we are examining faculty, student, and employer perceptions of intrapreneurship,which will provide the data to determine if a need exists to strengthen the entrepreneurialcomponent in the AM curriculum, and include greater emphasis on “intrapreneurial” skills andteam building. Because most recent graduates will not enter the workforce as entrepreneurs, theresearchers will explore how individual students learn and become self-employed, or learn to usetheir local knowledge assets on behalf of their employers; that is, do students see themselves as acontributor to a company and enjoying a career dedicated to helping a firm remain competitive ina
lab and met faculty and graduate students in the department. The programculminated in a Hackathon where teams of up to five students developed an application of theirchoosing and then presented their product to other students and three judges (the professorleading the program, a teaching assistant, and the institution’s chief software engineer). Havingannounced the Hackathon at the end of the day prior to the competition, the lead professor notedthat students had – without prompting – self-selected their own teams by the start of the nextsession that essentially divided students into all-male teams and teams of women with one malestudent. Interestingly, the two teams of mostly women took first and second place, the latter ofwhich consisted of
-categorical, and generative—get moreout of their higher education and are much better prepared for their careers than those who do not(Love & Guthrie, 1999). This conceptual shift is necessary for effective performance in STEM,yet the typical engineering student progresses fewer than two positions along Perry’s nine-positionscheme in college (Pavelich & Moore, 1996).Research has been conducted to understand how these theories play out across various judgmentdomains (e.g., “personal taste, aesthetic, value, and truth” as per Kuhn, Cheney, & Weinstock,2000, p. 309) as well as different fields of knowledge such as science (Elby, Macrander, &Hammer, 2016), engineering (Christensen et al, 2015), and design (Eastman, McCracken, &
URMsstudents and proportion of first-generation students in classes. Psychosocial Factors Influencing Course PerformanceSTEM Self-Efficacy STEM self-efficacy, defined as an individual's belief in their ability to excel in STEMtasks and activities [1], plays a pivotal role in shaping students' attitudes and behaviors in STEMfields. Anticipations of personal efficacy dictate the initiation, extent, and sustainability of copingbehavior when faced with challenges and adverse experiences [1]. This belief is influenced byInterest & Engagement Tactics for Success 2prior experiences, accomplishments, as well as social and environmental factors [2]. High STEMself-efficacy
physicallayout and technology of any given classroom suggest certain uses [10], [18]. “Studioclassrooms” afford active learning more than a traditional tiered lecture hall, and research hasdemonstrated that student learning outcomes improve as students interact more meaningfullywith their peers [15], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. However, studio classrooms do not easily allowfor lecture-based teaching, which is still practiced by many faculty members [24], [25]. On theother hand, flexible classrooms afford both active learning and lecture, as the tables and chairscan be rearranged into layouts that support either learning activity.Just as the affordances of a classroom can influence an instructor’s pedagogy, the instructor canchange and modify the
Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A Descriptive Study of Engineering Transfer Students at Four Institutions: Comparing Lateral and Vertical Transfer PathwaysStudents who attend two or more institutions during their post-secondary educational careers, ortransfer students, make up just over one-third of all American students.1 Additionally, 25% ofstudents who transfer will do so more than once.1 Reasons for transfer vary widely, but usuallyinclude academic, financial, or institutional factors.2 Moreover, reasons for transferring may bedifferent from reasons for discontinuing coursework until a later date (stopping-out), as thosewho stop-out normally identify more personal reasons for leaving an institution compared to theacademic
, documentation of work conducted throughout the semester, and completion of a finalprototype.The research and design stages of an independent study can be similar to that of an EngineeringCapstone project however there are some key differences in the student experience. First, in anindependent study, the student usually initiates the creation of the project to explore a topic ofmutual interest with a faculty member. At smaller teaching-focused institutions, many advancedtechnical topics in a student’s major are not covered in-depth and some students would like moreexperience in a particular area out of pure interest or to prepare themselves for a future career inthat field. Secondly, the student is not part of a student design team and often works
use of sustainable economic development and (4) that faculty members andengineers, together, undertake an effort so that engineering education addresses the challengesand social opportunities of the future.In seeking to respond to these demands, universities have been encouraged to play a more activerole in economic development by supporting policies and funding programs forcommercialization of technology and entrepreneurship education [4]. This occurs wheneconomic news shows how global competition, downsizing, decentralization, re-engineering,mergers, and new technologies have made careers more complex and uncertain for graduatesfrom all sectors [5,6]. In this context, political, economic and academic leaders conceiveentrepreneurship as one
professional responsibility among engineering graduates, while a variety of otherinterventions (e.g., service learning programs) have been developed to more broadly challengeengineering students to see themselves as socially engaged citizens and professionals.Nonetheless, there has been a surprising lack of research on development of social and ethicalresponsibility among undergraduate engineering students. Few studies have systematicallyexamined levels of ethical knowledge, decision-making capabilities, and commitments to socialresponsibility among large numbers of engineering students, much less examined how suchindicators change over time and are impacted (or not) by specific kinds of learning experiences.As a result, faculty, administrators, and
Engineering. Students must complete one ortwo industry-sponsored projects per semester.Student Empowered Design and Monitoring is a guiding principal for the program model;students own responsibility for their learning. Students identify which outcomes will beaddressed at the beginning of each new project, while working with faculty. Each project cycleincludes two reports – a design report and a written report, and a final presentation. The finalpresentation is made to faculty and external clients, and includes an oral examination to assessstudent understanding of the knowledge and competencies required. Establish Learning Graduate Entering Students and Design
because the majority of today’s engineering graduates do not have the broadbackground necessary to understand, take charge of and drive large-scale projects to completionin an economic fashion” (5). To the end of correcting these perceived deficiencies, Gordon hasfunded a number of engineering leadership degree programs in universities. One of them is atNortheastern University (NEU) in Boston, MA. Key elements of the degree program at NEUinclude experiential learning; distinguished speakers from industry to discuss and modelleadership; mentoring from the program, an industry partner, and the technical faculty; cross-cohort learning (6). A similarly ambitious revision of engineering education has been on-going atthe Massachusetts Institute of
position of authority within the group [8].The review paper on engineering leadership development programs by Crumpton-Young, et al.showed common agreement between professional engineers and engineering students about whichskills are most useful for an engineer in a leadership position [9]. But their work showed that thereis a need for richer qualitative data, which our study may be able to help provide. One such studyis by Cox et al., who asked engineering faculty members to assess students strengths, weaknesses,and future learning opportunities [10]. While leadership skills of engineering students maydevelop in many contexts, Knight, et al (2017) found that curricular emphasis on leadershipdevelopment is more reliable than student engagement in
Paper ID #16714Concept of a Human-Attended Lunar OutpostMr. Thomas W. Arrington, Texas A&M University Thomas Arrington worked as the student Project Manager for the Human Attended Lunar Outpost senior design project for the the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Texas A&M University in College Station. He has interned with Boeing Research and Technology three times, and was an active member of the Texas A&M University Sounding Rocketry Team.Mr. Nicolas Federico Hurst, Texas A&M 2015 Capstone Design Spacecraft Nico Hurst is a student of Texas A&M University. He recently graduated from the Aerospace
served for a few years as one of the faculty advisors for the student chapter of Engineers Without Borders (EWB), and has observed the benefits of service involvement on student learning and personal growth. Professor Bielefeldt is also affiliated with the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Communities, and is actively researching point-of-use ceramic water filters appropriate to treat drinking water in developing communities.Bradley A. Striebig, James Madison University Dr. Bradley Striebig is an associate Professor of Engineering at James Madison University. He has worked on sustainable development projects in Benin, India, Kenya, Malta, Rwanda, and throughout the United States. He is heavily involved
Session 2530 Development of Engineering Focused Lesson Plans for K8 Teachers and Students John J. Schemmel University of Arkansas, College of EngineeringIntroductionWhile the entire population continually benefits from the work of engineering professionals,there are still relatively few graduating high school seniors electing to pursue a bachelor's degreein engineering. The fact that an engineering degree is not widely considered by enteringfreshmen is not a new development. However, it is becoming a more serious problem as thenumber of
1990s, therefore much of the increase in the percentage ofwomen was actually due to many thousands of men leaving the field. Secondly, when the data isdisaggregated by discipline, greater disparities are found. For example, Chemical Engineeringincreased their percentage of women graduates from 21.7% in 1986 to 35.4% in 2000; however,Electrical Engineering (the largest discipline) only increased their percentage from 12.4% to13.3% in the same time span (which was not statistically different from no increase at all). My analysis of this graduation data, my experiences as an engineering student andprofessor, and my involvement with the American Society of Engineering Education leads me tobelieve that a new phase of research on equity in
Paper ID #16136Investigating How Design Concepts Evolve in Engineering StudentsMr. John Mark Dawidow, Harding University John Dawidow is a recent graduate of Harding University, receiving his bachelor’s in biomedical engi- neering. His research interests involve investigating how students think about design considerations in relation to social and technical dimensions.Prof. James L. Huff, Harding University James Huff is an assistant professor of engineering at Harding University, where he primarily teaches multidisciplinary engineering design and electrical engineering. His research interests are aligned with how
each semester. Figure 3 below demonstrates that regardlessof subject matter area students who attend five or more sessions show a significant improvementin grade point average (GPA) between midterm and final grades. Since session attendance hasshown an increase in GPA, some faculty members are now including bonus points for students toattend SI sessions as a means to motivate them to get extra assistance in a course.Beginning in the fall 2014 another resource was launched called “STEM Lab” to support coursesthat an SI leader was not assigned directly to cover. STEM Lab is run by senior level studentswho have demonstrated an ability to tutor students across multiple subject areas, and also possessa cumulative GPA of a 3.0 or higher
software engineering faculty.During the first two weeks, students are directed to seek and research a suitable project topic byquerying faculty members, employers, or any other source available to them. The caliber of theproject and its suitability as a capstone experience are subject to faculty approval. In the currentcase, the three students made two important decisions: they decided to work as a team and,among the few topic choices that were offered to them, they selected a project in robotics.The ECE department owns two Cyton V2 7-dof robotic arms29 in need of a simple intuitive userinterface that allows easy programming of manipulation tasks. Figure 5 shows a picture of onerobotic arm.Multidisciplinary project experience in SEIn regards to
students. Dr. Cadwell currently consults on a $1.2 million NSF grant that she procured in partnership with the Univer- sity of Idaho faculty in Curriculum and Instruction, UI Extension, and two local Native American Indian Tribes: the Coeur d’Alene (CdAT) and Spokane (ST) tribes. The grant, ITEST, Strategies Project—Back to the Earth (BTTE), is addressing a national call to increase the STEM workforce pipeline by supporting and improving the STEM educational experiences for Native American students. Dr. Cadwell is a member of the grant leadership team with expertise in STEM content, curriculum development, and technology ed- ucation. The team is using an interdisciplinary framework to reach under-served populations. The
hope to perform in their classes. • E.g., “Compared to other students, how well do you think you will do in engineering this year?” • E.g., “Compared to other students, how well do you hope you will do in engineering this year?” 5. Relevance and intention, assessing intentions to complete an engineering degree and perceived utility of engineering degree content for future career prospects. • E.g., “I intend to finish my engineering degree” • E.g., “How useful is learning engineering for what you want to do after you graduate?” • E.g., “How useful is learning engineering for your daily life?” Since the main goal of this study was to present the Icarus program and
. Daily earned her B.S. and M.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Florida Agri- cultural and Mechanical University – Florida State University College of Engineering, and an S.M. and Ph.D. from the MIT Media Lab.Shira VielDr. Karis Boyd-Sinkler, Duke University Karis Boyd-Sinkler, PhD is the Director of Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion and Adjunct Assistant Pro- fessor at Duke University’s Pratt School of Engineering. She plays a key role in providing strategies to strengthen Pratt’s efforts to create and sustain an equitable environment for all members of the Pratt Com- munity including students, staff, faculty, and alumni. She has over 7 years of experience leading multiple mentoring, outreach, and professional
did not explicitly capture the “analysis” and“modeling” aspects of this ABET criterion because they do not necessitate the design or creationof something new. As these terms lend themselves easily to research efforts in BME (e.g.,proteomics analysis or cardiovascular disease modeling), exploring the degree to whichundergraduate students are cognizant of these aspects of the field may yield important insightsinto a student’s choice to attend graduate school or pursue a research-based career.d) Making Measurements on and Interpreting Data from Living Systems This was the only criterion for which an analog was not identified in the student-provided definitions of BME. It represents an important differentiation from all other ABET
conceptualquestions on the final exam. The incorporation of an abbreviated DCI into the final negated theneed to sacrifice another full class period for administering the CI post-test. It should be notedthat neither the process of integrating a CI into an assessment for a course, nor the abbreviationof a research tool, is without precedent. For example, Smith, Wood, and Knight incorporated agenetics concept inventory into the final exam6. Additionally, Henderson studied if grading aconcept inventory significantly altered student performance and found that students will put forthan honest effort on concept inventories regardless of the incentives involved7. Henderson’sresult helps justify the Purdue instructors’ decision to provide students with a completion
master’s programs is vital for grasping how the nextgenerations of engineers are grappling with the challenges that current and emerging AItechnologies will create.Research QuestionsDrawing on interviews with 62 electrical and computer engineering (ECE) master’s students(described in more detail below), we explore three broad questions related to their perspectiveson AI. (1) What opportunities and dangers do ECE masters students see in artificial intelligencebroadly? Do they exhibit unbridled enthusiasm for AI’s potential? Are they apprehensive orfearful of AI developments and what an AI-saturated future will hold? As the future leaders ofthese technologies, ECE masters students are bellwethers for the views of the engineeringprofession more
• deliver relevant and challenging educational programs to attract an outstanding diverse student body • prepare graduates for rewarding careers in their chosen professions and encourage graduates to extend their level of knowledge through lifelong learning • conduct leading edge research advances engineering science and stimulate the intellectual development and creativity of both students and faculty, • extend exemplary engineering service and transfer knowledge that contributes to the well- being and betterment of society. In order to broaden participation in engineering, UNL COE will broaden the admission reviewprocess to deemphasize student test scores and to
at the University of Washington were offered in an agreement with WilliamBoeing in exchange for donating a wind tunnel to the University.vi At New York Page 14.1218.2University in 1923, two mechanical engineering faculty, Prof. Collins Bliss and Prof.Alexander Klemin, who studied under Hunsaker at MIT, began offering students anelementary aerodynamics class. In 1924 an experimental program was approved by theUniversity. The program was a success and it was decided to make it permanent.However, to do so, external funding estimated at $500,000 was required. Harry workedwith NYU Chancellor Elmer Ellsworth Brown to locate funds. Harry took a letter