student will identify in-plane motion of the blade from the lead-lag hinge. The student will identify feathering motion from the pitch links.The student may choose to draw swashplate pictures showing a tilt change from neutral position,or an elevation from neutral position, as indicators of cyclic inputs or collective pitch inputs.The student may draw before-after pictures of blade coning, blade flapping, and blade feathering.The student may draw pictures of lift distribution and Mach number distribution across the spanof the rotor blade in hover. The student may write equations for the conservation of momentum,with the Coriolis Effect and rotor speed or RPM.Alternatively, the student may choose to use a physical model of an articulated rotor
limited level of teamwork instruction is achieved passively inthe form of team peer evaluations, usually in capstone design courses and more rarely in othercourses. Given the currently limited and fragmented opportunities to learn about why and how towork in teams, engineering students may not know: (1) why teams exist and why good teamworkis important, (2) how individuals can be effective team members, and, (3) how to structure workwithin the team, track progress, and deal with issues along the way.In response to this identified weakness, a committee of representatives from various departmentsin the Faculty of Engineering and other teaching and support units are developing a series of sixworkshops that will be delivered to engineering students
findings and continued their analysisthrough collaborative writing interactions of the paper (e.g., commenting, editing, askingquestions to broaden/deepen the findings).Quantitative findings Of the faculty surveyed (n=49), 29 faculty stated that they participated in the NFLCprogramming, conversely, 20 of the participants stated that they did not participate. RegardingRQ-1 about reasons faculty reported about their attendance of NFLC, 12 out of 20 non-participant faculty noted that they had not heard of the NFLC; however, the other eightparticipants stated that they had heard of the NFLC or were invited but could not attend due toschedule conflicts, teaching commitments, overall busy-ness, or the programming did not meettheir specific needs
data collection. The format ofdemographic items can influence data whether researchers collect demographic data verbally, ona paper form, or electronically. A good strategy is to collect demographic information that isconsistent with a theoretical framing of social identities. Optimally, survey items arecomprehensive of all potential choices; however, the individualized nature of demographicvariables necessitates the collection of self-described identities as well.Speaking pragmatically, a good approach is to structure such questions not as either/or questionsbut as “select all that apply” questions. Another approach is to provide open-ended “write-in”responses that allow for students who do not fit within the predefined choices to document
working with Strategy Execution and Duke Corporate Education where he provides training for fortune 500 companies throughout the world.Mrs. Marie S. Call, Brigham Young University Marie Call graduated from Brigham Young University in 2013 with a BS in Chemical Engineering. She worked as a Transdermal Development Process Engineer with Actavis Pharmaceuticals from 2012-2013. Since then she has enjoyed balancing her primary occupation–raising her two (almost three) children– with research writing and collaboration with the Weidman Center for Global Leadership at Brigham Young University, focusing on Engineering and Technology student perceptions toward study abroad experiences. She currently resides in Houston, TX.Dr
are compared against the whole datasetto ensure that each theme works as it should.Phase 5. Refining, Defining, and Naming Themes: In Phase 5, themes are tested to ensure thatthey center meaning-making [12]. Themes must be sufficiently rich and informative to fullycapture the concepts they represent. Writing an abstract or definition for each theme can assist intheir elimination or retention [12]. After testing, themes are named using short phrases that evoketheir “meaning and analytic direction” [12].4. Results and Discussion4.1 Scoping ReviewAfter searching the two databases, 733 articles were found on Scopus and 397 articles were foundon Web of Science, for a total of 1,130 articles. After duplicate removal, 1,078 articles remained.The
coaching for and by language teachers (e.g., peer coaching, critical friending in educational contexts). Ari has planned and facilitated language and literacy workshops and lectures, as well as curriculum development, in Ghana, Israel, Italy, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Sweden, Thailand, and the USA. As a private person, Ari travels to the Israeli occupied West Bank of the Jordan river where he documents Israeli settlers who engage in violence, agricultural theft, intimidation, and threats. Ari’s videos, notes, and presence support a coalition of non-government organizations working in solidarity with Palestinian communities in the Jordan Valley to prevent the destruction of Palestinian villages and to prevent the
retrieved for full-text review. Upon assessing the full textfor eligibility, 17 articles were found to not fully meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria (e.g.literature review papers, articles outside of STEM fields, articles not focused on SLWD).Thirteen articles remained for consideration in this review. Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Inclusion Criteria • Publications focused on AI-driven and new technologies that are specifically designed to support SLWD in STEM education. • Publications in the form of a peer-reviewed journal or conference article
Paper ID #28865Outcome-Based (Engineering) Education (OBE): International AccreditationPracticesProf. Junaid Qadir, Information Technology University, Lahore, Pakistan Junaid Qadir is an Associate Professor at the Information Technology University (ITU)—Punjab, Lahore since December 2015, where he directs the ICTD; Human Development; Systems; Big Data Analytics; Networks (IHSAN) Research Lab. His primary research interests are in the areas of computer systems and networking, applied machine learning, using ICT for development (ICT4D); and engineering education. He is the author of more than 100 peer-reviewed research papers
Fast-Forward Engineering Program is a summer bridge and scholarship programat Louisiana Tech University funded by the National Science Foundation that allows risingsophomore engineering students to continue their curriculum ahead of schedule [1]. Eligibility isbased on unmet financial need and on-track degree progression to achieve a 4-year graduation.The program allows students to get more interaction with the faculty as well as increasedinteraction with their peers. The program also allows students to take part in local industry visitsso that students may see first-hand various engineering workplace settings. Due to COVID-19,the industry visits were virtual for the Summers of 2020 and 2021. Students participated in Zoomlectures from industry
institutions the opportunity toinquire about the Black experience from Black students without the stigma of asking suchquestions in large groups with people unfamiliar with that experience. With respect to graduatestudents, the lack of palpable sources for professional development influenced therecommendation for graduate community spaces to prioritize writing retreats, peer mentoringand other activities critical to advancing students in their doctoral studies [11]. Participants at PWIs gave recommendations about inclusion which they believed wouldimprove if there were more Black faculty hired in engineering programs. The overall reasoningto increase Black faculty was for mentorship and guidance as they navigated spaces that weren’tinclusive
-oneinstruction. The student would present weekly findings to his/her mentor, read scientific paperstogether, and plan future experiments. In addition to conducting research with mentors, menteesare required to attend three lunch meetings throughout the summer experience. These lunchmeetings focus on professional development and mentoring; providing an opportunity forstudents to discuss research progress with peers [12].The 2021-2022 SURE participants included 32 undergraduate students from various disciplinesacross campus. The participants were from the Civil and Construction Engineering Department,Mechanical Engineering Department, Electrical Engineering Department, MathematicsDepartment, Chemistry Department, Biology Department, Physics Department
teaches courses and conducts research related to Thermodynamics, engineering and public policy, engineering education, and gender in engineering and science. She is the co-author on an engineering textbook, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, which is used worldwide in over 250 institutions and she is an author on over 95 peer- reviewed publications.Caroline SolomonDr. Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler, Ph.D., is the director of the University of Washington Center for Evaluation and Re- search for STEM Equity (UW CERSE) and an affiliate assistant professor of sociology. She has been at UW working on STEM Equity issues for more than 17 years. Dr. Litzler is a member of ASEE, 2020-2021
) 0.007 Traditional 33.71 (5.82) 33.36 (5.68) 0.301 Self-efficacy Mastery experience (prior success) Mastery 4.10 (0.56) 4.25 (0.66) 0.005 Traditional 4.19 (0.52) 4.12 (0.53) 0.248 Vicarious experience (peer success) Mastery 4.63 (0.71) 4.78 (0.76) 0.012 Traditional 4.46 (0.53) 4.52 (0.63) 0.289 Social Persuasions (support for success) Mastery 4.38 (1.05) 4.54 (0.91) 0.018 Traditional 4.41 (0.92) 4.45 (0.87) 0.388 Physiological State (anxiety) Mastery 2.21 (0.96
Union, both in chemical engineering. In 2011, he received the ASEE Chemical Engineering Division ”Engineering Education” Mentoring Grant and in 2015 he received the Ray W. Fahien Award. His research interests include particle technology, transport phenomena, and engineering education. His current educational research is focused on peer instruction, technology-enhanced active learning, and electronic textbooks.Prof. Matthew W Liberatore, The University of Toledo Matthew W. Liberatore is a Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Toledo. He earned a B.S. degree from the University of Illinois at Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all
Northwestern’s Advising-as-Teaching model in which the first-year advisors and the first-year engineering program instructors are one and the same.Dedicated first-year instructors and advisors, as at Northwestern, were not feasible in ourengineering programs however, most notably because our engineering students share a firstsemester engineering design experience, rather than a first year design experience We insteadaimed to replicate what we perceived as the most influential and helpful elements of theNorthwestern Advising-as-Teaching model – regular, meaningful, interactions between studentsand their 360 Coach and E-Team (engineering team) peer mentor. Our 360 Coaches may achievethis regular interaction within the context of the first-semester
research activities, have been invited to number of international conferences as Invited Speaker, chaired panel discussions and numerous international conference sessions. He has served on more than 220 international conference program committees. Furthermore, he has published number of articles in peer- reviewed international journals and conferences. He is an active member of ACM, ASEE, ASEE/PSW and CSAB.Dr. Shakil Akhtar, Clayton State University Dr. Shakil Akhtar is currently Professor of IT and Computer Science at Clayton State University. Be- fore this he was the IT Department head from July 2007 to December 2008. He was a Professor in the College of Information Technology at UAE University from 2002 to 2007
to explore their own implicit bias in the areas ofrace, gender issues, and age (the core focuses within the course). Key elements of successful implementation into the engineering leadership environmentincluded creation and access of peer support and a course operational agreement that studentswere invited to sign that outlined inclusive pedagogical approaches and mindsets. Access to peersupport during the process of building skills necessary to facilitate a course like the onedescribed in this project could be achieved by engaging with diversity offices or other experts,participating in reading groups, or paying consultants with expertise in developing instructorcapacity in the areas of diversity and inclusion. In the case of the
]. Exercising her agency, Mariabella urged me (andthe group) to consider the displaced persons in the park as particular stakeholders in the design,with distinct needs and requirements. It led us to a distinctly different design space. Wedocumented this idea on the brainstorming paper in the moment. The group later took upMariabella’s idea by 1) including the displaced persons in the park amongst the differentpopulations we surveyed for the design, which led us to 2) focus our design efforts on seating inthe park. The structures of Mariabella’s and Ava’s peers could have constrained this suggestionthrough disagreement or challenge. As the people enacting the curriculum, the group leaders andI could have constrained Mariabella’s suggestion
of fall 2018 had over 2000undergraduate students enrolled [8]. Although overall the university enrolls more undergraduatewomen [9], this is not true for the college of engineering. As reported in 2016 only 24% ofundergraduates and graduates seeking engineering degrees at this university were women [10]. A search of the literature was conducted using the ERIC database, and 89 peer reviewed,academic journal articles published in the last 15 years were found to be relevant to the currentstudy. To be included as a relevant study, the focus had to be on factors influencing women’sdecisions to major in engineering and/or gender differences in influences to choose anengineering or STEM major. Twenty-eight studies clearly met these criteria
PFSlearning outcomes, please see: https://prospect.uncc.edu/.MAPS serves as indoctrination for new COE students to learn, understand, and establishpersonal connections to academic success and professional development strategies and campus-wide resources, networking opportunities, and organizations. The program structure is dividedinto two peer-led components: (1) transition, academic, and professional development coachingand (2) Supplemental Instruction (SI) for selected COE gateway courses. The coaching programhas evolved based on experiences and feedback from key stakeholders, leading to the continuousdevelopment of new strategies for improving participant satisfaction, academic and professionalsuccess, and retention. These enhancements have made a
reaching analysis or higher level of Bloom’s taxonomy). It is unlikely thatthere is broad consensus on what a sufficient level of ESI education for engineering studentswould entail.Some of the survey-takers and faculty who were interviewed advocated for greater integration ofSJP into engineering education. For example, a write-in comment on the survey stated “I thinkmost of our students get a reasonable exposure to ethics related to professional code of conduct,engineering design, and disasters. I would like to see more exploration of ethics at theintersection of humanitarian engineering and social justice, and the conflicting tensions that arisefrom trying to do good and solve problems using technology.”Constraints to integrating ESI broadly and
presentations. as a required part of the project for each group. This 3) They find the individual meetings with the GTF will more tightly connect the course objectives to be very helpful. This provided an opportunity related to these engineering tools and the project for them to get to know the GTF better and to goals. contact her during the process. In addition, they 4) It is better to allocate time in the labs regularly to have mentioned that this meeting had helped check their idea and help them to think creatively. them to continue the project more strictly, 5) In grading the part, having a group peer
Survey of StudentEngagement from 2006, many of the external obstacles facing NT students contribute to thedifficulty for them to develop peer relationships (study groups) at the university [14].Those students that are employed and seeking degree completion identified many professionalbarriers exhibited in the workplace including a lack of tuition reimbursement, competing timemanagement schedules, and/or lack of release time from work. Also institutional barriersinhibiting access to higher education included the high cost of tuition, and diminishedaffordability [4]. Furthermore, because adult learners (NTs) also face the barriers of simplycoping with previously outlined external factors add additional stress and/or anxiety arecompounded by the
areas of interest are chemical vapor deposition and engineering pedagogy.Prof. Michael F. Young, University of Connecticut Dr. Young (http://myoung.education.uconn.edu/) received his PhD from Vanderbilt University in Cogni- tive Psychology and directs UConn’s 2 Summers in Learning Technology program. He is the author of nine chapters on an ecological psychology approach to instructional design and has authored more than two dozen peer reviewed research papers. His work has appeared in many major journals including the Journal of Educational Computing Research, the Journal of the Learning Sciences, the Journal of Research on Science Teaching, Instructional Science, and Educational Technology Research and Development
by international students (Asian or otherwise), the causecould be traced to language issues, particularly in understanding the teacher and the material, andin expressing descriptive passages and abstract concepts in the English language. Singaporehaving been under British rule until after World War II and continuing to be under the influenceof Britain-trained policy makers, its lingua-franca is English, more British than American. In Group-A, by the time the student reached my course (Junior-Senior level), the foreignstudents had caught up with local idiom (– playfully referred to as 'Singlish') and the presentationskills of their peers sufficiently to hold their own in class and do well in assessments. Languagemistakes might be hidden in
assess impact of good supply chain practices such as coordinated decision making in stochastic supply chains, handling supply chains during times of crisis and optimizing global supply chains on the financial health of a company. She has published her research in Journal of Business Logistics, International Jour- nal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management and peer-reviewed proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Michael D. Johnson, Texas A&M University Dr. Michael D. Johnson is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Technology and In- dustrial Distribution at Texas A&M University. Prior to joining the faculty at Texas A&M, he was a senior product
. Which populations are being studied in engineering education using critical theoretical frameworks, and which populations are not being considered? 3. How are these critical theoretical frameworks used in the research methodologies?MethodsThe databases ERIC, IEEE Xplore, Journal of Engineering Education, ASEE PEER, Journal ofWomen and Minorities in Science and Engineering, and the Journal of STEM Education wereused to locate primary sources. The descriptors “critical theory,” “underrepresented minority,”“critical race theory,” “feminism,” “conciencia,” and “intersectionality” were used to locateprimary sources. These descriptors were also used in conjunction with other descriptors such as“underrepresented populations,” “Latino
student’s specified skills, in addition to each student’s level of interest ina particular project. This is the period when students are expected to form teams for the CapstoneDesign course so that they can begin writing and submitting bids for various projects of interest.By gauging the mutual interest of other students in various projects as well as seeing whether theyhave complementary skill sets, students can reach out to these students via alternative means suchas email or in-person to discuss opportunities for team building and formation.Finally, as a team, students submit bids for projects they are interested in and assign a priorityrank for each of their bids, which ranks their willingness to take on a particular project. Thesebids are then
also contributes to their lackof inclusion and sense of belonging. To a smaller extent, some hearing students misunderstand spokeninformation, especially in lab environments.We report on the evaluation of an extension to our Real-Time Text Display (RTTD), to handle multiplespeakers (RTTD-MS), for engineering labs. RTTD was developed to reduce frustration in following theteacher and other peers during laboratory and other academic settings. The system projects a real-timedisplay of captions (RTTD) above a teacher who can move around the room during the class orlaboratory, which may aid deaf students in viewing both the speaker and the speaker’s words as text.Our first study with RTTD found that deaf students in engineering course lectures