study to focus on chapter activities in the collegiate demographic. Participants in thisstudy, which utilized surveys and existing NSBE data, included student chapter leaders as well asadvisors (minority engineering program directors, engineering college faculty). Four majorquestions guided the survey design: 1. What are the characteristics of each chapter? 2. What activities do the chapters engage in, by type? 3. What assessment methods do the chapters employ to track success? 4. What outcomes are the chapters achieving, by type?The outcomes of interest directly align with NSBE’s 2025 strategic goal to graduate 10,000black engineers annually and include GPA, engineering program retention, graduation rate
developmental spaces our students share. Wedo this by supporting academic foundations in engineering, promoting community responsibility,and teaching principles of leadership. Our programming model includes cohort-style engineeringcoursework, bi-weekly course reviews, and a collaborative service-learning project in whichsecond-year students are project managers and first-year students are team members.The Engineering Leadership Community started as a retention strategy in 2009. Students who donot integrate socially and academically into their institution of higher learning are more likely todepart from college before earning a degree (1). In fact, student engagement can actuallycompensate for academic under preparedness, giving students the opportunity
component ordering lead times were all confounding issues that the MTR team faced. Allof these are real-world considerations that even the idealized design engineer should be aware ofwhen designing a product for market.GradingThe grading scheme for the course below holds students accountable for documenting every stepof the process to ensure all learning outcomes are met. The numerous writing and oral reviews ofthe team’s work ensure projects stay on track and properly document how each of the learningoutcomes is met. Each grading component is evaluated using either a rubric matrix (seeAppendix A for samples) or a detailed evaluation rubric (see Appendix B for sample). 1. System Concept Review (SCR) & System Requirements Review (SRR
need for engineering graduates to achieve a reasonably high level of “global preparedness”has been recognized and promoted by both the professional and educational engineeringcommunities in conferences, national reports, and publications.1 The National Academy ofEngineering (NAE), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the National Research Council(NRC) have each challenged universities to graduate students who are globally prepared or havea global perspective.2–4 But how can this be measured? Which types of international experiencesare most effective in fostering global preparedness among engineering students? What contextualfactors are catalysts for students achieving various degrees of global preparedness? In what wayscan engineering
credibility or respect 13, 19; andlack of mentoring and/or sponsorship by a senior colleague. 11, 13, 18, 20These findings from the faculty climate survey, objective data review, and benchmarking laid theground work for the successful submission and subsequent funding of the National ScienceFoundation Institutional Transformation (IT) grant. The AdvanceRIT (NSF Award #1209115project was implemented in 2012. The objectives of this project are to: 1. Refine and strengthen targeted institutional structures, and install practices that promoting representation and advancement of women faculty. 2. Improve the quality of women faculty work life, professional development, and incentive/reward structures. 3. Align institutional
“Moderately Selective” institution, about 20-30% of the incoming first-year CEAS studentsfor the past 10 years were placed into Algebra II or Algebra I during their first semester. Table 1below shows the percent of the first-year CEAS students’ enrollment in mathematics courses intheir first-semester at WMU from 2006 to 2015.Table 1. Percent of First-Year CEAS Students and First-Semester Mathematics Enrollment from2006 to 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Calculus II or 5.4 5.1 5.2 7.9 7.5 3.4 4.5 8.0 7.0 13.8HigherCalculus I 35.3 42.7 39.2 34.3 40.7 38.0 37.2 35.1 35.0 38.1Pre-Calculus 31.0 31.1 29.8 27.9 25.2 34.0 31.7
Women Engineers (SWE) and is the Faculty Adviser for SWE at VT. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Expanded Advice from Coordinators of LargeEnrollment First Year Engineering Courses Abstract This paper expands upon the coordination experiences and best practices of faculty coordinators within the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, some of whom have been 1managing large enrollment introductory engineering courses for several years . Since 2012, enrollment has increased from 1200+ to 1700+ students. In fall 2013, the courses
instruments in lab settings, 59% hadno experience with traditional instruments as part of in-class instruction, and 72% never used amobile devicei. The developed curriculum materials are being piloted in a variety of instructionalsettings including classrooms, labs, practicum experiences, and a combination of graded andnon-graded experiences. Over 250 students were offered experiential engineering modules in theFall of 2014, almost 500 in the Spring of 2015, and an additional 500 in the Fall of 2015. (SeeAppendix Tables 1 and 2 for a more detailed description of students.) It is anticipated, that bythe end of the planned grant over 2200 students enrolled in HBCUs will have had the opportunityto participate in experientially based learning using the
“playlist” totalsabout 20 minutes and is designed to present a logical progression of skills and concepts: 1. Tour of the Library Website - This video orients students to the library website as the essential gateway to our services and resources. 2. Popular Periodicals vs. Scholarly Publications - Teaches the critical differences between magazines and scholarly journals, and introduces the latter as the primary means of scholarly communication. 3. The Peer Review Process: What Is Peer Review? - Helps students understand that most articles published in scholarly journals undergo the peer review process 4. Finding Articles at FGCU Library - Demonstrates how to access the Library’s subscription databases to find
detailed overview of this newly developed course and its content is presented. Inaddition, we show how the structure of the course makes it especially well-suited to address oneof the more challenging ABET student outcomes to assess, outcomes dealing with the impact ofengineering solutions in a global and societal context. Finally, the degree to which we areachieving our desired learning objectives is evaluated using the results of student opinionsurveys and a direct assessment of student work.1. IntroductionThe arrival of the Internet of Things (IoT) has brought about a world where the everyday objectswe interact with, ranging from health monitoring devices to kitchen appliances and even toys, areembedded with intelligence and the ability to
Testing Laboratory for ALMComponents (DoE-NNSA) • Development of Bio-Mechatronics Research Laboratory • Organizing to es-tablish CAU as a USGBC-LEED Lab in the S.E. region • Design and development of a multi-disciplinaryEco-Entrepreneurship Program Curriculum SELECTED DESIGN PROJECTS 1. Experimental Investi-gation of the Mechanical Properties of Bone. 2. Design and Development of Bio-Compatibility Index for c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #14450 Bio-Materials. 3. Experimental Ultra-low Speed Wind Energy Investigation for Modular Applications. 4. Studies on Sustainability, Recyclability &
advisor-advisee relationship: Implications for engineering research, policy, and practiceRacial microaggressions within the advisor-advisee relationship: Implications for engineering research, policy, and practice The underrepresentation of Black men in engineering highlights a missing segment of thepopulation who could contribute to the knowledge economy.1 An increase in Black men inengineering could lead to an increase in Black faculty members – and in general, role models –who could teach and inspire future generations of students in science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM). To address this national concern, stakeholders must first identifyprevailing issues such as racial microaggressions
Engineering and Acquisition Division Director for the base. His areas of specialization include construction management, public works, and government acquisition & contract management.Ms. Sarah Isabel Romero, University of Florida Currently a graduate student at University of Florida achieving a Masters in Environmental Engineering Sciences. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 1 THE LARGE SCALE USE OF GEOTHERMAL ENERGY AND ITS BENEFITS OVER OTHER SOURCES OF RENEWABLE ENERGY.ABSTRACT As climate change becomes more of a reality, and as our non-renewable resources arebecoming depleted, finding "cleaner" renewable energy for
exclusive excellenceThe institutional context of this action research was a comprehensive undergraduate institution inthe Western United States, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly).Cal Poly’s many successes have created a traditional culture of exclusive excellence. Like many“successful” universities, entry and graduation highly favor those who have a wealth of historicaladvantages--this is particularly true for what is traditionally called “STEM”--Science,Technology, Engineering, and Math. These exclusive dynamics show up as gaps in access(Figure 1) as well as an apparent “achievement gap” with respect to students who aretraditionally underrepresented in STEM and other majors (Figure 2). At Cal Poly, this
), learningopportunities designed and delivered by the Center, and the faculty, staff, administration andstudents are the muscles that work to facilitate the changes.Stepping away from the metaphor, the framework that informs our work focuses on four settingsand three lenses from which to consider each setting. The four settings are: 1. Faculty, 2. Class/Students, 3. Administrators, and 4. the University.While the first three may be obvious, the forth is included not as an umbrella for the first three.The University is identified as a setting so that we explicitly consider the University as a whole,considering the institutional needs and strategic shifts. Considering the needs and shifts of theinstitution alongside those of faculty, students, and
provided a sense of community and place to receive advice to address these and other challenges. We found that the proposed collaborative qualitative research methodology was useful for not only exploring the experiences of new faculty, but also supporting the development of EERs. Introduction As the demands and expectations for faculty increase, many institutional leaders and future faculty question whether the typical graduate school model provides the necessary training for an academic career [1]–[4]. Prior studies suggest that graduate education provides students with anticipatory socialization of the role of a
against reference solutions submitted by theinstructors on various data sets. This computation task is run in the back end as is done through acloud hosting service such as Amazon Web Services (AWS).The web interface from a student’s point-of-view is shown in Figure 1. In Cody Coursework allquestions should be part of an “assignment”. Each assignment can have any number of questions.A start and end time can only be set at the assignment level, hence all questions in a givenassignment have a common administering time frame.When a student selects a question, its description will be shown in the right panel. The studentthen goes on to submit the solution to a given solution in a specified space. The solution is runthrough multiple tests and the
districts across Ohio preparing students for STEM career and college endeavors.Larraine A. Kapka, Sinclair Community College Assistant Dean and Professor, Sinclair Community College MSME, MS Ind Mgt, PE (Ohio) Over 20 years industry experience 15 years higher education experience c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Virtual Online Tensile Strength Testing SimulationAbstractSupported through NSF-DUE, this TUES Type 1 project is 1) developing an open source,virtual, online tensile testing laboratory simulation; 2) conducting research to compare the costsand learning outcomes for using on-site, hands-on tensile testing equipment versus an onlinesimulation; 3) creating close industry
followingresearch question: How and when do students use prototypes to engage with stakeholdersthroughout the design process? This research project was approved by a Midwestern university’sInstitutional Review Board.ParticipantsA total of 16 students from three different engineering capstone design courses were interviewedfor this study. Table 1 shows the distribution of students based on their gender, design course,and prior design experience. All student names were replaced by pseudonyms to ensureanonymity. Less than half of the students had not referenced previous design experience outsideof their capstone design project. Three students had higher education levels, having completed orwere currently in a Master’s Program while three students previously
of the TCP/IP, a mobile remote shake tablelaboratory is further proposed to meet the learning style of the new generation. In this paper, thedeveloped interactive remote shake table laboratories will be discussed in detail and acorresponding teaching module for the proposed mobile shake table laboratory is demonstrated.IntroductionHistory frequently reminds us how destructive earthquakes can be. For example, the Loma Prietaearthquake (magnitude 6.9) in 1989 caused an estimated $6 billion in property damage and tookaway 63 human lives.1 The Northridge earthquake (magnitude 6.7) in 1994 brought an estimatedof $20 billion property damage and claimed the lives of 57 people with more than 5,000 injured.2To design and build safer and more
of a structure; • conduct a simple analysis of risk; and • write a geotechnical report in standard format.To have students achieve these outcomes as well as the general course outcomes, the authordeveloped the schedule shown in Table 1. Week Topics Covered/Activities Conducted 1 Introduction to course; design thinking exercise developed by Stanford’s Design School (http://dschool.stanford.edu/use-our-methods/) 2 Engineering communication (memos, reports, presentations); introduction to civil engineering and design/construction in the urban environment; graphics
, what shall be taught and researched, and what standards shall be set for which rewards”(p. 75).9 The authors interviewed 39 experienced, full-time teaching faculty to probe theirexperiences and sense of belonging to this collegium. The following themes emerged:1. While teaching faculty are hired primarily for teaching, there are often written or unwritten expectations for other responsibilities (e.g., service and research). In many cases, though, these other activities are controlled or restricted by the departments, with the sense that the tenure-track faculty must sanction such work.2. Many teaching faculty reported everyday interactions that led them to feel regarded as lower status, and marginalized from the tenure
Build a Prototype Test and evaluate prototype Implement Communication of Results System Analysis and Control Improve: Review and redesign as needed Table 1: Engineering Design Process10Our Capstone course is offered every semester. The students in the Computer Engineeringprogram take this course during their last semester. Students have the option of selecting theirown embedded project or to work on a project that is given to them by their advisors. During thefirst week of the semester, students write a proposal to define problems and identify solutionapproaches for
software. Atregular intervals throughout the course, theory-based instruction is followed by exploration ofthe same concepts in the context of commercial simulation software.The topics covered in each segment are summarized in Table 1. They are grouped into roughly1/3 increments, each of which is followed by a written exam that tests theoretical topics with “byhand” problems that are straightforward enough to be solved with a scientific calculator. Table 1 – Content Summary of Existing FEA Course Theory Based Instruction Commercial Software AugmentSpring elements, direct stiffness method, truss Analysis of trusses including: Initial set-up,elements, coordinate transformations, stress in
integration. “One of the biggest educational challenges for K-12 STEM education is that few general guidelines or models exist for teachers to followregarding how to teach using STEM integration approaches in their classroom4” (p. 32). This project explored how five elementary classroom teachers integrated scienceand engineering in their classrooms while piloting engineering curriculum. Our specificresearch questions were:1. How do teachers integrate science units with engineering design units? a. What aspects of the curriculum or content do they struggle with? b. What do teachers feel most influenced their implementation in terms of their instructional goals or learning outcomes?2. How does the instructional sequence
, andarchitecture, the concept is not commonly used within the engineering disciplines. This paperoutlines the value and typical content of an engineering portfolio. A process to develop anengineering portfolio will also be presented. The paper will document the efforts of graduate andundergraduate engineering students to (1) archive professional academic work for display in aportfolio, (2) curate their archived collection to present a concise and cogent display of theirprofessional skills, and (3) organize the portfolio to demonstrate job skills.IntroductionModern communication methods have dramatically changed yet some processes are grounded inthe past. One of those processes is the employment application process, in this case forengineering positions
courses. Other applications have included constructing structuralmodels for structural design and capstone courses. This paper takes this use of classroomtechnology even further by demonstrating how K’nex pieces can be used effectively in an upper-division, highly technical structural dynamics / seismic design course.K’nex pieces consist of various rods and connectors as shown in Figure 1. The rods areingeniously sized such that right triangles are naturally formed. While one size of rod forms thesides of a triangle, the next size up forms the hypotenuse. The pattern continues as the rodschange colors and triangles get progressively larger. The connectors allow rods to be joined at45 and 90 degree angles in various configurations. Some connectors
called micro-nets. The main purpose ofthe project is to monitor a mountainous ecosystem in three dimensions. To achieve this, themicro-nets are spatially distributed from top to bottom on the mountain, and from the top to thebottom of 25 meter trees. This identifies the ecosystem by major elevation and by layers offorest canopy.The project goals are as follows:1 1) To achieve real time wireless three dimensional monitoring of a mountainous ecosystem. 2) To comply with all the minimum impact requirements in the Wilderness Act of 1964. 3) To make the system autonomous, requiring maintenance at most once per year. 4) To physically install the system and have it functioning within one year. 5) To maintain sensors within industry
engineers and non-engineers. Engineering faculty needto push for inclusion in the liberal arts core of their universities. Exposing those from otherfields of study to engineering broadens their knowledge base. The grand challenges facingengineering are going to require collaboration with those from other fields to solve. Engineeringas a liberal arts exposes others to the principles of engineering and well enable the types ofcollaborations needed to solve these problems.Bibliography[1] Abelson, Paul. The seven liberal arts: a study in mediæval culture. Vol. 11. Teachers' College, ColumbiaUniversity, 1906.[2]Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. “Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re‐examining technology S‐curves.” Strategic Management Journal
the activity and how it is viewed (4, 6). It is known that external influences such ascompetition, deadlines and restrictions can impact a person’s situational motivation for a specificactivity (12); all are factors to consider in educational environments.Hidi and Renninger proposed a four-phase model of interest development that suggested adynamic relationship between curiosity and interest (13). If curiosity is satisfied, then interest andengagement can occur. Furthermore, curiosity has been associated with a need for competencein Deci’s theory of intrinsic motivation (5). As Arnone, Small, Chauncey, and McKenna noted,“When curiosity is ignited, the interest component can then enter into the dynamic” (p. 188) (1).Alternatively, interest can