Learning in EngineeringDr. Patti Wojahn, New Mexico State UniversityGermain Degardin, New Mexico State UniversityMuhammad Dawood, New Mexico State UniversityMelissa Guynn, New Mexico State UniversityRachel Boren, New Mexico State UniversityIntroduction Engineering programs often struggle to optimally support and retain promising students. Toattempt to address that issue at a Southwest HSI land-grant university, our interdisciplinary teamof researchers set out to study the impacts of putting learning and success more directly into thehands of students. We began exploring what we could learn from preparing first-yearengineering students to take more control of and responsibility for their learning and their growthas learners [1]. With faculty and
not always the best way to gather information about the lives of peoplefrom other cultures and backgrounds." From Brayboy’s Toward a Tribal Critical Race Theory in Education ``Stories are not separate from theory; they make up theory and are, therefore, real and legitimate sources of data and ways of being." This key framework is important for our team when researching the experiences and current issues that Nativos face on Isla Barú.These comments foster confidence that students saw connections between CSTs and their designthinking, decision making, and outcomes.Scaffolding Contextual InformationOne factor informing students' adoption of alternative design frameworks and CSTs appears tobe the degree to which the
transgenderstudents, the best practices at other institutions, the attitudes and desires of the WPIcommunity, and what design changes might be most successful in that context. The workthey had done was not only a valuable learning experience for them, but it introduced acampus-wide conversation about transgender students and it concluded with specificrecommendations tailored for WPI’s particular institutional context. The report hasprompted WPI’s administration to take a new approach to bathrooms: the campus nowincludes either single-stall or multi-stall gender-neutral bathrooms in 17 buildings and theuniversity has made a commitment for gender-inclusive bathrooms in all new buildings.All gender-inclusive bathrooms are indicated on WPI’s interactive campus
couldtreat their conditions. Disability justice activists continue to fight to change policy, discourse,design, and practice, ultimately encoding rights to accessibility at multiple levels, includingfederal policy that governs architecture, public space, software interface design, and medicaltechnologies [29]. Left in the wake of coronavirus, patient advocacy groups are focused ondocumenting long-COVID symptoms to show the long-term health impacts of coronavirusexposure and fight for better treatment paradigms [30].These lay experts seek not to just be end-users of medical technology, but also to createknowledge informed by their own lived experiences [31]. Health social movements seek to alignpatients with a common goal, often a future where their
delivery of content in each different course. However, choosing the best course for thismodular approach can be difficult and one has to consider the compatibility of goals and outcomes for awell-suited match. For our beta-trial, we chose an Introduction to Engineering course as our point ofentry. This course was well match of our purpose due its diverse student major and multiple sectionavailability.Project Management Lecture ModuleOur Project management modules used a student-centric, backward-design curriculum.To impact our students and keep them heavily engage--- Technology-centric PIT successes and projectsstellar project management efforts are showcased to drill home the powerful impact of PIT. Followingeach “new clipping” our lecture series
product vision, prioritizing customer requirements and working cross functionally with part- ner teams (e.g., Engineering, Science, Analytics) to deliver differentiated product experiences. Amelia has a passion for experimentation and has a fifteen year background in advertising. She earned her Bachelor’s degree in English from Fordham University in New York.Shahriar SadighiRobert Pulvermacher Dr. Robert Pulvermacher is a Research Program Manager at Amazon. He is responsible for directing and supporting research streams around talent management practices and aligning research outcomes with UX, Data Science, Economist, and BIE teams. Robert previously worked as an Associate Director at Gartner and Senior Associate at
enhance thecultural experience7, and utilize graduate students in active mentorship of visiting students.In the School of Engineering Technology capstone projects are one of the most effective avenues tosynthesize an engineer’s education and therefore present themselves as an opportunity to insert globalawareness. Accreditation bodies including ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)require such an experience in the curriculum particularly in (h) the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal contextand “j”: “a knowledge of the impact of engineering technology solutions in a societal and globalcontext.”1 In the School of Engineering Technology, a
done effectively by examining past cases4 as well as future ones thatwill result from new products not yet released to society. Unlike the former approach, the latter,referred to as the Social Impact Approach is particularly beneficial in forcing the students tothink about the ethical problems related to products that exist but are not yet available. Thisremoves the hind sight perspective present when examining past cases.From a practical viewpoint, a basic knowledge of professional ethics is required in order to passthe examinations required for licensure. Also, the Accrediting Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) recognizes the importance of professional ethics and requires that this topicbe addressed in undergraduate education in
Paper ID #41314Creation of Open-Source Course Materials for Engineering Economics Coursewith Help from a Team of Students—Lessons LearnedDr. Tamara R. Etmannski, University of British Columbia Tamara Etmannski is an Assistant Professor of Teaching in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Canada. Her position is focused on teaching content and various curricula and teaching and learning initiatives connected to ’impacts in engineering’ (sustainability, leadership, economics, entrepreneurship). Her pedagogical interests include high-impact practices like active and experiential
questioned those practices to be an equitable instructor and researcher.Avneet is an Assistant Professor in the Human-Centered Engineering Program at BostonCollege. She was a graduate student in Purdue’s School of Engineering education from 2014 to2018. After Purdue, she worked in the corporate sector at MathWorks for a year and a half. Afterthat, she returned to academia, first as a Research Scientist at MIT, and then in her current role asan inaugural faculty member of a new undergraduate engineering program in a Jesuit LiberalArts College. Avneet grew up in several cities in India and considers her father’s military serviceand mother’s work as an educator and social worker to have influenced her life’s values. Shebelieves that her time at Purdue
Research and Evaluation from Virginia Tech. Her research and scholarship are focused on exploring the implementation of mixed methods, qualitative, and arts-informed research designs in studies examining issues of social justice and educational equity. Currently, she is on a research team examining the impacts of an out-of-school STEM summer program for racially underrepresented youth. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #21947Dr. Glenda D. Young, Mississippi State University Dr. Glenda D. Young is a visiting assistant professor in the department of Industrial and Systems
share in a group setting. We will conduct one focus group at each institution,comprised of 8 respondents. We plan to conduct 15 in-depth individual interviews at eachinstitution, resulting in 60 detailed student narratives. OUTCOMESThrough our multi-method qualitative study, we will create grounded theory32,33,34 to build aconceptual model for better explaining the educational pathways of student veterans inengineering. This study will have broad systemic impact by diversifying pathways to andthrough engineering programs, and in capitalizing on the informal and real-world experiences ofengineering student veterans. A comprehensive dissemination plan ensures that the study results,particularly the best practices for supporting veterans in
additional cognitive focus and energy on top of the design and implementation of the research study. I felt more pressure to theorize and conduct a high caliber literature review since it would be one of the first in the area and I did not want to “let my community down” or open it up for attacks. I can recall criticism of the work feeling deeply personal, so much so that it seemed people were attacking my identity as they asked questions about the research. I share this experience to help illuminate the challenges that marginalized students have when conducting research that may serve their communities. How can we make this process easier for them? How do we rethink the gatekeeping practices of literature reviews and academia overall to broaden
the editorial board chair for the Online Ethics Center, deputy director for research for the National Institute of Engineering Ethics, and past-division chair for the ASEE Liberal Education/Engineering and Society division.Matthew James P.E., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Matthew James is an Associate Professor of Practice in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Virginia. He holds bachelors and masters degrees from Virginia Tech in Civil Engineering.Dr. Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Andrew Katz is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He leads the
Freshman Engineering Program, in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University (WVU). She graduated Summa cum Laude with a BSME in 2006, earned a MSME in 2008, and completed her doctorate in mechanical engineering in 2011, all from WVU. At WVU, she has previously served as the Undergraduate and Outreach Advisor for the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department and the Assistant Director of the Center for Building Energy Efficiency. She has previously taught courses such as Thermodynamics, Thermal Fluids Laboratory, and Guided Missiles Systems, as well as serving as a Senior Design Project Advisor for Mechanical Engineering Students. Her research interests
courses in ECS,Science, and Mathematics. The training was focused on course module development for lower-division Engineering, Mathematics, and Science courses to incorporate high impact practices.Undergraduate Research for Freshman and Sophomore Students Undergraduate research consisting of laboratory/field activities and design projectsinvolving students, peer mentors, and faculty members were implemented in the Summer of2019. These activities were intended to increase the persistence of URM students in STEMdisciplines. The objective of Summer Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE) was toincrease students’ comprehension of concepts and topics and develop skills through real-worldexperiences at a very early stage as a freshman or
Griffin Pitts is currently an undergraduate computer science student with the University of Florida’s Her- bert Wertheim College of Engineering. As a student, Griffin conducts research within multiple disciplines, furthering the impact of machine learning and artificial intelligence. He has been awarded by the Uni- versity of Florida’s Center for Undergraduate Research and intends on attending graduate school in his future.Sage Bachus, University of Florida Sage Bachus is a fourth-year Mechanical Engineering and Pre-Med student at the Herbert Wertheim Col- lege of Engineering, University of Florida. His main research focus is in learning analytics and developing a way to better understand the underlying
developing their skills and interest in the STEM fields to ensuretheir success at the post-secondary level and beyond. The fundamental principles of E-CADEMY are based on a combination of best practices from research including: a project-basedlearning (PBL) curriculum, high dosage model, cohort of like-minded peers, engagement withSTEM professionals, and family engagement [4]-[8]. This paper provides an overview of theprogram’s component, student feedback and program model future considerations.II. Program Overview Project SYNCERE has provided equitable hands-on engineering experiences for morethan 20,000 underrepresented students in grades three through twelve since 2011. The goal of theorganization’s work is to create pathways for
received a stipend to assistASSURE-US leadership team members in conducting research projects that included: • Real-Time Object Detection using Artificial Intelligence • Self-driving Lego Robot using Artificial Intelligence • Hardware Accelerated Deep Neural Networks • High-Performance Computing using Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) • Study of Radio Frequency Energy Harvesting for IoT Devices • Design, Fabrication, and Analysis of Low-Cost Solar Powered Energy Harvesting Micro Air Vehicles using 3D Printing • Design, Fabrication, and Analysis of Low-Cost Customized Electric Skateboards • Data science projects using Jupyter Notebook The SURE took place in the labs associated with each discipline. The students were
receiving funding from NSF through SPARK and Texas State STEM Rising Stars. SPARK is a four years grant that looks to increase the recruitment and retention of female in engineering, computer science, and related fields by providing scholarships for low-income and talented students. Texas State STEM Rising Stars is a four years grant committed to increase the first and second year retention and graduation rates of students in STEM. Dr. Novoa is also the advisor of the Society of Women Engineers. She is committed to research on strategies to achieve gender equity and cultural inclusiveness in science and engineering.Dr. Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University - San Marcos Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Ph.D., is Assistant
, identity, and culture. Potential implications for practice, policy, andresearch are briefly summarized below in Table 2. Table 2: Servingness-Oriented Implications of Results Implications for Implications for Policy Implications for Research PracticeTheme 1: Self-Directed Programs should Educational policymakers Future research shouldLearning as a Prerequisite support differentiated should focus on examine mechanisms offor Mentees scaffolding of self- differentiation, support for students’ self- regulation, content abandoning a “one-size- directed learning
retention through activities, pro- grams, and events. Dr. Jones assumes a leadership role in the national engineering diversity and inclusion conversation regarding standards, benchmarks and best practices. She brings experience and proven track record of success in diversity and student development related work. Dr. Jones has held positions at Princeton University, California Institute of Technology, Occidental College, and California State Univer- sity, Long Beach. Dr. Jones’ professional experience is enhanced by her Doctorate in Higher Education Management from the University of Pennsylvania, combined with her research focus on experiences of underrepresented minority students in engineering disciplines.Prof. Helen
individual student and the institution. At the institutional level it is understoodas a mechanism that contributes to reducing attrition rates and enhancing recruitment plans butthere is a scarcity of empirical research related to PhD programs to understand this phenomenon.Contemporarily, Di Pierro [15] conceptualized doctoral mentoring as part of an institution’spragmatic retention plan to counter economic losses, potential loss in Carnegie classification, andvoids in research. Thus, mentoring should not be thought of as a disjointed obscure process, butone that is integrated and benchmarked as part of an institution’s best practices particularly forunderrepresented populations. For individual students mentoring often times is described as akey
sustain students’ attention [13]. Hernandez-de-Menendez et al. [13], argue thatactive learning leads to lower failure rates and promotes skills that engineers need to besuccessful in their professions such as teamwork, communication, and collaboration. However, although active learning can improve the experiences for students withinengineering, the impact of active learning on students of color and women are mixed [e.g., 14].Studies of the general college population have demonstrated positive effects of active learning onstudents’ self-confidence and persistence toward graduate school [15]. However, for somestudents, active learning practices such as volunteering to answer a question and being called onto answer a question in class can be
Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero has 15 years of international experience working in industry and academia. His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive pedagogical practices, industry-driven competency development in engineering, and understanding the barriers that Latinx and Native Americans have in engineering. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence fellow, a Diversity scholar, a Fulbright scholar and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society.Ms. Maia Greene-Havas, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Maia Greene-Havas
Scholars Program” Award # 1153281AbstractThe National Science Foundation awarded the University of Southern Maine with a grant forSTEM Opportunities for Academically Capable and Financially Needy Students entitled the“University of Southern Maine STEM Scholars Program,” Award # 1153281. At the completionof our fifth year, this poster presentation provides an opportunity to present data on the successof our S-STEM program, as well as share some of the best practices learned and applied. TheUSM STEM Scholars Bridge Program has been a model for blending the elements ofrecruitment, retention, and placement into an integrated, comprehensive but non-intrusiveprogram that promotes student success in transitioning from high schools and communitycolleges
not thefocus of most construction programs and are not discussed to a satisfactory extent in constructionclassrooms and laboratories, some students do not even have the chance to seriously consider thoseroles and even decide if they would prefer to work in those roles in the future. Unfamiliarity andmisconceptions about professional roles brings conflicts during practice and also increasesstudents’ doubts about their level of knowledge and capabilities [4]. Construction graduates havefound themselves working on transportation and infrastructure projects, instead of the typicalcommercial construction building projects that they are mostly prepared for through typicalconstruction programs. It is not uncommon to find students who have graduated
has been long and slow.While developing these learning analytics dashboards could be a relatively straightforwardproject for the Institutional Research office, an intentional process that engaged faculty as co-designers to help develop buy-in and to directly incorporate faculty perspectives was taken.Testing the dashboards troubleshoot technical issues and data definitions required multipleiterations. The dashboards currently are in draft stage and will require additional iterations oftesting before they are demonstrated to initial groups, such as the Inquiry in STEM Success FCand department chairs. Developing trust in the data is an important consideration. Introducingelements in the mini-activities during the college-wide meetings each
Philosophical History for EngineersAbstract Ethics education in the engineering curriculum is required by ABET. This paper presents anunconventional approach to meeting this requirement as surveyed and tested in the aerospaceengineering department of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, with theintention of having a lasting impact on engineering graduates throughout their working career.All professions have common codes of competence, integrity, and intended good will towardshumanity. Often these codes presume internal regulation and constraint to guard against humannature’s self-serving inclinations and proclivities. Here, in addition to relying on studentexposure to and knowledge of a particular
purposes. We pseudonymized student interview participants, instructor interviewparticipants, and CATME participants. Student interviewees received $10 gift cards for theirparticipation. We offered $25 gift cards to instructors in recognition of their time contributed tointerviews, but no one took us up on the offer. Students who were interviewed are identified byrace and gender here based on their self-identification.Author positionalities and rolesMasta, Dickerson, Ohland and Pawley constitute the project PI team. Margherio is the project’sexternal evaluator, and Grant is the graduate research assistant. The PI team conceived of theoriginal study motivation, focus, and general design, and acquired the funding. Masta applied forthe original IRB