foundation for entry into most STEM-related occupations, and interventions in earlyeducation are seen as a promising avenue to move girls towards careers in engineering.Compared to classroom teaching, afterschool programs are unique in their ability to offer moretime-flexible, hands-on activities that advance student-centered learning, which is crucial inSTEM education [2] - [4]. Linking Engineering to Life (LEL) is an afterschool, experientialengineering curriculum launched in the fall of 2020 by Vermont Afterschool, a statewidenonprofit dedicated to strengthening programs, empowering youth, and expanding access toafterschool and summer programs so that all Vermont youth are active, engaged, connected, andheard. LEL’s goal is to overcome barriers
Paper ID #40360Emerging Innovations and Global Challenges on Curriculum Design: CaseStudy of Teaching Security in Embedded System DesignDr. Mohammed Ferdjallah, Marshall University Dr. Mohammed Ferdjallah is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering at Marshall University. Dr. Mohammed Ferdjallah received his PhD degree in Electrical and Computer and MS degree in Biomedical Engineering from The University of Texas Austin. He also received his MD degree from the International University of the Health Sciences. He has a multidisci- plinary expertise in image & signal
engineering to design engineering. He has also functioned as an engineering technology faculty for three years at Zane State College in Zanesville, Ohio, where he developed and taught courses that included CAD, solid modeling, statics, strength of materials, machine design, and statistical process control. As director of the Multidisciplinary Capstone Program, he brings his experience from over 15 years mentoring over 150 capstone design teams to the cooperative effort of translating the research findings into concrete recommendations for teaching engineering design. He is currently active in curriculum development and education research focused on capstone design and student-centered learning.Lynn Hall, The Ohio State
mathematics.However, students may form inaccurate perceptions of the level of difficulty of complexengineering problems when they cannot see a clear link between a given class and its relevancein their future career [2]. It feels harder when there is a lack of appreciation for why thesecourses are included in the curriculum. If an engineering course helps students clearly see thepoint of learning, students are more likely to persist in completing the course.Laboratories are an integral component of the ABET-accredited engineering curricula andcourses. Laboratories provide students with the opportunity to learn by doing. This hands-onexperience helps students to develop a deeper understanding of engineering course content.Laboratories often require students
integratedcurriculum at Pittsburgh,” in Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting, November 16-21, 2008,Philadelphia, PA.[3] J.J. McCarthy, R.S. Parker, A.A. Abatan, and M. Besterfield-Sacre. “Building an EvaluationStrategy for an Integrated Curriculum in Chemical Engineering.” Advances in EngineeringEducation, 2(4):1-22, Summer, 2011.[4] J.J. McCarthy, and R.S. Parker. “Evaluation and Results for an Integrated Curriculum inChemical Engineering,” in Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual conference and Exposition,Vancouver, BC. 10.18260/1-2-17931.[5] M. J. Baird, and S. L. Shannon. “Unit Operations Lab Bazaar: incorporation of LaboratoryExperiences in Six Integrated Pillar Courses,” in Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC
;M University’s NUA2NCED Laboratory. His research focuses on hydrofoil boat design and developing unconventional educational applications for STEM students. Zach’s aerospace passions include logistic support, system integration, and aerospace business development. He has applied these interests as a ConOps Develop- ment intern with Fulcrum Engineering, LLC as well as a Integrated Logistics Support Management intern with Lockheed Martin. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Dissolving Interdisciplinary Barriers in STEM Curriculum Through Unconventional Hydrofoil Boat Educational Lab at the College Undergraduate LevelAbstractAs educational
,designprojects, and individual development. Accordingly, engineering curriculum is changing from disparatecourses reform and update to integrated curriculum design, which is facilitating collaboration acrossmajors,disciplines,anddepartmentsinconcertwithstudents’technicalandnontechnicalskillstoidentifyanddesigninnovativesolutionstosocietalproblemsandchallenges.2.2.RecentengineeringeducationinitiativesinChinaSignificantmilestonesofengineeringeducationinChinaoverthepasttwodecadesincludelaunchingthePlanforEducatingandTrainingOutstandingEngineers(PETOT)since2010,becomingsignatorymemberoftheWashingtonAccordin2016,theNEEinitiativewhichisconsideredasupgradedversionofPETOTin 2017, the SFT initiative and College of Modern Industry (CMI) initiative in 2021, and
/s11948-005-0006-3.[6] N. A. Andrade and D. Tomblin, “Engineering and Sustainability: The Challenge of Integrating Social and Ethical Issues into a Technical Course,” 2018.[7] A. Benham et al., “Developing and Implementing an Aerospace Macroethics Lesson in a Required Sophomore Course,” in 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2021, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637172.[8] A. Gupta, “A Practitioner Account of Integrating Macro-ethics Discussion in an Engineering Design Class,” Jul. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2–27498.[9] B. Jimerson, E. Park, V. Lohani, and S. Culver, “Enhancing Engineering Ethics Curriculum by Analyzing Students’ Perception,” Jun. 2013, p. 23.530.1-23.530.15. doi: 10.18260/1-2–19544.[10] Palmer
Engineering Education, 2023 Identifying curriculum factors that facilitate lifelong learning in alumni career trajectories: Stage 2 of a sequential mixed-methods studyAbstractThis research paper presents results from the second stage of a sequential mixed-methods studyexploring the impact of undergraduate curriculum on lifelong learning orientations in the contextof varying alumni career trajectories. Lifelong learning mindsets and skillsets are essential forgraduates of engineering programs as they grapple with an array of sociotechnical challenges andunpredictable career paths.Previously, we used interview findings, in combination with a literature review, to develop aconceptual framework and alumni survey that address several related
. Engineeringeducation, especially in higher education, creates similar big data for both faculty and studentsrelated to learning experiences. From clicks to page and video view times, points can be awardedfor engagement or left as an opportunity for student self-evaluation. The digital platform ofinterest here is the interactive textbook with integrated online homework. While these tools aremore common in math and introductory science courses, interactive textbooks for engineeringcourses are becoming more widely available [1-5].Historically, engineering textbooks have been the antithesis of active learning with static text thatis updated about once per decade. However, interactive textbooks put onus on students tocomplete participation clicks, view animations
Paper ID #37979Understanding Expert Perceptions of PBL Integration in IntroductoryAerospace Engineering Courses: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups withPBL and Aerospace Engineering InstructorsDr. Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Andrew Olewnik is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at the Univer- sity at Buffalo. His research includes undergraduate engineering education with focus on engineering design, problem-based learning, co-curricular involvement and its impact on professional formation, and the role of reflection practices in supporting engineering
strongfoundational skills in traditional power systems topics, with added skills in integration ofrenewable and distributed resources and in energy data analytics. In this paper, we present the process and initial outcomes of a collaborative two-institutionproject aimed at updating the undergraduate (UG) power engineering curriculum at bothinstitutions. The added educational modules focus on electric power distribution systems,renewable energy systems, and energy data analytics. In addition to new lecture modules, thecurriculum update revolves around active and situative learning methodologies, in an effort to helpstudents place topics into context and equip them to grasp effects of the emerging changes andtechnologies. The paper is organized as
, Satisfaction (ARCS) model of motivation to design an Internet-of-Thingsthemed curriculum for CS students in grades 9-12. The ARCS framework is used as aconceptual framework to unpack high school students’ motivational influences inengineering/computer science project-based learning via a series of focus groups. Using theinsights obtained from First and Second cycle coding based qualitative analysis, IoT-basedCS curricular modules that align with Grades 9-12 Computer Science Teachers Association(CSTA) standards were developed. The curricular design centered around creating learner-focused scaffolding in project-based learning environments, improving the relevance of theclassroom content with the real-world context that students have experiences in or
Paper ID #39777BSc Maritime Technology Curriculum Revision: What Will the Future NavalArchitect Look Like?Dr. Jeroen Pruyn, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Jeroen Pruyn is an assistant professor in Maritime Operations and Management (MOM) at Delft Uni- versity of Technology in the Netherlands. The field of MOM-bridges the gap between economics and engineering with a focus on the maritime sector. He currently acts as Director of Studies for the Bache- lor of Marine Technology at TU Delft and works on improving knowledge retention and commitment of students. ©American Society for
, Computer Science is drastic [3]. Furthermore, girls andwomen did not retain their STEM majors [1], [4]. The effort of promoting STEM and roboticseducation should start with early childhood education (ECE) for many reasons: reducingnegative gender stereotypes [5], encouraging women and other marginalized groups'participation in STEM, achieving social justice purposes [6], etc. In this paper, we examinepreservice teachers' perception of STEM and robotics integration in ECE. The authors’epistemological, theoretical, and methodological foundation of this research was informed by theCritical Feminism. Literature ReviewCritical Feminist TheoryCritical Feminism is an ever-evolving and malleable theoretical framework
“…specific instructional practices that supportstudents’ integration of engineering with concepts and practices from other STEM subjects,” aspressing issues driving professional development [1]. However, since curriculum innovationsthat work in some educational settings may not work in others [3], educators need guidance onhow to balance innovation and implementation that can be sustained and maintained throughteacher-informed classroom practices, especially when meeting the needs of diverse learners.Understanding how and why innovations in engineering education work is necessary forreplicating success across classrooms and school districts.Middle school engineering continues to be an important area of research. With growing evidenceof positive
, Simulation, Qual- ity, Six Sigma, Operations Research, Simulation, and Application of System Thinking. For more than 25 years, he has given training courses in different companies and training courses for teachers in topics related to statistics and Six Sigma methodology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Integrating companies and higher education in the teaching-learning process of Lean Thinking using Challenge-based LearningAbstractManufacturing companies constantly search for graduates who know more about LeanManufacturing to reduce waste and improve productivity. This paper presents a modelthat integrates teaching Lean Thinking in higher education within an organization’s fa-cility
Paper ID #38680Infusing Data Science into Mechanical Engineering Curriculum withCourse-Specific Machine Learning ModulesProf. Yuhao Xu, Prairie View A&M University Yuhao Xu received a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Cornell University in 2017. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Prairie View A and M University. He was previously employed by ASML-HMI North America Inc., where he worked on the industrial ap- plications of focused ion beams. His current research includes experiments on high-pressure combustion of petroleum-based liquid fuels and bio-derived fuels
existing curriculum constraints. In particular, teachers found that the NextGeneration Science Standards [1] practice of “computational thinking” was the best lens fordeveloping their aligned big data instruction. After exploring a taxonomy of computationalthinking in mathematics and science [2], the teachers collectively eventually settled on a core setof four computational thinking skills [3] most likely to be productive for their teaching focus;algorithmic thinking, decomposition, abstraction, and pattern recognition. This paper reports onthe variety of connections teachers developed with the practice of computational thinking, fromdata clustering as an active practice for simulating early generation of the periodic table in achemistry class
training courses aboard acombination of our 500-foot diesel training ship, the Golden Bear (Sea Training I and III), and a“Commercial Cruise,” aboard a commercial sea-going vessel (Sea Training II). The second halfof the sea service requirement is met over the cadet’s four-year tenure at CSUM by an aggregateof standing regular engineering “watches” aboard our training ship’s fully functional engineroom and time accrued in USCG approved courses.Integration of Assessments into CurriculumTo ensure that our engineering graduates meet STCW compliance to obtain a USCG engineerslicense they must meet all the STCW KUP based assessments and earn the required sea serviceaboard ship. The training we have integrated into our curriculum to ensure STCW
University of Memphis Dr. Stephanie Ivey is the Associate Dean for Research with the Herff College of Engineering and a Professor with the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Memphis. She directs the U of Mˆa C™s Southeast Transportation Workforce Center and thDr. Craig O. Stewart, University of Memphis Craig O. Stewart (PhD, Carnegie Mellon University) is an associate professor of communication at the University of Memphis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Implementing the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Model at a Public Urban Research University in the Southeastern United StatesUnderproduction, low retention, and lack of diversity in STEM disciplines
, my engineering freshmen are learning MATLAB in their second semester. So knowing how to transfer these activities to MATLAB would have been immensely useful.” After participating in the “Getting more Pololu “I am currently teaching an online workshop, what are your robots” (6); robotics course using CoderZ plans for integrating or “Review and develop the curriculum for 3rd and 4th revising mechatronics and existing course
DescriptionsThe research in this paper is an extension of efforts to develop an introductory civil andenvironmental engineering (CEE) course as described by Henschen [13]. Throughout recentyears, the course (referred to as CEE 190) has been overhauled from a one-credit seminar-basedcourse to a four-credit project-based course.The changes to the course were motivated by department-wide efforts to incorporate curriculumrevisions that better prepare engineering students for graduation and professional practice. Fiveskills were identified to be taught and reinforced at each curriculum level, as demonstrated byFigure 1. Figure 1. Skills to be taught and reinforced at each curriculum level [13].The purpose of CEE 190 is not only to introduce
networksoperate through an ongoing automation of traditional manufacturing and industrial practices,using modern smart technology, large scale machine-to-machine (M2M) communication, and theInternet of Things (IoT) applications to enable many supportive and essential industrialfunctions. This steady technology integration/implementation into industrial environmentsresults in increasing automation, improving timely communications and self-monitoring, andincreasing the use of smart machines that can analyze and diagnose process issues without theneed for human intervention [2].More recently, the term “Industrial Internet of Things or IIoT” has been also employed toindicate an extension of uses of the Internet of Things to other industrial applications and
Paper ID #39300The Effects of a Spatial Thinking Curriculum on Low-Income SophomoreSummer ScholarsDr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University.Ms. Lauren Fogg, Louisiana Tech University Lauren Fogg is a 3rd-year Ph.D. student in Engineering with a concentration in Engineering Education at Louisiana Tech University. She has a Bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering. Her research interests are diversity, gender equity
making sure every student graduate and the course curriculum and all that stuff.Drawing from our findings, EIF are not just restricted to their primary duty of teaching, they arealso involved in multiple other roles across the leadership spectrum in engineering education.One of the EIF that typifies this is Victor. Victor is the associate department chair; as such, heenumerates the number of leadership roles he takes on in his department. I'm the associate chair in the department, I am in charge of the undergraduate curriculum. I support several of the tasks such as scheduling, managing personnel, laboratories. Also, I am, in part of academics, I'm an ABET accredited program evaluator. So, during the last cycle, I
(big data), and connecting to the Internet to allow for theexchange of data. As smart products become ubiquitous, they provide enormous opportunities forscientists and engineers to invent new products and build interconnected systems of vast scale. Asa result, the STEM workforce demands are shifting rapidly. Mechanical engineers will play asignificant role in innovating and designing smart products and manufacturing systems of theIndustry 4.0 revolution. However, the current mechanical engineering curriculum has not keptpace. In this paper, we present an overview of a new curriculum along with the design of aninexpensive smart flowerpot device that was used as an instructional tool throughout thecurriculum. We provide details about how two
to develop an inclusive curriculum and classroom. The students of color in these classrooms also tend to do better academically in the field, in comparison to their peers who do not have such an opportunity to learn in this manner. Thus, it is imperative to examine how professional development experiences can be transformative learning experiences for STEM faculty, and what viewpoints, if any, these faculty bring into their learning of topics related to access, diversity, equity, and inclusion for students of color. With the goal of further uncovering the ways in which inclusive teaching and learning practices can become an integral part of STEM classrooms, this paper presentation provides a framework for
take advantage of games tosignificantly improve students’ comprehension in the process of learning knowledge 5 whileincreasing their focus retention. Moreover, by simulating real-world biological scenarios, studentscan learn while experiencing a high level of engagement.Consistency with established curriculaIn addition to innovative systems, we will not abandon valuable traditional educational methods.We will therefore also ensure that our system is in line with the principles of basic education. Thisis because only by integrating the learning platform with the established curriculum can weensure a balanced and comprehensive educational experience. To this end, we will conductnumerous workshops with students and teachers to evaluate and
projects as he focused on toy design and theirindustrial design aspects. Even with these efforts, the authors saw a lack in incorporatingentrepreneurial mindset (EM) into the instructor’s curriculum along with art concepts. In addition,the instructor always wanted introduce bio-inspired design through open-ended design anddevelopment exercises in his “Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering” course. Thus, an effortto incorporate EM, art, and bio-inspired design via a semester-long product development projectwas envisioned within a collaborative and interactive environment facilitated by a PurdueUniversity Polytechnic faculty member with support from the KEEN Institute. The lessons learnedfrom the first design and development cycle will be used