be shared. In summary, this accessible framework of invited speaker seminarsfollowed by student-facilitated discussions offers an inexpensive yet highly impactful method toenable engineering graduate students to develop as more aware, responsible, and inclusiveleaders within our field.IntroductionIn the summer of 2020, academic communities across the United States grappled with their rolesin perpetuating power structures that exclude underrepresented groups from science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM), resulting in the #ShutDownSTEM and#ShutDownAcademia movements [1], [2]. A salient feature of academia as a power structure isits role in gatekeeping the professional positions typically afforded the ability to shape
features in the product, as well as a storyline of the development process withsome enabling and challenging factors. The cases were all similar in length, roughly three pageslong, and included pictures from the project and of the product.2.2 Data collection and analysisThe data used in this study was collected from 115 student responses to an assignment wherethey were given an individual task to “reflect on three out of the six PESTEL dimensions'' oftheir chosen case. The students had been given the task after being introduced to the PESTELdimentions in class. They were requested to make at least two justified connections perdimension. Students could freely choose which three dimensions they wished to reflect on.Table 1. An example of the
practices in videodevelopment including technology and lessons learned with the broader engineering educationcommunity.IntroductionAs we enter the third year of the Pandemic, educators and academic leaders across the nation areseriously considering what the future landscape of higher education will look like. Manytechnology-enabled teaching strategies, including asynchronous video modules, will stay andgain wider use even after the institutions return to in-person instruction [1]. Michael Noetel at el.reported their systematic study on the effect of video on learning in higher education andconcluded that video can achieve the same (and sometimes better) learning outcomes comparedto other instructional methods [2]. Various types of video modules
assess these decisions.The researcher chooses an authentic context and structures the problem so that the solver is askedto make a relevant subset of the 29 decisions to solve the problem. The basic components of theframework are 1) provide an authentic problem context, 2) ask a series of questions that requiretest-takers to make decisions about problem definition and planning how to solve, 3) providemore information, 4) ask a series of questions that require decisions about interpretinginformation and drawing conclusions, and 5) have test-takers choose and reflect on their solution.One of the authors has previously developed such an assessment in chemical process design 28 .One important feature of these assessments is that students are not
) spatial mapping of urbanizationcharacteristics.The pedagogical assessment of these projects derive from the final reports/assignments for each course,as well as end-of-semester surveys that evaluate the students’ engagement with the project, includinghow they view their role within this broader project.IntroductionProject based learning (PBL) is a type of experiential learning in which students are presented with acomplex problem(s) that could have multiple feasible solutions and are tasked with developing a plan orproduct that addresses that problem. A lot of emphasis has recently been focused on integrating PBLexperiences into the undergraduate curriculum, particularly with an interdisciplinary component [1 – 3].Incorporating PBL into courses
educate more well-trained cybersecurity professionals forprotecting the Nation’s critical infrastructure. An effective cybersecurity professional shouldpossess technical knowledge and skills to identify weaknesses in an organization's informationinfrastructure and implement adequate preventive measures. For example, the responsibilities ofan information security analyst include security monitoring and analysis, incident response,intrusion prevention, and penetration testing. According to an estimate from the U.S. Bureau ofLabor, the employment of information security analysts is projected to grow 31 percent from2019 to 2029 - a growth rate much faster than the average for all occupations [1]. Hence, it hasbecome an urgent task to educate more
to explore various career paths to access to professional networks that would haveotherwise been unattainable. In particular, minoritized students gain critical mastery experiencesthrough engineering internships, which then increases their engineering self-efficacy andsignificantly guides their future engineering career decisions [1]–[3]. However, internshipexperiences are not equally accessed by all undergraduate engineering students [4], as it is firmlyestablished that minoritized students may encounter institutional barriers to career resources andbe stymied in their professional careers by structural inequities, leading to lower senses ofbelonging and uncertain professional identities [5]–[7]. In particular, within engineering,first
classroom. (Waldorf, 2016)At UNIVERSITY, the incorporation of GD&T into the classroom began with a recommendationfrom the UNIVERSITY’s industrial advisory board in addition to interviews with severalcompanies both locally and nationally. The recommendations stemmed from students not havingadequate GD&T and machine shop skills for both designing and manufacturing products upongraduation. Based on these recommendations, UNIVERSITY redesigned a traditional fieldsession course into a successful 1) online and 2) ‘hands-on’ scaffolded approach to teachingGD&T and machine shop skills to engineering students with the goal of translating theseteaching modules into modules for the current workforce development.Throughout the past year, over 23
technological gap, the University of Southern Maine has developed a CubeSatdesign competition targeting grade 6-8 and 9-12 students to engage participants in collaborativeSTEM learning. In this program, teams of 1-15 students from school districts across Mainecreate a unique science or technology demonstration mission and use the engineering designprocess to design and build a CubeSat meeting the mission requirements under cost, performanceand time constraints. Teams are judged on their mission success and ability to communicateresults to a broad audience. Teams are provided learning workshops in the design process,computer-aided design, computer programming and fundamental science during the competition.Methodologies, outcomes and assessment tools are
. Department of Education. Thesurvey focuses on nine major categories: applied academic skills, critical thinking skills,interpersonal skills, personal skills, resource management skills, information use skills,communication skills, system thinking skills, and technology use skills. ECE professionalengineers were asked to rank skills on a 1-5 Likert scale where “one” is not important and “five”is vital. They also were asked to rate the degree of preparedness upon graduation for the sameskills on a 1-5 Likert scale.This paper highlights the perspectives of 45 ECE professionals regarding the required skills ECEgraduates should possess upon graduation and how vital these skills are. The results of the surveyhighlight the gap between the level of
, math education, musicology, chemical/biomolecular engineering,material science, soil science, and theater) developed research communication outputs for thepublic by creating: 1) an individual video presenting their research through the lens of theirdiscipline alone; and 2) a convergent video where they collaboratively discussed their researchwith others in their cohort around a common theme, integrating all of their disciplinary lenses.Using a panel of respondents (n = 2,938) procured through Qualtrics, and purposefully recruitedto create a diverse sample in age and racial/ethnic background, the research team randomlyassigned respondents to watch one of three video treatments: one individual video, multipleindividual videos, or a convergent
(CGIW) wasadministered to measure students’ shift in: 1) Innovation Self-Efficacy, 2) Innovation Interests,and 3) Innovative Work. The results generated from this survey showed the students’ increase ininnovation self-efficacy as a result of the design of K-12 STEM projects. The findings will haveimplications for assisting engineering educators to adopt futuristic designs into their engineeringcurricula, understand how to encourage innovation self-efficacy in students for their futurecareers, and understand how student projects focused on teaching promote innovation self-efficacy.Keywords: Innovation Self-Efficacy, K-12 STEM projects, environmental engineering,augmented realityIntroductionEducation for innovation in engineering is a central
through the experiences of three of the faculty teaching the course, a TAwho has been grading student deliverables for several semesters, and an educational practicespecialist assisting with the course. The paper also discusses practical course challenges, andhow our understanding of the AAC&U rubrics and their use has challenged and enriched ourapproach. Our paper also discusses the learning outcomes possible for integrating writingassignments into a quantitative course. These include 1) clarifying the role of this vital core topicin students' professional futures, 2) developing student competencies in reading datarepresentations, 3) learning to read and interpret problem statements to devise quantitativestrategies for addressing questions
inspection analysis is employed to help students appreciate the merits andlimitations of each approach. In-class active learning techniques are used to illustrate implicationsof device non-idealities. The change in curriculum also necessitated the creation of newhomework assignments and exams. This paper will present the changes in curriculum, illustrationof teaching methodology using example topics, discussion on student assessment, and studentperception of the course. It will be shown the material covered is more advanced in nature and atthe same time student perception of the course has remained consistent.1 IntroductionDuring the Spring 2015 and Spring 2016 semesters, the junior level Electronic Circuits course(ECE 342) at University of
solving program [1]. Sincethe development of the McMaster program, engineering educators have continued to exploredifferent methods to employ to both make their teaching more effective and facilitate studentlearning. There are many different approaches and models to aid educators [1]-[5]. This studyidentifies problem-solving strategies that students proposed to change in future problem-solving,after completion of problem-solving review activities in a course that prepared them for theFundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam. This research was carried out by qualitatively codingstudent replies to weekly survey questions asking them if and how they would change theirstrategies for the next week and complementing those data with Likert-type responses
science andmathematics courses, thereby creating a gap in student’s preparation for lab work. Graduatingengineering students, not having the industry needed hands-on training in lab work, negativelyimpacted many companies. Eventually, that resulted 4-year programs called applied engineeringor engineering technology [1]. Even though 4-year programs in engineering technology areknown to have been around for more than 50 years, there is a lack of research in the engineeringeducation literature on engineering technology [2]. To that issue, we add the student retentionproblem and the need for more research about the factors that play a role in making programssuccessful at retaining and graduating more students.The problem of student retention in
Faculty Fellows Program1. Introduction Technical communication skills are highly valued in engineering[1]. Practicing engineersspend a large portion of work time writing or speaking; however, feedback from industryindicates a lack of communication skills in many engineering graduates[2]. To produceengineering graduates with the communication skills necessary to be successful in the modernworkforce, engineering curriculums need to improve how communication skills are taught. Themovement towards more effective teaching of communication skills to engineers has resulted inopportunity for collaboration with communication experts[3, 4] and the launching of WritingAcross the Curriculum (WAC) or Writing in the Disciplines (WID) programs[5-7]. One
Paper ID #36937Evaluation of Student Preparedness for Returning to In-Person Laboratory CoursesChristina Phillips Ms. Christina Phillips, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Christina Phillips is passionate about teaching and learning STEM content and is an adjunct professor at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Ave, Lowell, MA 01854; Christina_Phillips@uml.eduDohn Bowden Mr. Dohn A. Bowden, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Dohn Bowden is a doctoral student in Research and Evaluation in Education in the College of Education and is the Sr. Electrical Engineering Lab Manager at University of
Engineers are expected to solve grand challenges by applying math and science skills, butmost undergraduate curricula teach these technical skills in isolation, without connecting them tothe challenges facing society today. Research has shown that providing an applied sociotechnicalcontext within the engineering disciplines can enhance learning [1], [2], [3] and increasestudents’ satisfaction and interest - especially among marginalized groups in engineering [3].Equations, free body diagrams, and textbook homework assignments dominate typical in-classengineering discussion, so students can lose sight of their field’s significance. This disconnectcan make it harder for students to understand the social responsibility that comes withengineering
becoupled and used as a compliment when teaching the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) to broadenparticipation within the engineering disciplines. The guiding research question was as follows:How does the entrepreneurial mindset, bio-inspired design, and STEAM-integrated engineeringinstruction support engineering educator curriculum development? The data collectioninstrument was in the form of a workshop “exit ticket” which asked participants to respond toopen-ended questions and photovoice reflections. The preliminary findings highlighted four keythemes: (1) multiple perspectives, (2) intersectionality focus of arts, (3) benefits of learning thatgo beyond this PD, and (4) desire to learn more. These findings, obtained from participants at thebeginning
sharing our “tricks of the trade,” wehope to empower developing researchers to explore the impacts of informal learning in STEM.IntroductionIn response to numerous calls for improved STEM preparation at all levels in the United States(e.g., [1]–[3]), there has been a renewed focus on STEM education, particularly at the primaryand secondary education levels. This includes in-school opportunities, such as the introduction ofthe Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) [4], which seek to integrate engineering andtechnology into science curricula at all levels, along with a range of informal STEM experiences[5]. With this interest has come an increased research focus in the same area. For example, in aliterature review centered on pre-college
Institute (E2SI) heldannually by the College of Engineering at Villanova University. It provides an overview of theM3, which evolved from our more traditional mentor model. M3 was developed in the Spring of2021 through collaboration between the Engineering Entrepreneurship faculty (Faculty) in theCollege of Engineering and a new student-run organization, the E2SI Alumni MentorshipNetwork (Alumni Network).Mentoring incorporates the transfer of knowledge, skills, and ability through shared experience.The mentorship relationship serves to develop and strengthen self-confidence and entrepreneurialself-efficacy in the mentee [1]. Entrepreneurial mentors impact a wide range of behavioral andeconomic outcomes in a new venture, including entrepreneurial
Differential Chaotic Signals Electronics Junior Level Equations and Systems Feeedback Communications Machine Learning Senior Level Systems and Radar Figure 1. Proposed Electrical Engineering curriculum map.TheorySince the response of second-order linear systems are characterized by oscillation, their study isperfectly carried out using eigenvalue, Laplace and Fourier analysis. The archetypical example isthe harmonic oscillator described by a second-order ordinary differential equation. A dissipationterm is included to enable a discussion of stability. When a sinusoidal
on the homework assignmentsthat a significant fraction of the students failed to use modular techniques to solve the quadraticequations that were assigned and it was suspected that many of those that did were unsure ofwhy they needed to employ them. After constructing quadratic equations that took advantage ofthe peculiar properties of modular arithmetic the students were unable to use real arithmetictechniques and had to resort to modular methods thus reinforcing the need to use those methodsto solve the modular equations.IntroductionModular arithmetic is a staple of modern cryptography[1][4]. While Discrete Mathematics is aprerequisite for the Introduction to Cryptography course at the USCGA, students still struggle toappreciate the
principles are used in design projects to cultivate an empatheticunderstanding of stakeholders’ needs. A common ethnographic research practice issemi-structured, direct-dialogue interviews between design team members and stakeholders ofthe project. Students who conduct interviews for design research projects are often “novices,”with little or no prior experience in ethnographic research. Interviewers who have been trained ininterviewing have been shown to produce more accurate and in depth information [1]. This studyposes the question: How might we verify that novices have baseline competency for conductingethnographic design interviews before engaging in interviews for the design project?Ethnographic research in design differs from other user
-area of their engineering discipline. However, these forms of assessment position theinstructor as the sole evaluator of proficiency, which leaves little space for students to engage inassessing their own learning [1]. Yet, to prepare for engineering practice and the lifelonglearning that necessarily accompanies it, students need to develop strategies to self-evaluate thequality of their knowledge and skills [2]. Students could begin to do so during theirundergraduate years. Filling the gap that exams leave behind, “sustainable assessment” methodsin undergraduate courses can equip students with these strategies for self-evaluation of theirengineering competencies [3]. ePortfolios can facilitate sustainable assessment by encouragingstudents to
. Results will be available for the presentation at the time of theconference. While a single course may not have wide ranging changes across the population, it isexpected that aspects of the program will show impact and these will be explored.Keywords: Community-engagement, empathy, designIntroductionTo design effectively, engineers need to understand their diverse stakeholders to design conceptsand products that are both innovative and aligned with actual user needs and desires. Moreover,this increased understanding can support students’ creative and innovation capacities [1]. Withincreased global competition and the need to innovate, there is a growing need for moreempathic engineers and an increasing need for more research in the area to
education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development Initiatives-Clemson, 2) Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the College of Engineering, Computing and Applied Sciences-Clemson, 3) Interim Director of Student Services-Oklahoma State University, 4) Coordinator of the Women in Engineering Program-Oklahoma State University, and 5) Director of the Oklahoma State University Measurement and Control Engineering Center-Oklahoma State University. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Exploring Transfer Student’s
in an interdisciplinary process ofeffectively creating and implementing OER. Librarians have the knowledge and skills to workwith faculty to meet the needs of individual learners by working as co-designers in the use andmodification of existing OER and the creation of new OER [1]. They are also useful guides onOER since many faculty members are unaware of these resources [2]. Previous work hadexpressed the need to explore the use of OER in engineering libraries [3]. The work we share inthis paper involves a grant supporting the creation of OER in engineering led by an academiclibrarian. The paper discusses our ongoing design-based research focused on ourinterdisciplinary, multi-institutional collaborative OER development grant, funded by the