laboratories, classrooms, and their broader departments. Yet, graduatestudents broadly, as well as graduate WOC more specifically, rarely described mental healthwith their STEM graduate advisors (Mousavi et al., 2018; Wilkins-Yel et al., 2022; Wilkins-Yelet al., 2023). To date, there is a dearth in research examining how systemic agents, such asSTEM graduate advisors, actively support graduate Women of Color’s mental health. Extensive research documents the harmful and toxic ways in which graduate advisorsnegatively affect Black and Latinx graduate students. However, there have been fewer attemptsto highlight how graduate advisors can positively support graduate students, especially Black andLatinx graduate women in STEM. Understanding the
, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.proquest.com/docview/2051258067/abstract/CB7CF9CB623D477APQ/1[27] S. B. Meade, “Identifying Evidence Based Transition Strategies and the Barriers to EffectiveTransition Planning for Students with Learning Disabilities,” Ed.D., Northcentral University,United States -- Arizona. Accessed: Sep. 26, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://www.proquest.com/docview/1885095263/abstract/36A04BED8DBD4B12PQ/1[28] H. Jeannis, J. Joseph, M. Goldberg, K. Seelman, M. Schmeler, and R. A. Cooper, “Full-participation of students with physical disabilities in science and engineering laboratories,”Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 186–193, Feb. 2018, doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1300348.[29] J. C
exam. However, statistically significant interactions in our complexmodel might indicate that the escape room exercise enhanced prior laboratory work recollection,something that should be explored in future research with a broader sample.While there is no statistical significance that can be seen in the students’ final exam grades, thereis still value in executing the escape room as a course review exercise, which is demonstratedthrough student feedback. Looking at the word clouds shown in Figure 5, multiple studentsmentioned team aspects. 80% of students who participated in the escape room either agreed orstrongly agreed that the escape room required teamwork to be completed. ABET’s 5th studentoutcome states that students should “have the
saltwater estuarine system that is a defining feature of our region economically, sociallyand culturally. Traditional and innovative sensor-based water quality monitoring techniques were bothdiscussed and students were provided with links to additional resources, such as relevant local agency and 4organization websites, to help launch their independent exploration of the technical literature on the topic.In addition, students engaged in a hands-on activity, exploring the use of a low-cost, simple conductivity,temperature and depth (CTD) sensor node in a laboratory setting to provide a bridge between theory andtheir independent design
Year Engineering Experience committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Merrimack College Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is the new founding Associate Dean of the School of Engineering and Computational Sciences at Merrimack College (MA). Previously, she spent 13 years at the University of New Haven (CT) where her last role included four years as Assistant
] Weinthal, C. P. (2018). Remote Labs: A Method to Implement a Portable FAU Hack-a-Thon? Logic Design Laboratory Infrastructure and to Provide Access to Mod- • Poor ern Test Equipment (Master’s Thesis, Florida Atlantic University). • Fair [9] Weinthal, C.P., Larrondo-Petrie, M.M., Zapata Rivera, L.F., (2017, July). Evolution, Design and Implementation of a Modular Portable • Good Lab Kit for Logic Design. LACCEI 2017. Retrieved from URL
, inquiry-driven techniques that promote curiosity and involvestudents as active participants in the learning process have been advocated in recent times [8],[9], [10], [11].Experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP), which combines traditional coursework with flexible, non-complex, hands-on activities and experiments, is one pedagogical strategy that induces aparadigm shift in learning whether in classrooms or laboratories, as well as educationaloutcomes. [12] define ECP as a practical, learner-centered teaching approach that uses affordableand portable devices to demonstrate STEM concepts. By giving learners’ the chance to engagedirectly with engineering phenomena, build knowledge via first-hand experience, and connecttheory to practice, these immersive
Academic OutcomesAt its core, mindfulness is a practice that involves enhancing awareness of the present moment,which can significantly improve skills necessary for successful academic outcomes such assustained focus, increased open-mindedness and innovation, and time management. Sustainedfocus is crucial for engineering students who must master complex concepts and problem-solving skills. Mindfulness practices help train the mind to resist distractions and redirectattention to the task [30]. By regularly engaging in mindfulness practices, engineering studentscan develop the mental discipline to stay focused during lectures, laboratory work, and studysessions. In addition to improving concentration, mindfulness promotes a non-judgmental andopen
faculty, operate assupervisors, model collaboration, and provide experiences that influence undergraduate students’academic trajectories and career outlook [2], [3], [4], [5].Unlike other forms of mentoring, graduate student mentoring often lacks guidance or formaltraining [6], [7], [8]. Despite this, however, the impact of graduate student mentoring is criticalto their mentees' future academic and career trajectories [4], [9]. Much of the research literaturehas reasoned that two main goals of effective graduate student mentoring in engineeringeducation are guiding undergraduates in technical research and laboratory techniques andproviding mentees with social support [3], [9], [10]. These goals hold true for graduate studentsand postdoctoral
consists of various constructs, this paper only reports peer learning and collaborationitems.Module DesignFigure 2 shows the well-developed modulus structure and how the Experimental CentricPedagogy was deployed. This has been given a detailed explanation by Fibrined et al [19].Figure 2: ECP Instructional module design [19].CEGR 338 introduces students to the planning and design of elements of water treatment plantsand elements of wastewater treatment plants, and the design of sewers and water distributionsystem hydraulics. The ECP laboratory experiment applies the knowledge of general chemistryto sanitary chemical analyses, which include pH measurements and total dissolved solids.Hands-on Activity during Module ImplementationThe pH
science.Stacie Pisano, University of Virginia After receiving a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University, Stacie Pisano worked as an Electrical Engineer and Technical Manager at AT&T and Lucent Technologies Bell Laboratories for 16 years, designing and developing telecommunications equipment. She has been teaching at University of Virginia since 2002, and is currently the Director of the Center for Applied Math.Jennifer Felder Marley, University of Virginia Jennifer Marley is an Associate Professor of Applied Mathematics at the University of Virginia. She received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from North Carolina State University and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
do not explicitly includestandards for measurement processes within data collection. Moreover, “measurement is oftenconceived as a mundane activity, and in school it typically arrives pre-formed” [3, p. 723],reducing opportunities for students to confront real situations involving measurement processes.Particularly, first-year engineering students face limited opportunities to encounter real-worldsituations because they are often perceived to have limited experience with the nature ofengineering work [4]. The way in which STEM fields are taught is relevant and they must go“beyond traditional lecture and laboratory instruction, by incorporating rich integrated STEMlearning opportunities” [5, p. 10]. Therefore, it is imperative to explore how
the mechanics concepts. Another set of feedback was provided to students aftersubmitting the final project. In Spring 2023, one of the instructors (a tenure-track facultymember) offered a new research track that enabled students to visit the structural laboratory totest and analyze samples of materials under different loadings. Approximately 8.5% of studentsparticipated in the research track. Figure 2 shows a sample of projects from creative, analytical,and research tracks. (a) (b) (c) Figure 2. Students’ strength-based projects in a) Creative track, wooden built-up beam, b)Analytical track, modeling the ear pursing as discontinuous plate under axial loading c) Research
Scholarship (CES) or Community Engaged Research (CER). Ultimately, high qualityCE can span all of the traditional faculty activities of teaching, research, and service. While thisis a win-win in terms of beneficial impacts, it can also pose challenges in the faculty promotionand tenure process where academia traditionally compartmentalizes these activities and research-intensive institutions place outsized weight on the importance of research. In STEM fields,fundamental research (including laboratory experiments and numerical modeling) is oftenviewed as more scholarly than applied research. CES/CER is at risk of being devalued undertraditional academic standards [5-6] given its dual purpose of real-world benefits forcommunities.CES is increasingly
slope, reflecting lowest variation. This isconsistent with the smaller error bars seen in Figure 9, suggesting that the 0° print orientationproduces more predictable and consistent failure results. In contrast, the shallow slopes observedfor the 45° and 90° print orientations indicate greater variability in the failure loads for theseorientations, making them less predictable under applied tensile load.Based on this log-normal statistical analysis, it is crucial to note the important implication inlarge-scale manufacturing using 3D-printing. Although the sample size in a laboratory settingcan be very limited, typically about 20 in our case, the strength at very low percentile (such as inthe parts-per-million, or ppm, level) can be projected
test apparatus for an engineering laboratory course," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 2024.[18] T. M. Carrigan and B. A. Brooks, "Q: How Will We Achieve 20% by 2020? A: Men in Nursing," Nurse Leader, pp. 115-119, 2016.
gender composition impact student experiences in a project-based first-yearengineering course?Methods:This study examines the effects of group size on the experiences of first-year engineeringstudents working in mixed-gender groups. This research involves analyzing data collected fromstudents following their first-year experience in the Watson College of Engineering and AppliedScience at Binghamton University in the 2023/2024 academic year. During their first year, thesestudents took part in project-based curricula each semester.There are three main components of this first-year engineering program, a large lecture with 200-400 students, activity/laboratory sections of about 24 students each, and a discussion sectionswith those same 24 students
established research labs thatwould provide peer mentoring and a CoP for the incoming ECHS students. Leveraging existinglab infrastructure for professional, technical skill, and community development was ideal forremoving additional burden to those facilitating the program, both at the ECHS and universitylevels. The faculty mentors’ preparation and training played a critical role in creating an inclusive,effective research environment. For example, mentors tailored their feedback to meet students attheir developmental stage. They focused on practical skills like poster presentations, writing forresearch, and hands-on laboratory experimentation. One participant highlighted the value ofthese experiences: “This REU was significant in me feeling
and build asupport group. The goal of the pillar is to provide spaces for students to connect and offersupport through the program and beyond.Academics: The program offers academic courses in mathematics, chemistry, and programmingto prepare engineering students in academics to ensure success in the the fall semester. Themathematics placement is based on individual ACT scores among college algebra, pre-calculus,and calculus I. The mathematics courses are offered with credits, allowing students to advance intheir curriculum.Engineering at MSU: The program offers learning experiences in laboratories and researchcenters to enlighten students with the many opportunities offered by the institution for studentdevelopment and success. This pillar
to the integration of AI in learning and teachingin the Global South will also call Governments to train local researchers and developers, to forgepartnerships with external entities and to integrate digital skills training into primary andsecondary school curricula (Chinasa T. Okolo, 2021).Menekse, despite raising some risks that students who rely too much on AI might lose interestand curiosity, also shows some confidence in AI. In the guest Editorial of the JEE (June 2023),he explains how AI-powered virtual laboratories, seen as able to simulate physical experimentsand visualize fundamental engineering concepts, could be effective for teaching and learningpurposes. Also, Large Language Models (LLMs) are presented as able to provide
Paper ID #43925Developing Diverse Leaders through Peer Teaching and Undergraduate Research:A Work in ProgressProf. Mohamed Razi Nalim, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Dr. Razi Nalim is Chancellor’s Professor of Mechanical Engineering at IUPUI, where he directs the Combustion and Propulsion Research Laboratory and helps lead the Transportation and Autonomous Systems Institute. He has extensive experience in higher education and professional practice – in industry, academia, and government. He has administered research, sponsored work, graduate programs, international initiatives, accreditation, and
Paper ID #18363Innovative Manufacturing Education Experience for First-Year EngineeringStudents: Using a Seminar Course and Volunteerism to Enhance Manufac-turing SkillsMr. Eric Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Eric Holloway currently serves as the Senior Director of Industry Research in the College of Engineering at Purdue University, where he focuses on industry research in the College of Engineering. From 2007-2013, Eric served as the Managing Director and the Director of Instructional Laboratories in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. As Director, he was in
Paper ID #27192On Transfer Student Success: Exploring the Academic Trajectories of BlackTransfer Engineering Students from Community CollegesDr. Bruk T. Berhane, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Mary- land in 2003. He then completed a master’s degree in engineering management at George Washington University in 2007. In 2016, he earned a Ph.D. in the Minority and Urban Education Unit of the Col- lege of Education at the University of Maryland. Bruk worked at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, where
Paper ID #27039Proven Professional Development Strategies: Data from an ENG ASAP Trans-fer Student ProgramDr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and
Arkansas, Fayetteville. Before joining the U of A faculty in 1996, he served in the US Army as an engineer officer for 24 years. During his military career Dennis had the unique opportunity to build roads, airfields and other facilities on five different continents and spend over 11 years as a member of the faculty at the US Military Academy. His current research interests include laboratory and field determination of geotechnical material properties for transportation systems and the use of remote sensing techniques to categorize geohazards. He has published over 85 peer reviewed articles relating to his research and educational activities. Dennis holds BS and MS degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of
student success inengineering by removing the first-year bottleneck associated with the traditional freshmancalculus sequence.The first-year engineering math course, Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applications,included lecture and collaborative laboratory and recitation components. The course addressesonly the math topics used in core engineering courses such as physics, engineering mechanics,electric circuits and computer programming sequences. Using an application-oriented, hands-onproblem-based learning approach, it replaced traditional math prerequisite requirements for theaforementioned core courses in order for students to advance in the curriculum without firstcompleting a traditional first-year calculus sequence. This structure
promote integration of robotics in middle school science and math education. For her doctoral research, she conducts mechatronics and robotics research in the Mechatronics, Controls, and Robotics Laboratory at NYU.Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru, NYU Tandon School of Engineering Dr. Sheila Borges Rajguru is the Assistant Director of the Center for K-12 STEM Education, NYU Tan- don School of Engineering. As the Center’s STEAM educator and researcher she works with engineers and faculty to provide professional development to K-12 STEM teachers with a focus on social justice. She is currently Co-Principal Investigator on two NSF-grants that provide robotics/mechatronics PD to science, math, and technology teachers. In addition
learned. In an online environment that is asynchronous, learnersdo not have the constraints of time and place. By leveraging online technologies, studentlearning should be designed with transfer of same information to all learners. For the freshmanstudent, online learning is most suitable for factual type learning or less challenging learningactivities [12].F2F would be recommended for intensively challenging, high-benefit learning activities. Forexample, the hands-on laboratory experiments in EE110 solidify key concepts learned from themultimedia content: online videos, text readings, assigned homework and frequent onlinequizzes. Through peer collaboration, students can help each other work through the labs as wellas learning how to troubleshoot
method of group lab report writing proposed in this study blends individualaccountability with group ownership and collaboration. The I-in-Team submission method seeks tocreate a balance of individual work and teamwork.Methodology The test group for this study included 35 students enrolled in the ABET accredited junior-level Unit Operations Laboratory chemical engineering class at a public state university] Thesestudents were divided into 11 lab groups. The class was held in-person three sessions a week witha mix of both online submissions using Canvas and in-class physical submissions for assignments. The summarized grade distributions for assignments from the course applicable to thisstudy are provided below in Table 1. The final
enrollment course. Research should expand Hartman’s experiences withmore scholarship to understand how these influence faculty assessment decisions, such as usingtests, which our findings will begin to address. Another form of course context is the type of courses that influence the faculty’s coursedecisions. In engineering curricula, courses are typically in the form of introductory courses,fundamental engineering courses, laboratory courses, and capstone courses (Lord & Chen, 2015;Sheppard et al., 2009). Stark (2000) has argued that instructors of introductory courses tend toshape their goals of the course based on nature of the disciplines, and subsequently their courseplanning. In engineering education, however, studies on the types