. Hardy D, Puaut I. WCET Analysis of Multi-level Non-inclusive Set-Associative Instruction Caches. IEEE, December, 200810. Srikantaiah S, Kultursay E, Zhang T, Kandemir M, Irwin M.J, Xie Y. MorphCache: A Reconfigurable Adaptive Multi-level Cache hierarchy. IEEE, February, 201111. Kecheng Ji, Ling M, Wang Q, Shi L., Pan J., AFEC An Analytical Framework for Evaluating Cache performance in out of order processors. In 2017 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conf. & Expo.12. Yavits L., Morad A., Ginosar, Cache Hierarchy Optimization. In IEEE COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE LETTERS, VOL.13, NO. 2, 2014.13. Waldspurger C, Saemundson T., Ahmad I. and Park N., Cache Modeling and Optimization using Miniature Simulations. In 2017 USENIX
, High School Learning, and Postsecondary Context of Support,” 2012.[9] R. W. Auger, A. E. Blackhurst, and K. Herting Wahl, “The Development of Elementary-Aged Children’s Career Aspirations and Expectations on JSTOR.” [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732626?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents. [Accessed: 27- Feb-2019].[10] L. S. Gottfredson and R. T. Lapan, “Assessing Gender-Based Circumscription of Occupational Aspirations,” J. Career Assess., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 419–441, Sep. 1997.[11] D. A. Jepsen and G. L. Dickson, “Continuity in life-span career development: Career exploration as a precursor to career establishment,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 217–233, 2003.[12] “Women Who
(b) Construction Manager, but rather the student wrote constructionmanager along with interior design as career choices. Another student selected both options (b)and (e), and still another student selected two options both (a) and (b). In Section Cl-S2, aparticular student selected (a), (b), (d), and then specified safety inspector-manager. The responses given by the students in the Post-Questionnaire are described in Figure 2.For Question 1 of the Post-Questionnaire, 11.8% (2 students-Cl-S2) answered Yes, that they stillwanted to be an Architect after completion of the course (Figure 2a). Although students’responses from Cl-S1, came from both Q.1& Q.2 by individual students, as only two studentsindicated that they wanted to become
Lo,sys Mo, j m r i o V i m e ro V e external in out V2 V2 Energy d Esys Q net,in Wnet,in m i h 2 gz m
, “Vulnerabilities in Two-Area Automatic Generation Control Systems under Cyberattacks,” International Symposium on Resilient Control Systems (ISRCS2016), Chicago, August 16- 18, 2016.[16] M. Sloderbeck, C. Edrington, and M. Steurer, “Hardware-in-the-Loop Experiments with a Simulated Electric Ship Power System utilizing a 5 MW Variable Voltage Source Converter Amplifier”, IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives Conference, IEMDC '09, May 2009.[17] Van H. Nguyen, Y. Besanger, Q. Tuan, C. Boudinnet, and T.L. Nguyen, “Using Power-Hardware-in-Loop Experiments together with Co-Simulation for the Holistic Validation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems”, IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies, ISGT
,” Historical geography, vol. 1, pp. 304–319,2016.2. L. Bu, “The construction and historical position research of Jining section of the GrandCanal of the Yuan Ming and Qing Dynasties,” MS thesis, Dept Civil Eng., LiaoningUniv., Liaoning, China, 2012.3. P. Tong, S. Wu, Z. Wang, and S. Li, “Nanwang Water Diversion Pivotal – Aparamount achievement of hydro projects in 600 year ago,” China Cultural Heritage, vol.6, pp. 29–36, 2011.4. H. Xia and Q. Le, “Space- time evolution for mid-21st century water resources overthe Beijing- Hangzhou Grand Canal under the IPCC-A1B scenario,” Journal of EastChina Normal University (Natural Science), vol. 6, pp. 179–189, 2015.5. R. Zhang, “Textual Research on Locks of Jining' s Ancient Grand Canal,” Journal ofJining
-safety-certification-for-transportation-project-professionals-program- through-artba-foundation/ Accessed January 2018][2] R.U. Farooqui, “Achieving Zero Accidents – A Strategic Framework for Continuous Safety Improvement in the Construction Industry,” Ph.D. dissertation, Civil Engineering Dept., Florida International University, Miami, FL, 2011.[3] Z. Zhou, J. Irizarry and Q. Li, “Applying advanced technology to improve safety management in the construction industry: a literature review,” Construction Management and Economics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 606-622. June 2013.[4] M. Behm, “Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept,” Safety Science, vol. 43, pp. 589-611, April 2005.[5] T.M. Toole
Engineering 01, 71-75.[5] Fan, Q., Zheng, Q., Zheng, K., Wang, Z., Wang, X. (2013).“In-depth Hexahedral Cooperation Mode in Engineering Education Between Universities and Enterprises”.Experimental Technology and Management 12, 26-30.[6] Zeng, Y., Wang, G. (2011).“The Study on the Construction of Training System under Outstanding Plan”.China University Teaching 07, 75-78.[7] Chen, X. (2014). “The Study on Benign Construction of PETOE through Joint Training Model of University-Enterprise Cooperation”.Education and Vocation 11, 125-126.[8] Research Group of the "Made in China 2025" Plan and the Cultivation of Engineering Technology Talents (2015). “ The Made in China 2025 Plan and the Cultivation of Engineering Technology Talents
of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2016.[10] Retherford, Jennifer Q. and Joseph K. Amoah. "Incorporating ASCE's ExCEEd Principles in Capstone Project and other Active Learning Courses" In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Southeast Section Conference, 2014.[11] ASCE. EXCEED. http://www.asce.org/exceed/[12] Morse, Audra. "Application of the ExCEEd Teaching Model to Improve Graduate Teaching in Environmental Engineering Courses (AC 2009-606)." In American Society for Engineering Education, 2009.[13] Retherford, Jennifer Q. and Angelica M. Palomino. "Departmental Implementation of ASCE's ExCEEd Teaching Principles." In Proceedings of the American Society of
model in secondary agricultural education on students' content knowledge, scientific reasoning ability, argumentation skills, and views of the nature of science (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florida.Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Villa, E. Q., Kephart, K., Gates, A. Q., Thiry, H., & Hug, S. (2013). Affinity research groups in practice: Apprenticing students in research. Journal of Engineering Education, 102, 444- 466.Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Vinck, D. (Ed.). (2003). Everyday engineering: An ethnography of design
. Interdiscip. Soc. Sci., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 37–51, 2010.[18] M. Horner and M. Horner, “Leadership theory : past , present and future,” vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 270–287, 1997.[19] H. Sullivan, P. Williams, and S. Jeffares, “Leadership for Collaboration: Situated agency in practice,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–66, 2012.[20] R. Reiter-Palmon and J. J. Illies, “Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective,” Leadersh. Q., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 55–77, 2004.[21] K. Limsila and S. O. Ogunlana, “Performance and leadership outcome correlates of leadership styles and subordinate commitment,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., vol. 15, no
flexural bucklingstress, Fcr, via a Q-factor which was a function (in part) of the effective area of the cross sectionof slender elements. These equations are shown in Figure 3, the typical lecture slides, as theyshould be. However, especially to the inexperienced student, this is likely just a mess ofmeaningless equations which they will simply follow blindly. Providing even a little context –making a connection between Q and the flexural buckling strength curve – at minimum will givestudents a better feeling for what the equations do. Similarly, the new method overall strategyshown in Figure 4, and it is clear that in concept nothing changed between old and new methods.This, again, instills confidence in the future designer. When students are
=7913. [Accessed: 26-Jan-2018].[6] M. J. White, “The history of the Engineering Libraries Division, part 1 - 1893 to 1960,” in 2016 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26170.[7] M. Borrego, M. J. Foster, and J. E. Froyd, “Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45–76, Jan. 2014.[8] A. Brettle, “Information skills training: a systematic review of the literature,” Health Info. Libr. J., vol. 20, no. s1, pp. 3–9, Jun. 2003.[9] R. J. Jacobs, J. Q. Lou, R. L. Ownby, and J. Caballero, “A systematic review of eHealth interventions to improve health literacy,” Health Informatics J., vol. 22, no. 2
will develop an understanding of the core concepts of technology 2 (Objectives M, N, P, Q, T, W, X, CC, BB)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the relationship among 3 technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study (D, F, G, H, J)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the cultural, social, economic, and 4 political effects of technology (D, E, H, I, K)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the effects of technology on the 5 environment (D, F, G, H, I)Standard Students will develop an understanding of the role of society in the 6 development and use of technology (D, E, F, G, J)Standard Students will develop an understanding
-packagedand placed into inventory.In order to calculate the required the minimum sample size (n), assumptions for the margin oferror (ME), confidence level (𝑧𝑧𝛼𝛼 ), and values for p (successes) and q (failures) must first beestablished. Using customer complaint data prior to the inspection system, the student assumed ap-value of 0.005 and a q-value of 0.995; 0.5% of product is defective (sampling success) 95.5%of product is good (sampling failure). A margin of error of 0.15% and a confidence level of 95%were then assumed to fit the expected success rate. Using the Margin of Error equation [3]: = 𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑧𝑧𝛼𝛼2 ∗𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑧𝑧𝛼𝛼 ∗ � , the minimum sample size: 𝑛𝑛 = = 8,494.2
, “Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span,” in The Self in Transition: Infancy to Childhood, D. Cicchetti, Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990, pp. 61–97.[9] V. Hospel, B. Galand, and M. Janosz, “Multidimensionality of behavioural engagement: Empirical support and implications,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 77, pp. 37–49, 2016.[10] S. Lam et al., “Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries.,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 29, no. 2, p. 213, Jun. 2014.[11] L. M. Thien and N. A. Razak, “Academic coping, friendship quality, and student engagement associated with student quality of school life: A partial
Versus Evening Type Adolescents: Is There a Synchrony Effect? Personality and Individual Differences, 42(3).Hill, M., & Epps, K. (2010). The Impact of Physical Classroom Environment on Student Satisfaction and Student Evaluation of Teaching in the University Environment. Academy of Educational Leadership, 14(4), 65-79.Jabi, W., Hall, T., Passerini, K., Borcea, C., & Jones, Q. (2008). Exporting the Studio Model of Learning - Teaming Architecture with Computer Science. Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (pp. 509-516). Antwerp, Belgium: Education and Research in Compuater Aided Architectural Design in Europr (ECAADE
.) A1 (m2) D2 (in.) A2 (m2) (in.) s2) Q (ml) t (s) (m3/s) CD (ave.) SD 1 A 1 1.029 0.00054 0.078125 3.0927E‐06 13.75 3426 500 55.1 9.07E‐06 1.12 2 1.029 0.00054 0.078125 3.0927E‐06 13.75 3426 500 54.5 9.17E‐06 1.13 3 1.029 0.00054 0.078125 3.0927E‐06 13.75 3426 500 54.4 9.19E‐06 1.14 1.13 0.0078 B 1 1.029 0.00054 0.09375 4.4535E‐06 13.75 3426 500 37.1 1.35E‐05 1.16 2 1.029 0.00054 0.09375 4.4535E‐06 13.75 3426 500 36.1 1.39E‐05 1.19 3 1.029 0.00054 0.09375 4.4535E‐06 13.75 3426 500
transition: An exploration of emerging adulthood, Journal of Counseling & Development, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 174-181, 2010.[3] T. D. Ngo, A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K. T. Nguyen, and D. Hui, Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges, Composites Part B: Engineering, 2018.[4] Q. Gao et al., Fabrication of electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds with 3D controllable geometric shapes, Materials & Design, vol. 157, pp. 159-169, 2018.[5] Z. X. Khoo et al., 3D printing of smart materials: A review on recent progresses in 4D printing, Virtual and Physical Prototyping, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 103-122, 2015.[6] M. Abshirini, M. Charara, Y. Liu, M. Saha, and M. C
. 3, pp. 243-257, 1995.[7] Canvas. Instructure, 2019. https://www.canvaslms.com/about-us/[8] M. Singh, Q. Sun, and C. Weber, “An Evaluation of a Digital Learning Management System in High School Physics Classrooms.” In Proc. of the ASEE 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition, Paper 17350. New Orleans, LA, 2016.[9] R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman, “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education,” Engineering Education, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 674–681, 1988. Available as of March 3, 2012 from http://winbev.pbworks.com/f/LS-1988.pdf[10] R. S. Dunn and K.J. Dunn, Teaching Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles. London, U.K.: Pearson College Division, 1978, 336 pp.[11] D. Kolb, Experiential Learning
significantly. Thestudents were surveyed on the following questions regarding agile practices: Q-A1: “Working in pairs on this project was challenging.” Q-A2: “Having bi-weekly gate presentations to briefly discuss the progress in team project helped me to be more engaged in the group's progress and makes team work and communication between the students and the instructor more transparent.”The survey results show that only 20% of students found working in pair to be challenging,which was previously pointed out by students as a main challenge during the second yearimplementation of the design project (only PBL). This was complemented by the results of thesecond question where 80% of students found the bi-weekly gate presentations
International Symposium for NextGeneration Infrastructure Conference, pp. 131-135. London, UK.[13] Huang, H. W., and Zhang, D. M. (2016). Resilience analysis of shield tunnel lining underextreme surcharge: Characterization and field application. Tunnelling and Underground SpaceTechnology, 51, 301-312.[14] Wu, D., Liu, H., Yuan, C., and Wei, D. (2016). A quantitative assessment framework for post-earthquake transportation network resilience using fuzzy logic. In Transportation Research Board95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-3864).[15] Zimmerman, R., Zhu, Q., de Leon, F., and Guo, Z. (2017). Conceptual modeling frameworkto integrate resilient and interdependent infrastructure in extreme weather. Journal of InfrastructureSystems, 23(4), 04017034.[16] Wang, L
Division, part 1 - 1893 to 1960,” in 2016 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26170.[7] M. Borrego, M. J. Foster, and J. E. Froyd, “Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 45–76, Jan. 2014.[8] A. Brettle, “Information skills training: a systematic review of the literature,” Health Info. Libr. J., vol. 20, no. s1, pp. 3–9, Jun. 2003.[9] R. J. Jacobs, J. Q. Lou, R. L. Ownby, and J. Caballero, “A systematic review of eHealth interventions to improve health literacy,” Health Informatics J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 81–98, Jun. 2016.[10] A. M. Fiegen, “Systematic review of research methods: the
after of a TechFriday. Q: My Current level of interest in learning about Charlieplexing is: Figure 1. Pre Survey of Charlieplexing with Arduino Tech Friday Q: After participating in today’s Tech Friday, my current level of interest in Charlieplexing is: Figure 2. Post Survey of Charlieplexing with Arduino Tech FridayStudent Mentoring and TutoringOur mentoring program helps recruit STEM major students from community colleges. As a teamof
equivalency will be described in terms of coursematerials, hands-on labs, student support and assessment. The same course materials were usedin both on-site and online versions. To have the same hands-on lab experience, studentspurchased an affordable lab kit to set up a home lab and perform the same lab exercises as in anon-campus lab. Piazza, an online Q&A discussion forum, was used to provide students withprompt answers to their questions, equivalent to but more convenient than on-campus officehours. Finally, to give the same assessment to online students as to on-site students, ProctorU, anonline proctor service, was used in the final exam.The online course was first piloted in summer 2014 with 128 students enrolled. Since then, anadditional
. Page 26.814.12Appendix A: Toys included in the review Toy Name Area of Focus Number of Reviews MindWare Imaginets Art & Other 192 MindWare Physics Physics concepts 51 Workshop MindWare Q-BA-MAZE Engineering & 51 2.0: Big Box Construction MindWare Microscope Kit Math & Science 50 & Book MindWare Chaos Tower Engineering & 43 Construction MindWare Snap Circuits Physics concepts 26 Rover MindWare Equate Math & Science 51 MindWare KEVA Engineering and 50 Contraptions (200 Plank) Construction MindWare Snap Circuits
shift, receiver position, and velocity. The high rate data arerecorded typically at 100 Hz (100 samples per second). Data types included in the high rate dataare the in-phase accumulation (I), quadrature accumulation (Q), and phase. The fullspecifications and characteristics of CASES receiver are described in detail in [10].Amongst other outputs, the CASES receiver provides the ability to obtain raw GNSS data (e.g., Page 26.819.6L1, L2 phase observables and range observables) and also data for accessing atmospheric effects(e.g. TEC, individual channel carrier to noise power ( C / N 0 ), amplitude scintillation index ( S 4
occurredwithin the last 30-45 days, from any relevant and reputed magazine or newspaper or journal. Thenews item or event should be directly related to and should meet one or more course objectives.Each student will Open the URL link and present the topic to the class for 5 minutes – what,when, where, its impact as it relates to the course learning outcome. This will be followed by abrief Q&A session. Students are assigned grades for participating in this activity. Each studenthas to complete the following tasks: identify the source and event (or news), the location of theevent/news, how is the event/news tied to the current course, and what is the importance of thenews/event. The student will also have to discuss quantification as applicable to the
), ordisagreeing (4), or strongly disagreeing (5) to specific questions (1, 2, 3, 4) in the surveydiscussed in Section 3. Table A.1. Data Collection – Sections 1 & 2. Section 1 Section 2 Q 1 2 3 4 5 Q 1 2 3 4 5 Overall 1 15 3 1 0 0 1.26 1 20 11 1 1 0 1.48 1.37 2 14 4 1 0 0 1.32 2 22 8 2 1 0 1.45 1.39 3 14 4 1 0 0 1.32 3 21 11 0 1 0 1.42 1.37 4 12 5 2 0 0 1.47 4 19 11 0 3 0 1.61
Coll Univ. 2013.5. Brownell JE, Swaner LE. High-Impact Practices: Applying the Learning Outcomes Literature to the Development of Successful Campus Programs. PEER Rev. 2009.6. Kuh GD. High-Impact Educational Practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Assoc Am Coll Univ. 2008.7. Wenzel T. Definition of Undergraduate Research. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 1997;17.8. Laursen S, Hunter A, Seymour E, Thiry H, Melton G. What is Known About the Student Outcomes of Undergraduate Research? In: Undergraduate Research in the Sciences: Engaging Students in Real Science. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010.9. Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A