in undergraduate education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Enhanced Learning of Load Path in a 3D Structural System using Virtual RealityIntroductionVirtual reality (VR) has evolved from being used only in video-games to be used as a powerfuleducational tool in the areas of engineering education. It us useful due to its ability to recreate thereal world in a costly efficient manner [1]. Research [2, 3, 4] has shown that the use of VR inengineering education has improved the learning process and increased the motivation of studentsof understanding new concepts, developing a better ability
ofa tree, which imitated the visual scheme of the entire course as a scaffolding tool. This can beconsidered as an “expert-generated concept map” and an “advance organizer” as described byother authors [19, 23]. This frame was used to explain the branches of dynamics and how theyevolve from the basic dynamics just like the stem and branches of a tree grow from the root asshown in Figure 1. Then the different topics from each chapter of the course were placed near thecorresponding branches of dynamics in the concept tree to provide a clear idea of the entirecourse content and how it would be covered. Students were then introduced with the idea of aconcept map, how the concept map would be completed and used in the class, and theresponsibility
have embodied the features in our experimental work thus far. 1. A session of modest duration. Our model of teaming sessions is meant to live alongside everyday practice and be repeated. As such, individual teaming sessions need to be modest in relation to the everyday work in which they are situated. In our case, we have embodied this dimension by having teaming sessions of one hour, and further sessions that occur roughly once per month. 2. A commitment to no preparation. Since a lack of time to prepare can contribute to poor attendance and engagement, and a requirement to prepare extends the footprint of the work, our model includes a commitment to not requiring preparation byattendees. In practice
sciences, andethics that in a conventional educational curriculum would require students complete a series ofpre-requisite courses to enroll in a higher-level graduate course on CPS. However, these topicsby their very interdisciplinary nature can serve as motivating examples for students with variedbackgrounds and interests to engage in early in their educational pathways. This motivates ourdesire to develop a new educational model that is not only student-centered but also serves theimmediate and future needs of the employers in diverse sectors that are building cyber-physicalsystems with attention to their lifecycle management [1] [2] [3] [4]. The educational model explored in this research includes project-based learning (PjBL)[5] for
anticipated students will gain additional knowledge due to the several types offorces: tension, compression, and different boundary conditions.There are two parts in this present phase: first, conduct the experiment, and then put theexperimental data into a pre-coded program and display the simulation results (see Figure 1).The technology will be developed so that both the experiment results and the simulation resultsmay be obtained simultaneously, thereby shortening the time required for the demonstrationcycle. Figure 1: DIC Method to demonstrate classical mechanics concept.A teacher can physically place this little device (less than 1 kg) on the tabletop and then deliverhis or her presentation in a traditional class lecture setting
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work in Progress: Development of a Project-Based Civil & Environmental Introductory CourseIntroductionTeaching “soft” skills to engineering students presents a unique set of challenges compared totechnical skills. Topics like technical writing and oral presentation are not commonly perceivedby students to be in the domain of engineering while most practicing engineers would disagree[1]. Communication skills are just one example of a range of professional skills outside ofdiscipline-specific skills that can aid new engineering graduates. Our civil and environmentalengineering (CEE) curriculum committee developed
thetextbook. In addition to our built-in simulator, in summer 2021, we developed a new auto-gradedlab environment to support MIPS with 10 new lab assignments that have been used in 6 differentcourses.To evaluate both the platform and the content of the labs, we analyzed these labs attempted by28-84 students across all 6 courses. We summarize the average completion rate and the averagetime spent on each lab. Our analysis also shows how using the simulator impacts student struggleon homework assignments embedded in the textbook. Finally, we share our best practices forauthoring similar auto-graded assembly problems.IntroductionComputer organization courses often come with a programming component that is close to thehardware used in the course [1],[2
learn about the women undergraduate participants’personal-familial contexts that contribute to their entry to majoring in engineering as identifiedby the women themselves.Preliminary findings indicate that: (1) our participants tend to have supportive families; (2) whileall experienced gender biases, not everyone has formed a critical consciousness of sexism; and(3) being able to actually engage by “doing” something and creating a product is key to thewomen’s finding joy in engineering and associating themself with the field/profession. It isimportant to note that the second interviews, which focus on the educational journey of theparticipants in relation to engineering identity development and project team experiences, areunderway. The
approach for interfering with the disease process.In this course, students conceptualize an authentic research question, design and carry outexperiments to answer that question, and reflect on their learning experience. The courseprovides students with the opportunity to identify and solve an authentic research problem in asupportive cognitive apprenticeship environment [1, 2]. Each student leaves the course havinglearned a set of skills that is unique to their experience that is relevant for their self-designedproject.IntroductionLaboratory-based courses are an integral part of the undergraduate engineering curriculum [3].Performing laboratory experimentation gives students the opportunity to apply some of thefundamental concepts they learned in
develop an inclusive, equitable, and just practice of design.Figure 1 Team of engineers in SJ-ED BEDP module illustrated by Charleen Lopes (2021) 2 Within the module, the student learned some historical context of highway construction in theUnited States. For example, highway projects such as the interstate system have had adisproportionate impact on marginalized communities through displacement (Bullard, 2004). Inaddition to the history of highway construction, the student also learned about socially just designprinciples that, if followed, can enhance outcomes. This includes the vital work required tocollaboratively involve communities as primary
education regardless of education level. Atthe college level, classes became available online both synchronously and asynchronously tomeet student needs in different locations and time zones. Due to the health concerns regardingin-person class meetings, in-person labs and studios migrated online [1]. The sudden move toonline learning placed students at a disadvantage due to the lack of space and resources thatbeing on campus provides.Along with the COVID-19 pandemic, Asians and Asian Americans began to experienceincreased xenophobia and prejudice due to the connections of COVID-19 to China. So not onlywere Asian and Asian American students faced with the problem of increased xenophobia andprejudice, but they also had to return to their homes. Taken
and to the welfare of the nation. Traditionally, diversity initiatives havelumped together strategies for increasing underrepresented racial and ethnic groups inengineering with sexism, homophobia, and other inequities. The Black Lives Mattermovement has demonstrated that race must be tackled specifically in order to dismantlesystemic racism. In addition to persistent racist language (e.g., “master/slave,”“whitelists/blacklists”) in the curriculum [1] and scholarship, the unique challenges that Blackengineers face are often erased since their identity is homogenized with other racial and ethnicgroups under the harmful label “underrepresented minority” or URM [2]. Since language createsthe norms and cultures of communities and perpetuates
integrationof such technology along with virtual reality, in which they explore the factors necessary tocalculate and analyze to perform simulation of working solar panels in virtual reality. They willbe working towards providing a solution to the problem of achieving sustainable manufacturing.They consider the effects of certain parameters such as the effect of solar cell tilt or solar celltracking on manufacturing problems. Students learn the fundamentals of photovoltaic (PV) effectand how to design a renewable system given standard test conditions according to requirements.Virtual reality helps give a platform for students to implement the sustainable concepts in practice.1. IntroductionThis paper describes the green STEM (science, technology
disciplines such as mechanical, industrial, andelectrical.1. IntroductionTests and examinations are a stressful part of college life necessary to reinforce and evaluate theknowledge a student received in a course, and invariably some students perform better thanothers at test-taking. However, in engineering, there has been little study about theinterrelationships between test designs, the time required for test completion, and studentperformance outcomes. Therefore, this study proposes to examine the relationships between thetime students used to complete an exam and their performance outcome, and the type of examquestions administered to students and their performance outcome. The study examines theserelationships using data from multiple
dynamics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Forming Cognitive Connections: Desktop Learning Modules, Structural Analysis Software, and Full-Scale StructuresIntroductionOne of the biggest challenges in teaching civil engineering students a theory-intensive courselike structural analysis is helping students make the connection between the engineeringmechanics taught at the front of the room and how those concepts define the real behavior ofactual engineered structures. According to Montfort et al. [1], “Concept inventories suggest thatmost students do not truly understand the concepts covered in their STEM
levels, preferred learning methods, and critical thinking. We developed aquestionnaire with open-ended questions to assess the self-confidence levels and relatedfactors, which was taken by one-hundred ten students in two semesters. The studentsanswers were coded and analyzed afterward. We found that self-confidence is weaklyassociated with the students’ critical thinking and independent from their cognitive levels,preferred learning methods, and expectations from the course. The results suggest that toimprove the self-confidence of the students, the instructors should work on improving thestudents’ critical thinking capabilities.1 IntroductionUndergraduate students are expected to step directly into software developer positions andsucceed
include: difficulties getting classmates to engage in discussions in remote formats,difficulties staying alert and attentive in remote formats, frustrations with learning new softwarefor remote instruction, and the fun of engaging with physical devices in the in-person format.While in general remote instruction lowered students’ self-determination, one remoted sessionfrom the study was particularly motivating. Attributes from various remote sessions arecompared to identify successful strategies to motivate students during online synchronousclasses.I. BackgroundEngineering education has been slow to enter the realm of online instruction [1] especially incomparison to other educational disciplines [2]. The pandemic of 2020 pushed all disciplines
into the spotlight, testing the “flexibility and resilience of students, faculty, andadministrators” [1]. This COVID-19 instructional pivot challenged engineering educators inproviding a virtual substitute for the lab-based, hands-on experiences, and teamwork that theirdiscipline demands. This shift was not without its challenges, a recent ASEE report found thatonly 53% of faculty felt they were given adequate resources from their institution to transitiononline teaching [1]. Given the importance of community and hands-on engagement inmakerspaces, the COVID-19 pivot also forced academic makerspaces and those that use andsupport them to abruptly shift their instructional practices. Considering that many academicmakerspaces are supported by
Powered by www.slayte.comBringing it down from the ivory tower: Translating Engineering- for-Community-Development (ECD) graduate student researchinto community engagement and undergraduate student learningAbstractThe goal of this paper is to show how graduate engineering students working on Engineering-for-Community-Development (ECD) projects and theses 1) acquire socio-technical educationthat prepares them to critically engage with community development (formation); 2) propose totranslate their academic scholarship into formats and language that lead to effective engagementand appropriation by the communities they want to serve (translation); and, from this translation,3) extend their scholarship into curricular opportunities for undergraduate
, and scholarship of teaching and learning. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Undergraduate Students' Motivation to Learn, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Assessments in a Cybersecurity CourseAbstractThe theoretical framework of self-determination theory (SDT) [1], [2] suggests that providing alearning environment which supports students' autonomy, competence, and relatedness promotesstudents' autonomous motivation and desirable learning outcomes. To promote choice andautonomy in a cyber forensic course at a large research university, students were given a varietyof assessment options in place of their regular high-stakes
and the projectionsfor a scaled porting of the model to a campus-wide level.I. IntroductionEducational research has widely documented the achievement gap between students fromdifferent socioeconomic statuses (SES). The seminal work by Coleman et al. in 1966 sparked amyriad of studies and initiatives addressing this phenomenon with different views regardingrelation, incident factors, or effects [1][2][3][4]. Despite more than fifty years of documentedefforts, the prevalence of the gap, studied at national and global levels, continues to highlight theneed for renovated approaches [5][6]. At the college level, this gap manifests among studentsfrom lower SES with a higher attrition level, longer times to graduate, and significantly
as “the art of analyzing and evaluating thinking with a view to improving it.”Peter Facione, the spearhead of the APA Delphi study, describes CT as “judging in a reflectiveway what to do or what to believe” [12]. According to McPeck, a philosopher and CT researcher,CT is “the propensity and skill to engage in an activity with reflective skepticism” [13]. The mosthighly cited definition is the one by Robert Ennis, who is of the opinion that CT is “reflective andreasonable thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe or do” [14]. Ennis' definitioncaptures the commonly noted dual nature of the critical thinking, consisting of 1) the use of rationalcriteria to judge the thoughts and ideas of others, and 2) the subjection of one's own
can’t solveproblems. To address such an issue, we decided to spend the last week of class time on solvingreal world problems. To do so, we select some programming projects among old ACMprogramming contest problems from the website ICPC.org [1] and student practice on them. Thisis done in our Data Structures and Algorithms classes.Teamwork Projects as Class AssignmentsThere is a high probability that when the graduates get hired for a new job, they are going towork as a team member on reasonably large size projects. Everything is new to them, workingenvironment, supervisor, team members, projects, etc. It is very crucial for the newly hiredemployees to know how to get along with other team members and colleagues and tolerate thedifferences among
brought about by our redesign, and wouldencourage our colleagues to consider how to center community building within the design ofengineering courses as we have shown in this case.IntroductionPrior to the broad shift to online teaching in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, students whoselected to be online learners were quite different than students who chose in-person courses.Online learners tended to be older [1], [2]–seeking convenience of asynchronous learningenvironments [1] while they balanced work with their education [2]–as compared to residentialstudents who were more traditional aged and sought face-to-face connection with their peers andinstructors [3]. Since 2019, the group of students who are online learners has become larger andmore
of the evaporative cooler.Finally, we outline worksheet and conceptual assessment questions to accompany classroomactivities and present conceptual assessment results from a spring 2022 pilot classroomimplementation of the evaporative cooler LCDLM in a Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfercourse. Significant student learning gains were observed after implementation, suggesting apositive influence of the LCDLM on understanding.IntroductionIt is now well-accepted that the use of active learning strategies, which encourage students toengage with materials rather than passively receive information, promote better academicperformance and improve student attitudes compared to traditional lecture-based strategies [1, 2].Further, interactive learning
, machine learning with natural language processing, visualization, and presentation.Subsequently, participants were engaged in Computer Science research analyzing a real-worlddata set gathered from Twitter™ 1 between January and June 2020. Participants were organizedinto teams to investigate subtopics within the broader subject of misinformation: 1) detectingsocial media bot accounts, 2) identifying propaganda with computational methods, and 3)studying the discourse surrounding science preprints (i.e., papers that have been posted to theInternet but have not been peer reviewed). The program culminated in an exposition where eachteam presented research results to program officers, senior faculty, deans, government officials,and industry experts
challenged by increasing numbers of studentsthat do not purchase the recommended textbook but rely solely on posted lecture slides andrelevant material, in-class notes, class recordings (lately), freely available internet videos, andpossibly illegal electronic textbook copies. After obtaining some experience with PressBooksand H5P from a pandemic-induced online-lab project, and aided by an institutional OER fund,the authors decided to convert their class notes on energy and mass balances into an OER usingthose two tools. The aim is to provide students with a free centralized repository for coursecontent and practice that will (1) enhance student understanding through non-text additions(quizzes, videos, and interactive activities) that meet multiple
policies), improve effectiveness,and/or inform decisions about future program development,” [1] the author did not seek an IRBapproval.BackgroundMechanics of Materials course has been offered in flipped modality since 2013 at the Universityof Connecticut to enhance the quality of the course, share uniformed resources to all students andprovide alternative learning resources for diverse learners. There are pre-lecture videos availablethat students watch before attending the class. The class activity includes a short lecture by theinstructor about the topics of the day followed by problem solving by students. Pictures from reallife examples are shared with students during lecture and think-pair-share method is used tofacilitate peer interactions
possession.Truly filled with hope and outward expression.I came in thinking “oh, life would be grand”For a Black womxn who was of high demand.But I speak my truth and my peers despise,I do my work, but my advisor deniesI live my life, but I can’t seem to advanceAnd they wonder why I am sick of this song and dance. - Fantasi Nicole, The Holistic Soul Scholar Black womxn continue to be caught in the matrix of oppression regarding theirintersectional identity within an engineering doctoral context. We, as in Black womxn, are bothhypervisible and invisible, overvalued and undervalued, respected yet demeaned, and admiredyet shamed [1]–[5]. With the desire to make a difference in the world and in our
full survey instrument is shown elsewhere[23], with chemical engineering self-efficacy rated on a 6-point Likert scale [1 = completelyuncertain, 6 = completely certain] and coping self-efficacy, social and academic integration, andintent to persist all rated on a 7-point Likert scale [1 = strongly disagree/not at all, 7 = stronglyagree/very true].A total of 22 students attended the camp in Fall 2019 and Fall 2020, compared to 43 non-camperstudents taking the MEB course for the first time. The coronavirus pandemic reduced the usabledata in two ways. First, since classes were meeting online during Spring 2020, the effortrequired for students to complete the post-soph survey was more than usual (students mustchoose to click a link on their own