, seminars, reflection Proceedings of the 2024 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2024, American Society for Engineering Education ETD 505writings, and tailored resources to improve retention rates [12]. These services are crucial forstudents to navigate their program's academic demands effectively and stay on track to graduate.Furthermore, ETS-IMPRESS has a broader mission to increase the representation of first-generation, underrepresented students, women, and veterans in ET degree programs. Since itslaunch in 2018, the program has not only recruited first-year scholars but also
, teams were required to develop a project that couldcompete in the 4-H robotics competition using an Arduino microcontroller. They were thenrequired to create instructional materials such that a high school aged student could recreate theproject. For the course, all students purchased the Sparkfun Inventor’s Kit which included amicrocontroller and an array of electronic components including sensors and motors [11]. Teamsalso had access to additional sensors and motors that could be used.The project took place over seven weeks with the following weekly deliverables:Deliverable Week 1: 1. Completion of Safety Training (Individually) 2. Completion of Service Orientation and Reflection (Individually) 3. Investigation of Sensors and Motors
and Professional Field Trips Development Leadership team of campus org Objective: Create a Case competitions stackable-units digital Complete LinkedIn and badge program Handshake profiles Research Read and reflect on transportation careers & certifications
disparities in educational opportunities) [3], [8], [10]–[14], [16], [17], [19],[23]. Following this lecture, the students further engaged with the material outside of class byviewing the movie “Picture a Scientist” and listening to a recording of an episode from ThisAmerican Life entitled “The Problem We All Live With.” These multimedia resources werechosen since they reinforced the topics discussed in the in-class lectures through emotivepersonal examples and provided supporting data on gender and racial barriers in education andscience. The students additionally processed the information presented in the lecture as well asthe multimedia material by submitting a reflection on the content as a course assignment.Approximately midway through the
students’ ability to thrive as humans and potential future engineers? What does it take tobalance technology with authenticity? The purpose of this paper is to provide readers with a frontrow seat to one educators’ reflection on her evolving understanding of the nuances ofdetermining when technology in engineering education can be liberatory and enhance humanflourishing using current literature as well as her positionality and diverse experiences in thefield of education. Readers should be able to engage with key questions for reflecting on therelationship between human flourishing and technology integration, consider how to supportengineering educators’ development of judgment for technology integration, and take anopportunity to reflect on their
,particularly by using pedagogical bridges and partnerships.IntroductionAlthough there have been years worth of “diversity efforts,” the field of computing stillstruggles.Lack of diversity in computing is documented, according to the US Equal EmploymentOpportunity Commission African-Americans make up 7.4% of the high-tech industry [1, 2]. Thecomputing workforce is reflective of the computing in higher education stats. According to the2018 Taulbee Survey, only 5.4% of students enrolled in the responding Computer Science,Computer Engineering, or Information programs identified as Black/African-Americans [3].Although the statistics look bleak, efforts to change these statistics exist and continue to gaintraction. Often called Broadening Participation in
on equal footing. During these activities, the CA engages students to share ideas,reflect on progress, and explore the problem and solution space further, by providing timelyfeedback. By the end of the small group activity students are asked to summarize their learningfrom the activity. The instructor-led sessions are then split into three parts, the first two aredidactic lectures, and the third is an active learning activity which takes place in smallgroups.The impact of this course design will be studied with pre-, post-surveys and assessments,interviews, and students’ performance in the course to evaluate their sense of belonging in thefield of engineering [3] and their development of mechanical design competency
school students withopportunities to reflect on their physical and mental well-being?Conceptual Framework Funds of Knowledge. The concept of funds of knowledge emerged from the work ofVelez-Ibañez and Greenberg [4] who described the strategic and cultural resources and skillsutilized by Mexican American families in the U.S. Southwest. They described how these“specific strategic bodies of information” [4, p. 314], were utilized to ensure and maintain thewell-being of their families. For instance, they described families and their knowledge of folkmedicine to provide medical care for their families due to the lack of doctors and thediscrimination faced by Mexican Americans in rural areas in the Southwest. Eventually, Molland colleagues [5
for the games included in the curriculum. Figure 1. Example of the hardware settingTheoretical FrameworkWe developed a conceptual framework for the PICABOO hardware curriculum that reflected ourteam’s shared vision for the structure and the outcomes of our curriculum. Specifically, we aimto promote engineering identity and persistence by gamifying the learning experience to fostersituational interest [7] and to support students’ self-efficacy for engineering [8]. Additionally,educators' self-efficacy also influences their confidence in teaching hardware concepts [9]. Therelationships between these theoretical foundations are illustrated in Fig. 2 and are incorporatedinto the design and development of the modules
-basedbystander training; self reflections on microaggressions and implicit bias; and in-class teamexercises and discussions on the intersection of power dynamics, team interactions, anddiscrimination, as well as strengthening empathy though a recognition of societal privilege andeconomics factors. Throughout these trainings, activities, and discussions, an emphasis is placedon development of concrete actions that students can take within their current and future teams topromote an inclusive, collaborative, and psychologically safe environment for all members.As implementation of these active learning techniques to DEI concepts within the seniorundergraduate aerospace capstones is a relatively new update to the curriculum, development ofmetrics to gauge
should be moreinclined to further pursue engineering once they realize the importance of it to society. At theend of the project, students were asked to reflect on their experiences using reflection reports andfocus group discussions.The results illustrate a significant increase of interest, sense of belonging and confidence in theircompetent abilities from the engineering students, especially among females and racializedstudents.IntroductionThe engineering discipline currently shows a lack of representation of women and minorities inthe field. Although female undergraduate student enrollment for engineering in Canada has beenabove 20% for the last seven years, the percentage of female engineering faculty members hasremained under 20% for the
privilegeinfluence student teams and team-based design, as well as short reflections asking students toapply such lenses to their teamwork experiences, following emancipatory pedagogy suggestionsof Freire [14], hooks [15], and others. For example, we assigned a reading on groupconversational characteristics, which led to a number of interesting reflections from somestudents about how much they enjoy “ritual opposition” (a method of testing ideas by tearingthem down, which Tannen [16] claims is common amongst men) and from other students abouthow those same interactions make them feel unsafe and silenced. Most reflections indicated 1students realize that neither
for her efforts in encouraging students to develop an entrepreneurial mindset. Amy has contributed to the development of a new hands-on multidisciplinary introduction to engineering course and a unique introduction to engineering MOOC. She is interested in curricular and co-curricular experiences that broaden students’ perspectives and enhance student learning, and values students’ use of Digital Portfolios to reflect on and showcase their accomplishments. Amy earned her Master’s degree in Biomedical Engineering from Arizona State University (ASU), and is currently pursuing her PhD in Engineering Education Systems and Design.Ms. Jill L. Roter, Arizona State University Jill Roter is a senior instructional design
extensive experience training MI and isa member of the MI Network of Trainers, an international collective of MI trainers which promotesbest practice in MI training and practice. Due to the challenges in getting 17 people from sixdifferent departments or service units in one place, the course was run as two weekly 1-hoursessions for a total 15 sessions. This allowed the participants who had little to no counsellingbackground to gain confidence and skills. They were able to practice reflective listening and MIskills between sessions and share experiences with the group. This also built a learning community,which will be important for debriefing after difficult conversations. As one participant said, “Theway the course was delivered in small doses
-Atlantic section as well as ASME and IEEE. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Virtual Service-Learning Tutoring Experience for EngineeringUndergraduatesAbstractIn the fall semester 2020 a service-learning option was provided to students enrolled in aprobability and statistics class that is required of all engineering majors. The instructor hadpreviously participated in service-learning seminars for faculty at the university who wereinterested in using that pedagogy in their classes. This paper reviews the seminar program, thebackground of the community partner, the nature of the service-learning experience and thequalitative reflections of the students who
methods for determining surface roughness have also beendeveloped. All of these methods operate under the principle that a reflection of a surface carriesinformation about that surface1. An example is shown in the figure. Figure 1 Reflected laserThere are many variations of using light to perform non-contact surface roughness measurement.One apparatus capable of accomplishing this has been developed by the EngineeringApplications Center at the University of Hartford. This design uses a solid state red laser toprovide a monochromatic collimated light source which is aimed perpendicularly to the surfacein question. The backscatter or diffuse reflection2 from the surface is reflected coaxially backtowards the
public profile [19]; therefore, engineering and non-engineering students working on surveying problems would be able to learn about this major andincrease the awareness of surveying among engineering and non-engineering students.The paper has the main objective to discuss the concept of integrating Math and Statisticscourses with Surveying Engineering, and to outline the main steps of the implementation plan.We discuss our developed a framework for classroom implementation that is characterized bythe acronym DSR, which stands for Discuss, Solve, and Reflect. The paper also providesnumerical examples of surveying related RL problems relevant for different Math and Statisticscourses.Future Implementation PlanAs educators we see those students
Technology). This literacy variable is concerned with learners’ awareness of various available technologies that could be used to improve their work as well as their social life and self-improvement. It also reflects the willingness to explore and adopt technology. Mature students become aware of state-of-the-art technologies relevant to their professional domain and personal needs. They are also receptive to change in their existing ways of doing things as well as to the adoption and adaptation of new technologies for better work performance. • Literacy 2: Operational Skills. This literacy variable reflects the understanding of learners about the purposes and functionality of various technologies, the
comparative energy and pollution outputs associated with landfilling or waste-to-energy incineration of the non-recycled wastes. 7 Reflective Students discuss what they learned from the guest speakers and their Essay current impressions of EVEN, including if they plan to stay in the major and what topics they are particularly interested in.In assignments 1, 5, and 7 students typically indicate which sub-discipline area(s) of EVENinterest them. This evolves over the course of the semester, including students who indicate inassignment 7 that they don’t intend to major in EVEN. Assignments 2, 3, and 6 allowed thestudents to experience how energy
University. In addition to technical research interest in applied surface chemistry, her engineering education research interests include the learning of engineering modeling, the impact of reflective practice in learning engineering, authentic assessment methods, and "girl-friendly" education.Vincent Pizziconi, Arizona State University Vincent Pizziconi is an Associate Professor in the Bioengineering Department at ASU. His teaching responsibilities are in the areas of introductory engineering, engineering design and biomaterials. His research interests are in innovative education in engineering and on the development of molecular, cellular and tissue strategies to develop bioresponsive and
Paper ID #18355Technological and Engineering Literacy Classes from different perspectives:A pilot studyDr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning and aspects of tech- nological and engineering philosophy and literacy. In particular how such literacy and competency are reflected in curricular and student activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching engineering in particular
anengineering degree and write a reflective comprehensive report at the end of the course.Previously published results reported a positive impact on first-year engineering studentretention and performance after the first year of implementation of the DYP program. The resultsof the four-year longitudinal study confirm an increase in overall GPA and persistence for thefirst-year, but more remarkably it shows that the DYP program has a long term sustainable effecton student success. Results show statistically significant differences in GPA and persistence ratesbetween the DYP cohort and control cohort for all years. The DYP cohort showed higher overallGPAs: +0.53 year one, +0.33 year two, +0.31 year three and +0.26 year four (p<0.001, exceptfor year
the presented activities was performed byasking students: Please write something you learned after visiting each of the projects in today’sfield trip. Students were given a reflection worksheet at the first activity they attended and wereinstructed to respond to the same prompt after completing each activity. Student open-endedresponses were analyzed using a thematic data analysis approach [12-13].Content InterestStudent interest toward the outreach event activities was gathered by asking students to respondto a single question on a poster board: Did you learning something interesting from this activity?A poster board was mounted on the wall adjacent to each activity (Figure 1). The poster boardsincluded three response options selected by
often team-based and develops based on peer, colleague, and client feedback.attempted to address in this study. This is a validation study of an open-ended questionnaire, theViews about the Nature of Engineering Knowledge (VNOEK) Questionnaire, which was Elements of this framework reflect other NOE descriptions in the literature [9] [14] and it is alsodesigned to gather K-16 teachers’ views about the NOEK. The questionnaire was created as part supportive of those other articulations. However, it is not identical, and we needed an instrumentof
forentrepreneurship and innovation. Although studies have analyzed how students perceive this typeof training, few of them have unveiled its influence on behaviors and career goals. The formativeuse of the assessment instruments employed is limited, so more efforts are needed to evaluateentrepreneurial training towards its continuous improvement. This article proposes a methodologyto involve students in curriculum evaluation so they become partners in curriculum delivery andteaching practices. To explore its benefits, we applied it on a Major focused on engineering design,entrepreneurship and innovation. During classroom sessions of three Major courses, a form wasused to generate individual reflections and collective discussions about course methods
Feedback provided to learners (dialog, email, etc.) o Recommendations accepted/rejected o Instructor’s observations Simulation Output: o Last phase/cycle completed o Results of schedule, cost, range and quality o Final status charts o Final score Self-Reflection: o Reflection feedback provided to the learner o Learner’s reflection inputALATs provide the capability to visualize the experience performance data, userrecommendations, and user actions. Figure 2 shows a screenshot of the Learning Analysis Tool.For example, instructor could use this tool to visualize the weight recommendation for APSdepartment by a specific student, and analyze the actions made before each
potentiallymake improvements in curriculum based on these findings. Therefore, this paper takes theFirst-year Engineering Honors Program at the Ohio State University in the United States andthe Engineering Experimental Class at Beihang University in China as their case studies ofinternational comparison of the entire first two years’ curriculum. As an intermediary ofteaching activities and the basic guarantee of achieving educational goals, course is ablueprint and plan for cultivating what types of people. This paper takes courses as theresearch object, compares the whole course setting, and studies the syllabi of basic coursesand teaching methods reflected in the syllabi. Methodologies including text analysis,frequency analysis, comparative research
, being two faculty from the College of Liberal Arts (Interior Design program), onefaculty from the College of Agriculture (Landscape Architecture program), and three from thePurdue Polytechnic Institute (two faculty from Construction Management Technology, and onefrom Mechanical Engineering Technology). The authors´ academic ranks also vary, includingfour assistant professors, one associate professor, and one full professor.The methodology for this study includes collecting individual reflections from the facultyinvolved. Faculty members were provided with twelve guiding questions to help them focus ontheir expectations about this collaborative process and experience during the early planningprocess. All faculty members involved in the DCI
similar summer research programs offered at universitiesaround the country. The framework of the supporting features of Northeastern University’sprogram is what enables participants to succeed in the labs, build self-efficacy in STEM andprepare them for their academic journey into college. The weekly schedule is supported throughmorning homerooms during which a variety of topics and activities are introduced, in addition tolunchtime technical seminars, and field trips to local companies and research facilities. Utilizingformative evaluations, such as weekly reflections to inform program design and implementation,allows staff to make adjustments that might be necessary to ensure a high level of participant andfaculty satisfaction with the program
first course. Results of thisqualitative assessment were analyzed using a rubric developed to measure growth in perceptionsand attitudes. In addition, students wrote reflection papers about practical leadershipexperiences during their industry internships, using the guiding principles and themes of theprogram to illustrate what they learned. Students also synthesized their observations of industryleaders after shadowing each of two C-Level leaders.Early results from assessments conducted after the first year in the program indicate students aredeveloping significant self-awareness, building life-long skills and habits that will serve themwell as they assume greater leadership responsibility. Early results also indicate the necessity ofcreating