one works as an Engineer by definition. [Instead] we work as a construction commission. So you don’t work as an engineer, pure engineer. So I don’t feel like [projects] would be beneficial. If the professors keep giving you projects, you’re not going to apply it actually at work. Instead they [could] give you calculations to the problems - that might be helpful.As the above example shows, students in the focus group drew upon their understanding of thenature of the workforce in the region in order to determine the relevance of the project. Whilesuch views are not likely to reflect the emerging job functions in the MENA region [15],instructors may garner more student buy-in by engaging with these perceptions of the
associated activities.AcknowledgmentThe project is sponsored by the National Science Foundation grant DUE-1457880. Their supportis greatly appreciated.References 1. Anderson, J., Barrett, K., and P. Schwager, “Information Systems Certification: The Perspective Of The Human Resource Manager,” Eighth Americas Conference On Information Systems, p.p. 2134 – 2142, 2002. 2. Sorkin, S., “Promoting computer science, engineering, and related programs with scholarships and student support services,” Frontiers in Education Proceedings 35th Annual Conference, p.p. 2-21, 2005. 3. Packard, B., “Mentoring and Retention in College Science: Reflections on the Sophomore Year,” Journal College Student Retention, vol. 6 (3), p.p. 289-300
-point scale. DoS Domain DoS Category DoS Scores (n=4) Average Range Activity Engagement Participation 3.25 2-4 Purposeful Activities 3.75 3-4 Engagement with STEM 3.25 3-4 STEM Knowledge and STEM Content Learning 3.5 3-4 Practices Inquiry 3.5 3-4 Reflection 3.25 2-4The classroom used at ECSU allowed informal
", Global J. Eng. Educ.,vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 89-100, 2007.[4] J. A. Donnell et al., "Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communicationskills: What the literature says", Proc. 118th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 22. 1687.pp 1-13, 2011.[5] K. P. Mineart, M. Cooper, "Improving student technical communication via self-reflection", Proc. 122nd ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., pp. 26.927.1-26.927.13, 2015.[6] G. Dixon, G. T. Beverly, "Improving undergrad presentation skills", Proc. 122nd ASEEAnnu. Conf. Expo., pp. 26.933.1-26.933.17, 2015.[7] O. Buzzi, S. Grimes, A. Rolls, "Writing for the discipline in the discipline?", Teaching inHigher Education, vol,17, no. 4, pp. 479-484, 2012.[8] D. Rus, "Developing technical writing skills to engineering
U.S.filled in 47% of all jobs but only 24% of the STEM jobs [6]. In other words, 76% of the STEMjobs are held by men. In community services, women had a volunteer rate of 27.8% in 2015compared to men 21.8%. Women volunteered at a higher rate than men and this was true acrossall age groups, educational levels, and major demographics characteristics (such as race andemployment status) [7].Influence is closely associated with leadership. A capable leader provides guidance at theworkplace, home, and/or community [8]. It follows that, those influencing are consideredefficient leaders that motivate their colleagues, family or community [9, 10]. Transformativeleadership idealizes influence which reflect standards of moral and ethical conduct; it
, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. ReferencesBarr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.Computer Science Teacher Association (CSTA), & International Society for Technology in
. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, L. C. Benson, A. E. Bumbaco, N. Kellam, A. L. Pawley, and C. M. L. Phillips, “Qualitative research quality: A collaborative inquiry across multiple methodological perspectives,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol 106, no. 3, pp. 398-430, 2017.[57] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, “Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol 102, no. 4, pp. 626-659, 2013.
, andBiomimicry, participants were asked to reflect to what extent they felt prepared to teach K-12children maker-centered learning, innovator competencies, and biomimicry. Responses wererecorded on a Likert scale from 1 (no emphasis) to 5 (complete emphasis).For the scale Value of Maker-Centered Learning, Innovator Competencies, and Biomimicry,participants were prompted to identify the extent to which they see value in K-12 studentsengaging with 15 topics related to maker-centered learning, innovator competencies, andbiomimicry. Participant responses were recorded on a Likert scale from 1 (no value) to 5(complete value).For the scale Utility of Maker-Centered Learning, Innovator Competencies, and Biomimicry,participants were prompted to rate the
computationalsimulations. This was a crucial component in the learning process as they learned the connectionwith and the need for experimental testing. This was reflected in one response, “We also knewthat the isolation would have an effect on the structure response however, we didn’t expect it tohave a huge impact. The results of our data was shocking to all of us.” Lastly, by using theisolators in the experimental test, the students had excellent insight into ways that these 3Ddevices can be improved for future applications as discussed in the next section. Overall, thestudy was effective in bringing a rather theoretical subject matter such as seismic isolation to lifeand increasing students’ ability to relate to the subject matter and begin to build upon
becoming an effective professor. These categoriesare broad and it is apparent that the assessment of performance is unavoidably subjective. Eachindividual brings a unique perspective to a classroom experience, which influences theirperception of the communication skills, organization, and caring spirit of the professor. Whilethe proposed rubric does not eliminate the subjectivity of a professor’s teaching performance, itdoes provide a tool for young professors to reflect on performance and identify focus areas thatare shown to improve teaching.Final Credits – AcknowledgementsThe inspiration for this collaboration began at one of the staple experiences for young andaspiring civil engineering professors. The ASCE ExCEEd Teaching Workshop, or
observers and how to provide collegial and useful feedback. Later in thesemester, after all members of a group have completed their observations, each group meets toprovide feedback to one another. Finally, each participant submits a reflection paper at the endof the semester. Eleven faculty (including three from Hillsborough Community College)participated during year three and thirteen more are set to participate in spring 2019. Participantsare provided a stipend of $500.(d) Training for graduate assistants in laboratory coursesPrior to the start of a fall semester, three to four days of training are provided to graduatestudents who are assisting in laboratory courses. The morning sessions are led by STEERpersonnel who model active learning
education and developers of instructional materials and curricula, as well asteachers and designers planning classroom strategies, of initiatives in formal engineeringeducation. The development of educational strategies is explored with the intent to move studentsalong a trajectory towards expert design behavior.AcknowledgementJeff Kan carried out the sentiment analysis. This material is based upon work supported by theNational Science Foundation under Grant Numbers: 1463873 and 1463809. Any opinions,findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References Ahmed S. (2001). Understanding the use and reuse of experience in
Paper ID #25278Board 34: Use of Big Data Analytics in a First Year Engineering ProjectDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Nidhal Carla
answers questions. 30% Project How well the schedule and the budget are managed with remaining time, tasks and Planning & resources. Are the tasks done in a reasonable time or last minute? Are the task’s management dependencies, priorities, critical path, issues, risks, delays, and issues managed well and reflected in the task planning? A recovery plan is in place in case of delays task 30% reshuffling and rescheduling? Technical Individual technical contribution towards the project on a regular basis. All team Contribution members have well-thought-out solutions for technical issues and they are resolved in timely manner. Technical achievements are tested and verified
being answered affirmatively. So far, for addressing program elements in #2, students aremost satisfied when being given tours of energy businesses and buildings, and surveys are beingdeveloped to address the question thoroughly.Acknowledgement of SupportThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1565068.DisclaimerAny opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.5. References[1] National Science Foundation, "NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Program | NSF - National Science Foundation," 2018. [Online]. Available
typically represent the dominate groups inengineering programs.Future work will complete this study with the full data set and seek corrective action for thetroubling trend of intervention driving students away. Additionally, more tailored approach to eachmajor type may be necessary in order to prevent negative consequences of intervention.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no.DUE-1431578. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] W. S. Swail, K. E. Redd and L. W. Perna, Retaining Minority Students in Higher Education: A
comprehensively what studentswere thinking regarding how they were learning professional skills. Our results showed thatstudents value the ABET outcomes and think professional skills are essential for careerdevelopment but felt the PLI implementation was not an effective way to teach and encouragethose skills.As industry and student needs evolve over time, programs similar to the PLI must remainadaptable and receptive to feedback to ensure the content reflects those changes. Based on theresults from our current study, engineering students believe they should be learning ABETprofessional skills via integration into the core curriculum. As ABET professional skilldevelopment is integrated into the core engineering curriculum, it will be essential
National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Security Agency(NSA) GenCyber Award #H98230-18-1-0095 (called GenCyber:COWPOKES); 2) The NSF NoyceGrant No 1339853 (called SWARMS); and 3) The US federal Math and Science Partnership grantunder No Child Left Behind (NCLB) (P.L.107F110, Title II, Part B) administered by the WyomingDepartment of Education MSP Grant No. 1601506MSPA2 (called RAMPED). Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the NSF, the NSA, or the U.S. government.This work was completed with the help of students from the University of Wyoming through thedirection of the College of Engineering’s CEDAR (Cybersecurity EDucation
evaluationcontext 0 2 20 0 reportAssessment of SO(i)SO(i) includes a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. InCapstone II, students must reflect upon the project they just completed and state what they woulddo differently if starting over again. Table 7 shows the results of this assessment. All six (100%)of groups performed satisfactorily or better on this factor. Table 7: Results of assessment of SO(i) AssessmentCriteria Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Excellent Tool Commentsi - a recognitionof the need for,and an ability toengage in life
losingcommunication with the RPS system.Beyond the level of accuracy provided, the system does face other limitations. Reflected lightand glare inhibit QR code detection when said glare occurs adjacent to the QR code itself.Detection is also inhibited when QR codes are not perpendicular to the camera. The system canhandle most skewing of QR codes less than 20°, however larger angles result in loss of detectionwhile moving and severe angles can prevent stationary QR codes from being detected at all.CostThe cost of the system for support of one course was approximately $6,000. This estimateincluded the 8020 aluminum structure, the cost of the LabVIEW and NI vision software, thecomputer, and the electronics of the system. The effective cost of the system for
lower rate than any other discipline1, which is reflected in anaggregate participation rate of about 17.8% in science and engineering at the associate’s andbachelor’s degree-levels for military servicemembers and veterans.2 Although a large portion ofveterans perform technical roles during their military careers, those experiences do not typicallylead to technical careers after their military service. This project, Stern2STEM, investigates thetransition of servicemembers from military service to baccalaureate STEM degree programs andimplements evidence-based interventions that increase participation in STEM fields and supporta more successful transition into technical careers. By providing student veterans, who alreadypossess technical STEM
and criteria established by accrediting agencies such as theACCE for BIM education. This may be one of the reasons why many CM programs are stillstruggling with incorporating BIM education in their curricula. To support industry innovation,CM programs should offer BIM education to students for their future careers.Innovative construction companies (e.g., Turner, Skanska, Whiting-Turner, etc.) have creatednew BIM and virtual design and construction (VDC) positions as they transition from traditionalpractices to ones integrating BIM technology into their organization. To reflect this industrydemand and change, CM programs have been gradually introducing BIM in their curricula. Inliterature, the importance of BIM education for students’ future
insolation during the monthTable 1- List of participant Activities with specific learning objectives and outcomes. Activity # 1: Basics of Solar Trajectory in the Sky.Participants meet at the Sundial during different months of the semester, at noon time, andperform simple measurements: Activity # 2: Clear sky insolation calculator.Following [6], participants created a calculator for direct, diffuse and reflected radiation, using aspreadsheet. The exercise was done for different locations, hour of day, and panel’s tilt andorientation. Activity # 3: Determination of Solar Panels Efficiency.Endowed with an inexpensive pyranometer, participants measured the global irradiance in theplane of the array of a campus photovoltaic array
materials are commonlyused by NASA: 1. Aerogel: 99.8% air and the rest is silica/glass. 2. Gold paint: Commonly used on rovers, gold paint’s high reflectivity helps reduce energy that is radiated from body.Dissociation of Water: ElectrolysisThis method is currently used in industrial applications. It involves using electricity todisassociate [2]the water into hydrogen and oxygen which is then stored. This method is wellunderstood in industry and required little research. This offered the project a way forwardwithout requiring deep research into the disassociation.Water Vapor CaptureCapturing the water vapor is the crux of this project. The water on the moon exists as ice belowthe surface. There are two main methods of extracting the water
detection tools, such as Moss [10], may also be integrated for instructors as they become necessary. Moreover, besides record every single operation of students and program execution settings, it is possible to store copies of students’ code to understand their progress. The information will be valuable for future studies on how students learn and debug their programs. Acknowledgement We want to thank the AWS Cloud Credits for Research and the Microsoft Azure for Research Program. This project is supported in part by NSF ACI1535108. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations in this materials are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
require them to organize a local fair. We expected this toresult in 34 mentored students participating in the 2014-2015 program. This goal was met: in thespring, project teachers (N=17) reported between 0 to 58 students (Med. = 9) participating inS&E fairs at their school. Teachers reported mentoring between 0 to 47 students (most rangedfrom 2-4, Med. = 3). Excluding the teacher who reported 47 mentees, this leads to a total numberof 51 students who were mentored this year. Although this result was encouraging, the studentsmentored did not reflect school diversity to the extent that the program had hoped. Table 2 shows the characteristics of students in the class, who completed fair projects,and who were mentored. Underrepresented
rudimentary examples from the classroom sessions. Thehomework examples will evolve to reflect more real-world situations, with more open-endedproblems. A flipped format alone, without meaningful assessments, does not necessarily meanthe instructor is doing “less of the doing and thinking for the students”[12] simply by moving thesolving of closed-ended analysis problems from the home into the classroom.References[1] Dollar, A., and Steif, P. (2009) “A web-based statics course used in an inverted classroom.” Proc. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Austin, TX.[2] Wiggins, G., and McTighe, J. (2005) Understanding by design, 2ed., ASCD, Alexandria, VA.[3] King, A. (1993) “From sage on the stage to guide on the side.” College
make adaptations to suit students with less flexibleschedules, especially engineering students, reflected a commitment by faculty and administratorsto be entrepreneurial in seizing opportunities to develop the program.Engineering ChangesAs entrepreneurship activities proceeded in the Business Department, in the Engineeringdivision, a first-year introductory course intended to familiarize students with computerapplications for engineers was modified in 2013 to follow a new paradigm wherein coursecontent was presented paralleling a real-world engineering consulting project. Topic-specificlectures focused on requisite computer application, analysis and writing skills were paced withperiodic “business meetings.” Those meetings were related to a
the UK were likely to be hired into industry engineeringjobs for which they were far less qualified than their American student counterparts. Uponfurther study and reflection, however, it became clear that UK businesses viewed a Third Classdiploma in much the same way a USA employer would view an American graduate with a 2.0GPA, i.e. as minimally qualified to be a potential employee.The author’s initial impression was that the external assessment of UK engineering educationprograms was much more rigorous than in the USA, due to the frequent encounters betweenexternal reviewers. However, after attending a UK exam board meeting, the author realized thatthe primary difference was not in the frequency of the visits. Rather, the six year cycle of
, labs, and online learning modules related to clean energy that reflects industry trends. This will allow faculty to easily modify curriculum to keep up with industry trends in the rapidly changing field of renewable energy technology. o Provide students with a core technical knowledge base (suggestions included electronics, HVAC, or Instrumentation) o The curriculum should be dynamic in its forms and modalities to enable adaptations as the industry and its technologies change • Provide education and training to help students develop “soft skills” such as communication, teamwork, adaptability, and problem solving. These skills are important to have in