shouldbe wary of how early technical STEM courses may impact students' approaches to projects lateron and should look for opportunities to let students bring in pieces of their identity or otherinterests. For example, an RPI assignment lets students tell creative stories with alternate endingsto practice branching or Fiesler et al.'s CS1 assignment asks students to write a program to makedecisions about a list of college applicants [32, 33].Considerations for readings and HCD topics-- While the students' responses to the first HCDreading assignment were more tech-centric than HCD-aligned, their responses to later readingassignments were more balanced. This shows that shifting a perspective takes time and it isworthwhile to have multiple
; Castellan, 1988) to analyze the means of our originalitem scores (scaled 0-3) across science content area and grade-level to determine the extent towhich these different classroom types differed in terms of the degree (or level of rigor) to which agiven item was implemented. This second analysis allowed us to expand our understanding fromthe crosstab analysis to consider the degree to which each item was present in a given context. Wealso conducted post-hoc Dunn tests (Siegel & Castellan, 1988) when item mean differences werefound to be statistically significant to identify the item level(s) in which these differences occurred. Findings and DiscussionDue to the exploratory nature of our work, the following
gone from zero EOP outcomes addressed to twenty addressed andseven assessed across multiple years. The next phase will be to carefully review where the gapsare in the curriculum and determine what targeted efforts can be made to increase adoption andintegration of the framework.AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by a grant from The Lemelson Foundation.References [1] M. Robinson and K. Sutterer, “Integrating sustainability into civil engineering curricula” Proceedings of the Annual ASEE Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, June 22- 25, 2003, https://peer.asee.org/12190. [2] S. Burian, “Teaching sustainability and sustainable engineering practice in the civil engineering curriculum,” Proceedings of the Annual
., Reed, T., Imbrie, P., & Reid, K. (2014). Research-Informed Policy Change: ARetrospective on Engineering Admissions. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 274-301.Jacob, B. A., Lefgren, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226–244Lagerlof, J.N.M., and A. J. Seltzer. (2007). “The Effects of Remedial Mathematics on theLearning of Economics: A Natural Experiment.” Working Paper.Legewie, J. & DiPrete, T.A. (2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in scienceand engineering. Sociology of Education, 1-22.Lord, S., Ohland, M. W., Layton, R. A., & Camacho, M. M. (2019). Beyond pipeline andpathways: Ecosystem metrics. Journal of
Approach to MeetingSustainable Development Goals. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education,2022References [1] Oded Berger-Tal and Jose´ J. Lahoz-Monfort. Conservation technology: The next generation. Conservation Letters, 11(6):e12458, 2018. [2] Gerardo Ceballos, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anthony D. Barnosky, Andre´s Garc´ıa, Robert M. Pringle, and Todd M. Palmer. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5):e1400253, 2015. [3] Jenna Mueller, Mary Dotson, Jennifer Dietzel, Jenna Peters, Gabriela Asturias, Amelia Cheatham, Marlee Krieger, Baishakhi Taylor, Sherryl Broverman, and Nirmala Ramanujam. Using human-centered design to connect engineering
Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper No. AC 2010-925 7ASEE 2022 Paper, Minneapolis, MN, June 22, 2022 (Submission 22; April 10, 2022)[4] C. Carroll, S. A. Sell, and M. B. Sabick, “Introduction to Entrepreneurial-minded Learningfor Faculty of Foundational STEM Courses Using the KEEN Framework”, 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Paper #18279[5] https://engineeringunleashed.com/card/618AppendixIn this appendix, the tasks of each module are briefly introduced and student video samples areused to illustrate how each module works in the following sections.Module 1 Tasks: Atomic structure of engineering
an Innovating Curriculum with an EntrepreneurialMindset workshop organized by KEEN. The feedback and support provided by workshop facilitatorsAndy Gerhart, Glenn Gaudette, and Brad Dennis, and the ongoing coaching of Heather Dillon wasinstrumental to this work. The current version of this project was developed with funding from anEngineering Unleashed Fellowship from KEEN.References[1] Hart Research Association, “Falling short? College learning and career success,” 2015.[2] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. Jossey- Bass, 2016.[3] R. Marra, D. Jonassen, B. Palmer, and S. Luft, “Why Problem-Based Learning Works: Theoretical Foundations.,” J. Excell. Coll. Teach., 2014.[4] M. Besterfield-Sacre
of information. He is often preoccupied with issues of surveillance and newlimits on privacy due to technology.References[1] C. E. Harris Jr., M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? And When?,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 93–96, 1996, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00216.x.[2] B. Newberry, “The dilemma of ethics in engineering education,” SCI ENG ETHICS, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 343–351, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.[3] C. Fiesler, N. Garrett, and N. Beard, “What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics?: A Syllabi Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland OR USA, Feb. 2020, pp. 289–295. doi
Oct. 23, 2021).[6] D. A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2013.[7] M. Thüring and S. Mahlke, “Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction,” International Journal of Psychology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 253–264, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1080/00207590701396674.[8] T. de Jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, “Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education,” Science, vol. 340, no. 6130, pp. 305–308, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1126/science.1230579.[9] D. May, “Cross Reality Spaces in Engineering Education – Online Laboratories for Supporting International Student Collaboration in Merging Realities,” International Journal of Online and
., Walters, R., Fernández-Frey, M., Ramírez, M.,Rosado Casanova, B., Heemstra, J., Marshall, A.-M., & Rodríguez, L. F. (2022). Compound[ing]Disasters in Puerto Rico: Pathways for Virtual Transdisciplinary Collaboration to EnhanceCommunity Resilience, manuscript in review Global Environmental ChangeWarnick, G., et al. 2008. Globalization: A new frontier for capstone courses. Proceedings of the2008 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Pittsburg, PA: ASEE.McKim CA. The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of MixedMethods Research. 2017;11(2):202-222. doi:10.1177/1558689815607096Paschal, C. B., & Crist, I. S., & Rowe, C. J. (2017, June), Strategies for Successfully IncreasingEngineering Study Abroad
through food and cooking,” Matter, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2578–2581, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.005.[4] E. A. Nevenglosky, C. Cale, and S. P. Aguilar, “Barriers to Effective Curriculum Implementation,” Res. High. Educ. J., vol. 36, p. 31, Jan. 2019.[5] National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, Design, Selection, and Implementation of Instructional Materials for the Next Generation Science Standards: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018. doi: 10.17226/25001.Appendix A – Pre-COVID Materials OutreachPre-COVID Materials OutreachFor “off-campus” outreach, we worked with local teachers to understand the topics they werecovering and how our efforts could complement
-07052016000400017.[10] F. Kri, F. Gil, M. González, & C. Lamatta, “Ranking de Notas como predictor de éxito en la educación superior. Caso de estudio USACH,” Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Santiago, Tech Memo. Consejo Nacional de Educación CNED, dec. 2013.[11] D. Contreras, S. Gallegos, & F. Meneses, “Determinantes de desempeño universitario: ¿importa la habilidad relativa?”, Cal Edu, n.o 30, p. 18, apr. 2009, doi: 10.31619/caledu.n30.172.[12] F. Gil, R. Paredes & I. Sánchez, “El ranking de las notas: inclusión con excelencia”, Centro de políticas públicas de la UC, vol. 8, nº 60, pp. 1-19, may. 2013.[13] C. Pérez, L. Ortiz & P. Parra, “Prueba de Selección Universitaria, rendimiento en
and J. A. Dantzler, “Mathematical problem solving forengineering students,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference & Exposition, 2005.[3] J. A. Livingston, “Metacognition: An Overview,” ERIC Institute of Education Sciences,2003. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED474273. [Accessed Feb. 5, 2022].[4] S. J. Grigg and L. C. Benson, “A coding scheme for analyzing problem-solving processes offirst-year engineering students,” European Journal of Engineering Educations, vol. 39-6, pp.617-635, Mar. 2014.[5] F. Anseel, F. Lievens and E. Schollaert. “Reflection as a strategy to enhance taskperformance after feedback,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol.110-1, pp. 23-35
overview,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 902, pp. 437–447, 2014.[4] R. W. Deters, B. Terwilliger, S. Kleinke, R. K. Coppola, and J. Coppola, “Ten years of the real world design challenge,” in AIAA SciTech Forum, 2018, AIAA Paper 2018-0050.
choice, and three of those six must be in a non-engineering department.This means an aerospace engineering student has only 2-3 courses in which they can specializein an area of their interest, assuming a course in the area of interest to the student is offered in thesemester(s) they take their electives.It is worth noting that the maximum number of credits a student can take without “overloading”is 18, so the maximum number of courses a student could take is about 48, allowing potential formore specialized coursework. Further, some students come into the institution with credits thatcan be applied to some required classes or electives, resulting in more potential for specializedcoursework. It may be worth quantifying in future research how many
Technical Communications in a Introductory Design Course through Interventions from the University’s Writing Center,” submitted to the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition of the ASEE, June 12-15, 2005, Portland, OR.5. See especially The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row, 1976; Madness And Civilization: A History Of Insanity In The Age Of Reason. London, Routledge, 2001; and Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage, 1995.6. Faigley, Lester. The Brief Penguin Handbook. New York: Longman, 2002.7. Ferguson, Eugene S. Engineering and the Mind’s Eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1992.8. Finkelstein, Leo. Pocket Book of Technical Writing for Engineers and Scientists. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2005.9
, NY, USA. https: //doi.org/10.1145/1315803.1315812, 2006, 38–45.[13] D. L. Reinholz, “Developing mathematical practices through reflection cycles,”Mathematics Education Research Journal vol 28, no 3 2016, 441–451.[14] M Meneske, S. Anwar, and Z.G. Akdemir, “How Do Different Reflection Prompts AffectEngineering Students’ Academic Performance and Engagement?” in The Journal ofExperimental Education vol 1 no 19, 2020.[15] Ng Sook Han, Ho Ket Li, Lee Choy Sin, and Keng Pei Sin, “The evaluation of students’written reflection on the learning of general chemistry lab experiment,” in MOJES: MalaysianOnline Journal of Educational Sciences vol 2 no 4, 2014, pp 45–52.[16] R. B. Kline, Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to
and an enhancedlearning environment.Problem DefinitionOne of the first steps in introducing a case study is clearly defining the problem and its context,followed by determining a goal for the analysis, identifying key facts and relevant data, andproposing viable solutions [51]. As the literature indicates, incorporating case studies is a form ofactive learning that engages the students via narrative, which “put[s] [students] squarely in theshoes of real people wrestling with real dilemmas” [52]. Cases also allow students to exercise themoral imagination, which is the ability to view a situation from a variety of perspectives anddiscover new “mental models” for decision making [53].In the complex case of Everest pollution, students will need
, incentive programs, and cost effectiveness: A lack of equity and excellence for black students in texas, new york, and florida. Journal of Negro Education, 84(2):139–153, Spring 2015. [5] Drew S. Jacoby-Senghor, Stacey Sinclair, and J. Nicole Shelton. A lesson in bias: The relationship between implicit racial bias and performance in pedagogical contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63: 50–55, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.010. [6] Ilja Cornelisz, Martijn Meeter, and Chris van Klaveren. Educational equity and teacher discretion effects in high stake exams. Economics of Education Review, 73:101908, 2019. ISSN 0272-7757. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2019.07.002. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com
engineering judgment and to identify ways to supportstudents to make and refine assumptions. Although this study suggests that an open-endedmodeling problem can support teams of students to engage in making assumptions, additionalstudies are needed to understand the ways group dynamics and class norms interact withstudents’ engagement in making assumptions.References[1] J. Gainsburg, “The mathematical disposition of structural engineers,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 477-506, 2007.[2] C. Dym, Principles of Mathematical Modeling, 2nd Ed. Burlington, MA, USA: Elsevier, 2004.[3] S. G. Vick, Degrees of Belief: Subjective Probability and Engineering Judgment. Reston, VA, USA: ASCE Publications, 2002.[4] H
theserelationships.AcknowledgmentThe authors would like to thank the USF College of Engineering Academic Initiative Fund for supportingthe Foundations Lab study, and we thank all the students who participated in the lectures and took thetime to complete the survey and self-reflection assignment.ReferencesAutor, D.H. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation.Journal of Economic Perspectives 2015, 29, 3–30. https://economics.mit.edu/files/11563Barrett, Jacqui. (2018, April 19). The U.S. Is Facing a Critical Skills Shortage, Reskilling Can Be a Partof the Solution. LinkedIn. https://blog.linkedin.com/2018/april/19/the-u-s-is-facing-a-critical-skills-shortage-reskilling-can-be-part-of-the-solution?trk=lilblog_04-26-18_biggest-skill-gap_tl
column based on the testing system was 6 ftat SLU and 4 ft at Rose-Hulman. Furthermore, the capacity of the hydraulic ram used for thecompressive tests is 50 kips. The column was designed to buckle about its weak axis at differentloads depending on effective length to illustrate elastic and/or inelastic buckling. The resultingsection was a W3x2.54 GR 60 “junior I-beam” (3 in. deep I-beam) acquired from Gerdau that istypically used for cross beams of box truck floors. The I-beam has slightly tapered flangessimilar to an S-shape compared to a wide-flange beam typically used as a column, but can still beused effectively to accomplish the objectives of the module. The first step in the design process was to create the column buckling curves
to trigger and monitor logic outputs. Also, its elapsed simulation time is controlled by the user.Figure 10. A datapath with 8 registers, 1 decoder and 2 multiplexers but excluding an ALU At the bottom of the datapath as not shown in figure 10, a function unit which consists of an arithmetic unit and a logic unit (ALU), as well as a shift unit is usually connected at the bottom of figure 10. An input named FS (Function Select) is used to choose which operation to act on the data from the registers that are released by the multiplexers. Full adders and 2’s complement conversions are usually used to build the arithmetic unit. Additional multiplexers inside the function unit are used to form addends and logic shift