ethnic group, were the most certain of choosing engineering or CS as a major (79% were very certain or certain). Males were also more likely (p=.153) to transfer to ASU than females.The students were asked to rank several areas for which they wanted more information. Theareas in order of rank were: 1. Financing a Bachelor’s degree 2. Learn more about engineering 3. Where engineering jobs are located 4. Know more about the engineering majorsIn Fall 2012, we designed a survey for CC students to answer the question: “What about Page 26.550.4engineering attracts or does not attract you
the gender diversity of AfricanAmerican engineering BS degrees is shown in Figure 1, which also shows the initialdecline and slight recovery in gender diversity for all engineering BS degrees across thepast nine years. The female fraction of engineering BS degrees had reached its highestlevel in 2002 at 20.9%.6 Page 26.618.3 Figure 1 Female fraction of African American and all US BS engineering degrees.2African American male recipients of engineering BS degrees grew from 2398 in 2005 to2742 in 2013, an increase of approximately 14%.4 In contrast, the number of femaleAfrican American recipients of engineering BS degrees declined 23%, from 1144 in
contextualizationThe four courses were contextualized in a hypothetical remodeling project of a small, singlefamily residence. This scenario was chosen because it is familiar to students, it is a realisticapplication of class principles, and it lends itself well to integrating material from differentcourses. An overview of the house is shown in Figure 1. Students analyzed two houseremodeling improvements in this project: installation of an air conditioning (AC) unit on theroof, and removal of an exterior wall to open up access to the yard. These two tasks are shown inFigure 2. In what follows, a chronological account is given of the exercises in the class related tothe project.Figure 1: Single family residence used in the remodeling project. Architectural
board and controlling the frequency of a piezoelectric speaker. This previousresearch was presented in several papers 1. The idea has shown great promise in terms ofengaging students in learning programming.Recently, the technology began to offer the new tablet devices that incorporate the capability ofreading eBooks and run different application ranging from games to sophisticated scientificapplications. The major limitation for these devices to spread out quickly in the markets was tillnow the price. Prices have dropped rapidly due to several factors like the mass production,competition, cloning and fast pace of advances in the hardware and manufacturing technology.These devices are now in the hands of almost all college students and very
Program (www.stevens.edu/nano) at Stevens. He has been awarded the NSF CAREER award, the ASEE Mechanics Division Ferdinand P. Beer and E. Russell Johnson Jr. Outstanding New Educator Award, and the 2009 Outstanding Teacher Award from the Stevens Alumni Association. Page 26.1213.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Outcomes of a Systems Engineering Project for K-12 TeachersIntroductionPresident Obama’s Educate to Innovate initiative set a goal of preparing 100,000 new andeffective STEM teachers over the next decade.(1) Concurrently, the publication of the NextGeneration
with guidelines concerning theexpectations of their final presentation. Although the national Future City competition includesthe production of a physical model of the city, there was not adequate time to design, simulate,and construct a physical model in our competition so we instead relied on SimCity™ screenshotsand a narrative in a final written report.The design competition culminated with a presentation by each team in the Pecha Kucha style Page 26.1274.5(Figure 1). Presentations were exactly six slides presented in a 3-minute period (30 seconds perslide). Since teams were large, only a subset of team members presented. Teams were givenonly
) for the 25th to the 75th percentile istypically 1850 to 2100. The breakdown by area of the exam per year is shown as Figure 1.Typically, 95% of the students enrolling ranked in the top 25% of their high schools with the lowof 91% occurring in 2009 and the high of 97% occurring in 2011. Nearly all of the studentsenrolled within the program are considered “traditional,” indicating that they are full-timestudents that enrolled in college immediately after graduating high school2. Page 26.1315.2 750 730 710 690 670 SAT Score
sanitation crisisAbstract:According to the WHO, 2.5 billion people lack access to proper sanitation resources.1 Integral tothis alarming statistic is the absence of sanitation technology. Current engineering initiativeshave responded to this challenge with toilet fairs and competitions showcasing cutting-edgetechnologies in the sanitation sector. That is, engineers have often approached this sanitationcrisis as well as other world problems from a technocentric perspective―the philosophy thatconsiders technology as capable of solving human problems.2 Technocentrism speaks to thecurrent outlook of engineering education. We as engineering students are trained to design andbuild technical solutions for world problems. Furthermore, this focus within
engaged in engineer-esque activities, we hopeto further the conversation surrounding educating the engineer of the future.Broadening Engineering PathwaysA more inclusive vision of engineering crossed with making could build future engineeringcapacity as well as raise awareness to the general public of the work and impact such workoffers. Findings from the Center on the Advancement of Engineering Education’s AcademicPathways Study studying undergraduate persistence in engineering and students’ pathways byand through engineering studies, found two groups of students with different motivations forengagement.1 The first seeks financial security, overcoming barriers of foundational math andscience courses to continue, aiming for graduation. The second
Page 26.616.2more as a metaphor for conveying students’ experience of disappointment than to insinuatemalicious intent.(i)In K-12 engineering programs, the overwhelming curricular emphasis is on engaging, design-based classroom activities: open-ended, hands-on projects requiring creative synthesis acrossmultiple domains of knowledge on the part of the student.1 In university engineering programs,students confront an educational philosophy that can be characterized as exclusionary and builtupon a “fundamentals first” approach to learning:2 analytically rigorous, rote learning of basicprinciples in math and science (e.g., calculus, chemistry, physics) followed by engineeringsciences (e.g. statics, fluid dynamics) followed by engineering analysis
through the Lens of LiminalityAbstractThe purpose of this study is to learn about the experiences of postdoctoral scholars (postdocs) inscience and engineering fields. It is guided by the theory of liminality. Forty-two postdocsemployed at a Mid-Atlantic, research-intensive University, participated in individual interviewsto describe their experiences as postdocs at the University. This paper provides answers to thefollowing three research questions: (1) What are the benefits and challenges of science andengineering postdoc positions? (2) What liminal experiences characterize the postdoc position?and (3) What recommendations to improve the postdoc experience emerge from this study?IntroductionThe purpose of this study is to learn about the
advancement in engineering disciplines and careers.1 For instance,Scholars studying career decision-making and vocational socialization of women engineers have:(a) drawn attention to the prevalence of masculine tropes in engineering schools’ missionstatements,2 (b) related the dominant disciplinary and occupational stereotypes to women’sdisciplinary and career preferences,3 and (c) explained a woman’s choice to build her career inengineering professions requires negotiating the masculinist cultures that prevail incontemporary organizations involved in educating, training and hiring from the workforce thathas received tertiary engineering education.3,4 Such examples have sought to improve thesocialization and mentoring experiences of women engineers
effects of Chernobyl crystallized theimportance to the Germans of protecting one’s own and the significance that energy andenvironmentalism plays in their future and the future of their children.”4 Following theFukushima reactor disaster of 2011, the Energiewende was given even more precedence and apush forward with Chancellor Angela Merkel leading the shut down of 8 of Germany’s 17nuclear reactors (see Figure 1).Figure 1: Nuclear Plant Decommissioning in Germany 2000 – 2020From Energy Transition/Energiewende, Bolle Foundation [5]With this shuttering of nuclear plants, and an overarching goal for “80% of Germany’s electricpower to be generated from renewables by 2050”6, the Energiewende is well underway. In fact,the amount of electricity produced
the unit, students wereintroduced to the problem of land mines in Laos. Un-detonated land mines are a serious Page 26.857.5threat both to large animals such as elephants and to the people who live in these areas.One technique for dealing with them is to lob objects into areas with land mines to safelydetonate them. The students were tasked with the challenge of designing a cheap andportable “launcher” for throwing clay (play-doh) at land mines. Specifically, thefictitious client in this scenario asked the students for a launcher that 1) could launch aprojectile 10 m, 2) could land it within 0.5 m of a target, and 3) incorporated levers inorder to do
adjoining machine shop, and adjacent meeting rooms. Storage for designed systems, supplies,and stock is incorporated into the space. The machine shop, which is connected to the workstudio, is only open during hours when the professional staff is on site, with those hoursexpanded at the end of the semester. This facility is a component of MIT’s Department ofMechanical Engineering and primarily serves that segment of the MIT student population. Figure 1. MIT: Pappalardo LabThe Pappalardo Lab can be characterized as a notable academic makerspace for its level ofstaffing and its training programs. The lab is staffed by six fulltime manufacturing educatorswho provide training and instruction in using the facility’s
further developthan others, be societally relevant, and motivate the students.Figure 1: Methodology of German Engineering18,19.Examples of past design projects include “Construction of a modular coffee machine system forrestaurants of various sizes,” “Design of a very large barbeque grill” (winning design constructedand used successfully), “The use of water absorption on zeolites for cooling,” “An automatic haircleaning apparatus,” and “An un-manned system for destruction of illegal poppy plants.” Page 26.154.5Instructional approach: Didactic concept and support systemTo meet all of these goals in the project week course, it is taught in
InformationModels for the development of additional learning modules. The presented work illustrates howthe influence of instructional theories and design can support the generation of a new learningplatform for construction engineering and management.1. Introduction One of the main objectives of engineering education is to shape students that possess awide variety of knowledge, skills, and attitudes obtained as a result of education, experience, andachievement.[1] This holds true for construction engineering students, who are challenged withreal world problems during their education and after graduation. This educational objectiverequires educators to prepare their learners to solve real world problems, with which theArchitecture, Engineering and
most STEM departments reporting noactive faculty mentoring programs in place. The benefits of mentoring in the workplace havelong been documented in the literature, yet early and mid-career faculty at OU were generallyleft to fend for themselves unless they were fortunate enough to identify helpful faculty in theirdepartments on their own. So, it was thus not surprising that most faculty members indicated thatthey were not receiving assistance from their colleagues or department in the forms of careeradvice and development opportunities and that more mentoring, particularly as it pertains toresearch, was needed (Figure 1). As was seen in other studies, the percentage of women facultywho agreed or strongly agreed with the need for more
multidisciplinary program, housed in the College of Engineering, drawing on specific faculty and departments for its coursework; faculty appointments were in their home department. • Administration of the program by a Director of Graduate Studies, with a staff assistant • Overall coordination by an Advisory Committee appointed by the Dean of Engineering, responsible for curriculum and related issues. • Thesis and non-thesis options, based on coursework primarily in engineering, with at least one course in organizational behavior from the Business School (see Table 1). Courses include those specifically developed for the Manufacturing Systems program, as well as electives from several departmental programs
data indicates that JEE and EJEE have published a similarnumber of articles related to diversity till now, approximately 50 and 56 papers respectively.Itemization of publication data based on a historical timeline reveals the extent of diversity-related engineering education research during various time periods. The timeline data ispresented in Table 1. Table 1. Itemized timeline of diversity-related publications Time period Number of diversity related publications JEE EJEE 2010-2014 8 17 2005-2009 7 22 2000-2004
thecomplimentary studies requirements of Canada’s CEAB criteria, while responding to the uniquechallenges of delivering Humanities instruction to engineers. These in-house Humanitieselectives work to accommodate engineering timetables, address differences in typical courseinstruction and delivery that may challenge our students, and relieve the self-consciousness ofengineering students in an unfamiliar discipline. A more complete discussion of these motivatingfactors and the University of Toronto’s response can be found in Chong, Tihanyi andWilkinson[1].While Representing Science on Stage demands that students step out of their comfort zone totake risks in an unfamiliar discipline, it does so in an environment that is familiar: an engineeringclassroom
(NAE) and its 2007 publicationRising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter EconomicFuture [1] in which they urged a focus on developing, recruiting, and retaining engineers. Datasupporting this demand is documented in the National Science Foundation’s publication, Scienceand Engineering Indicators 2012 [2], using Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2002 to 2018 thatproject job openings from growth and needs replacement, which will top 160,000.There is an evermore urgent need for our higher education sector to graduate engineers whopossess the knowledge, skills, and abilities to respond to a 21st-century world with its technical,social, and ethical complexities. Indeed, engineers’ abilities to meet these needs
these, the Revise/Iterate activity proved promising for two reasons. Iterationis a goal-directed activity that involves making incremental refinements during the developmentof a design solution. A dependence on iteration to optimize solutions, along with consideringtrade-offs and constraints, is one of the distinguishing factors between the process of engineeringdesign and scientific inquiry.2 This is important in the context of STEM education to ensure thatscience inquiry and engineering design are represented authentically, as epistemologicallyrelated, but distinct, problem-solving processes. Secondly, as students iterate through a solutionsto a problem, their understanding of the problem also evolves,1 and studies suggest that a higherrate
students who had shown significant dedication andinterest in the design activities.The assessment process for individual students is designed to customize the assessment processto each student and is modeled after an industry performance appraisal system. Studentsestablish goals and expectations for the semester with guidance from their faculty mentor. Oncethe goals have been determined, progress toward the goals is documented and evaluated.Expectations are communicated with rubrics. Table 1 shows an example of the individualevaluation rubric that students complete to identify and summarize their accomplishments andlearning. Students are assessed over five dimensions of accomplishments, process, criticalthinking, communication and leadership
wascreated to provide students with a working foundation for exploring the governing principles ofmaterials science and the mechanics of materials. Typical class size is 25 students per sectionwith two sections running per semester.The course has four major topic areas as shown in Figure 15: • Characterization of Mechanical Properties • Analysis of Structural Elements • Material Properties and Structure (Science-led Approach) • Life Cycle Thinking and Eco-audits (Design-led Approach) Integrative Design Project Figure 1. Course layout of Materials & Mechanics course5Materials & Mechanics is a multidisciplinary course that provides
differently than any other story. Fundamentals of episodic memory, empathy, andcollaboration were components of the students’ experience and the core part of a final interactiveexhibit visited by more than one hundred people. Results demonstrate broad applicability: 1)fostering communication among engineering and design students with their teams and theirusers, and 2) introducing a generative storytelling approach in an interaction design class.Introduction and BackgroundToday, the need for storytelling1 is perhaps one of the most vibrant, yet misunderstood andunderappreciated qualities of any business. Without coherent, considered storytelling, it isimpossible to craft the kind of subtle brand messaging which separates winning organizationsfrom also
. Page 26.1718.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 What Behaviors and Characteristics Do Engineering Competition Team Members Associate with Leadership?Engineering student competition teams (ECT) are promoted as incubators for the development ofleadership, 1, 2 yet we know little about how leadership actually develops within these teams. Acase study of two teams at a public university in the central U. S. was performed, with theobjective of exploring leadership development at the individual and team levels. Implicit in theconcept of team leadership development is the development of individuals as leaders. This paperdiscusses the behaviors and characteristics that students
Page 26.1724.3a process modified from the Stanford University design process that begins with whateach student personally cares for about the challenges faced by the underservedcommunity. This serves as the team’s point of view for the remainder of the designprocess. It becomes a method for balancing the need to provide immediate assistancewith the ability to thoughtfully create breakthrough-engineering solutions collaborativelywith the community that needs them.The GEE course has the following learning components: 1. An overview of conventional paradigms of development for addressing complex global problems, academia-led engineering initiatives in underserved communities, and challenges of finding sustainable solutions to
freshman tojunior year of our B.S. Bioengineering curriculum.Introduction to the Engineering ProfessionEGS1006L - Introduction to the Engineering Profession is a 1 credit hour freshman level coursethat is the gateway to all subsequent FGCU engineering courses. The course is designed tointroduce the engineering approach to problem solving and the engineering design process,utilizing team-based learning. This is accomplished through an over-arching semester-longresearch project focused on discipline-specific engineering innovations. “Mini projects” are usedin this class to encourage student discovery of new technologies or innovations within their fieldof study as a means of helping them select an appropriate topic for their research project
bothcompletion and accuracy, and partial credit was awarded for both. For the homework, since alarger number of problems were submitted, only a selection of problems that were submittedwere assessed for each assignment. Table 1: Description of courses included in the study ID Assessment Term Class Period Instructor(s) N* H1 Homework Fall 2013 TR 8:00-10:45am A&B 37 H2 Homework Spring 2014 TR 8:00-10:45am A&C 32 Q1 Quizzes Fall 2014 WMF 8:00-9:50am A&C 35 Q2 Quizzes Fall 2014 MWF 11:00-12:50pm B 33*N is the number