Conference Session

Out-of-school-time Engineering: Implications for Underrepresented Students

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University; Radiah C. Minor, School of Agriculture and Envrinmental Sciences, North Carolina A&T State University; Vernal G. Alford III, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

Negron, Niya King, Tameka Coly and Shaerya Patel .REFERENCES1. Kant, J. M.; Burckhard, S. R.; Kilts, W. K.; Min, K., Increasing Diversity in Engineering: Capacity Building Matters. 2014.2. Schunk, D. H.; Miller, S. D., Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. Academic motivation of adolescents 2002, 2, 29-52.3. Shumow, L.; Schmidt, J. A., Enhancing Adolescents' Motivation for Science. Corwin Press: 2013.4. Schmidt, J. A.; Shumow, L., Change in self-efficacy in high school science classrooms: An analysis by gender. Psychology of self-efficacy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers 2012.5. Zeldin, A. L.; Pajares, F., Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Youssef, San Diego State University; Enrique A. Ainsworth, University of California - Los Angeles; Casey Ann Shapiro, UCLA Center for Educational Assessment; Hannah Whang Sayson, UCLA Center for Educational Assessment; Marc Levis-Fitzgerald, University of California - Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

assessment evolutions. Based onfeedback from each assessment, the program evolves as the Center seeks to close gaps betweenthe program expectations and goals, and students’ experiences. Moreover, the Center strives tointegrate best practices per new research. Concurrently, assessment instruments are updated toreflect the updated programs elements and activities. For example, 50% or more of all theparticipants in the Cohort 2 reported large or very large gains in their laboratory safetyknowledge, openness to having their views challenged, openness to work with people withdifferent beliefs, and openness to consider and discuss new research ideas; however these itemswere added to the assessment after review of Cohort 1’s experiences (thus Table 3 does

Conference Session

Chemical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

D. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park; Sarah E. Zappe, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park; Esther Gomez, The Pennsylvania State University - University Park; Manish Kumar, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

– Very good).Analysis of program ratings revealed overall satisfaction with the REU program (M = 4.17; Mo =4). Ratings of “Good” or higher, as evidenced by mean and mode responses, were obtained forthe following REU elements: working relationship with research mentor(s) (M = 3.17; Mo = 4);working relationship with research group members (M = 3.75; Mo = 4); the amount of time spentwith research mentor(s) (M = 2.83; Mo = 4); the advice given about careers and graduate school(M = 3.45; Mo = 3); and the research experience overall (M = 3.25; Mo = 3). The REU elementof the amount of time spent doing meaningful research received a “Fair” rating overall (M =2.83; Mo = 2), suggesting an important area of improvement for the research program.Table 5

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Diversity Issues in K-12 and Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah M. Grzybowski, The Ohio State University; Kerry Dixon, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division

: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subjectability. Oxford Review of Education. 26(1), 35-48.2 Younger, M. & Warrington, M. (1996). Differential achievement of girls and boys at GCSE: Some observationsfrom the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 17, 299-314. Downey, D. B. & Yuan, A. S. V. (2005). Sex differences in school performance during high school: Puzzlingpatterns and possible explanations. The Sociological Quarterly. 46(2), 299-321.3 Hannover, B. & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Whyhigh school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction. 14, 51-67.4 Peetsma, T., Hascher, T., van der Veen

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Entrepreneurship Education in New Contexts

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark M. Budnik, Valparaiso University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. Merrill, "CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment," Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 2, no. 3, 2008.3. C. Charyton, and J. Merrill, "Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 2, 2009.4. M. Perl, "Developing creativity and innovation in engineering and science," Inter. Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, no. 27, 2008.5. H. S. Fogler, S. E. LeBlanc, B. Rizzo, Strategies for Creative Problem Solving, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, 2013.6. T. Simpson, R. Barton, and D. Celento, "Interdisciplinary by design," Mechanical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 9, 2008.7

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning Strategies II

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matias Recabarren, Universidad de los Andes; Claudio Alvarez, Facultad de Ingenieria y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de los Andes; María Ignacia Díaz, Universidad de los Andes

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Commission(CONICYT) through grant FI-11130067.References[1] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey ofAwareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207.[2] Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the developmentof expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-150. Page 26.1166.12[3] National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[4] Felder

Conference Session

Emerging Computing and Information Technologies II

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Candido Cabo, New York City College of Technology/City University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing & Information Technology

sstudents andd/or very baddperformaance of otherrs. Figure 2 shows s the peercent of stuudents who pperformed well (i.e. whoobtained >= 7 in the assessmentss) in the diffeerent program mming conccept assessm ments. The figgureillustrates why computer program mming coursses are gatew way courses with low paassing gradess: inmost con nceptual cateegories less than t 50% of students perrformed at an adequate llevel.4.2 Explo oratory Facto or AnalysisTo furtheer understandd the nature of students’ understandiing of computer program

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Engineering Curriculum Design and Evaluation

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan M Lord, University of San Diego; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University; Euan Lindsay, Charles Sturt University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

5 19% 28%Administrators responded to a question about in which year(s) students study design.Responses are shown in Table 9, noting that respondents were free to select multiple years ifapplicable. Table 9 – In which year(s) do undergraduate students study design? Dept. Head Dean Year (N=166) (N=64) 1 36% 36% 2 51% 48% 3 71% 59% 4 72% 67% 5 or higher

Conference Session

Research Methods I: Developing Research Tools and Methods

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Thomas, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Nicole M. Colston, Oklahoma State University; Tyler Ley P.E., Oklahoma State University; Beverly DeVore-Wedding, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Leslie R. Hawley, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Juliana Utley, Oklahoma State University; Toni Ivey, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Linda Katehi, Greg Pearson, and Michael Feder, Editors. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.3. Davis, L.A. & Gibbons, R.D. (2002). Raising public awareness of engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.4. Wulf, W. A. (1998, Winter). The image of engineering. Issues in Science and Technology. Retrieved from: http://issues.org/15-2/wulf-2/5. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x6. Sadler, P.M., Coyle, H.P., &

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Two-Year Engineering and Engineering Technology Programs

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University; Chitra N. Javdekar, Massachusetts Bay Community College; Claire Duggan, Northeastern University; Marina Bograd

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

subjects that might presenta struggle. Peer and professional tutors are available through the academic achievement centerto assist with technical subjects as well as writing and math. The college caters to workingadults by offering courses after typical working hours, on weekends and online. Facultymembers teaching online curriculum have undergone training and use universal course designtechniques (S. Burgstahler, 2006 16) to cater to all learning styles.Student advising starts prior to entering the program. Students meet with a designated Collegeand Career Navigator who is the first point of contact for each student participating in thiscertificate program. The College and Career Navigator assists with the application process andremains a point

Conference Session

Graduate Student Needs and Experiences, Exploring Graduate Funding and Undergraduate Research Experiences

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert N. Coffey Jr., University of Michigan; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

?  What specific topics or information do you hope will be covered as part of the professional development activities during this summer research experience?The focus of the post-experience survey was to assess academic and developmental outcomesassociated with program participation, as well as students’ experiences. Many of the questionsfrom the pre-experience survey were repeated in the post-experience survey, which alloweddirect comparison of individual answers across the 10-week program. The post-survey alsoincluded a set of open ended questions:  What part(s) of the summer program did you find most valuable or helpful?  What part(s) of the summer program did you find least valuable or helpful?  Please share any

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; P. Scott Carney, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Dipanjan Pan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andrew Michael Smith, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Frederick, A. Byars-Winston, A.-B. Hunter and J. Handelsman, "Increasing the Persistence of College Students in STEM," Science, vol. 341, pp. 1455-1456, 27 September 2013.[4] J. G. Cromley, T. Perez, and A. Kaplan, "Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention: Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions," Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, pp. 1-8, 2015.[5] L. Espinosa, "Pipelines and Pathways: Women of Color in Undergraduate STEM Majors and the College Experiences that Contribute to Persistence," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 209-241, 2011.[6] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. Laursen and T. DeAntoni, "Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for Undergraduates in

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Strategies Beyond the Classroom to Tackle Gender Issues

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katherine G Nelson, Arizona State University; Susan Shapcott, University of Bath ; Jenefer Husman, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

perceive engineering asan overtly hostile environment – in fact, they acknowledged the challenges but seemeddetermined to overcome them. Sheryl Sandberg’s presence at Facebook will only help.References1. Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, (4-11).2. Gibbons, M. T. (2009). Engineering by the numbers. ASEE [Internet]. [revised 2009:1-36. Available from http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2009-profile-engineering- statistics.pdf3. Kvale, S. Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews, learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd

Conference Session

Construction Session 3: Curriculum

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Namhun Lee, Central Connecticut State University; Talat Salama P.E., Central Connecticut State University; Seong Jin Kim, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction

in the Classroom. 3rd Edition, New York, Routledge.5. Leasure, A. R., Davis, L., & Thievon, S. L. (2000). “Comparison of Student Outcomes and Preferences in a Traditional vs. World Wide Web-based Baccalaureate Nursing Research Course.” Journal of Nursing Education, 39: 149-154.6. Cole, R. A. (2000). Issues in Web-Based-Pedagogy: A Critical Primer. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.7. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). “Constructing Virtual Worlds: Tracing the Historical Development of Learner Practices.” Cognition and Instruction, 19 (1), pp. 47-94.8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher, 18 (1), pp

Conference Session

Clinical Learning Experiences in BME

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony E. Felder, University of Illinois, Chicago; Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois, Chicago; Susan Stirling, University of Illinois at Chicago; Kimberlee M Wilkens, University of Illinois at Chicago

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

clinical immersion. To further guide students through the design process, team-basedactivities related to workshop topic(s), readings, and case studies were assigned for individualteam discussions.Program Deliverables and Surveys: By the conclusion of the CIP, teams were expected to generate a single, succinct problemstatement based on their primary research in a clinical environment. Moreover, new to thisprogram year, students were taught the basics of concept exploration and were expected to applythis knowledge to their identified problem. Three deliverables were generated by the programparticipants: individual blog entries, a written team report, and team presentation. The individualpublic blog aimed to document each student’s experience

Conference Session

Computing Technology Applications-II

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yun Dai, University of Southern California; Tianmeng Li, University of New South Wales; Ang Liu, University of New South Wales; Stephen Lu, University of Southern California

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

”,“crossing the chasm”, “technological S curve”, and so forth. Figure 9. Word-cloud of peer interactions within study groups Figure 10. Distance between keywords of peer discussionsLessons Learned about Peer InstructionAt the conclusion of the course, multiple course participants were interviewed to solicit theirfeedback on the P2P platform. Some interesting lessons were learned in terms of how theplatform was used in practice.Generally speaking, student feedback was mostly positive. According to students, it was“fairly straightforward” to learn to use the platform, especially since a detailed user guidehad been provided. It was helpful to view the feedback of other students, which oftentimestriggered a student to

Conference Session

Engineering Design Graphics Division Technical Session 3 - Spatial Visualization Topics

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John E. Bell, Michigan State University; Tommy Lister, Michigan State University ; Srishti Banerji; Timothy J. Hinds, Michigan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Design Graphics

 features that would  promote more meaningful engagement in the app, show the importance of high quality design  and implementation of technology tools for learning and research.  References  [1] S. Sorby, N. Veurink, and S. Streiner, “Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM  outcomes? The answer is ‘yes,’”  Learning and Individual Differences , vol. 67, pp. 209–222,  2018.  [2] M. Berkowitz and E. Stern, “Which cognitive abilities make the difference? Predicting  academic achievements in advanced STEM studies,”  Journal of Intelligence , vol. 6, no. 4, p. 48,  2018.  [3] S. Sorby, B. Casey, N. Veurink, and A. Dulaney, “The role of

Conference Session

Track: Learning Spaces, Pedagogy, & Curriculum Design Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity

Authors

Adam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech; Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Learning Spaces, Pedagogy & Curriculum Design

Paper ID #25004High Risk, (with Hope for) High Reward: Lessons Learned from Planningand Hosting an UnconferenceAdam Stark Masters, Virginia Tech Adam S. Masters is a doctoral student and Graduate Research Assistant at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. They received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Delaware and are currently pursuing a Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Adam’s research interests include access, equity and social justice in engineering.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also

Conference Session

Collaboration and Communication in Problem-based Learning

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Xiang Zhao, Alabama A&M University; Showkat Chowdhury, Alabama A&M University; Tamara Chowdhury, Alabama A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, dissemination of the resultsof this work is expected to provide a model for institutional implementation of evidence-basedpractices at colleges or universities of similar size and/or student body demographics as AAMU,a land-granted minority serving university.AcknowledgmentThis study has been supported by the S-STEM program of National Science Foundation (NSF)and MSEIP program of Department of Education (DOEd). The authors greatly appreciate thesupport and encouragement from the NSF and DOEd program officers and university colleagues.References 1. Chang, M. J., Cerna, O., Han, J., & Sáenz, V. The contradictory roles of institutional status in retaining underrepresented minorities in biomedical and behavioral science majors. The Review of

Conference Session

Biological and Agricultural Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Erin Ingram, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Jennifer Keshwani, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Tammera J. Mittelstet, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Julie Thomas, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biological and Agricultural Engineering

generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press, 2013.[4] “NGSS Hub.” [Online]. Available: https://ngss.nsta.org/About.aspx. [Accessed: 08-Oct-2019].[5] E. R. Banilower, P. S. Smith, K. A. Malzahn, C. L. Plumley, E. M. Gordon, and M. L. Hayes, “Report of the 2018 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education,” Horizon Research, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC, Dec. 2018.[6] Afterschool Alliance, “The Growing Importance of Afterschool in Rural Communities,” Afterschool Alliance, Washington DC, USA, Mar. 2016.[7] E. R. Banilower, P. S. Smith, I. R. Weiss, K. A. Malzahn, K. M. Campbell, and A. M. Weis, “Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science And Mathematics Education,” p. 311, 2013.[8] R. Hammack

Conference Session

First-year Programs: Student Perceptions and Perspectives

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Devin R. Berg, University of Wisconsin-Stout; Tina Lee, University of Wisconsin-Stout; Elizabeth Anne Buchanan, University of Wisconsin-Stout

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

, B. M. Wallen, and J. A. Starke, “An Environmental Engineering Sequence: Deliberately Addressing and Evaluating Environmental Attitudes and Knowledge (presentation & 6-page paper),” presented at the 2017 Mid-Atlantic Section Fall Conference, 2017.[3] S. Dexter, E. Buchanan, K. Dins, K. R. Fleischmann, and K. Miller, “Characterizing the Need for Graduate Ethics Education,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 153–158, doi: 10.1145/2445196.2445245.[4] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

M. Scott Stanford P.E., United States Air Force Academy; Joel Sloan P.E., United States Air Force Academy; James B. Pocock, United States Air Force Academy; M. Mark Russell P.E., DFCE

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

. Furthermore, The Crucibleprovides a culminating experience conducted primarily in a one week timeframe without addinga separate 3-hour (or 6-hour) course, which could prove useful to other programs withconstrained curriculums.References[1] R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, C. D. Sorensen, B. R. Swan, and D. K. Anthony, “A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 1995, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1995.tb00163.x.[2] S. Howe and J. Wilbarger, “2005 National survey of engineering capstone design courses,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2006, pp. 11.4.1-11.4.21.[3] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020,” ABET, 2019. [Online]. Available

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND) Technical Session 14

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Ronald Sturgess, Florida International University; Bruk T Berhane, Florida International University; Stephen Secules, Florida International University; Haiying Long; Daniel Ifeoluwa Adeniranye, Florida International University; Jingjing Liu, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

-traditional students, and broadening participation in engineering education. He received his B.S. in electrical engineering from Tuskegee University, an M.S in journalism from the University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign, an M.S. in physics from Fisk University, an M.S. in industrial engineering from the University of Central Florida and an M.Ed. in educational leadership from Texas Christian University.Dr. Bruk T Berhane, Florida International University Dr. Bruk T. Berhane received his bachelorˆa C™s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland in 2003. He then completed a masterˆa C™s degree in engineering management at George Washington University in 2007. In 2016, he earned a PhDr. Stephen Secules

Conference Session

Learning Mechanics through Visual and Tactile Modalities

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarira Motaref, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics Division (MECHS)

anddevelopment. Prentice-Hall.[2] Letina, A. (2015). Application of Traditional and Alternative Assessment in Science andSocial Studies Teaching. Croatian Journal Educational / Hrvatski Casopis Za Odgoj I[3] Chrysochoou M, Zaghi AE, Syharat CM (2022) Reframing neurodiversity in engineeringeducation. Front. Educ. 7:995865. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.995865[4] Armstrong, T. (2012). First, Discover Their Strengths. Educational Leadership, 70(2), 10.[5] Daniels, S., & Freeman, M. (2018). Gifted dyslexics: MIND-strengths, visual thinking, andcreativity. In S. B. Kaufman (Ed.), Twice exceptional: Supporting and educating bright andcreative students with learning difficulties, Oxford University Press (pp. 266-277).[6] von Károlyi, C. (2001). Visual–spatial

Conference Session

Student Division (STDT) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tahlia Altgold, The Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

thechanging design. Finally, they note that providing students with contextual information beyond medicalneeds supported innovation. This suggests that teaching students to be socially aware of their role andwork as engineers beyond technical efficacy is important in developing their empathic design ability.Thus, Kong et al.’s [12] work provides specific instructional activities designed to teach students how toactively incorporate empathic tendencies into their design process.Eliciting Empathy Through Personal ReflectionWhile the instructional methods previously discussed are embedded in elements of traditional BMEcurriculums (design, teamwork, and ethics), Lunn et al. [13] and Morgan et al. [14] describe a standaloneBME course based on story-driven

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado Denver; Tom Altman; Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado Denver; Heather Lynn Johnson; Marie E. Evans, University of Colorado Denver; David C. Mays, University of Colorado Denver

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Leaving Revisited: Persistence, Relocation, and Loss in Undergraduate STEM Education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019.[7] K. D. Tanner, “Structure Matters: Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity,” CBE—Life Sci. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 322–331, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-06-0115.[8] A. Kezar, S. Gehrke, and S. Bernstein-Sierra, “Designing for Success in STEM Communities of Practice: Philosophy and Personal Interactions,” Rev. High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 217–244, 2017, doi: 10.1353/rhe.2017.0002.[9] R. H. Thaler and C. R. Sunstein, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.[10] J. H. Tomkin, S. O

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Student Growth & Professionalization

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of Portland; Jordyn Wolfand, University of Portland; Kathleen Bieryla, University of Portland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

. 2, pp. 379–387, 1999.[3] H. Rodriguez-Simmonds, J. Ortega-Alvarez, S. Atiq, and S. Hoffmann, “Identifying sources of information that students use in deciding which engi-neering major to pursue Identifying sources of information that first year engineering students use in deciding which engineering major to pursue,” in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.877.1-26.877.16.[4] S. Zahorian and S. A. Zahorian, “Factors that Influence Engineering Freshman to Choose Their Engineering Major Factors that Influence Engineering Freshman in Choosing Their Major,” in 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013, pp. 23.589.1-23.589.13.[5] B. M. Argrow and B. Louie, “Introduction to

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 3 - Diversity

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah Rosene Conover Kimmel, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Maya Sri Miriyala, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Hanwen Liang, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Megha Agrawal, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Kaitlyn Tuvilleja, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Rebecca Marie Reck, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

-principles- guidelines-and-examples[2] D. L. Edyburn, “Universal Usability and Universal Design for Learning,” Interv. Sch. Clin., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 310–315, May 2021, doi: 10.1177/1053451220963082.[3] C. S. Sanger, “Inclusive Pedagogy and Universal Design Approaches for Diverse Learning Environments,” in Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education: Lessons from Across Asia, C. S. Sanger and N. W. Gleason, Eds., Singapore: Springer, 2020, pp. 31–71. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1628-3_2.[4] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the Entrepreneurial Mindset to Engineers. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61412-0.[5] Doug Melton, “CURIOSITY: What do we mean?,” KEEN Cards, Engineering

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 7

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tijesunimi Abraham Adeyemi, Morgan State University; Pelumi Olaitan Abiodun, Morgan State University; Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

work that was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant #1915615, titled “Adapting an Experiment-centric Teaching Approach to Increase StudentAchievement in Multiple STEM Disciplines”. It should be noted that the opinions, results andconclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] H. P. Learn, “Brain, mind, experience, and school,” Comm. Dev. Sci. Learn., 2000.[2] M. Weimer, Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.[3] Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2009, p. 12190. doi: 10.17226/12190.[4] S

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 4: Supporting Success 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manuel A. Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Aidsa I. Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nayda G. Santiago P.E., University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Pedro O. Quintero; Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nelson Cardona-Martinez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Sonia M. Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico Mayagüez Campus

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

Experience Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line. 10.18260/1-2--34508[2] V. Johnston, Why do First Year Students Fail to Progress to their Second Year? An Academic Staff Perspective, In Proc. Of the 1997 British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Univ. of York, Sep. 1997[3] L.A. Kirby and C.L. Thomas, High-impact Teaching Practices Foster a Greater Sense of Belonging in the College Classroom, Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 368-381, Jul. 2021[4] Purzer, S., & Douglas, K. A., & Folkerts, J. A., & Williams, T. V. (2017, June), An Assessment Framework for First-Year Introduction to Engineering Courses Paper presented at 2017 ASEE