such as these, engineers will increasingly work on globallydispersed teams, where engineers in the United States may be working virtually with otherindividuals around the world. Graduates of engineering programs need to be prepared to workon projects that may be physically located in another country. They must also be able to work ondiverse teams with other engineers who may be from a different culture or country. As NAEnotes, “Many advanced engineering designs are accomplished using virtual global teams –highly integrated engineering teams comprised of researchers located around the world. Theseteams often function across multiple time zones, multiple cultures, and sometimes multiplelanguages.”2Employers of engineers have expressed the need
2011. Ms. Cross is currently in the fourth year of the Engineering Education PhD program at Vir- ginia Tech and involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students. Her research interests include teamwork and communication skills, assessment, diversity, and identity construction.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Holly Matusovich (co-PI) is an Assistant Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. Her expertise includes motivation and related frameworks, using these frameworks broadly to study student
Engineering Dr. Leroy Z. Emkin Practice” Week 6 “Challenges in Flightdeck Design” Dr. Amy Pritchett Week 7 “Putting Nanomaterials to Work for Biomedical Dr. Younan Xia Research” Weei 8 "Applying to Graduate School" Dr. Jeffrey Donnell Week 9 “The Problems with Interconnect” Dr. Paul Kohl Week 10 End of Program Project Presentations ParticipantsMeetings are held every Tuesday morning where each participant reports orally what he/she hasaccomplished in the past week and his/her plans for the current week. Following the individualresearch status reports, fundamental research
large projects and portfolios, butthese are typically more time-consuming and difficult to evaluate. Page 23.1151.3 2The SurveyIn order to find out how others were using textbook exercises, we developed a web survey usingGoogle Forms and sent it to three listservs for college educators and educational researchers: thePOD Mailing List, the ACM SIGCSE Members List, and the Engineering Technology* listserv.Most of the questions on the survey were open-ended.The survey collected 142 responses. Due to the uncontrolled nature of a web survey, this
students were done twice; once before the principles of innovative thinkingand problem solving was introduced to the students and once after the students were introduced tothese principles and were tasked with its application on various activity-based class projects. Thelone survey for the capstone-design students were done towards the end of the semester. It wasobserved that there was considerable improvement in the Cronbach’s alpha number (a measure ofconsistency) in the second survey that was done at the end of the semester by which time thestudents were effectively well versed with the EM mindset and were able to successfullyimplement it. However, for the capstone course it was observed that the Cronbach’s alpha numberwere similar due to the
from ASSIST (Articulation System Stimulating Interinstitutional Student Transfer)website assist.org.5A similar situation exists with regard to the Freshman Introduction to Engineering course, someform of which is recommended or required for a majority of engineering majors. This courseranges from a 1-unit survey of career options to a 3-unit project-based introduction to design, Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education 93which is in many cases discipline specific. Other more subtle differences in course
Paper ID #45190Evaluating the five pillars of a Summer Bridge Program and their influenceon participants’ intentions to complete an engineering degree.Lorena Benavides-Riano, Mississippi State University Lorena Benavides-Riano, originally from Colombia, is a second-year Engineering Ph.D. student at Mississippi State University. In July 2020, she completed her bachelor’s degree in Environmental Engineering at the National University of Colombia. After graduation, Lorena worked as a research assistant investigating the effects of development projects on environmental parameters and rural communities in Colombia, South
courses provided a solid foundation for adapting to and comprehending theimportance of a more modern and digital approach to product engineering and lifecyclemanagement. This project produced a framework and course content that strengthens andmodernizes our programs and addresses shortcomings identified by our Industry Advisory Board.IntroductionTo successfully teach and implement Digital and Smart Manufacturing concepts, companies willneed a more flexible and technology savvy workforce that is familiar with key areas ofcomputerized product development including design, engineering, manufacturing, andmetrology. Advances in 3D CAD/CAM/CAE software tools and programming interfaces areproviding a more robust environment for Product Lifecycle and
their degrees, etc. Thesevisualizations could be very helpful in describing students’ paths through programs. Secondly,colleges considering changes to admissions and/or transfer processes into and within the collegecould use the visualizations to get an accurate “as-is” view of student paths. This could be helpful indeveloping new processes as well as benchmarking for evaluating the performance of any changes.Specific research questions (RQs) of this project were: RQ1: Are there differences in entrance and/or exit patterns of undergraduate engineering programs that can be visualized with Sankey diagrams? RQ2: Do patterns in student flows suggest where in a particular program, or on which students, resources aimed at improving retention
background is in propulsion systems and combustion. Dr. Husanu has more than a decade of industrial experience in aerospace engineering that encompasses extensive experimental investigations related to energy projects such as development of a novel method of shale natural gas extraction using repurposed aircraft engines powered on natural gas. She also has extended experience in curriculum development in her area of expertise. As chair of the Engineering Technology Curriculum Committee, she is actively engaged in aligning the curricular changes and SLO to the industry driven student competencies. Her main current research interest is in engineering pedagogy, focusing on development of integrated mechanical engineering
in the context of higher education institutions in Latin America and theCaribbean, which are directly related to some advances in compliance with SustainableDevelopment Goals (SDG) number 4 on quality education of the countries of this region inthe SDG Index. The obtained data allow us to understand the existence of educational needsof university professors from Latin America and the Caribbean, who wanted to learn not onlyabout STEM and migration but also about the intersectionality of DEI with other minorities,such as black communities, natives, Hispanics in the United States, and LGBTIQ+.IntroductionSignificant efforts have been made to promote gender equality in higher education. However,addressing broader projects on Diversity, Equity
thoroughreviews of the literature; in which two are most recognized: systematic and scoping literaturereviews. These two methods are particularly useful forms of reviewing what is already writtenand known about the topic, identifying research gaps, and in some cases, and analyzing existingliterature. Scoping Reviews and Systematic Literature Reviews are similar and different in theirown ways. For example, a scoping review may be utilized for understanding the “breadth” of aresearch topic, but a systematic literature review may be utilized for understanding the “depth”and appraise the literature of a topic [1]. Both of these literature reviews are helpful for noviceresearchers when they are beginning a project or want to explore the potential of a
lab. Students returned from the lab and had lunch provided bythe program. The students spent the next couple of hours either working on project deliverables(poster, paper, etc.) or meeting with presenters (researchers, student groups, etc.). Each dayconcluded with an SEL activity. Students were dismissed from the program at 3:15 pm each dayand returned to a school near their home by school bus.Project PresentationsThe program culminated in a presentation of learning through a poster session that resembled amini science fair competition. Students worked on research papers and prepared posters thatthey presented to expert judges (university faculty, graduate students, science teachers), andtheir families. The purpose of the event was to provide
secured multiple grants for innovative projects. A senior member of IEEE, he actively contributes to the field through publications and conference presentations. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Direct Assessment of Student Achievement through D2LAbstractThis paper delves into the implementation of D2L/Brightspace learning outcome toolsspecifically designed for the direct assessment of course outcomes, with a keen focus on ABETStudent Outcomes (SOs) based on our experience preparing for the ABET accreditation visit.ABET accreditation is a mark of excellence in applied science, computing, engineering, andtechnology programs. This accreditation guarantees that graduates are equipped with
to the smart farm project ▪ Practicing 3D design using Sketchup Team building app Setting your own goal of the project 7 ▪ Introduction to the smart farm project 2 ▪ Setting up the physical computing Team building environment Setting your own goal of the project Reviewing software coding and 3D design for building smart farms 8-10 ▪ Software design for their projects 3-4 ▪ Hardware design reconstructing the Arduino code 3D printing and leveraging various
, examining their impact on teachers’ practices and student learning. Ana’s research also explores the pedagogical potential of environmental citizen science, particularly how science learning occurs through participation in community-based projects. She is currently a Research Associate at Manchester Metropolitan University and an Associate Lecturer at the Open University, where she teaches undergraduate modules on international education and research with children and young people.Dr. Alison Buxton, University of Sheffield ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #49151Dr Alison Buxton is a
Paper ID #45865Empowering Educators: A Pilot Study of Faculty Training on Building Decarbonizationand Clean Energy IntegrationMohamed Khalafalla, Florida A&M University - Florida State University Dr. Mohamed Khalafalla is an Assistant Professor of Construction Engineering at Florida A&M University’s School of Architecture and Engineering Technology. His research expertise includes risk analysis, cost estimating, and concrete materials research. Dr. Khalafalla has contributed extensively to projects sponsored by the Department of Energy and the Tennessee Department of Transportation, conducting studies in
the LemelsonFoundation, VentureWell Foundation, and the American Society for Engineering Education, andnow includes several useful resources for engineering educators seeking to expand engagementwith sustainability topics across curricula at their institution (Anderson & Cooper, 2022). Theseresources include the EOP Framework, a guide to teaching core EOP learning outcomes, amapping between EOP learning outcomes and ABET student outcomes and the United NationsSustainable Development Goals, a joint NSF-Lemelson program in the Research in theFormation of Engineers (RfE) portfolio, and the EOP mini-grant program.The work in progress described in this paper is the subject of our EOP mini-grant in Cohort III.Our mini-grant project involved the
Paper ID #49179BOARD #153: Work in Progress: Designing a Role Playing Game for anAstrobiology CourseProf. Steven McAlpine, University of Maryland Baltimore County Steven McAlpine is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Entrepreneurship, Engineering, and Individualized Study programs at UMBC. He has been teaching role playing game design and leading campus wide RPG events for the past ten years. He also leads the multidisciplinary sustainable design course entitled INDS 430: The Kinetic Sculpture Project, which won the grand prize in the 2015 Baltimore Kinetic Sculpture race. ©American Society
. Hopefully, this alternative grading system results in enhanced learning andcritical thinking with less pressure to make or earn a particular grade. Instead, the motivation ofseeking to learn complex new material was offered in a variety of ways using both traditionalmeans such as quizzes and essays, as well as creative methods of group work and design project-based learning. Numerous and diverse aspects of the engineering profession are explored frombasic circuit design prototyping and soldering, lab report documentation, spreadsheetmanipulation, team building, engineering research, engineering research, etc.After mining this monumental amount of data from thousands of students since 2012 with vitaland significant support from our registrar’s
of middle and high-school-aged Black scholarspartook in a summer program for two weeks to learn about AI in science. Throughout theprogram, they explored how paleontologists utilize computer vision to classify images forscientific purposes. The children also identified potential issues with AI, such as biases in thedatasets used to train ML models. Not only did the scholars learn about AI, but they also hadhands-on experiences building models using Google Teachable Machine, a teacher andstudent-friendly tool for classifying data. For their project presentations, participants createdposters that identified community-relevant issues to address via computer vision, theclassification to perform, the data they used, and classification
project were to assess and enhance the usability of PMKS+. Thisinvolved identifying and addressing the challenges and user needs associated with the application.A redesigned interface, informed by user research and feedback, was implemented, alongside theaddition of new features to improve the overall user experience. The effectiveness of these changeswas analyzed to determine their impact. Such changes will not only improve the usability ofPMKS+ software at WPI but also at other universities with Mechanical Engineering degrees whereplanar linkages are an important topic in the curriculum.The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 delves into the background of the application,including its development history and earlier improvements. Section 3
Paper ID #48220MSI Faculty on the Rise: Strengthening Federal Grant Proposals throughCross-Institution Collaborations and NetworkingMs. Randi Sims, Clemson University Randi is a current Ph.D. student in the department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. Her research interests center around undergraduate research experiences using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Her career goals are to work as an evaluator or consultant on educationally based research projects with an emphasis on statistical analyses and big data.Kelsey Watts, University of Virginia Kelsey Watts is a postdoc at the
component.Then, they spent another 7 days to complete the second component. Finally, they focused on thethird component in the last a few days. In what follows, we will describe each component in details.4.1 Arduino and robotics We used an off-the-shelf robotic kit: “OSOYOO V2.1 Smart IOT Robot Car Kit for Arduino” available at Amazon. It costs about $65 per kit and has a product page which contains 16 basic lessons (Fig. 1) and 8 sample projects (Fig. 2). The basic lessons are self-explanatory and have detailed instructions of circuit building and coding. Only a few participants had limited prior experience with Arduino and computer programming, but the kits are very suitable for beginners who do not have prior experience with Arduino
minimizes on-the-job-training and allows the workplace to maximize the productivity of newhires that have the necessary skills to integrate seamlessly and almost immediately into theirworkplace. The academia-to-industry skills gap in engineering has existed for many years,specifically in the areas of communication, collaboration, professionalism, project management,etc., which are collectively called professional skills [1], [2]. Professional skills in engineeringcan be defined as the skills needed to succeed in the engineering industry such as employabilityskills, leadership skills, interpersonal skills, organization skills, emotional intelligence skills, etc.The term “soft skills” was first referenced for engineering education in 1918 by Charles
instructor reflects this as demonstrated by student performance on a linkedlist implementation assignment as well as an unbalanced binary search tree implementation assignment. Bothassignments showed improved performance; and quicker submission times with more than half students turningin the unbalanced binary search tree assignment before the deadline. Finally, more students chose animplementation project as their final project, between the choice of completing an implementation project or aproject studying a data structure not covered in the course, than have typically done in the past. On this lastpoint, I will share experiences with the breakdown of students opting for one or the other from many semestersteaching data structures across several
beach.Ms. Connie Syharat, University of Connecticut Constance M. Syharat is a Ph.D. student and Research Assistant at the University of Connecticut as a part of two neurodiversity-centered NSF-funded projects, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF:RED) ”Beyond Accommodation: Leveraging Neurodiversity for Engineering Innovation” and In- novations in Graduate Education (NSF:IGE) Encouraging the Participation of Neurodiverse Students in STEM Graduate Programs to Radically Enhance the Creativity of the Professional Workforce”. In her time at the University of Connecticut she has also has served as Program Assistant for an summer pro- gram in engineering for middle school students with ADHD. Previously, she spent
Paper ID #38522A Comparative Literature Review: Comparing Approaches to TeamworkAssessment in Engineering Education in the US and ChinaMiss Yi Cao, Virginia Tech CAO Yi is a Second-year PhD student at the Department of engineering education in Virginia Tech with the guidance of Dr. Jennifer Case. She has been working as research assistant at the International Center for Higher Education Innovation(ICHEI), a UNESCO Category 2 Center for two years. She did several researches related to project-based learning, teamwork assessment and comparative education research.Dr. Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech Dr. Qin Zhu is Associate Professor
engineering is an interdisciplinary major that offers lectures, team projects, andlaboratory tasks. One of the milestone courses, Biothermodynamics, which encompassesformulas, equations, and physical applications of biology systems, is traditionally taughtpassively through lecturing and note-taking. In the past two decades, active learning methodshave been studied and promoted vastly in engineering education, including adding group workand peer interaction into the teaching and learning of such courses to increase studentengagement [1-4]. This work-in-progress study further explores the ability to create a“neighborhood” in a sophomore-level Biothermodynamics classroom. The present study aims todesign a new learning environment that maximizes students
(under 1%),only changing from 117 doctorate degree recipients in 2010 to 120 in 2019 [3].NASA Historical Efforts with Tribal Colleges and UniversitiesAccording to Maynard [3], NASA has supported an effort called “Tribal Colleges andUniversities Project (TCUP)” since 2010, as one of various STEM education and outreach grantprograms specifically targeted to support Tribal Colleges and Universities-related initiatives.“The overall goal of the project is to expand opportunities for the nation’s STEM workforcethrough capacity building, infrastructure development, research and engineering experience,outreach, and information exchange” [4]. In 2008, Congress directed NASA to establish a projectthat was focused on climate change education. The Global