a challenging experience. In this paper, anembedded design project in an online only sophomore course is presented. The design project isbased on the EFM8BB1 from Silicon Laboratories. The EFM8BB1 is an 8051 seriesmicrocontroller that is self-contained, economical, and very student friendly. What follows is adiscussion of the sophomore course, an overview of the EFM8BB1, and an example of theproject design based on the EFM8BB1.1. IntroductionThe sophomore course referred to in this paper is the second course of the digital designsequence in the electrical engineering technology program at Kennesaw State University.Kennesaw State University was founded in 1963 as part of the University System of Georgia. In2015, Kennesaw State merged with
geographic limitations [17]. This promotes accessibility andscalability, making it feasible for learners to engage with AM technology regardless of theirproximity to a physical lab facility. Consequently, innovative AM laboratories and remotelearning environments play a crucial role in teaching students’ practical skills and understandingAM processes and technologies. Some of the remote labs are shown in Figure 1. B) A) C) Figure 1: Three Innovative AM labs, A) Network camera accessible AM laboratory [18], B) Remotely accessible AM laboratory [19], C) Remote laboratory with 3D printers and
, A. Dukes, and R. Clark, “Student performance in partially flipped ece laboratory classes,” in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jun 2020.[34] Y. Tsividis, “Teaching circuits and electronics to first-year students,” in IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 1, 1998, pp. 424–427.[35] ——, “Turning students on to circuits,” IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society Newsletter, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2008.[36] “Analog discovery 3 reference manual,” https://digilent.com/reference/test-and-measurement/analog-discovery-3/reference-manual, last downloaded, February 7, 2024.[37] M. Radu, C. S. Cole, J. Harris, and M. Dabacan, “Use of electronics explorer board in electrical engineering education,” in American
University, where he also served as a research assistant at the Environmental Pollution Research unit, in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. As part of his contribution to science and engineering, Pelumi has taught as a teaching assistant both at Morgan State University and Obafemi Awolowo University. With passion to communicate research findings and gleaned from experts in the field as he advances his career, Olaitan has attended several in-persons and virtual conferences and workshop, and at some of them, made presentation on findings on air pollution, waste water reuse, and heavy metal contamination.Adebayo Iyanuoluwa Olude, Morgan State University Adebayo Olude is a doctoral student and research assistant at Morgan State University’s
there are a myriad of reasonsthat instructors may decide to forgo live demonstrations, two common reasons for doing so arethat they doubt the effectiveness of live demonstrations, or that the time required to develop andimplement an effective demonstration prohibits instructors from utilizing them.As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, instructors around the world were forced to adapt theircourses to be delivered remotely. While the vast majority of classes have returned to traditionalin-person formats, instructors retain the skills required to produce effective teaching videos. Ithas been shown that online laboratory activities can have some unique advantages [1]. Thispresents an opportunity for instructors to develop pre-recorded demonstration
got their hands on a physical circuit was in a subsequent course, ECEN 2270:Electronics Design Lab (EDL), in which students build an autonomous car that navigates a routedefined by a line on the floor. While ECEN 2270 is a hands-on laboratory course, the exercises areall directed toward building a product, not exploring the fundamental principles of circuits.When we were asked to teach the ECEN 2250 course for the first time, we believed that it wasimportant to include a hands-on laboratory experience. However, we were constrained in not beingable to change the course from a 3 to a 4-credits, could not change the meeting pattern of three,50-minute sessions per week, and did not have physical laboratory space available for the 138students to
Engineering Education, 2024 Virtual Reality Simulation of Wind TurbineAbstractThis research study presents an innovative virtual reality (VR) laboratory module aimed atenhancing green manufacturing education, particularly focusing on the intricacies of wind turbineefficiency. This VR-based educational tool provides a hands-on learning experience that simulatesthe operation of a wind turbine, allowing students to explore the dynamics of wind energyconversion. Using VR controllers and headsets, participants can interact with a virtual environmentthat includes a vertical wind turbine and a fan blower, complete with start/stop buttons and controlsfor adjusting wind speed.The virtual lab is built on the Unity 3D platform
Paper ID #44150Board 127: Work in Progress: Strategizing the Integration of VR and AR inSTEM Education: Aligning Educational, Organizational, and TechnologicalStrategiesDr. Amirmasoud Momenipour, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Amir Momenipour, PhD in Industrial and Systems Engineering, is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Management at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology with interests and expertise in teaching human factors, user experience, and work analysis and design. Dr. Momenipour is a member of the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE), and Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.Dr. Priyadarshini
practical skills, thereby bridging the often-cited gap between academic theoryand real-world application. The ultimate goal is to prepare senior engineering students toconfront and solve contemporary engineering challenges through the lens of environmentalsustainability, thus readying them for impactful professional careers.A detailed teaching strategy that incorporates workshops, laboratory sessions, and designprojects is outlined. Each component is meticulously aligned with the fluid mechanics syllabus toenrich student learning and ensure the cohesive integration of theory with practice. Workshopsare tailored to run concurrently with fluid mechanics topics, offering a platform for theapplication of theoretical knowledge in a practical setting. A
Paper ID #42202A Summer Leader Experience for Rising High School Seniors – Integratingan Introduction to Environmental Science & EngineeringKimberly Quell, Kimberly Quell is a laboratory manager in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering at the United States Military Academy. She graduated with an M.E., Environmental Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, 2023 and B.S., Environmental Science, SUNY-Environmental Science and Forestry, 2010Cristian Robbins, United States Military AcademyKathryn Blair NewhartCol. Andrew Ross Pfluger, United States Military Academy Colonel Andrew Pfluger, U.S. Army, is
1 Session 2023 The JUMP into STEM Experience Dr. Nelson Fumo Mechanical Engineering Department The University of Texas at Tyler AbstractThe JUMP into STEM is an online building science competition for undergraduate and graduatestudents at U.S. colleges and universities launched by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Theprogram recognizes the need of increasing the number of graduates from building science programsto cover
early so that the project and all the clerical type stuff can be taken care of ahead of time. Better organization and less last minute decisions would really help to improve this course.” “The lab course lost value after the trip since we were done with the project” “Course should only be 8 weeks long if there is only one trip during spring break”V. Conclusions, Lessons Learned, and Future Work:Teaching the Global Engineering Laboratory component for the first time was a transformativeexperience that significantly enhanced the first author’s teaching skills. The development of thelaboratory content and structure allowed the refinement of the instructional approach, focusing onthe Inquiry-based learning model. This model, centered around student
engineering collaboration have been proposed [18, 19].Previously, we reported on educational innovations to teach students of engineering aboutdevices with biomedical applications [20, 21, 22]. These teaching efforts included thedevelopment of devices in the laboratory [23], the deployment of these devices to the field (inthis case, the community environment) [24], and the ongoing improvement of devices to promotehuman health [25]. These efforts incorporated high school teachers as well as historicallyunderrepresented student populations to learn about and become involved in device development[26]. These prior efforts targeted long-standing problems of sustainable development includingsecure access to safe supplies of food and water [27, 28, 29, 30
the lab. Following introductions, the 15 students were split intotwo groups: Group A (8) engaged in the laboratory experiment first while Group B (7) was takenon the engineering tour first. This arrangement was mirrored at the 1 ½ hour mark. Thelaboratory experiment was led by a university-trained undergraduate teaching assistant. Studentswere told that they should try to complete at least one of the experimental exercises, but wereencouraged to attempt as many as possible. Student learning was self-regulated: trying first anddiscovering the results. The tour was led by a trained undergraduate university student tourguide.The Student Laboratory Experience: Results and Feedback from the ParticipantsOf the 15 student participants, 87% started
meet weekly in lecture and in a laboratory setting found that project managers spend a minimum of 20% of minimal incentive for the lab managers to learn from these videos.• BMED students are randomized and placed into groups of five students and each their time dealing with conflicts. The watch rate of the videos ranged from 28% to 44%, indicating that group is assigned to an upperclassmen undergraduate BME student mentor, a the module videos did not have a substantial effect on the lab “lab manager”(LM), through the Effective Teaching
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. We examined course materials to identify where writing is explicitly or implicitly referenced, the genres that were assigned, and writing concepts that were represented. Analyzing course materials allowed us to identify a wide range of activities and assignments related to writing. We observed that implicit references to writing are prevalent, writing activities are weighted toward upper-level classes, and the most common genres are related to laboratory activities. Writing concepts that occurred frequently in upper-level laboratory courses correspond to disciplinary values of precision and clarity, while concepts of novelty and evidence were infrequent. This
predictive analytics may one day supplant laboratory testing, defect diagnosis andrecognition.The aim of this paper is not to provide a review of the rapidly expanding technology that iscasting simulation. Instead, this paper focuses on the use of simulation for aiding an introductionto metal casting course via distance learning. The purpose of this paper is to identify an approachutilizing simulations activities to teach a Metal Casting course via distance learning.Objectives 1. To design distance learning using a simulation tool to introduce practical casting activities for an engineering course. 2. To compare metal casting students’ outcome pre and post the use of the simulation tool.MethodologyThe goal was to develop and test a
GUIDING STUDENTS IN THEIR HANDS-ON WORKAs mentioned in previous section, hands-on work is an integral part of both college educationand professional training. Although hands-on work can be incorporated into teaching,laboratories remain the predominant method for practical learning [2] . Consequently, mostengineering courses are delivered through lectures supplemented by lab sections. Typically,students are provided with a lab manual to guide them through specific tasks relevant to thelecture topics. Lab manuals come in various formats; some publishers offer hardcopy manualsalongside textbooks. While these manuals are user-friendly and directly linked to the coursematerial, they may present drawbacks. For instance, the equipment specified in the
coping mechanism developed during thecivil war and its aftermath. This might surprise people from different cultures, even Hispanicfriends, who may perceive it as not taking things seriously. However, it is often a way of dealingwith serious topics.In my teaching role for a biological engineering laboratory and assisting in other courses, I haveobserved that Guatemalans, and maybe other internationals, often use English as if translatingdirectly from Spanish, leading to amusing situations and further discussions. In engineering, thepragmatic and straightforward nature of scientific topics helps, though it gets challenging whenadding nuance or developing narratives for experiments or engineering situations.Graduate school in English has been a
is not an ABET requirement.Traditionally, surveying courses have emphasized lecture sessions covering surveying principlesand methodologies, complemented by laboratory exercises particular to various surveyingmethods and utilizing surveying instruments [5]. However, alongside this conventional approach,PBL is being introduced, offering students hands-on experience in applying theoreticalknowledge to real-world scenarios [4]. PBL encourages critical thinking, interdisciplinarycollaboration, and the development of essential professional skills such as problem-solving,communication, and project management. Prince and Felder present strong evidence thatinductive teaching methods are more effective than traditional deductive teaching methods
Publishing, 2021.16. Deniz, Sabri, Ulf Christian Müller, Ivo Steiner, and Thomas Sergi. "Online (remote) teaching for laboratory based courses using “digital twins” of the experiments." Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 144, no. 5 (2022): 051016.17. Maksimović, Mirjana, and Nikola Davidović. "The role of Digital Twin technology in transforming engineering education." In 9th International scientific conference Technics and Informatics in Education, pp. 264-270. 2022.18. Zacher, Serge. "Digital twins for education and study of engineering sciences." International Journal on Engineering, Science and Technology 2, no. 2 (2020): 61-69.19. Sepasgozar, Samad ME. "Digital twin and web-based virtual gaming technologies for
studentsto submit original work rather than code from outside sources. Students were also discouragedfrom using code from outside the course within the syllabus and during class lectures.While video and flowcharts submissions did provide some structure to discourage using code fromoutside sources, the advent of ChatGPT and similar generative AI resources that can producecomputer code required a change. In Spring 2023, while keeping the assignments similar, gradingwas changed to reward the process rather than the outcome. To accomplish this, grading wasmoved from being performed by teaching assistants outside of class to in person grading performedduring laboratory hours and office hours. The points awarded for functionality of the codesubmitted were
Engineering Education, 2024 Generative Learning in Two Community-Based Experiential Undergraduate Courses This research to practice paper analyzes the innovative teaching elements of twocommunity-based experiential undergraduate courses. Experiential learning on its own shifts aclass from a more traditional format to “an approach that is semi-structured and requires studentsto cooperate and learn from one another through direct experiences tied to real world problems”[1, p. 4]. When engaging with the community through experiential learning, additionalperspectives are integrated into learning with the intent that all parties will benefit. This can beachieved through multiple course designs, two of
computer networks and communications, especially in wireless communications and wireless sensor networks. Her research has been published in leading scholarly journals in engineering, including the IEEE Transactions on Communications, the IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, IEEE Transactions on Education and the International Journal of Modeling and Simulation. Dr. Yaprak’s research has been funded by grants awarded her from the National Science Foundation, the US Department of Energy, NASA, the US Navy, and the business community. She has held 8 research fellowships at NASA research centers (John Glenn Laboratory at Case Western, Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Cal Tech, Ames Research Center at Stanford, and the
, As- sociate Director of the Learning Agents Center (http://lac.gmu.edu), Co-Director of IT Entrepreneurship Laboratory (http://lite.gmu.edu) and Co-Director ofHarry J Foxwell, George Mason University Harry is currently Associate Professor at George Mason University’s Department of Information Sciences and Technology. He earned his doctorate in Information Technology in 2003 from George Mason Univer- sity’s Volgenau School of Engineering (Fairfax, VA), and has since taught graduate courses there in big data analytics and ethics, operating systems, computer architecture and security, cloud computing, and electronic commerce.Dr. Ioulia Rytikova, George Mason University Ioulia Rytikova is a Professor and an
experiences and observations, this paper delves into crucial strate-gies for success in teaching, research, and service, offering essential principles to guide new facultymembers toward a successful start in academia. The paper discusses strategies for teaching acrossvarious undergraduate levels, establishing and cultivating research groups within undergraduate-focused programs, and actively engaging in service roles within the academic community. Addi-tionally, it emphasizes the importance of advising, mentorship, self-care, and achieving work-lifebalance, particularly with regard to the unique experiences and challenges faced by female facultymembers. By providing practical tools, resources, and best practices, this paper aims to empowernew faculty
merits and rigor ofactive learning over passive learning as well as providing faculty with ongoing pedagogicaltraining will be necessary to realize the advantages of active learning in higher education.Experiment-centric pedagogy is an innovative active learning pedagogy that has transformedlearning and teaching experience in the classroom and laboratory. As described by Authors [10],experiment-centric pedagogy places students at the center of the learning process. Experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP) focuses on inexpensive and safe hands-on tools and activities to promotelearning in STEM subjects. As presented by Connor et al. [5], and Authors [6], ECP engageslearners and improves their comprehension, familiarity, and retention of knowledge
model, undergraduate students exploredundergraduates in Biomedical Data Science Laboratory class to AI hyperparameters tuning such as the number of epochsthrough computational and machine learning projects for ● Students implemented dice overlap metric and lossidentifying disease and objects in biomedical images. ● Students gained experience implementing the training loop and Materials and
ETD 455 Integrating IoT in Mechatronics Lab for Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum: Embracing Industry 4.0Jiayue Shen, Daniel Jones, Kazi Imran, SUNY Polytechnic Institute; Xiangyu Wang,Purdue University Fort Wayne; Weiru Chen, Slippery Rock University; Lanju Mee, University of Maryland Eastern ShoreAbstract In the context of Industry 4.0, mechatronics labs are increasingly incorporating Internet ofThings (IoT) technologies to enhance the teaching of system control and monitoring concepts.This paper presents the development of nine lab modules to integrate IoT technologies into themechatronics lab for
communication skills. In fact,undergraduate lab (along with capstone design) is very useful in satisfying ABET StudentOutcomes 3 (an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences), 5 (an ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborativeand inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks and meet objectives) and 6 (an ability todevelop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and useengineering judgment to draw conclusions).There have been significant developments in the use of virtual teaching labs and this has led toarguments on the pros and cons of using virtual labs in place of physical labs. Mosterman et al.[1] argued that virtual laboratories