and students for each year of data for this study. Thenumber of students in the table refers to those who completed the PR Survey and were placed ina project. Use of this data for the study was approved by the UF Institutional Review Board. Table 1. Data for this Study: Number of Projects and Students for 2019 – 2023 Academic Year Students Total projects Number of Unique and New Sponsors 2019 – 2020 47 13 13 (all assumed new for year 0 of study) 2020 – 2021 55 14 13 unique, 6 new 2021 – 2022 59 11 10 unique, 3 new 2022 – 2023 79 18 17
. (2003). Community-basedresearch and higher education: Principles and practices. John Wiley & Sons.Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2010). Community-Based Participatory Research Contributions toIntervention Research: The Intersection of Science and Practice to Improve Health Equity.American Journal of Public Health, 100(S1), S40-S46.Wood, D., Gura, A. Z., Brockman, J. B., & Alptekin, S. (2018). Board 4: Student Outcomes inAcademic Community-Engaged STEM Projects with Multi-Dimensional Diversity. In 2018ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Wood, D., Gura, A. Z., Brockman, J. B., Carolan-Silva, A. R., Boukdad, S., & Alarcon, J. C.(2019). Board 25: Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot.In 2019 ASEE
, 2017). Elements of a chilly climateinclude managing stereotypes (McGee, 2018), juggling competing responsibilities (Bowman, 2006),feelings of isolation (Ong et al., 2018), as well as feelings of hypervisibility (Smith et al., 2016) for Blackstudents. While many Black students can successfully navigate this climate, enduring the chillyenvironment in Engineering can perturb their journeys through STEM (McGee & Martin, 2011). ASEE(2021) reported that only 8669 Black females and 21,000 Black males were enrolled in undergraduateengineering programs. Also, ASEE (2021) highlighted that Black students represent just 3.6% of alldoctoral degrees in engineering. While there is a growing body of literature aimed at unpacking theexperiences of Black
, educationalgames, and game-based learning? Academia Letters, Article 209.https://doi.org/10.20935/AL209.Bodnar, C. A., Anastasio, D., Enszer, J. A., & Burkey, D. D. (2016). Engineers at play: Games asteaching tools for undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(1),147-200.Cavanagh, S. R. (2019). How to make your teaching more engaging. Chronicle of HigherEducation.Davis, D., & Lee, J. G. (2019), Building Escape Rooms to Increase Student Engagement in First-Year Engineering Classes Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32486de la Flor, D., Calles, J. A., Espada, J. J., & Rodríguez, R. (2020). Application of escape lab-room to heat transfer evaluation for
and S. Grigorian, “The near-peer mathematical mentoring cycle: studyingthe impact of outreach on high school students’ attitudes toward mathematics,” InternationalJournal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 46–64, Jan.2019, doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2018.1467508.[30] H. Oh, S. Hsi, M. Eisenberg, and M. D. Gross, “Paper mechatronics: present and future,”in Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children, TrondheimNorway, Jun. 2018, pp. 389–395. doi: 10.1145/3202185.3202761.[31] C. Dixon, C. T. Schimpf, and S. Hsi, “Beyond Trial & Error: Iteration-to-Learn usingComputational Paper Crafts in a STEAM Camp for Girls,” presented at the 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Jun
) Cohort A (1) Cohort B (1) Fresno State Cohort A (1) Cohort B (1) Total Awards 8 16 16 16 8Awards are disbursed by semester allowing us to respond to changes in scholar eligibility, e.g.changes in financial need, students transferring out of FCC, changing majors, or dropping tobelow full-time status (exceptions for full time status were permitted during the COVID-19pandemic). Table 2 shows the number of awards given in the first two years of the program.Table 2: Program Scholarship Awards by Project Year and Semester (Actual) Year 1 (2019/2020) Year 2
advertising”. This might require a weekly email to the team managersto remind them of their specific duties and encourage them to guide the team in their roleswithout micromanaging specific roles.On the whole, the METE format has met and exceeded initial expectations for creating astructured environment where students can practice and improve their teamworking skills.References[1] ABET (2020). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020-2021,https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020-2021/#GC3, accessed Sept. 9, 2020.[2] S. Sangelkar, B. Mertz, A. Bernal, and P. Cunningham. “Benchmarking Teaming InstructionAcross a Curriculum”, in Proceedings of the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference
-9310.2008.00503.x.[8] M. Pearson, R. Striker, E. Swartz, L. Singelmann, and E. Alvarez Vazquez, "Driving Change Using MOOCS in a Blended and Online Learning Environment," 2019.[9] E. A. Vazquez et al., "Federal Funding Opportunity Announcements as a Catalyst of Students' Projects in MOOC Environments," in 2019 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 2019, no. October, pp. 79–83, doi: 10.1109/LWMOOCS47620.2019.8939657.[10] L. Singelmann, E. A. Vazquez, E. M. Swartz, M. Pearson, and R. Striker, "Student- developed learning objectives: A form of assessment to enable professional growth," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2020, vol. 2020- June, doi: 10.18260/1-2--35244.[11
Paper ID #34521The SEECRS Scholar Academy at Whatcom Community College: Three Co-hortsof S-STEM Scholarships LaterEric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl holds an MS degree in mechanical engineering and serves as associate professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been a member of ASEE since 2001. He currently serves as awards chair for the Pacific Northwest Section and was the recipient of the 2008 Section
the overall video views occurredprior to the switch and only 13% occurred after the switch. For the Introduction to ComputerScience course, all students viewed at least one video with an average of 13.3 views per student.The number of videos viewed per student after the switch to online showed a slight increaserelative to the fall 2019. In both classes, students reported only watching videos on topics thatthey found most difficult. Videos on more fundamental or more difficult topics had higherviewership. Results suggest that students were using the videos as supplemental materials andthat the videos were successful in helping students master the course material.IntroductionStudents entering the University of Idaho, and universities in general
Progress)” Proc. ASEE 2019 Annu. Conf., Tampa, FL, 2019.[10] M. Singh, K. Francis, J. A. P. Sather, and P. Egberts. (2009). “Designing and Implementinga Transdisciplinary Engineering Camp (Evaluation, Diversity)” Proc. ASEE 2019 Annu. Conf,Tampa, FL, 2019. [11] J. A. Kitchen, G. Sonnert, and P. M. Sadler. “The impact of college- and university-runhigh school summer programs on students’ end of high school STEM career aspirations.” Sci.Ed. vol 102 pp. 529–547. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21332
Science Foundation.Dr. Gaillardon and Kelly have financial interest in the company Tetrad: Sensor NetworkSolutions, LLC, which commercializes air quality sensing solutions and provided engineeringserviceReferences[1] World Health Organization, “How air pollution is destroying our health,” https://www. who.int/air-pollution/news-and-events/how-air-pollution-is-destroying-our-health, January 2019, online; accessed 17 January 2019.[2] American Lung Association, “State of the Air 2018 - Most Polluted Cities,” https: //www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/sota/city-rankings/most-polluted-cities. html, 2019, online; accessed 17 January 2019.[3] “AQ & U,” http://aqandu.org/, January 2018, online; accessed 24 January 2019.[4] A
. Falchikov and J. Goldfinch, "Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks," Review of Educational Research, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 287-322, 2000.[3] T. Wanner and E. Palmer, "Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1032-1047, 2018.[4] Sunny Designs, LLC, "CATME: Smarter Teamwork," [Online]. Available: https://www.catme.org. [Accessed February 2019].[5] C. Pung and J. Ferris, "Assessment of the CATME Peer Evaluation Tool Effectiveness," in Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011.[6
with other mechanical engineering faculty who areinterested in or have experience with such an undertaking, to further the shared knowledge of themechanical engineering higher education community. We look forward to the discussion andinsights that will be gained from this experience at ASEE.References[1] Y. Siow, J. Szwalek, J. Komperda, H. Darabi, F. Mashayek, “A Critical Look at MechanicalEngineering Curriculum: Assessing the Need”, in ASEE IL-IN Section Conference Proceedings,2019, Purdue ePubs: epubs@purdue.edu[2] S. A. McNeilly, K. Pakala, D. Plumlee, “Revolutionizing the Mechanical EngineeringUndergraduate Curriculum,” in Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020,American Society for Engineering Education.[3] F. Buitrago-Florez
Educational Technology, 35(5), doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5930.[2] Feng, Z., Xiao, K. (2022). “Data Management and Marketing Methods of Interactive Video Websites in the Era of Big Data,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Volume 2022, Article ID 7771070, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7771070.[3] Itani, M. (2013). “The Effectiveness of Videos as a Learning Tool in an Engineering Ethics Course: A Student’s Perspective,” Proc. of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 23-26, Atlanta, GA, Paper ID 6422.[4] Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., Škugor, A. (2021). “Video-Based Learning (VBL) - Past, Present and Future: an Overview of the Research Published from 2008 to 2019,” Technology, Knowledge, Learning, 26, 1061
undergraduate seniorswithin the department. We determined the types of badges to offer based on feedback from studentsurveys, a senior student focus group, and our External Advisory Board. These groups helped usidentify the badges which would be the most valued and meaningful for both students andemployers. We have offered students the opportunity to earn badges for Outstanding Team Membersince Spring 2018 and Outstanding Mentorship since Fall 2019. Two new badges, Outstanding OralPresentation and Outstanding Writing, will be awarded January 2020. These badges are usuallyearned in the Fall semester to allow students to showcase these competencies on their resume orgraduate school application. Management and Earning of Badges
Paper ID #26981Science and Engineering Courses, Theory and Practice; An ExampleDr. S. ”Hossein” Mousavinezhad P.E., Idaho State University Dr. Mousavinezhad was the principal investigator of the National Science Foundation’s research grant, National Wireless Research Collaboration Symposium 2014; he has published a book (with Dr. Hu of University of North Dakota) on mobile computing in 2013. Professor Mousavinezhad is an active mem- ber of IEEE and ASEE having chaired sessions in national and regional conferences. He has been an ABET Program Evaluator for Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering as well as
. Prior to joining Southeast, he was with McDonnell Douglas Corporation (now the Boeing Company) in St. Louis, MO. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Pilot Hole Approach with Partially Flipped Classroom Yumin Zhang, David K. Probst Department of Physics and Engineering Physics Southeast Missouri State University Cape Girardeau, MO 63701 AbstractEngineering courses can be divided into two categories: theory-intensive and practice-intensivecourses. For the courses in the second category, students cannot learn the
://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2020.1777360[4]. Zoghi, S. (2015). Engineering economics and its role in the engineering curricula. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23958[5]. R. Leland, “Enriching the Engineering Economics,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 25-28, 2017. Columbus OH.[6]. Burns, J., & White, B. (2021). Curriculum Element: Using the Wall Street Journal to Provide National and Global Perspectives in an Engineering Economy Course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1- 2--36892[7]. Ankeny, C. J., & Gentry, K., & O'Neill, D. P., &
Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of North Texas, Denton, TX Copyright 2023, American Society for Engineering Education 2students who were given the option to choose from a range of assignments. This was compared tosemesters where no choice was given. The results of the observation suggest that providing non-computer science students with assignment choice can lead to increased engagement, motivation,and satisfaction with the course.Overall, this observation provides evidence for the importance of offering assignment choice to non-computer science students taking a CS course to support their success in
that use algae as a pathway to generate combustibleliquids1. These biofuels have the potential to become alternatives to fossil fuels by having a naturaland efficient option available with a material that is prevalent in the world1. Algae-derived biofuelsalso remove most of the risks that come with fuel sources, by reducing the harmful emissions duringcombustion1. As an alternative fuel source, algae-based biofuels have proven to be very effective asnot only an alternative but also as a higher quality than fossil fuels in terms of emissions. When used Proceedings of the 2023 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference University of North Texas, Denton, TX Copyright
Assistant Engineering Educator in2022. Before WSU, she was a Computer Science Instructor at Hutchinson Community College, © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceHutchinson, Kansas. She teaches programming classes such as Object-Oriented Programming,Data Structures, and Programming Paradigms. Her research includes Functional Programmingand Computer Science Education.Huabo Lu (He/Him/His)Huabo Lu obtained his Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciencedegree from Wichita State University in 2018. He joined Wichita State University in 2019, as anAssistant Teaching Professor. Before joining WSU, he was an Assistant Professor
2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Motivating Learning in the Face of Generative Artificial Intelligence Wilson, Sara E. Mechanical Engineering, University of KansasAbstractGenerative artificial intelligence (AI) presents a number of challenges for engineering educators.It is particularly challenging for those teaching lower level programming courses where a numberof generative AI tools are capable of creating functional code in several computer languages. Toaddress this, assessment of homework in a first-year Mechanical Engineering course was changedfrom a focus on functioning code to the process of creating code. This switch in
, 2019.[7] D. Cetindamar, K. Kitto, M. Wu, Y. Zhang, B. Abedin and S. Knight, "Explicating AI Literacy of Employees at Digital Workplaces," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, no. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference[8] M. C. Laupichler, A. Aster, J. Schirch and T. Raupach, "Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review," Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101, 2022.[9] M. C. Laupichler, A. Aster and T. Raupach, "Delphi study for the development and preliminary validation of an item set for the assessment of
. Therefore, this study focuses on the following research questions.RQ1: How did participating in an interdisciplinary collaborative service-learning project affectteamwork effectiveness as measured by CATME?RQ2: How did students perceive the varying intervention modalities during the evolvingCOVID-19 pandemic affected their teamwork?MethodsParticipantsA total of 411 undergraduate engineering students agreed to participate in the research fromSpring 2019 to Spring 2022. Out of this, 78.6% of the participating students were male, and15.8% were female. Most students identified as White or Caucasian (58.9%), followed by Blackor African American (16.8%). Participants were assigned to the treatment or comparison groupbased on the course section they
better? The prevalence andinterdisciplinarity of research collaborations in multidisciplinary institutions," Journal ofInformetrics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 736- 756, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.06.006.[10] Q. Zhang, and K. Kozak, “Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research NeedsUsing Topic Modeling,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. Jun.2019, doi:10.18260/1-2—33223.[11] T. E. Behrens, P. Fox, A. Laird, and S. M. Smith. "What is the most interesting part of thebrain?" Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2-4, Jan. 2013, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.010.[12] Scopus. “Sources.” Scopus.com. https://www.scopus.com/sources.uri (accessed Mar. 11,2023)[13] E. W. Weisstein. “Statistical Test.” Concise
Paper ID #34814Applying Research on Reducing Student Resistance to Active LearningThrough Faculty Development: Project UpdateLaura J. Carroll, University of Michigan Laura Carroll is a PhD candidate pursuing a degree in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan.Ms. Lea K. Marlor, University of Michigan Lea Marlor is a Ph.D. student at the University of Michigan, studying Engineering Education Research. She joined the University of Michigan in Sept 2019. Previously, she was the Associate Director for Education for the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science, a NSF-funded Science and
in 2019, Right: The digital classroom during Pandemicmonths of 2020.The digital classroom at the beginning of the lock down had a novelty effect in students as theywere curious about how the learning process would take place online. For some of them it wastheir first experience online and the same applied to some professors. The online sessions wereheld at the same time as they were scheduled for on campus teaching, however, it soon becameevident that long sessions were not best suited for online teaching, as there are some courses withsessions up to 4 hours in a row for courses like Architectural Projects. In Fig. 2 we can see atypical session on campus where the professor can make use of models that he has available forthe course on campus
Engaging Students Through Flexible Assessment”, Proceeding of theAustralian Conference on Science and Mathematics, 2016.[3] Irwin, Brian; Hepplestone, Stuart. “Examining Increased Flexibility in Assessment Formats”. . Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 7, November 2012, pp. 773-785.[4] MacLellan, Effie. “Assessment for Learning: The Differing Perceptions of Tutors and Students”. Assessment &Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 4 2001.[5] Mealy, Bryan. “Enhancing Student Success Using Flexible Assessment”, Proceedings of the 2019 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education (ASEE) PNW Conference[6] Mealy, James. (2019). “Knowledge for People, Not Profit”, [7] Nicol, David J; Macfarlane-Dick, Debra. “Formative
Senior Member of the IEEE, a Member of the ASEE, and is a licensed Professional Engineer (P.E.) in the state of Florida.Mr. Jorge Luis Portillo RodriguezRebeca Feregrino Rodriguez, Kennesaw State University Electrical engineering technology graduate from Kennesaw State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Industrial Wire Cutting Machine: A Senior Capstone Design Project Austin B. Asgill, Jorge Portillo-Rodriguez, Rebeca Feregrino Rodriguez Eric Fernandez, Red Hayes Kennesaw State University – Marietta CampusAbstractManual wire cutting with poorly designed manual