Engineering Education Association), and in the past served as First Vice President of IFEES (International Federation of Engineering Societies) Page 19.13.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Engineering for the Americas: Progress on the Action Plans of the Ministers of Science and Technology of the Organization of American StatesThe Organization of American States’ First Meeting of Ministers and HighAuthorities of Science and Technology, held in Lima, Peru in November of 2004,resulted in the Declaration of Lima [1], which pronounced that science,engineering
Regression, Experimental Design, Program Evaluation, and Survey Methods. Page 19.14.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 1 Engineering Leadership Development Programs: Universities Respond to Critical Needs in the US and InternationallyIntroduction In a world where technological innovation continues to accelerate, engineers need tocontinuously evolve and improve, just like the new technology they are developing. The need forengineers to be effective leaders and
Caribbean.These are examined, and a summary of the state of engineering program accreditation in theregion will be presented.IntroductionEngineering program accreditation is the key to a global knowledge economy. Internationallyrecognized Engineering accreditation establishes programmatic and institutional optimizationthat provides quality assurance, internationally recognized standards, and a process ofcontinuous improvement. This would bring internationalization to academia, which would inturn build capacity, foster development, enable mobility and move the countries to globalcompetitiveness.The International Engineering Accreditation Alliance (IEA) [1] groups the agencies that havebecome signatories of the six international mutual recognition
Educational PartnershipIntroduction:Over the last three decades, the internet has accelerated interconnectedness. From thisinterconnectedness, the appearance of the “micro-multinational” or small to medium-sizedcompany that operates internationally has become a major contender. Given the highlyinternational level of economic activity now seen1, engineering graduates will likely be calledupon to navigate effectively in the global economy.In response to economic needs, post-secondary institutions have begun to address ways thatglobal competency can be integrated into engineering programs. Five educational methods thatcan be used to help develop global competency are listed below: 1. International enrolment refers to the traditional student
Faculty Development and International Collaborations Using Vertical Education Enhancement Model Stephen U. Egarievwe1,2 and Ralph B. James2 1 College of Engineering, Technology and Physical Sciences, Alabama A&M University, Normal, AL 35762, USA2 Nonproliferation and National Security Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USAAbstractThis paper presents the international collaboration and experiences of an effective facultydevelopment initiative based on a vertical education enhancement (VEE) model. The VEEfaculty development program was designed to effectively improve performance and moralthrough
Engineering Education’s (ASEE), Going theDistance report, 53.6% Hispanics, 61.4% Native Americans, 61.7% African Americans and 49%Female students who enter engineering programs do not graduate in this major.1 This translatesto an engineering workforce that comprise of about 6% Hispanics, 0.3% Native American, 4%African Americans and 13% females according to the latest National Science Foundation’sreport.2 With such high attrition rates among minorities and underrepresented groups, changingthe current engineering workforce’s diversity portfolio is of grave national importance andrequires a plethora of high impact approaches. In the aforementioned ASEE report, over 60strategies and best practices were proposed. High impact practices included first-year
American universitiesbrings a variety of benefits to those institutions including developing international ties, securingfinancial resources, adding diversity to the intellectual pool of students and fulfilling a shortageof engineering talent in the US [1]. However, competition for recruiting these students hasincreased in the past few years with Australia, the UK and Germany attracting a large number oftalented students [1]. Several approaches have been reported to ensure the number of internationalstudents on campuses does not decline [2], including collaborations, increased efforts inrecruitment, and commitment to new funding for marketing and program promotion [3]. These aregood strategies, however, according to Srivastava et al (2010) “there
, andGeotecnica Ambiental. They served as important ambassadors for the tour, able to show off theirsignificantly increased linguistic and cultural proficiency in Spanish/ in the Chilean way of life.As role models they could relate best to the younger SIEPers, advocate for Chile as a site oftechnology and culture and the site of choice for the younger students’ up-coming year abroad.SIEPers can choose between study abroad options in Spain, Mexico and Chile, and it is adifficult undertaking to steer them away from the always preferred Spain and open their mind-sets towards Latin America.xiiiAcademics: The Chile J-term students earned 1-4 URI Credits: 3 credits for CVE 323: Sustainable Solutions for Developing Communities – Using Paul Pollack’s 2008 book
. This involves shared education that happens across several university settings. Authorsin16 present ideal features for BOL to have a effective collaborative learning is to: (1) providetechnical and resources support, (2) get familiar with each system, (3) launch effective andsustained communication, (4) build mutual trust, and (5) get organized in all aspects of thecollaboration. In this type of collaboration using BOL can have various types of communications(a) Discussions with other instructors teaching classes in the program at two institutes involvedin the collaboration. (b) Lecturing or chatting with students in the class, may be from differentinstitutes. Communication in a BOL typically takes three forms: (i) communicating with
global environment. This evaluation process consists of monitoringthe development of the learning experience. Also, students need to evaluate the experience as a Page 19.22.5function of theory in combination with feelings by participating in a reflection session. Finally,feedback should be provided to the student to complement their reflection.To accomplish this goal, the following specific objectives have been defined: 1. Increase the incorporation of global-centric, real-life, meaningful research and professional development activities in the classroom. 2. Increase the preparation of STEM students to enter an interdisciplinary
with do-it-yourself (DIY) kits they could use at home alongside a neuroscience MOOC.2. Research questionsIn order to better understand the experiences of students who were sent at-home laboratory kitsto use alongside this MOOC, we ask four primary research questions:1. How can we characterize the ways in which students around the world use onlineresources with the at-home lab kits? What online behaviors can we identify for the students inthe treatment group when they are likely to be using the kits at home? For example, how muchtime do they spend online watching lab videos that demonstrate kit experiments?2. How is their use of the kits reflected in their online individual and collaborativebehaviors? What patterns of behaviors (e.g
for such educational programs and they are not subject toaccreditation anymore. Without any regulatory requirements or norms, due to such approach,many employers did their best to minimize their expenditures related to educating or retrainingtheir personnel. However, the problem of interaction with the labor market that has not beensolved by now to the necessary extent or with the necessary effect becomes more and morecritical. [1]The system of continuing professional education (hereinafter – “CPE”) was formed within theinstitutions of engineering education due to their own initiatives only: Late in 1990s – early in2000s educating economists and managers was considered to be of highest priority and mostdemanded in Russia. There were certain
, technical objects andprocessing procedures [1]. Therefore interest and taste for engineering are among successfactors in his professional activity. Mechanical aptitude, power of engineering observation,mechanical intelligence and spatial perception are professionally important qualities. However engineering activity is of creative nature. Real engineer should actindependently, creatively and with initiative in every field. Often engineers become teammanagers, therefore administrative abilities are also of great importance. Sense of responsibility is also necessary for professional engineers as wise utilizationof funds, equipment and manpower often depends on his work, abilities and self-discipline. At the university future
practices inengineering education in different EU-countries).Project ApproachIllustration of the SALEIE project’s main themes is shown in figure 1.Figure 1. SALEIE Project Workpackages and Main ThemesThe methodology that this project is following is to audit current practice, design new models, integratethe models into trial institutions, monitor and evaluate the trials and analyse, report and disseminatethe findings.As a first step questionnaire surveys have been developed, launched and the results have been analyzedfor an audit of the current situation and current practices in interest areas of this project. The surveyshave been designed to audit:• The skills required of graduates able to help industry to respond to the current global
“engineering elite” without boundariesand cross-country barriers. Different cultural background of engineers in a global world may,however, form unpredictable barriers to their cooperation within a transnational company or auniversity. On the other hand, cultural differences as a set of various “points of view” andapproaches can make a fruitful contribution to the development of engineering community [1].Professional growth of engineers is closely linked to the global challenges mankind faces today.In the XXI century, the mankind is facing a number of new challenges; their solution willdetermine the future progress and even survival. The “global agenda" today includes thefollowing issues: corruption, poverty, environmental pollution, human rights
situation exists for womenin underrepresented groups across all ranks in computer and information science. This meansthat the numbers of women professors in engineering from underrepresented groups are so smallin the U.S. (less than 1%), that most of them can be readily identified [1]. Increasing therepresentation of women and diversifying the field of engineering has become a nationalimperative, which is closely aligned to the United States’s ability to maintain its globalcompetitive edge [2], [3]. Initiatives that facilitate women’s access to mentoring relationshipsand research networks have proven successful in providing women engineers with the academiccapital necessary for career advancement [4]. Research demonstrates the direct
-leveltechnical equipment and adaptability with an innovative development vector. Large-scaleinnovation of the industry is largely determined by ensuring its production of highly skilledstaff, training quality of that should be responded with fast-changing demands of thedeveloping manufactures. In modern conditions, the main goal of the petrochemical industry enterprises is toimprove the quality of products, ensuring theirs competitiveness and as a result, theachievement of profit, which is the source of funds for the further development of enterprises[1]. During the transition from one stage of company development to another, there is anaccumulation of organizational problems. These problems may be the result of making wrongmanagement
develop solutions for real-worldissues. Despite involvement of some graduate students in international research, there remainsubsets of graduate students from underrepresented minority (URM) groups who have neitherbeen encouraged nor invited to participate in international projects. The Council of GraduateSchools’ 2013 publication, “Graduate Education for Global Career Pathways,” included papersthat encouraged graduate students to participate in global conferences as means to engage, andserves as the premise for our strategy to broaden participation of URM graduate students ininternational projects.1 The Graduate School at UMBC and the National Science Foundation’sPROMISE: Maryland’s Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP
for the future it is critical to decrease emissions from fossil fuelswhile harnessing energy from renewable resources. These concerns reach across political andgeographical borders, and, when considering the establishing of knowhow and practice indeveloping nations, researchers and practitioners need to address the special needs of capacitybuilding and infrastructure and resource limitations. Beyond that one must be cognizant of howto create a link with engineers and scientists to begin with and then go beyond that to maintainthe collaboration while considering issues related to tact, communication, and understanding theinfluence of culture on research and interaction practice [1].In this paper we consider a USAID/NSF PEER program aimed at
. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) citesfactors such as increased access to high performance computing, Internet connectivity and othertechnology by previously under-developed countries as some of the reasons for the increasednumber of firms globally that are now competing for engineering projects (1). In some cases,major projects require the contributions of virtual global teams made up of members located indifferent parts of the world. These teams often function across multiple time zones, multiplecultures, and sometimes multiple languages. They also can take place synchronously (live) orasynchronously (viewed at a later time). The challenge of working effectively with multiculturalteams will continue to grow in importance. NAE
university in China. The summer courseshave been launched at the University H since 2012. In 2014, forty-one graduate-levelcourses were offered with 24 courses in engineering related disciplines. Among these24 courses, 19 engineering courses have invited scholars from outside of theuniversity to be guest professors. These international collaborative summer courses(ICSCs) have emerged to be a dynamic platform for diversifying students’ learningexperiences. Most of the courses would invite renowned professors from topuniversities around the world to conduct the teaching. As shown in Figure 1, fifty-fivepercent of professors came from the US, followed by the UK and Japan (14%respectively). ICSCs provide students with a short-term exposure to
apparent absence of constraints in project initiation and the suffocating presence of con-straints in project execution.There is evidence in fact that the highest forms of creativity may be derived from designingwithin an envelope of significant constraint, i.e. thinking “inside the box” [1]. There is also anemerging view of “reverse innovation” that suggests that good design for the constraints of thedeveloping world informs and improves design for the developed world [2-5].The current study exposed students to environments significantly different from their own,perhaps a worthwhile objective in itself. But the core objective of the study was to exposestudents to environments of high constraint. The countries selected were among the 138 coun
technical higher school teachers are membersof IGIP. Annually 10-20 of them take part in the IGIP conferences where they present theirpapers and participate in the interchange of views.IGIP system of training centersThe most important part of IGIP’s activity is training and certification of engineering teachers.Below we shall describe both aspects. Preparation of teachers is institutionalized in special IGIPTraining Centers (TC) that are situated in many countries. In Russia a TC is usually called theCenter of Engineering Pedagogy (CEP) [1]. Each TC must be once accredited by IGIP and thenreaccredited every 5 years. Now there are 35 accredited TCs all over the world and 14 of themare in Technical Universities located in different regions of Russia
not only in quantity but also in quality. In order to provide the society withquality engineers in the new century, engineering education has been developed more andmore in three dimensions, i.e., academic, entrepreneurial, and societal components. It isparticularly described as “engineering education is now comprised of three key axes:technical, professional and global skills” [1]. After analyzed the current situation ofengineering education, James Plummer proposed the changes we should make in order tohave a mixed curriculum with other fields for students to learn many skills not intraditional engineering curriculum but very useful in their professional career [2].Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) has implemented the project based
attributes of a global engineeremerged. These are:1. Demonstrates an understanding of engineering, science, and mathematics fundamentals2. Demonstrates an understanding of political, social, and economic perspectives3. Demonstrates an understanding of information technology, digital competency, and information literacy4. Demonstrates an understanding of stages/phases of product lifecycle (design, prototyping, testing, production, distribution channels, supplier management, etc.)5. Demonstrates an understanding of project planning, management, and the impacts of projects on various stakeholder groups (project team members, project sponsor, project client, end- users, etc.)6. Demonstrates an understanding of the ethical and business norms
scientific research capability of engineers refers to a linking andoperation method where each component of the development system coordinates and promotes eachother. According to relevant studies both at home and abroad, the development mechanism forscientific research capability of engineers can be generally classified into four dimensions, includingpolicy guarantee mechanism at the national level, engineering education mechanism at the collegelevel, synergic development mechanism at the industry level, and drive mechanism at the individuallevel. The specific measurement indexes and the bibliography are set forth in Table 117. Due to wordcount limitation, this paper only lists part of the measurement indexes.Table 1 Dimensional and Measurement
strategies that provideglobal perspectives and international experiences to help their graduates excel in their futurework environment” [1]. Despite this need, only few students are able to or willing to have a studyabroad experience. The 2013 Open Doors report from the Institute for International Educationshows that nationally only 3.9% of engineering students studied abroad during theirundergraduate career [2]. In addition, despite the growing awareness of the benefits of studyabroad by students, the challenges preventing students from studying abroad are numerous andcomplex [2]. According to the IIE Generation Study Abroad White Paper Series, the primarychallenges for many U.S. students can be grouped into to three overarching categories: cost
forSTEM education. The report detailed the need for increased efforts to build the future US STEMworkforce and identified five key areas of priority investments including the following: 1) Improve STEM Instruction 2) Increase and sustain youth and public engagement in STEM 3) Enhance the STEM experience of undergraduate students 4) Better serve groups historically underrepresented in STEM fields 5) Design graduate education for tomorrow’s STEM workforceOne of the results of this strategic plan is a Fiscal Year 2015 US Department of Educationbudget that allots approximately 320 million US Dollars (USD) to pre-kindergarten-through-grade-twelve (P-12) STEM education and learning, and over 152 million USD to support
magnitude may create power quality problems. Electric vehicles bring more and more attention to general public Signal processing perspective simulation results: due to their environmentally friendly advantage and lower price. To Without EV Charging Case Voltage increases smoothly from make this come to real life, the electric power generation and a 4.3% to a 1.7% drop distribution grid infrastructure need to be improved a lot to support With EV Charging Case Much more random behavior with average voltage Fig. 1. Distribution of EV charge times Fig. 2. Rapid charging station system the significant extra load provided by these
reactive power. systems can be accurately estimated, square, have been utilized to ensure the power system is operating at a nominal A voltage sag is defined by the IEEE standard 1159‐1995 as: “decrease in the root mean particularly for unbalanced systems since frequency in real time while maintaining a balance between the generation and square (RMS) voltage at the power frequency for durations from 0.5 cycles to 1 minute.” the system becomes noncircular when load. Since the