Publications, 2016, p. 248. SAGE Publications.[14] C. O. Flores, T. Poisot, S. Valverde, and J. S. Weitz, "BiMat: a MATLAB(R) package to facilitate the analysis of bipartite networks," Methods Ecol Evol, vol. 7, doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12458.[15] C. Brehm, J. Linsey, and A. Layton, "Designing MakerSpaces in a Nested Structure to Maximize Student Impact," presented at the ASEE 2020 Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada, abstract accepted.[16] C. Brehm and A. Layton, "Designing eco-industrial parks in a nested structure to mimic mutualistic ecological networks," Procedia CIRP, vol. 80, pp. 590-595, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.011.[17] M. Almeida-Neto, P. Guimarães, Paulo R
, “Engineering Ph.D. students’ research experiences: A think-aloud study,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Educ. Conf., 2019, pp. 1–4.[21] N. H. Choe and M. Borrego, “Master’s and doctoral engineering students’ interest in industry, academia, and government careers,” J. of Eng. Educ., vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 325–346, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1002/jee.20317.[22] G. Sallai, J. Vicente, C. Berdanier, and K. Shanachilubwa, “Coping landscapes: How graduate engineering students’ coping mechanisms correspond with dominant stressors in graduate school,” in 2022 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., 2022.[23] E. Hocker, E. Zerbe, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Characterizing doctoral engineering student socialization: Narratives of mental health, decisions to
efficacy beliefs with 3D design and printing," Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 76-83, 2019.[17] J. L. Sargent, B. M. Holloway, S. R. Bayley, and A. V. Walter, "Investigation of Pre- Service Teacher Self-Efficacy for Teaching Engineering," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30729.[18] K. L. Turner Jr, M. Kirby, and S. Bober, "Engineering design for engineering design: Benefits, models, and examples from practice," IE: inquiry in Education, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 5, 2016.[19] N. G. Lederman and J. S. Lederman, "Next Generation Science Teacher Educators," Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 929-932, 2013/10/01 2013, doi
September 1998 to January of 2003), College of Engineering Associate Dean of Academic Affairs (Jan. 2003-April 2006), and the Associate Dean of Undergraduate Studies (April 2006-September 2013). Dr. Karimi is a Fellow of ASEE, a Fellow of ASME, senior mem- ber of AIAA, and holds membership in ASHRAE, and Sigma Xi. He has served as the ASEE Campus Representative at UTSA, ASEE-GSW Section Campus Representative, and served as the Chair of ASEE Zone III (2005-07). He chaired the ASEE-GSW section during the 1996-97 academic year.Dr. Randall D. Manteufel P.E., The University of Texas at San Antonio Dr. Randall Manteufel is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). He has
remotely during COVID. In 2021 and2022 a hard copy of the pre-survey was handed out on the first day of class. The post survey wasavailable online and also handed out on the last day of class. Response rates were much higheron the pre-survey (71-88%) than the post-survey (25-63%). Results in this paper represent onlythe paired responses where students completed both the pre and post surveys.DEI Course Integration DetailsEthicsThe ethics homework assignment for the course in 2019 to 2022 are shown in Figure 1. In 2019portions of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Community Panel [42]were shown in-class. During the panel Lena Young-Green discusses how her community inTampa, Florida, was impacted when the interstate highway was
consider theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts” (p.8). FEIAP (2019) stipulates that “Engineering practice must consider economic, public health,safety, legal, social, environment and sustainability factors” (p. 2). Similarly, ENAEE (2021)states that Bachelor Degree Graduates must demonstrate an “awareness of the widermultidisciplinary context of engineering,” an “awareness of non-technical - societal, health andsafety, environmental, economic and industrial - implications of engineering practice (p. 11) the“ability [...] to recognise the importance of non-technical [...] constraints” (p. 9), and the “abilityto develop and design complex products (devices, artifacts, etc.), processes and
. Zizka, “Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: the employers’ perspective,” High. Educ. Ski. Work-Based Learn., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 591–606, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1108/HESWBL-10-2019-0148.[2] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly, and C. G. Nicometo, “Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms,” Eng. Stud., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–174, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2010.519772.[3] A. Briliyanti, J. W. Rojewski, D. J. L. Colbry, and K. Luchini-Colbry, “STEMAmbassadors: Developing Communications, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills for Graduate Students,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun
; Ali, F. (2022, August). Examining K-12 Singaporean parents' engineering awareness: An initial study of the knowledge, attitude, and behavior (KAB) framework (fundamental). In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.20. Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A. P., Osman, H., Ohland, C., Cardella, M. E., & Yeter, I. H. (2019, June). Examining the role of parents in promoting computational thinking in children: A case study on one homeschool family (Fundamental). In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.21. Yeter, I., Rynearson, A., Ehsan, H., Rehmat, A., Dasgupta, A., Fagundes, B., Menekse, M., & Cardella, M. (2019) Design and implementation of data collection in a large-scale, multi- year Pre-College Engineering Study: A
, “Progress with the professional spine: A four-year engineering design and practice sequence,” Australas. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 63–74, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.7158/22054952.2013.11464079.[3] Z. S. Roth, H. Zhuang, and A. Zilouchian, “Integrating design into the entire electrical engineering four-year experience,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/integrating-design-into-the-entire-electrical-engineering-four-year- experience[4] R. Khan and L. Romkey, “Scaffolding reflection across the design curriculum: Triangulating Student, Alumni, and Faculty Perspectives of the Role of Design within an Engineering Science
ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, June 23-26, 2013.11. M. Phillips, “Standards Collections: Considerations for the Future,” Collect. Manag., vol. 44, no. 2-4, pp. 334– 347, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/01462679.2018.1562396.BiographiesMARILYN DYRUD is a professor emeritus, recently retired from Oregon Institute of Technology after 40 years ofteaching. An ASEE member since 1983, she has been active in the Engineering Technology and Engineering EthicsDivisions. She has served on the ETD Board and the ASEE Board, held all officer positions in the ethics division,and chaired ASEE’s Ethics Task Force. At the section level, she chaired the Pacific Northwest Section and served asZone IV chair. Marilyn is an ASEE Life Member, Fellow, and
sociotechnical integration professional development proposal.Finally, we thank the Colorado School of Mines Office of Research and Technology Transfer foran internal planning grant that financially supported our research collaboration and intervieweeparticipation.References[1] W. E. Bijker and T. Pinch. Eds. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, 1987.[2] J. S. Rossmann and H. Stewart-Gambino, “Cornerstone design for sociotechnical ‘Grand Challenges,’” in Proc. 2019 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., 2019.[3] G. D. Hoople and A. Choi-Fitzpatrick, Drones for good: How to bring sociotechnical thinking into the classroom. Springer Cham, 2020.[4] N. Andrade and D
instructor shouldintervene.References[1] J. Keller, Motivational design for learning and performance. New York: Springer, 2010.[2] K. Ashford-Rowe, J. Herrington, and C. Brown, “Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 39, pp. 205–222, 2014.[3] A. Johnson and J. Swenson, “Open-ended modeling problems in a sophomore-level aerospace mechanics of materials courses,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. Tampa, FL: ASEE, Jun. 2019, p. 33146.[4] J. Swenson, A. Johnson, T. Chambers, and L. Hirshfield, “Exhibiting productive beginnings of engineering judgment during open-ended modeling problems in an introductory mechanics of
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Design of Steel and Course Wood Structures Structural Analysis (CE403) (CE404) Credit Hours 3.5 3.0 Lessons 35 @ 75 minutes 40 @ 55 minutes Iteration - 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lessons on Wood 17% 15% 21.3% 22.5% 22.5% 22.5% 22.5% (% of total course) Credit Hours on 0.60 0.45 0.64 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 Wood (hrs) Course Grade for
Undergraduate Engineering Education. Cambridge,MA:WorldwideCDIOInitiative.Crawley, E. F., & Hosoi, A. E. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET)programatMIT-Buildingcommunity,developingprojects,andconnectingwithindustry.In2019 ASEEAnnualConference&Exposition,Tampa,Florida.Crawley,E.F.,&Hosoi,A.P.,&Mitra,A.B.(2018).RedesigningundergraduateengineeringeducationatMIT–the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,SaltLakeCity,Utah.deGraaff,E.,Markkula,M.,Demlová ,M.,Kuru,S.,&Peltola,H.(2007).Innovativelearningandteachingmethods. In C. Borri & F. Maffioli (Eds.), TREE: Teaching and research in engineering in Europe
Engineering Diversity Program,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/fostering-an-asset-mindset-to-broaden-participation-through-the-transfor mation-of-an-engineering-diversity-program[4] Society of Women Engineers, “SWE Research Update: Women in Engineering by the Numbers (Nov. 2019) - All Together,” 2019. https://alltogether.swe.org/2019/11/swe-research-update-women-in-engineering-by-the-numb ers-nov-2019/#_edn3 (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).[5] E. T. Cline, “Promoting Academic Success of Economically Disadvantaged, STEM-Interested, First- and Second-Year Undergraduate Students via the ACCESS in STEM Program at University
example.Selecting and implementing the A2000 system without adequate coordination resulted in workbacklog and employee frustration. The [company] should have conducted a retrospectivesessions at defined points in the system replacement and implementation process would havehelped to identify the root performance issues and allow development of course-correctionactions to be taken sooner.References[1] Rabb, R., and Greenburg, D. (2019), “Meeting Industry Needs for Professional and Technical Skills With NewGraduate Degrees,” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Tampa, FL, June16-19.[2] Greenburg, D., Huntington, S., and Michalaka, D. (2022). “Developing an agile project management course forgraduate students.” Proceedings
Engineering at UL Lafayette in 2013, the Outstanding Senior Faculty Research Award from the ME De- partment in 2016, MSU and BCOE Faculty Research Award in 2018; he was named to the Jack Hatcher Chair in Engineering Entrepreneurship in 2018 and promoted to Full Professor in 2019. In his profes- sional societies, Dr. Liu was elected a Fellow of ASME in 2017, a Fellow of SAE in 2019, and received the SAE Forest R. McFarland Award in 2020. Dr. Liu is a Professional Engineer registered in Ohio State and also holds active membership in ASEE and AAAS. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONLINE PHASE-FIELD THEORY COURSE FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
of the learningstrategies used in different settings of course offerings in engineering and science disciplines. In-class problem-solving activities engage and challenge students using real-life and imaginarysituations where students engage in such higher-order thinking tasks as analysis, synthesis, andevaluation[1]. Active learning is a broad concept used to refer to educational approaches designedto make students participate rather than passively listen. According to Felder and Brent “anything © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conferencecourse-related that all students in a class session are called upon to do other than simply watching
, 2023.[7] J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience,and School, National Research Council, National Academy Press, 2000.[8] A. C. Estes, R. W. Welch, and S. J. Ressler, “The ExCEEd Teaching Model,” ASCE Journalof Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, pp. 218-222, Oct. 2005.[9] A. C. Estes, “Shock and Awe in the Civil Engineering Classroom,” ASCE Journal ofProfessional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, pp. 1-5, Jan. 2005.[10] A. D. Battistini, “Using Themes and Pop Culture References to Make Introductory CivilEngineering Courses More Engaging,” Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, Tampa, FL, June 16-19, 2019.[11] K. Mangan, “The Personal
) instigating broad interest in and awareness of EM-based engineeringfaculty mentorship and development (Curiosity), (2) connecting engineeringfaculty to build and share resources and mentorship professional developmentopportunities (Connections), and (3) contributing to the knowledge base aroundeffective engineering faculty mentorship (Creating Value).The approach taken by M360 was to support teams nationwide via subawardsthrough a call for action around mentorship. Proposals received fit into twocategories: 1) research and development, or 2) scaling and adaptation. A total of 19EM-based mentorship projects were funded during two cycles between 2019 and2021 (see Table 1). The PI team reviewed all proposals and later provided regularsupport to the
Technology from Murray State University, and a Ph.D. in Interdisciplinary Engineering from the University of Alabama at Birmingham. Dr. Webster is a certified GD&T-Technologist, SOLIDWORKS Expert, and Six Sigma Green Belt. For his teaching and mentoring of students he has been awarded the 2021 ASEE ET National Teaching Award, 2021 Purdue Teaching for Tomorrow Fellowship, 2021 Purdue Teaching Academy Pandemic Teaching Award, 2019 ASEE EDGD Rising Educator Award, and 2019 SME Distinguished Faculty Advisor Award. Dr Webster’s research interests include ET outreach (e.g., recruitment and retention) and design education with focus areas in CAD, instructional techniques (e.g., project-based learning), and technology.Dr
, Minnesota State University, Mankato Catherine Spence is an Assistant Professor at Iron Range Engineering through Minnesota State University, Mankato in the Integrated Engineering Department. She received her PhD in Engineering and Science Education in 2019 and a BS in Electrical Engineering in 2014 at Clemson University.Dr. Marissa A Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor at Utah State University focusing on neurodiversity and identity and motivation. She completed her Ph.D. in Engineering Education focusing on motivation and identity for engineering graduate students. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP
modern challenges.References[1] K. Johnson, J. Leydens, B. Moskal, and S. Kianbakht, “Gear switching: From ‘technical vs. social’ to ‘sociotechnical’ in an introductory control systems course,” in 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), 2016, pp. 6640–6645.[2] K. Johnson et al., “The Development of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022.[3] B. Friedman and D. G. Hendry, Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. MIT Press, 2019.[4] S. Costanza-Chock, Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, 2020
365Assessment data of last three years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22 were compiled and arerepresented in Table 3-1 and Figure 3: Table 3-1 Senior Project Assrssment Summary by Objective 2019-2022 2019 2020 2021 2022* Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage Course Learning of Students Deviation of Students Deviation of Students Deviation of Students Deviation Objectives Scoring from 70% Scoring from 70% Scoring from
ASEE 2023Some of the key barriers to offering CS to elementary school students that have been foundinclude administrators are not supportive, teachers have not yet received training to teach CS, andresources for adoption remain low [4–7]. A key barrier that has been mentioned in past studies isthat teachers have no time to add an additional subject area to their day, particularly since they areimmersed in teaching to their state standards which more heavily emphasize language arts andmathematics [4].Integrating CS and computational thinking (CT) into subjects such as math and language arts hasbeen viewed as a way to mitigate the barrier related to time [8] and to create innovative learningenvironments [9]. Integration also provides
Sustainable Development,” United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2019. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sdgs.un.org/publications/future-now-science-achieving-sustainable-development-gsdr-2019- 24576[52] B. E. Hughes, “Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students,” Sci. Adv., vol. 4, no. 3, p. eaao6373, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao6373.[53] T. L. Strayhorn and R. M. Johnson, “What Underrepresented Minority Engineering Majors Learn from Co-Ops & Internships,” presented at the 2016 ASEE International Forum, Jun. 2016. Accessed: Dec. 19, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/what-underrepresented-minority- engineering-majors-learn
Electronic Resources for Innovation-Based Learning,” in 2019 IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS), Oct. 2019, pp. 75–78. doi: 10.1109/LWMOOCS47620.2019.8939640.[2] L. Singelmann, E. A. Vazquez, E. M. Swartz, M. Pearson, and R. Striker, “Student- developed Learning Objectives: A Form of Assessment to Enable Professional Growth,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. Accessed: Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/student-developed- learning-objectives-a-form-of-assessment-to-enable-professional-growth[3] E. A. Vazquez et al., “The MOOCIBL Platform: A Custom-made Software Solution to Track the Innovation Process with Blockchain Learning Tokens,” presented at the 2021
, 2021. Accessed: Feb. 14, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37411[6] J. Ford et al., “Transitioning from Capstone Design Courses to Workplaces: A Study of New Engineers’ First Three Months,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 6B, pp. 1993–2013, 2019.[7] D. Reeping et al., “How are Threshold Concepts Applied? A Review of the Literature,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH: ASEE, 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2--27965.[8] K. O’Keefe, E. Rangelova, S. C. Packer, Q. K. Hassan, and I. Detchev, “WIP: Decoding a discipline-towards identifying threshold concepts in geomatics engineering,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt
et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.[25] E. Rutz, “Adaptable and Agile - Programs to Meet Emerging Workforce Needs,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/adaptable-and-agile-programs-to-meet-emerging- workforce-needs[26] S. Barker and A. Clobes, “Work in Progress: A Holistic PhD Admissions Rubric--Design & Implementation,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in- progress-a-holistic
problem solvers to problem seekers: The necessary role of tension in engineering education,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2016- June, 2016, doi: 10.18260/p.26976.[12] A. D. de Figueiredo, “Toward an Epistemology of Engineering,” in 2008 Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, 2008, pp. 94–95.[13] D. Riley, “Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit,” Eng. Stud., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 249–265, 2017, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631.[14] E. P. Douglas, M. Koro-Ljungberg, and M. Borrego, “Challenges and promises of overcoming epistemological and methodological partiality: Advancing engineering education through acceptance of diverse ways of knowing