the National Academies, Dr. Butler was an analyst for the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, a research associate in the Department of Environmental Health of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, conducted research at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, and practiced as a product safety engineer at Xerox Corporation. He has directed numerous National Academies studies on engineering and environmental policy topics. Dr. Butler earned his BS and MS degrees in electrical engineering with a concentration in biomedical engineering from the University of Rochester and his PhD in public policy analysis from Carnegie Mellon University. He is a recipient of the National Academies’ Cecil
their instructional practices. The proposed toolkitwill promote potential shifts in educational enacted practices grounded in evidence-basedstrategies and student narratives.Faculty classroom teaching preparation in STEM fields, particularly within engineering, is oftenseverely lacking [1]. Due to the research-emphasis within many doctoral programs, faculty havelimited training as it relates to high impact teaching practices and fostering inclusive learningenvironments [2]. Once in the professoriate, faculty reward structures often prioritize researchproductivity over teaching, leaving little incentive for faculty to hone their instructional skills[3]. While a lack of effective teaching practices is problematic for all undergraduates, there
the center since its launch and our progress after twoyears of operation with the help of tutors. We also present the formation of a tutor network,which is designed to be diverse in terms of academic background and culture. An evaluation ofthe impact of our approach on makerspace diversity, inclusion, and equity is presented throughthe analysis of statistics and reflections from the tutors involved in the initiative. The studyshows that our proposed tutor network can effectively serve as a role model for fosteringdiversity, equity, and inclusion in academic makerspaces for undergraduate students.BackgroundThe University of Hong Kong's Faculty of Engineering has established the Tam Wing FanInnovation Wing [1], also known as the HKU Inno Wing
excellence in teaching and learning [5]; (2) the absence of astandardized accessibility curriculum within computer science education; (3) a lack ofestablished best practices for accessibility; and (4) a considerable learning curve for educatorsadapting content to be fully accessible. These challenges suggest not only variability inimplementation but also a critical gap in the standardization of accessible educational practicesacross the field. Additionally, these challenges have been made even more difficult in the onlinelearning environment, where digital accessibility issues increase considerably. Despite thiscomprehensive discussion, these two studies demonstrate how little has been researched aboutthe pedagogical practices employed to make
- Champaign Mr. Partha Kumar Das is a final year PhD student in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. He is an experimental and theoretical fluid mechanics researcher whose expertise lies on hydrodynamics in microfluidic flows to describe particle dynamics with the emphasis on particle manipulation applications in microchannel. His teaching experience includes instructing fluid mechanics courses in undergraduate levels, designing undergraduate fluid mechanics lab facilities, and training the teaching assistants in undergraduate courses for conducting undergraduate laboratories. He has multiple fellowships, awards, and recognitions including Teaching Fellowship
Conference. Moreinformation and details related to themes and analyses may be found in that paper. This paper’smain focus was to collect and present case studies for engineering ethics instruction.ReferencesBairaktarova, D. and Woodcock, A. (2015). Engineering ethics education: Aligning practice and outcomes. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(11), 18–22. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2015.7321965.Bielefeldt, A. (2022). Work in Progress: Personalizing Engineering Ethics through the Individual Stories of Engineers and People Impacted. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference. Excellence Through Diversity. Paper ID#37519.Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.Brunhaver, S. R., Jesiek
., ‘Adding diversity and culture to the engineer’s toolkit: Evaluating a unique course option for engineering students’, in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018.[4] E. Volpe et al., ‘Building a Leadership Toolkit: Underrepresented Students’ Development of Leadership-Enabling Competencies through a Summer Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) in Engineering Education’, in 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2023.[5] S. Burgstahler, Creating inclusive learning opportunities in higher education: A universal design toolkit. Harvard Education Press Cambridge, MA, 2020.[6] S. Herbert, The inclusion toolkit. Sage, 2011.[7] M. McLaughlin and M. Press, ‘Transitionary Teaching Toolkit: Best Practices for
Paper ID #43349A Collaborative Approach to Implementing Design Thinking and Rapid Prototypingin a High School Engineering CampMs. Rebecca Glasgow, University of Nevada, Reno Rebecca is the Engineering and Fabrication Librarian at the University of Nevada, Reno. She supports the learning, teaching and research needs of faculty and students for the College of Engineering and a wide variety of departments that use the Makerspace. Her time with the DeLaMare Science and Engineering Library has allowed her to explore curriculum development and instructional design, which she has applied to her makerspace training programs and
reflects best practices in project-based learning, recognized for successfulproject execution. The emphasis on repeatability and randomization aligns with establishedexperimental design principles, ensuring robust and valid results. This phase integrates insightsfrom project management, optimizing resource allocation and timelines [14]. The iterative natureof work plan development improves the adaptability in students, reflecting the dynamic nature ofreal-world engineering projects. Research highlights that involving students in planning enhancestheir ownership and responsibility [15]. Table 1 Sample projects for years 2022-2023 Project title Group Primary
educational practice [1] that provides opportunities forstudents to develop their research and technical skills, network with other students/professors,raise their awareness of graduate studies, and understand the social context of research. Whileundergraduate students are often able to participate in research at their own institution ornationally in the US (through available Research Experiences for Undergraduates sites), it is alsopossible for undergraduates to complete research internationally.In addition to the domestic benefits of research experiences, this provides an opportunity tonetwork with international students/professors, learn about a different country and culture, andlearn new perspectives on how professionals from other countries
prepared to not prepared at all. Survey responses will bemonitored over time to assess the impact of these changes and identify areas where furtherintervention may be needed. Survey feedback will be used to iteratively refine the modules andcourse learning outcomes.Appendix A: Seattle University ECE Themes of Professional Formation1. STEM Technical Skills (Scientific, Engineering, and Computational Skills) a. Design Skills i. Engineering Trade-offs and Design under Constraint 1. Global, Cultural, Social, Environmental, and Economic Constraints 2. Concern for Public Health, Safety, and Welfare ii. Sustainable and Ethical Design Practices 1. Design Informed by the Energy Budget and Carbon
, in 2016, and the B.S. degree in intelligent transportation engineering from Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China, in 2014. He was Graduate Teaching Assistant for ECE1013 Foundations in ECE, ECE1022 Foundations in Design, ECE4713/6713 Computer Architecture, and ECE4753/6753 Introduction to Robotics at the undergraduate level and as a guest lecturer delivered graduate-level courses, ECE 8743 Advanced Robotics and ECE8833 Computational Intelligence. He received the ECE Best Graduate Researcher Award from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University in 2023. He received the Research Travel Award from Bagley College of Engineering, Mississippi State University in 2023
differing perspectives based on thedocumented experiences of women along the Oregon and similar Overland Trails in the late1840s and early 1850s. Games were implemented using the Inform programming language,characterized by coding statements taking the form of complete sentences. This approachprovided a natural language syntax environment, making it inclusive for individuals outsidetraditional programming disciplines. To assess the course's effectiveness, pre- and post-activitysurveys with a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) focus were designed and administered. Thesubsequent statistical analysis revealed a significant positive impact, with a large effect sizedemonstrated in raising students' awareness of gender representation
Paper ID #44342Integrating Engineering Design in Laboratory Sessions for Second-Year MechanicalEngineering StudentsDr. Deeksha Seth, Villanova University Deeksha Seth is an Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering department at Villanova University. Her primary research interests includes integrative and interdisciplinary engineering education.Dr. Robert P. Loweth, Purdue University Robert P. Loweth (he/him) is a Visiting Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research explores how engineering students and practitioners engage stakeholders in their engineering
, courses tailored to enhancing pedagogical skills in such areasbecome valuable. As such, teacher professional development programs and courses that focus onteaching engineering with real-world problems emerge as catalysts for transformative teachingpractices. In the context of this study, we delve into a 3-hour graduate course entitledNanoEnvironmental Engineering for Teachers (NEET) offered free of cost at Rice University,Arizona State University, Yale University, and the University of Texas at El Paso under theNanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment(NEWT). The NEET class is designed for AP Environmental Science, Environmental Systems,Biology or Life Sciences, and K-12 STEM teachers to learn about water
(NHERI) – NetworkCoordination Office (NCO) is a National Science Foundation funded collaborative grant thataims to coordinate research and outreach activities for the multi-disciplinary natural hazardsengineering research. As part of the NHERI-NCO, the Education and Community Outreachinitiatives include opportunities for undergraduate students to conduct research to mitigate theeffects of natural hazards. The Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) has been well-researched as a best practice for preparing college students for graduate studies (Willis, Krueger,& Kendrick, 2013), especially underrepresented students in engineering (Labrador & Perez,2006). Curriculum was developed specifically for the NHERI REU program to
, no. 6, pp. 847-867, 2015, doi: 10.1002/tea.21221.[26] T. Fernandez et al., "More comprehensive and inclusive approaches to demographic data collection," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/25751.[27] A. B. Costello and J. W. Osborne, "Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis," Practical assessment, research & evaluation, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1-9, 2005.[28] L. R. Fabrigar, D. T. Wegener, R. C. MacCallum, and E. J. Strahan, "Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research," Psychological methods, vol. 4
practices and tools (SEPTs), that is, the tools and techniques for designing,implementing, and maintaining software over time. As a result, the productivity or reliability ofengineering work involving software can be hampered by problems that could have been avoidedwith the use of modern best practices in software engineering. Despite a history of research onSEPTs in computing fields (e.g., computer science and software engineering) and computationalscience fields (e.g., computational physics and bioinformatics), the use of SEPTs in engineeringfields is not well understood.To address this problem, in this paper, we present ongoing work investigating how practitionersand undergraduate students in non-computing engineering disciplines understand and
implemented multiple interactive Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Mixed Reality (MR) modules and platforms. These modules have been effectively utilized in mechanical design, training, remote operation, and engineering education. Israa has received recognition for her contributions, including the best poster and presentation awards for her work, the 2024 Bravo Award for Employee Recognition, and induction into the Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi, placing her among the top 10% of Purdue Graduate students. Her academic journey reflects a commitment to advancing knowledge and contributing to technological innovation in XR control systems. Her professional aspirations include applying for an Assistant Professor
multiple identities in the current culture of engineering. Dina has won several awards including the 2022-2023 Outstanding Research Pub- lication Award by the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division I, 2018 ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Best Diversity Paper Award, 2019 College of Engineering Outstanding Graduate Student Research Award and the Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Distinguished Scholar Award. Dina’s dissertation proposal was selected as part of the top 3 in the 2018 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Division D In-Progress Research Gala. Dina was a 2016 recipient of the National Science Foundation’s Graduate Research Fellowship and an
. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13, pp. 909-922, 2019.[28] T. Litzinger, L.R. Lattuca, R. Hadgraft, & W. Newstetter, “Engineering education and the development of expertise,” Journal of engineering education, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 123-150, 2011.[29] P. Tynjälä, R.T. Salminen, T. Sutela, A. Nuutinen, & S. Pitkänen, “Factors related to study success in engineering education,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 221-231, 2005.[30] B.A. Brown, J.M. Reveles, & G.J. Kelly, “Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning
scholarship of teaching. His efforts in leading the Sustainable Buildings program were recognized with the 2019 Award for Excellence in Education Abroad Curriculum Design. He has also worked as a construction project engineer, consultant, and safety inspector. He believes educating the next generation of professionals will be pivotal in sustainability standard practices. Regarding engagement, Dr. Valdes-Vasquez has served as the USGBC student club’s adviser and the ASC Sustainability Team’s faculty coach since 2013. He is a CSU President’s Sustainability Commission member, among multiple other committees. In addition, he is involved with various professional organizations at the national level, including the
: Utilizing the information, I worked with ChatGPT to draft a comprehensive charter. This included defining the scope of the program, outlining the roles of ambassadors, and establishing guidelines for operations and decision-making processes.b. Formulating the Pledge: Ideation: I sought ChatGPT's assistance in brainstorming ideas for a pledge that would resonate with the ambassadors. The focus was on commitment to cybersecurity best practices, ethical behavior, and continuous learning. Drafting the Pledge: ChatGPT helped in drafting a concise and impactful pledge, ensuring it encapsulated the core values and responsibilities of the ambassadors.c. Guidelines for Starting a Chapter: Framework Development: ChatGPT provided a step-by
teamwork in collaborative research settings?" To comprehensively address themain research question, the study will explore the following sub-questions: • RQ1: What are the perceived weaknesses of teamwork as experienced by students? • RQ2: How do students in URPs navigate and resolve conflicts within their teams? • RQ3: What are the strengths of teamwork as perceived by students in URPs?By addressing these questions, the study aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the roleand impact of teamwork in URPs. It seeks to offer insights into best practices for fosteringeffective teamwork in such programs and to highlight the potential areas for improvement inteam dynamics. This, in turn, can inform the design and implementation of future URPs
impact the acceptance of the observation, formal training, and practice. Despite theserecommendations and the impact on the efficacy. The value of AI in efforts, individuals encounter challenges such as anxiety,behavioral intervention coaching could be extended to other areas of organizational difficulties, delivery issues, and visual designskill development as AI improves and clients become morecomfortable with the feedback provided by the AI tool. constraints [2]. Overcoming these challenges necessitates The AI Coach being used in this research is Edy, a publicly deliberate practice, constructive feedback, and continuousavailable AI Coach
at the University of Florida. Her interests are polymer chemistry, additive manufacturing, and data analytics.Katherine Miller, University of Florida Katherine Miller is a graduate of the University of Florida with a Bachelor’s of Science in Materials Science and Engineering. She is a content and format reviewer for EQuIPD Data Science and AI curriculum. Her other research is in biomaterials, focusing on naturally derived hydrogels under Dr. Josephine Allen at the University of Florida. Her interests are additive manufacturing, STEM education, and remote sensing of hazardous materials. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Developing an AI and Engineering Design
significantly lower level of belonging than major level students, men, andwhite students respectively. By creating a more connected and authentic student communityearlier in their academic career, we aim to increase levels of belonginess among these studentgroups and encourage continued connection and empathetic engagement throughout the students’college and professional experience.Assignment Description & Implementation DetailsThe story sharing assignment is assigned during the second week of a ten-week quarter in anovel introductory engineering course focused on developing a socio-technical mindset [5]. This2-credit course, ENGR 101: Engineering, Design, & Society, is a graduation requirement for allengineering and design students at Western
[5]. Faculty at the University of Michigan have gone a step further todesign and implement seven “biomedical engineering in practice” modules in theirundergraduate curriculum [6]. These modules are designed to be student-centered, with most ofthe experiential learning activities occurring in the classroom. The modules led to significantlearning gains, particularly in female students. These studies show the value of incorporatingexperiential learning in the classroom with the goal of not only reinforcing course content butalso building professional engineering skills.There is a significant need for workforce development for the biopharmaceutical industry withcourses going beyond the science and emphasizing R&D skills used in process
and scholarly approach. The structured framework has guided the comprehensiveexamination of relevant literature in a manner reflective of best practices in scholarly writing. Thereview used research databases, search strings, and inclusion criteria for an unbiased search toprovide a narrative description that elaborates meaning full story about the existing research in thisfield.Search ProcedureMultiple search databases were queried to select papers to write a literature survey. EBSCO host,Wiley Library, and IEEE Xplore databases were selected because they provide the advanced searchoption to apply practically identical search strings to select papers to ensure that the chosen papersalign with the objectives and focus of your research. EBSCO
Engineering Education and earned her Ph.D. from Arizona State University, in Engineering Education. After gaining her Ph.D., she worked as a postdoctoral associate at Florida International University in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education and a visiting assistant professor at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. Her research interests center on the concept of sense of belonging, graduate education, mixed-methods and synthesis research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 [Work-in-Progress] Sense of Belonging in STEM Higher Education: Developing a Scoping Review Protocol and StrategyIntroductionIn STEM higher