increase students’ interest in STEM and expand theiraccess to opportunities to experience integrated STEM activities. Our work focused on middleschool students as research shows that interest in STEM decreases through middle school [1].The planned intervention is based on existing theory and research on motivation, as well as theemerging body of literature on integrated STEM instruction. Research shows that relevance isessential to student engagement in science and mathematics [2]. Research also indicates thatthere is a link between students’ interest and experiences in school and their future educationalcareer choices [3,4] . Therefore, engaging students in engineering activities where they solve realworld problems motivates them to learn science
. Theresearcher described key highlights from the research about developing strategic partnerships,and the practitioner translated those highlights into actionable strategies for session attendees.This give-and-take presentation style highlighted our focus on connecting research and practice.The partnership’s orientation toward outreach and dissemination had a positive impact on onemember’s professional advancement. In total, we produced more than 20 professional productsin less than three years.The impact of the work of the partnership has been amplified because of the collaboration. Fromthe research side, one of the recent findings is that many teams utilized informationalcommunication, in which change leaders provide details about plans and goals
undergraduate student at North Carolina State University pursing a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology. She plans to attend Graduate School to obtain a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology upon graduating from NC State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Doctoral Students’ Motivations and Identities: Findings and ImplicationsProject OverviewThe goal of this project is to improve the understanding of how graduate student experiencesinfluence engineering identity formation and goal setting processes. Engineering identity andmotivational goal setting processes have been shown to be important factors for undergraduatestudent participation in engineering
Conference Proceedings, vol. 1413, no. 1, pp. 163–166, 2012.[3] C. J. Finelli, S. R. Daly, and K. M. Richardon, "Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 331-361, Apr. 2014.[4] S. E. Shadle, A. Marker, and B. Earl, "Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments," International Journal of STEM Education, vol.4, no. 8, pp. 1-13, Dec. 2017.[5] R. Thorpe and R. Holt, The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research. London: SAGE Publications, 2008.[6] M. Borrego, M.J. Foster, and J.E. Froyd, "Systematic literature reviews in engineering education
Paper ID #21832Defining and Assessing Competencies in an Undergraduate Reinforced Con-crete Design CourseDr. Matthew D. Lovell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic Change Happen (MACH) program. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University, and he holds his PE license in Indiana. Matt is very active with respect to experimentation in the
visibility has impacted the way in which the CEEDepartment approaches diversity. The poster will also illustrate how the RevED team has madechanges since the first year and what future plans are being made.IntroductionThe College of Engineering at Rowan University was established in 1992 through a multimilliondollar gift by an engineering entrepreneur [1]. The engineering college is divided into thefollowing departments: Civil and Environmental, Electrical and Computer, Chemical,Mechanical, Biomedical Engineering and the Engineering Entrepreneurship Program. Throughthe National Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering and computer scienceDepartments (RED) grant, the Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department isattempting to change
everything which is very important in his orher future professional career advancement.In the following sections, we briefly review the senior design background, report thedesign of effective stress and upward seepage laboratory demonstration budget andschematic design materialization and project schedules. Significance of the project ishighlighted with pertinent concluding remarks and conclusions drawn at the end.BackgroundAny time a structure is being built, it requires an extensive amount of planning byengineers of multiple disciplines and every building project always begins with thefoundation. A structure is only as strong as the foundation upon which it is built, which iswhy it is so important that subsurface investigation of the underlying
college at a rate of nearly 100%.ConclusionsWe have had strong participation in faculty development programming offered through our NSFECliPSE grant and this work has supported continuous improvement in teaching, learning, andstudent success within our College. We are continuing this work with the development of a new,comprehensive academic and career advising program in our College and incorporation ofdiversity and inclusion themes in our work. We continue to work to identify the most impactfulfaculty development activities and develop a plan to institutionalize these beyond the support ofthis grant. Above all, we have made great strides towards developing a culture that supportsinnovative teaching, student-active pedagogies, and support of
similar jobs in aviation industry.References [1] United States Government Accountability Office. Air force training: Further analysis and planning needed to improve effectiveness, 9 2016. URL https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/679849.pdf. Report to Congressional Committees. [2] Guo-Feng Liang, Jhih-Tsong Lin, Sheue-Ling Hwang, Eric Min yang Wang, and Patrick Patterson. Preventing human errors in aviation maintenance using an on-line maintenance assistance platform. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(3):356 – 367, 2010. [3] Sajay Sadasivan and Anand K. Gramopadhye. Technology to support inspection training in the general aviation industry: Specification and design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39
,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research capabilities. The model developed through thisprogram may help to exemplify the establishment of a sustainable collaboration model betweenacademia and industry that helps address the nation's need for mature, independent, informed,and globally competitive STEM professionals and is adapted to other disciplines.In this poster, the details of the program will be described. The challenges and lesson-learned onthe collaboration between the two participating universities, communications with industrialpartners, recruitment of the students, set up of the evaluation plans, and development of theprogram will be discussed.MotivationTo match the demand forecast for skilled STEM professionals, graduating sufficient
discuss preliminary results fromstudents using the virtual reality system and the activities we have developed.IntroductionThis paper will discuss a current work in progress of implementing a learning module that usesvirtual reality and a game environment to teach students professional development skills. We willuse Game Based Learning (GBL) as our framework for this research and as a base for ourapproach in teaching these skills to our students. We will begin by doing an overview of ourresearch including our motivation for this research, our theoretical framework and the use ofvirtual reality as a teaching tool. We will then discuss our current progress in developing both thelesson plan, hardware and software used for this learning module
environment, develop appropriate behavioral approaches,help students make interdisciplinary connections, and improve learning outcomes.Learning System Figure 1. Interface of Moodle learning systemThis study built upon past research and used action research methods to identifyappropriate adjustments to activity planning and guidance methods, with the objectiveof developing cooperative interaction and creative thinking abilities in students overone academic year [12]. The Moodle learning platform was employed to enablestudents to interact regarding class projects. A modular structure, divided into a coremodule and a plug-in module, was adopted to establish the platform. The plug-inmodule was interfaced with the core module to add or
provides a laboratory ofcommon experience for development of language, logic, and problem-solving skills in theclassroom; 3. A democracy demands that its citizens make personal and community decisionsabout issues in which scientific information plays a fundamental role, and they hence need aknowledge of science as well as an understanding of scientific methodology; 4. For somestudents, it will become a lifelong vocation or avocation; and 5. The nation is dependent on thetechnical and scientific abilities of its citizens for its economic competitiveness and nationalneeds [12].Upon graduation from undergraduate construction programs, graduates are engaged in thedesign, planning, engineering, construction, estimating/budgeting, management
problem couldpartly be solved by allowing students to choose their own teammate, but this may have adverseeffects on the learning of students who do not enter the class knowing a study partner. In ongoing work, we plan to study (a) the quality of interactivity of students conductinghomework this way, (b) the possible benefits to students who enter the course with lower priorknowledge, and (c) conduct repeated measures using the same homework assignments but with anew cohort of students. As a part of this study, we have asked students to record themselves doing the homeworktogether so that we can assess the quality of their interactions. Although we tried to avoid bias bymaking it clear to students that their self-recorded video would have
this cohort to those reported for CU students, itis worth noting several substantial differences between the courses and students being assessed.The first difference is the course at CU is a semester-long course dedicated to electrostaticscontent [8]. Whereas, this course can dedicate only two weeks to electrostatics content. It is alsoworth noting the relative preparation of students in this course versus the CU students. Thedifferences in the relative preparation of the two groups is illuminated in Table 2, with CUpretest scores of 30.9% compared to this cohort’s 16.8%. Comparison of the CU Physics degreeplan with this university’s Electrical Engineering degree plan reveals CU students have greaterexperience with electrostatics prior to
the average rating in the traditional classroom. The main reason for that is asfollows: Although the conventional teaching module is adopted in the first stage (the first sixweeks), the teaching contents are smaller but with a more comprehensive teaching syllabusthan the flipped one. Therefore, students have better commanding and application of theknowledge taught in the traditional classroom. In the flipped module, teaching chapters cover70% contents of the teaching plan. Because of the flipped module, the video content uses thefragmented form under dispersed teaching, leading to students' relatively weaker mastering ofknowledge than in the first stage, which explains the second phase of the test scores showinga slightly decreasing trend
interested in student attitudes andsubsequent performance. To accomplish this, we will continue to track a single cohort ofstudents from material balances through the remainder of their career in the chemicalengineering program. We will keep track of student retention, subsequent courses and respectiveinstructors, as well as performance, attitudes, and external experiences such as research orinternships. We also are in the planning stages of a more homogeneous course model for materialbalances. The revised course model will focus on exposing students to problems that engage thefull spectrum of learning styles. As learning styles describe the cognitive processes involved ininformation gathering and problem solving, we believe it is important to teach
had to be multiplexed, which are controlled by switches (Table 2). To achieve deeper understanding and learning, it was considered prudent to provide some facility which could be used to access additional internal register and/or control signal values. Unassigned output pins and seven segment decoders were setup for such additional registers and control signals as seen in Figure 9. Even though reassigning pins will decrease accessibility to standard registers, a user or a designer can observe and verify the internal working of a module for planned system improvement or expansion.Figure 8: Locations of WIMP51 register and control signal access as part of the standard viewing
PortfolioGoals for AFOSR to strengthen the Air Force basic researchprogram as defined in AF S&T Strategic Plan: • Provide scientific leadership for the AF basic research enterprise • Attract the Nation’s/World’s best S&Es to contribute to and lead AF/DoD research • Ensure the coherence and balance of the AF basic research portfolio • Foster connections between AFRL researchers and the National/International basic research community • Maximize the discovery potential of the defense research business environment Focus on the Future AF with the ultimate goal to make Today’s AF and Tomorrow’s AF Obsolete! 7 Shaping the
Plans,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319–336, Oct. 2010.[10] E. Cech, B. Rubineau, S. Silbey, and C. Seron, “Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering,” Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 641–666, Oct. 2011.[11] S. Sheppard and R. Jenison, “Examples of freshman design education,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 248–261, 1997.[12] D. Kilgore, C. J. Atman, K. Yasuhara, T. J. Barker, and A. Morozov, “Considering Context: A Study of First-Year Engineering Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 321–334, Oct. 2007.[13] P. Sarkar and A. Chakrabarti, “Assessing design creativity,” Des. Stud., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 348–383, Jul. 2011.[14] T. P. Yildirim, L
Strategic Plan: Goal 1: Transform lives through meaningful learning experiences Goal 2: Inspire, nurture and empower scholarship, creativity, discovery, innovation and entrepreneurial initiatives.The Project CollaborationOne challenge faced in the first year of the project collaboration was that the art and engineeringclasses met on different days. This meant that aside from one scheduled meeting outside of classtimes, the students were strongly requested to meet several times over the length of the projectoutside of class times. This did not work as hoped. While some teams did meet, othersencountered difficulty finding times to meet as a full team or reported a breakdown incommunication. There was a general sense of frustration
, Western Michigan Univeristy Lenore Yaeger is the Assistant Director of Advising for the College of Engineering in Applied Sciences at Western Michigan University. She holds a Master of Science in Education in school counseling in higher education from the University of Nebraska and is pursing a doctoral degree in Evaluation from the Interdisciplinary PhD in Evaluation at Western Michigan University focusing on evaluation and program planning in higher education.Katherine N. Fox, Western Michigan University Katherine Fox received a M.S. in College Student Personnel from Western Illinois University and a B.A. in English from Northern Illinois University. Katherine’s current professional interests include holistic
undergrad in electrical engineering from Yanbu Industrial College.He worked in Saudi Aramco as instrumentation and communications engineer at King AbdullahUniversity of Science and Technology (KAUST) in water plan project. He worked asinstrumentation and control engineering at Marafiq Company in Technical service Department.Today, he is continuing his master degree in electrical Engineering at University of the Districtof Columbia in communication track. His interesting in cybersecurity.Auther2 Dr. Paul CotaeDr. Paul Cotae, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering is the Director of the PhDProgram at SEAS and Director of the SEAS Research Center. His research is in DigitalCommunication, Information theory, Statistics and Applied Mathematics
been part of modern society for more than 50 years. There are several softwaredevelopment methodologies in use today. Traditional methodologies use comprehensiveplanning, detailed documentation, and expansive designs for developing software. Since 2001,more recent methodologies such as agile modeling, have gained significant attention from thesoftware engineering community. Some of the characteristics of agile modeling are (a) shortdevelopment cycles, (b) incremental planning, (c) continuous feedback, (d) reliance oncommunication, and (e) evolutionary design7. Thus, agile software development is an approachto software development under which requirements and solutions evolve through thecollaborative effort of self-organizing and cross
the Department of Workforce Services, "In general, themore education, the higher the wage." Also, "Technical and management skills equal higherwages." (Department of Work force Services, 2017). Thus, the outcome from this initiativeis to offer a stackable credential education plan focusing on aerospace technology andmanufacturing in southwestern Utah.According to the 2015 Economic Report to the Governor, prepared by the Utah EconomicCouncil, the tech sector is having a transformative effect in Utah. Investments in thisarea in 2013 were over $100 million and total venture capital investments were around$1 billion in 2014. Jobs in this segment pay 167 percent of the Utah average annual Proceedings of the 2019 Conference for
lessons learned from the perspective of its three majorconstituents: students, industrial partners, and academic institutions. This paper would providethe opportunity to understand how a collaborative effort among academic institutions andindustries could answer the question, “how to meet the ever-increasing demand of qualifiedtechnicians created by emerging technologies and the silver tsunami?” The primary objectiveof this paper is to inform educators and industrial partners who are planning to develop similarprograms of best practices in order to ensure a smooth implementation process.Introduction and BackgroundEngineering technology (ET) education in the United States is still facing many challenges,unlike engineering education. As pointed out
their trackingover time for each user/student is another beneficial application of such technological capability,besides being able to distinguish novice vs. experienced students well as their relativeperformance across task difficulty levels [5, 6].Class and Lab DescriptionMMET 201 Manufacturing and Materials is a service course taught every semester to non-majors in the Industrial Distribution (ID) program at Texas A&M University. The ID curriculumwas recently revised; MMET 201 was developed to replace two materials courses and adedicated manufacturing course in the previous degree plan. The new course is 4 hours ofcredit, which includes 3 hours of lecture and a 2 hour lab each week. There are 14 sections of 16students in a regular
to be added in the next stages. The first one would be to have a solenoidcontrol valve controlling the flow into the return relief loop. This loop allows better flow controlin the system. The other addition is to have an auxiliary oil tank as backup oil and to have theundesired flow from the pump output directed towards it instead of being looped back to the inletpipe of the pump.Other future plans include adding a particle counter or a sampling line that would allow studyingthe level of contamination in the oil downstream the filter and helps in evaluating the system filterperformance under various variables. This would be phase II of this project and currently fundingproposal are being developed.AcknowledgementThe project was built up and
assessment andfeedback were done through the evaluation of biweekly submitted reports. There were four maincategories toward the final GPA of the students: biweekly and final draft reports (15%), finalreport (50%), presentation (25%), and team work evaluation (10%). The details of the fourcategories are as follows: 1) Biweekly reports: constituted 15% of the final GPA. These reports summarized the work of the previous two weeks. Each report was recorded on a log-book that included minutes of meetings, weekly list of achieved and pending goals, notes from outside research, calculations, sketches and drawings, test plans, collected data, and analyses. Each of the biweekly reports had a general theme as follows