, and Pacific Islander students.2. Program ComponentsOver the past several years, Skyline College has made large strides toward reaching aninstitutional goal of a robust and accessible transfer pathway to 4-year and graduate degrees inEngineering. As a leading partner in the Silicon Valley Engineering Tech Pathways (SVETP)initiative, the college is contributing to an integrated and accelerated system of K-14 STEMcareer pathways to increase the number and diversity of students succeeding in high-demandpost-secondary education and careers in computer science, engineering, and other STEMdisciplines. Through this initiative, the Engineering and Computer Science Departmentdeveloped the Engineering and Technology Scholars (ETS) Program which included
HispanicContext. TaLENt Fellow Action-Based Research ProjectsThe four action-based projects conducted during the 2021-2022 school year are brieflydescribed in Table 2. These projects aimed to integrate engineering design into the participatingschools' curriculum by implementing various strategies, such as creating engineering designchallenges, developing a teacher professional development program, integrating engineeringdesign into existing science curricula, and building partnerships with local engineers andindustries. The TaLENt fellows led these projects, with support from their school colleagues andan engineering curriculum mentor from the "TaLENt." While this article does not provide adetailed account of each Project's implementation cycle, it does
have never experienced doing research or engineering design.4 Addressing these significant factors in the learning of STEM and especially in coming toknow, experience, and integrate engineering practices as part of the STEM learning continuum isbecoming an imperative that pre-collegiate education must address. However, challenges existwhen a shift in paradigmatic approach to learning and instruction is introduced to a well-established educational system.Shifting approaches to STEM educationThe recent release of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) marks a significant shift inthe core concepts and approaches guiding science, technology, engineering, and mathematicseducation content in the coming years.5 Most notable is the
, as well as creative problem solving skills [11-16]. Design projects are a promising way toprepare students for industry [17]. Authentic design problems that have meaning beyond theclassroom are most effective [18] as they allow students to integrate knowledge and practice[19].Commonly, instructors include a host of active learning instructional strategies to scaffoldstudent learning related to projects. Broadly, active learning instructional strategies have beenshown to better support learning than traditional lectures [4, 20, 21]. We employed an activelearning technique used commonly in the past—particularly in elementary classrooms—calledjigsaw [22], which is well backed by learning theory [23, 24].Jigsaw is a technique in which students
work, posters, presentations and final projects), a pre/post analysis of a scenarioinvolving a hazardous chemical and a video-recorded session of teams analyzing anambiguous scene indirectly related to course content.Background and Context“Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present” is an experimental first-year, two-termcourse designed and taught by an interdisciplinary team of faculty from engineering,humanities, and entrepreneurship and innovation at Worcester Polytechnic Institute(WPI), a technology-focused university in Worcester, Massachusetts. The university isbest known for its 47 year-old project-based curriculum.“Humanitarian Engineering Past and Present” provides a deep, integrative learningexperience of benefit to both STEM and non
renewableenergy courses, establishing a wind and solar energy systems training laboratory, a year-roundhands-on energy training program, a residential bridge program, undergraduate researchexperience, and summer internships. In addition, professional development training was affordedto faculty members from other minority-serving institutes (MSIs). They were introduced torenewable energy curriculum development, developing laboratory modules, and hands-ontraining with advanced energy trainers so they can enhance STEM education and integrateenergy courses at their respective campuses. The program components are briefly described next.Enhancing Renewable Energy Curriculum: Three renewable energy courses were redesignedto integrate hands-on learning modules
, maturity, and for settingthe example both inside the classroom and out. They bring a wealth of experience and act as rolemodels to non-veteran students. [1] Anecdotally, it is easy to see that veteran presence in theclassroom positively effects the performance of the other students in the course, given theirinherent team-oriented mentality. This work-in-progress study focuses on an attempting toquantify this positive effect of veteran students on the academic performance of their non-veterancounterparts. Initial results revealed that veteran students do have a positive, quantitative impacton the grades of the non-veteran students.The integration of veteran students into the day-program of mechanical engineering at The Citadeloffered an interesting
Society. It provides the rationale for curriculum implementation, andthe integration of SDG’s topics into the course material.2. Vision of the ProgramThis project has significant institutional support, as Penn State and UNI entered into a university-wide strategic partnership agreement. UNI provides local resources, faculty, coordination andlocal students. At Penn State, the Cross-cultural Engagement and STEM Program has beenadded as a faculty-led program in its portfolio of approved perennial study abroad programs.The Cross-cultural Engagement and STEM Program represents a joint educational initiative,focusing on cultural immersion, exchange and STEM activities between Penn State and UNI. Inthis program, up to 30 Penn State students can travel
master high-orderconcepts (Jones, Minogue, Oppewal, Cook, & Broadwell, 2006).Professional Development Curriculum Math and science teachers from the public state school for the blind who participated in the120 hours of professional development activities received 15 weeks of an asynchronous onlinecourse in science, math, and engineering content and education for students with VI. The initialhalf of the course was based on the textbook “What is Life?” Phelen, 2015) and the teacherscompleted modules for each chapter on the textbook LaunchPad program. The second half ofthe course consisted of readings and reflections on teaching STEM content to students withvisual impairments, a review of inquiry-based teaching methods, infusing dramatic
is currently interested in engineering design education, engineering education policy, and the philosophy of engineering education.Dr. John Heywood, Trinity College-Dublin John Heywood is Professorial Fellow Emeritus of Trinity College Dublin- The University of Dublin. He is a Fellow of ASEE and Life Fellow of IEEE. he is an Honorary Fellow of the Institution of Engineers of Ireland. He has special interest in education for the professions and the role of professions in society. He is author of Engineering Education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction. His most recent book is The assessment of learning in Engineering Education Practice and Policy. IEEE Press/Wiley
graduation) is double among transfer studentscompared to students who entered as freshman. Consequently, transfer studentsdisproportionately lack the family knowledge resource necessary to form realisticexpectations. Researchers have shown that students successfully navigate through transfershock when they are more transfer ready. Transfer readiness is impacted by counseling,advice from students and faculty, and an understanding of the academic requirements of thenew institution [11]. Another prominent factor impacting students’ success in four year completion aftertransfer is integration into the social aspects of the new institution. This social integrationincludes participation in clubs, organizations, and events of different cultures
clubs and students organizations now thrive here.Table IV: Educational approach at University College London, UK (UCL) Educational Key Characteristics feature • Integrated Engineering Program (IEP) Challenges: two intensive five-week design projects tackled by incoming first-year students. Both Challenges are multidisciplinary and brings together students from across UCL Engineering; • Scenarios cycles: five-week curricular clusters, which underpin the curriculum in Years 1 and 2 of study, where students spend four weeks learning engineering theory and skills that are then applied in a
industrystandard to an FPGA-based intelligent controller for daily life applications. Such project willcontribute to the feasibility study of industry standard of wireless IEEE 802.11 and VHDL,FPGA for real world applications [2]. The developed system of FPGA-based microwave ovencontroller integrated with IEEE 802.11 wireless communication is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1 The system design of the wireless intelligent micrwave controllerStudents implemented the intelligent controller on FPGA and also developed IEEE 802.11communication functionality for remote control. The features of this team-based project are asfollows. • The project provides students with a great opportunity to obtain extensively hands-on experience to deal with
. Heer joined the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University as a member of the professional faculty. In this role, he coordinates the TekBots R program development and implementation. In addition to his research interests in creating innovative engineering education experiences, he is also performing his Ph.D. research in the area of integrated sensor systems using nanotechnology.Donald Heer, Oregon State University Heer works on the development of the TekBotsTM and Platforms for LearningTM program in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Oregon State University. As the Educational Research and Development Coordinator, he has coordinated the curriculum
, particularlycommunity service and humanitarian engineering projects, by creating intentional linkagesbetween the formal curriculum (e.g. developing global awareness) and these informal learningexperiences (e.g. engineering-related study abroad). Such linkages may be particularly effectivein helping develop students’ contextual awareness.” As engineering entrepreneurship education takes shape and continues to leverage co-curricular experiences for learning, Lattuca et al.’s findings suggest that a more in depth analysisof entrepreneurial co-curricular experiences in the context of the Terenzini and Reason’s collegeimpact framework is warranted. There is an organizational reliance on both entrepreneurshipacademic and co-curricular programs, required
/troubleshooting, and student participation requirements should be weighed beforeinclusion in curricula.The modern engineering lesson plan and classroom should adapt constantly to match theimproving communication technologies and make regular attempts to blend the most usefultechnological advances with up-to-date, relevant curricula. Keeping educational technology up todate should be thought of as an integral part of an engineering curriculum and in-step with thecutting edge of innovation.References[1] A. W. Chickering and Z. F. Gamson, “Seven principles for good practice in undergraduateeducation,” Biochemical Education, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 140–141, 1989.[2] N. D. Vaughan, M. Cleveland-Innes, and D. R. Garrison, Teaching in blended learning environments
integrate student learning of nanotechnology across the civil andenvironmental engineering curriculum [7].The problem-based learning framework is embedded with assessment instruments, such asdecision worksheets, that are intended to capture student knowledge and critical thinking. Thisparticular research project aims to assess methods for evaluating critical thinking fromillustrative and written responses on worksheets completed in an engineering-focused classenvironment. It is proposed that this can be accomplished by: examining how students absorb,process, and apply new information through multiple iterations of similar active learningexercises, when new information is presented between each iteration; examining how groupdynamics influence
electrical and computer engineering from the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, in 2007 and 2010, respectively. He worked as an analog IC designer at Texas Instruments, Dallas, between 2011 and 2012. He was a Member of Technical Staff, IC Design at Maxim Integrated, San Diego, CA, between 2012 and 2016, and a Staff Engineer at Qualcomm, Tempe, AZ, between 2016 and 2019. In 2019, he joined the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Oklahoma State University, where he is currently an assistant professor and Jack H. Graham Endowed Fellow of Engineering. His research interests include power management IC design, hardware security, and energy-efficient computing. ©American Society for
: Creating a First-Year Culture with a Multi-Faceted ApproachAbstractThis complete evidence-based practice paper presents an update of analysis and observations in arequired first-year engineering curriculum at Northeastern University, which is a medium-sized,private, urban university. A curricula redesign resulted in a “cornerstone to capstone” approachwith a pilot program rolled out to 2 sections of a first-year engineering course in the Fall of 2014.The goal of this cornerstone approach was to integrate design, programming, graphicalcommunication, and engineering analysis previously taught in two separate first-yearengineering courses by creating an 8 credit hour, 14 week course that focuses on real world,hands-on design
current RED projects. Next it moved into two hypothetical cases, to allow for an in-depthdiscussion of revolutionary and not-so-revolutionary ideas. The session concluded with tips for arevolution.In this session, Villa began by explaining that a revolutionary curriculum is one that substantiallyshifts fundamental understandings of learning and the content, practices, and structures ofeducation. This includes a systems level approach that addresses social, contextual, andorganizational processes in addition to curriculum. The approach needs to address coreentrenched historical and cultural norms and core beliefs and values of faculty, students, andother stakeholders in the community.Next Koretsky and Salzman discussed traditional ways of thinking
College during the fall of 2014 in the Incubator experience. Although the pilot study did notfind an advantage of teaching integrated courses, it was an important step towards the re-envisioning of the existing curriculum. The Purdue Polytechnic Incubator operated as a facultynetwork that explored best practices on education by deconstructing the models of traditionaldisciplines. This allowed for re-visioning of the traditional educational model by including co-teaching and group reflections as a core component of the experience. The integration ofhumanities and technology provided with a rich ground for student development. Rather thanfocusing only in a mechanistic approach to technology, students were able to draw parallels withtheir cultural
Paper ID #39876Enhancing Student Engagement and Skillsets towards TransportationCareers Using Digital Badge Program: A Case StudyDr. Venktesh Pandey, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University Venktesh Pandey is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering at North Carolina A&T State University. His research integrates intelligent transportation systems and emerging mobility services in traffic operations, congestion pricing, and transportation plan- ning models with a focus on sustainability. Dr. Pandey has broad interests in improving Engineering
a deeper understanding of topics like logic gates,components, computer architecture, and assembly language. It does this through the gamificationof standard digital logic and computer architecture curriculum elements via a skill tree that buildsup into a significant achievement, the development of an 8-bit turing complete processor. Each leafof the tree is a separate puzzle that falls within different requisite areas of knowledge necessaryto build the components used in a processor. These areas of knowledge are delegated to sectionsof the skill tree with easy-to-understand labels such as arithmetic, memory, or logic gates. Eachpuzzle directly relies on knowledge or components developed in previous areas of the tree. In this
learning, STEM integration, engineering education, curriculum development, and self-efficacy.Dyanne Baptiste Porter, Georgia Institute of Technology Dyanne Baptiste Porter is a postdoctoral research fellow at Georgia Tech Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). Prior to earning her Ph.D. in Mathematics Education, she taught high school mathematics for eight years. Her research interests include interdisciplinary mathematics teaching and learning, equitable teaching and learning practices in STEM, and increasing representation in advanced mathematical sciences.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Associate Director and Principal Research
The extent to which a first-year engineering student ‘‘defines the self through a James, W. Identification role or performance in engineering” (p. 1342) (1892/1968)58Fleming (2013)28 Academic and “We focus on the cultural context in which the identity develops, namely the MSI Gee (2000)10, Social campus. Researchers have conducted studies on identity development of Carlone (2007)44 Integration engineering students, specifically. They found that three factors influence the development of an engineering identity, (1) how engineering is understood as a
for a greater diversity oftraining setups to be utilized in a smaller area.IntroductionIn order to effectively teach instrumentation, mechatronic and robotic courses in an Engineeringor Engineering Technology curriculum, a variety of electromechanical laboratory setups aredesirable. [1] Exposing students to an assortment of technologies is also desirable, to give themas broad an experience as is reasonable. Thus, setups containing different sensors, effectors andactuators and indicators are needed. Quite often, the cost of such laboratory setups (or trainers) ishigh, thereby challenging the desire to have numerous full setups.To broaden the students’ programming capabilities, many programs teach such courses acrossboth microcontroller and
for their students.Questions regarding classroom implementation and viability for integration were also posed to theparticipants. For instance, 60 percent of the participating teachers indicated that they felt the levelof technical support was sufficient, meaning assistance with integration of the ‘COSMOSEducational Toolkit’ to the curriculum being developed. This was an important metric to capture,as the objective was centered on learning about different technical components of the toolkit andhow to leverage the kit for curricular content. However, a couple of teachers also indicated theywould prefer a greater amount of help during this phase, and another indicated a preference forworking more on their own, indicating some variation in
retainstudents across wide cross section of the population. While the diverse population of fiveboroughs of New York City provides a large pool of potential candidates, QCC attracts studentsfrom all five boroughs with a majority of student originating from Queens County. The collegealso attracts students from Nassau and Suffolk counties as well. This paper will present ourefforts to maintain and improve the diversity of our student body. The efforts are focused on ourhigh school recruitment effort, the Summer Robotics program, the Women in TechnologySummer Workshop, and the changes we initiated in our curriculum in an effort to maintain andhave our student achieve a successful academic outcome. Research shows that a first-generationcollege student needs
of the curriculum and teaching from the instructor’s perspective. Seldin11focuses on assessing plan, procedures, preconditions, and products as elements of teachingevaluation. Stevenson and Kokkinn12 propose a method of evaluation of teaching using lists ofevaluative statements. Ramsden and Dodds13 recommend the use of generalized questions inevaluation of content (what should be conveyed to the student) and structure (teaching methods).Recognizing that “[c]ommunication and collaboration with faculty are increasingly important inthe development of both curriculum-integrated and stand-alone “just in time” library tutorials,”Appelt and Pendell14 employ faculty feedback on tutorial structure, discipline-specific content,and content integration
includes a series of five courses8.1.2 Description of workshop seriesAt the University of Waterloo, students have limited opportunities for acquiring formal trainingin working and communicating in teams. As part of the curriculum, students participate in aminimum of five four-month co-operative (co-op) work terms in industry. While on co-op,students may choose to take an elective professional development course on teamwork; however,we have found that actual student enrollment in this course has been very limited. Duringacademic terms, students have the option of enrolling in a student leadership program15 (thatencompasses teamwork skills), but, again, only a small portion of engineering students choose todo so. For a majority of students, a