graduates do notface a critical thinking “skills gap,” but a “context gap” upon entry to the workplace due to thesituatedness of engineering work and communication practices. While it may not be possible within theundergraduate education context to fully replicate the contexts graduates will face in practice, coursesdesigned with a focus on engineering judgment and critical thinking as enacted through writing processesmay adequately simulate aspects of engineering work contexts in ways that require students to strengthentheir critical thinking skills. Furthermore, the literature suggests that unstructured, team-based projectswith extensive communication requirements such as a written report, oral presentation, or proposal maypermit greater student
a 29 year career in the Consumer Packaged Goods, Pharma- ceuticals, and Agricultural Chemical Industries to lead the four School of Engineering Technical Leader- ship and Communication (TLC) Programs – the Gordon-MIT Program in Engineering Leadership (GEL), the Undergraduate Practice Opportunities Program (UPOP), the Graduate Engineering Leadership Pro- gram (GradEL), and the School of Engineering Communication Lab. Immediately prior to MIT, Reza was the Vice-president of Research, Development, and Innovation for the Specialty Division of the Clorox Company. In that role he was accountable for developing innova- tion strategies for a diverse set of businesses and ensuring robust technology roadmaps and innovation
Fellow, and an MIT Chemical Engineering Communication Lab Fellow.Mr. Alex Jordan Hanson, University of Texas at AustinJennifer M. SchallDr. Jesse N Dunietz, Massachussetts Institute of Technology Jesse Dunietz is an educational designer for the MIT Communication Lab, an artificial intelligence re- searcher, and a freelance science writer. He develops training materials for the engineering graduate students who join the Communication Lab to serve as communication coaches for their peers. He holds a bachelor’s in computer science from MIT and a Ph.D. in computer science from Carnegie Mellon Uni- versity.Amanda X Chen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Biological EngineeringRohan Chitnis, Massachusetts Institute of
. Page 25.1319.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The International Society of Engineering Education (IGIP) and the New Pedagogic Challenges in Engineering EducationAbstractNever has the speed of development in the area of engineering been as accelerated as it istoday, as we observe the enormous and driven growth of the area of engineering. Today’stendencies require concerted new efforts in engineering education - or in other words, theimportance of pedagogy in the field of engineering is growing enormously. These changesstrongly demand new didactic and pedagogic paradigms. The International Society ofEngineering Education (IGIP) offers to contribute to the relevance and
Confidence, Identity, and Belonging Among Engineering and Engineering-Interested Students in a First-Year Engineering Design CourseAngela BielefeldtDr. Bielefeldt, P.E., is a Professor at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder) in the Departmentof Civil, Environmental, & Architectural Engineering and the Director of the Integrated DesignEngineering program. She has taught at CU Boulder since 1996, including a variety of courses for first-semester students. Her primary research interests in engineering education include sustainability,community engagement, social responsibility, and ethics.Joan TisdaleKatherine RamosMike Soltys © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Confidence, Identity
, her research interests include engineering education, particularly as related to systems thinking, organizational cultures, professional identity development, and supporting the success and ideas of underrepresented students within engineering.Dr. Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan Shanna Daly is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan. She has a B.E. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton (2003) and a Ph.D. in Engineering Edu- cation from Purdue University (2008). Her research focuses on strategies for design innovations through divergent and convergent thinking as well as through deep needs and community assessments using design ethnography, and
of EngineeringIntroductionIn the summer of 2016, the Boise State University Computer Science (BSU CS) department was arecipient of a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the program titled`Revolutionizing Engineering Departments` (RED).1 In our proposal, we documented our very uniqueposition as a well-established computer science department that has just expanded the number oftenured and tenure-track faculty nearly two-fold, that has an excellent relationship with area industriesthat commonly employ BSU CS graduates, and a strong desire to increase enrollment and retention ofstudents who are members of traditionally underrepresented groups in Computer Science education andComputer Science professions. With a nod to the
Paper ID #43247Impacts of Near-Peer Mentoring Between Graduate Students and UndergraduateTransfer Students in Engineering and ComputingShannon Conner, Clemson UniversitySkylar Hubbarth, Clemson UniversityDr. D. Matthew Boyer, Clemson University Dr. Boyer is a Research Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering & Science Education in the College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. His work focuses on how technology supports knowledge building and transfer in a range of learning environments. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Impacts of
of Research ethics, the MIT Kaufman Teaching Certificate Program (KTCP) course, and un- dergraduate genetics. She believes in the power of peer-coaching as a method of improving an entire community’s ability to communicate effectively.Dr. Marina Dang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Marina Dang holds a PhD in Chemistry from Brandeis University, where she also served as an instructor for the Science Posse Boot Camp program. She taught chemistry at Emmanuel College and later became a STEM curriculum developer for an educational startup. In 2014, she joined the MIT Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering to serve as its first Communication Lab manager. As the Communication Lab model spread to new
. Enhancing Engineering Education Research Capacity through Building a Community of Practice. in Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2005.13. Walker, G.E., et al., The Formation of Scholars. First ed. 2008, San Francisco: Jossey Bass. 232.14. Wenger, E., Cultivating Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. 1998: Cambridge University Press.15. Nettles, M.T. and C.M. Millett, Three Magic Letters-Getting to PhD. 2006, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 329.16. Lovitts, B.E., Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. 2001, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc. 307.17. Golde
Paper ID #38378Better together: Co-design and co-teaching as professional developmentLynn Mandeltort, University of VirginiaDr. Priya Date, University of VirginiaDr. Amy M. Clobes, University of Virginia Dr. Amy M. Clobes is committed to supporting current and future graduate students as Assistant Dean for Graduate Affairs for the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. In her current role, Dr. Clobes collaborates to support existing programs and develops new initiatives in graduate student recruitment, training, education, and career and professional development. Dr. Clobes holds a B.S. in
. Page 23.146.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Am I a Boss or a Coach? Graduate Students Mentoring Undergraduates in ResearchAbstractYOU’RE@CU is a mentoring program in which graduate students are paired with 1st or 2nd yearundergraduate engineering students to conduct research is now entering its third year ofoperation at The University of Colorado Boulder. The undergraduate mentees benefit fromexposure to a research community and the process of doing cutting-edge engineering research,while the graduate student mentors benefit from the experience of being a mentor, defining aproject and guiding a novice engineer through the ups and downs of doing research
programs tend to focus on leadership asa set of skills or experiences bolted onto a traditional engineering education with limited formalevidence of the impact these experiences have on student development.The purpose of this study is to test the effect of experiences engineering students have in leadershiproles on their perceived gains in leadership skills, using a national dataset. The framework guidingthis study is a model for engineering leadership identity constructed from Lave and Wenger’scommunities of practice model and Komives et al.’s model for leadership identity development(LID) which recognizes that the engineering formation process is, at its core, an identitydevelopment process. Engineering leadership is theorized to develop from
focuses on providing foundational algebra skills with extracurricular supports.Also, STEM-based modules feature hands-on engineering and STEM projects to foster interest inthe field, and guest speakers from the STEM enterprise provide real-life context.The summer bridge program builds on a successful model already developed in collaboration withBaltimore City Schools, Baltimore City Community College, Lockheed Martin, and the FortMeade Alliance (an industry employer association). In Baltimore, Lockheed Martin jointlydeveloped a project with high school and college faculty in which students completed designs andprototypes for the boot component of an exoskeleton model. Through this project, student teamsexperienced the engineering design and
theirlearning skills. The use and impact of the ECE-WisCom is evaluated through a mixed-methodsapproach. The collection and analysis of data include surveys, network interactions, journaling,interviews, observations, and focus groups. The analysis considers student community formation,identity development, and academic performance as well as participant intersectionalities.Overall, the ECE-WisCom seeks to improve the college experience of engineering students bysupporting their learning process and socialization, a couple of skills relevant and with lifelongimpact in college and beyond.BackgroundRecent studies show that, while 58% of White students persist in earning a STEM degree, thepercentage of Latinx students who persist is only 43% [1]. This NSF
Annu. Conf. Expo. 14. Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H., & Oware, E. (2006, October). Engineering a professional community of practice for graduate students in engineering education. In Frontiers in education conference, 36th Annual (pp. 1-5). IEEE.15. Kolikant, Y. B. D., McKenna, A., & Yalvac, B. (2006). The emergence of a community of practice in engineering education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2006(108), 7-16.16. Allie, S., Armien, M. N., Burgoyne, N., Case, J. M., Collier-Reed, B. I., Craig, T. S., ... & Jawitz, J. (2009). Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in a community: Improving student learning in engineering education. European Journal of
programs was $5,665 [24] or approximately one-third thecost of the University of Minnesota.F. Engineering Pathway“Community Colleges play a key role in preparing Americans to enter the workforce withassociate’s degrees or certificates or to transition to four-year educational institutions” [2].Nearly half (47%) of all U. S. students who earned bachelor’s degrees in science andengineering between 2010 and 2017 did some coursework at a community college, and 18%earned associate degrees [2]. Students can take the first two years of a four-year engineeringdegree at a community college, and then transfer to and graduate from a four-year engineeringprogram. This is considered the community college pathway toward a Bachelor of Sciencedegree in
agricultural storage warehouses. He is a licensed Certified Building Contractor in the State of Florida and a member of the USGBC of Oklahoma.Dr. Rachel Mosier P.E., Oklahoma State University Dr. Rachel Mosier is an Assistant Professor at Oklahoma State University. Her research interest is the cost of sustainable construction and sustainable infrastructure. Other research interests include technology in the classroom. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 “A survey of undergraduate students utilizing an interdisciplinary laboratory building”AbstractUniversities with graduate programs typically focus on graduate research assistants seekingmaster’s and
Engineering andthe National Research Council, with support from the National Science Foundation that wasinitiated to improve engineering education at community colleges and improve the prospects forcommunity college students’ achievement of Bachelors Degrees in Engineering at four-yearinstitutions.The paper attempts to establish some basic ground rules for building a quality control assessmentsystem and creating active partnerships between Community Colleges and the four-yearUniversities with an ongoing dialog. This effort is also directed at building a unified approachfor attracting and retaining students in engineering and to articulate a seamless engineeringcurriculum for a continuum of education that will fortify engineering education for the
centered on the ability of community engagement to change theirperceptions of populations, its role in confidence building, the sense of contribution as amotivation factor, and the idea that community engagement is the only tool to receive suchintangible and priceless benefits. The final theme entailed three concepts that focused primarilyon sheer enjoyment and fun participants and students found in the event, the importance ofhands-on experiences to promote such engagement, and the usage of hands-on activities to createcuriosity and engage in problem-solving.A. Community Engagement in Student IdentityRecent studies suggest that outreach as a context for developing retention-oriented identities hasled many students to seek formal volunteer
literacy; student life; learning communities; and professional development. She has worked on projects whose funding sources have included the National Science Foundation, the Institute of Education Sciences, and the U.S. Department of Education.Prof. John Bergendahl, Worcester Polytechnic Institute John Bergendahl is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He has six years experience as a practicing engineer in industry, and holds a B.S. in mechanical engineering, an M.S. in environmental engineering, and a Ph.D. in chemical engineering; all from the University of Connecticut. His recent research efforts are primarily directed at investigating
AC 2011-1551: LOOKING AT ENGINEERING STUDENTS THROUGH AMOTIVATION/CONFIDENCE FRAMEWORKSamantha Ruth Brunhaver, Stanford University Samantha Brunhaver is a third year graduate student at Stanford University. She is currently working on her PhD in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in engineering education. She completed a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University in 2008 and a MS in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Design for Manufacturing from Stanford University in 2010.Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching Consulting Senior Scholar principally responsible for the Preparations for the Professions Program
solutions and end of term survey Practice professional Developed: prior course work (MTE100), warm-up problems communication (graphical, Assessed: warm-up problems, written assignment post-event, written, and oral) end of term surveyThe robotic manipulators were built using kits of pre-fabricated components (Tetrix Prime kits,and off the shelf pneumatics components). The groups then went through the engineering designprocess, by developing initial designs, and iterating through them to achieve their final goal.The warm-up problems drew on knowledge from each of their 1A courses. These problems werethe early steps in manipulator design, such as determining the forward kinematics of a knownconfiguration. The
Resources Engineering and a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, while working with the Austin chapter of Engineers Without Borders as a volunteer and project lead for a project in Peru. She has published and presented on incentivizing decentralized sanitation and wastewater treatment, on sustainability of coastal community water and sanitation service options, as well as on integrating liberal arts and STEM education, currently through the vehicle of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program. She has co-designed workshops oriented toward educational change for Olin’s Summer Institute and the joint Olin College-Emerson College event: Remaking Education.Dr. Selin Arslan, Lawrence Technological
practice from ouranalysis: (a) authentic-task driven, (b) collaborative inquiry, (c) reflective-design process, (d) engineeringidentity. Future we will build on this study and develop some valid instruments to measure thesecharacteristics in order to clarify the relationship between community of practice and engineeringstudents’ learning effect.Keywords: community of practice; engineering learning; authentic-task driven; collaborative inquiry;reflective-design process; engineering identityINTRODUCTIONAs the largest developing economy in the world, China is facing a lot of challenges in terms of emergingindustries and new technologies. As a result, China is calling for increasing the quantity and quality ofengineering students to meet society’s
faculty and administrative positions. She is a licensed civil engineer with a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Dr. Sarah Rodriguez, Virginia Tech Sarah L. Rodriguez is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member with the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. Her engineering education research agenda centers upon engineering and computing identity development of historically marginalized populations at higher education institutions. Currently, Dr. Rodriguez is involved with several large-scale interdisciplinary research projects focused on institutional environments and STEM identity development are sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Kapor
on the west side of the State. The AeA was responding to an internal report generatedby a task force from its state Council which advised that “state colleges and universities mustincrease capacity and improve access for would-be students” and that “the legislature shouldfocus on funding new capacity in higher education.” The only State university on the west sideof the state offering an EE degree received state funding to increase capacity by 20%, but theneed for more qualified graduating engineers remained unmet. The AeA had identified NSCC asa well suited community college partner for EWU, as its laboratories had been recentlyrenovated to include state-of-the-art equipment for the pre-engineering and other technology-related programs. To
in engineering education and graduate student success, and has been recognized as a Master Facilitator by the National Research Mentor Network. She is also co-PI for two NSF-funded projects that enhance graduate student success: one is a professional development program offering training in communication, teamwork, leadership, and mentoring skills for interdisciplinary work; the other is a joint effort with Spelman College (a historically black institution serving women) to expand opportunities and increase diversity in STEM by developing a five-year BS+MS program. Dr. Luchini-Colbry also volunteers as the Director of the Engineering Futures Program of Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, which provides
Business School. He served as director of this program from 2007 – 2014. His research inter- ests are in heterogeneous catalysis, materials characterization and nanomaterials synthesis. His research group has pioneered the development of electron microscopy tools for the study of catalysts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Jigsaws & Parleys: Strategies for engaging sophomore level students as a learning communityAbstractEarly chemical engineering coursework provides an important foundation in topics such asenergy and material balances. A common pedagogical approach to these topics includesproviding engineering analysis problems with basic context and a single
, altmetrics, and patron use data of electronic resources. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Mapping Graduate Student Workshops to Career Readiness FrameworksAbstractAlong with campus collaborators, the Colorado School of Mines library has facilitated aworkshop series for graduate students since 2019. Recent developments inspired us to re-examine past workshop offerings in the context of career readiness. To understand strengths andweaknesses in workshop coverage, we compared our past offerings to frameworks from thePerkins Collaborative Research Network (PCRN) and the National Association of Colleges andEmployers (NACE). The results of this effort highlight strengths and weaknesses of theworkshop series