Paper ID #38234Engineering Firms as Racialized Organizations: The Experiences of BlackMale EngineersDr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences and Engineering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the University of Florida. His research interests are in the areas of problem-solving, cultures of inclusion in engineering, and social justice in engineering ethics education.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida. Prior to joining the faculty
objective and politically neutraldiscipline, scholars have recently called for reforms to engineering education that challengetechnical/social dualism by integrating the “social realm” into dominant ways of thinking,knowing, and in doing engineering [1-2]. By social realm, we mean to evoke the waysengineering shapes, and is shaped by, social, cultural, political, and ethical systems, that informwho gets to participate in engineering, how and why engineering problems are perceived andundertaken, the results of engineering work, and who benefits from the outcomes of engineeringwork [1,3]. As scholars become increasingly aware of the role engineering plays in socialsystems, there have been increasing calls for engineering education to center the
-course materials, students in Botswana will complete the eight-week course guided by aproblem-based learning activity wherein students will work to solve an authentic real-worldproblem local to their community. As a part of the learning experience students in Botswanawill also develop 3-D modeling skills and their spatial ability while designing a solution to a real-world problem; students in the US will develop skills in the area of engineering ethics, creativityand problem-solving as they will serve as “consultants'' for student teams in Botswana (Finelliet al., 2012; Guntur, Setyaningrum, & Retnawati, 2021). The ABLE short program offers civil engineering students in Botswana an opportunity todevelop their visualization and 3D
Paper ID #40105Work in Progress: Engaging First-year Engineering Students throughMakerspace Project-based PedagogyDr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Dr. Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college transitions and retention of underrepresented engineering students, engineer- ing ethics, PreK-12 STEM education, and also research about engineering global preparedness.Dr. Erik A. Johnson, University of Southern California Dr. Erik A. Johnson is a Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Southern
Cost of production (CoP)scaling strategiesFinancing a business Financing a business (FB)Generating new ideas based on societal needs and business opportunities Generating new ideas (GNI)Innovating to solve problems under organizational constraints Organization constraints (OC)Innovative client centered solutions through design thinking Design thinking (DT)Learning from failure Learning from failure (LFF)Role of product in value creation Role of product (RP)Resolving ethical issues
xmodification, & operation ofengineering tools…Safety. Identify health, safety,and environmental issuesrelated to technological x xprocesses and activities, anddeal with them responsibly.Communication.Communicate effectively x xabout laboratory work with aspecific audience…Teamwork. Work effectively x x xin teams…Ethics in the Laboratory.Behave with highest ethical x xstandards…Sensory Awareness. Use thehuman senses to
knowledge andparticipating in ethically in communities of learning [1]. In previous courses, it was found thatstudents lacked these information literacy skills and needed far more than one library instructionsession and one assignment to master these skills. It was determined that in order to accomplishthese objectives, multiple library information literacy instruction sessions and informationliteracy-based assignments were necessary.Implementation GuidelinesTo prepare for the unit of study, the professor reached out to professors in each of the 11engineering departments and conducted at least one interview with a faculty member about theirresearch. These five-to-ten-minute conversations were recorded on zoom and posted for studentsto watch.Table 1
Comprehension and laws and regulations, and social movements; identify alignments and gaps in Analysis (1) research and (2) practice within this context. Recognize and respect cultural differences and apply relevant skills to 2 Cross-cultural Humility collaborate across cultures, with an emphasis on life-long learning. Examine ethical implications of global research and development, including Global Engineering 3 consideration of power imbalances; recognize the limitations of engineering in Ethics guiding global development
. Figure 1. Desired skills for instructors in COILWithin the socioethical management skills, we have grouped social and ethical skills. One ofthe essential abilities is communication, not only oral and written communication but alsousing distinct channels or tools (e-mail, text messages, or chats). One related skill tocommunication is using comprehensiveness to clarify statements and notes [9], facilitating thestudents' feedback in diverse forms. In this part, ethical and social skills acquire a relevantrole, so communication must be based on respect in a comfortable and sure environmentconsidering cultural differences and institutional policies. Under this last point, instructorsmust also establish course policies and rules for class
most likely to be successful.However, there are certain cons of using data analytics in departments: (a) Limitations of data: Analytics relies on the quality and quantity of data available. If the data is incomplete or inaccurate, it can lead to flawed decision-making. (b) Cost: Implementing analytics tools and systems can be expensive, which may be a barrier for some academic departments, particularly those with limited resources. (c) Resistance to change: Some faculty and staff may be resistant to using analytics to make decisions, particularly if they are not familiar with the technology or feel that it undermines their expertise. (d) Ethical concerns: There may be ethical concerns around the use of student
Student Outcome 4). It can be challenging foreducators to find opportunities for their students to develop these skills due to the demands ofteaching the extensive technical material associated with the curriculum. This paper describesour experience using a current event related case study in a technical elective to address ABETstudent outcomes 2 and 4.Case studies involving sustainability and environmental issues provide a unique opportunity forengineering students to tackle technical and ethical issues. Including a role-playing component ina case study presentation provides additional opportunities for students to develop awareness ofsocial justice issues. A wind energy workforce development and engineering education grantprovided an
reported use by course and category is presented. 15 12 9 6 3 0 Math (Calculus Economics, Ethics, Transportation Structures Environmental/ Surveying Geotechnical and Statistics) and Management Water Resources 1 (Extremely low confidence) 2 (Low confidence) 3 (Neutral) 4 (Confident) 5 (Extremely confident)Figure 2: Student self-confidence in their ability to use the FERH to solve FE practice exam problems by topic. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Southeastern Section Conference (A
Multi-Disciplinary Design: Implications for CS and Engineering PedagogyIris BaharDr. Omur-Ozbek is an Associate Professor of Teaching in the Department of Civil and EnvironmentalEngineering at the Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO. Dr. Omur-Ozbek’s teaching interestsinclude environmental engineering concepts, environmental chemistry, water quality analyses, ecologicalengineering and environmental and social justice, and engineering ethics. Her research interests includedrinking water quality and treatment, odorous and toxic algal blooms, impacts of toxins on crops andhumans, impacts of wildfires and hydraulic fracking on surface water quality, and affected indoor airquality due to use of contaminated tap water.Ashley
Outcomes 2(an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs withconsideration of public health, safety and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social,environmental, and economic factors) and 4 (an ability to recognize ethical and professionalresponsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts).Summary Faculty hoping to implement the Solar District Cup in capstone design courses can lookforward to an engaging, detailed design opportunity for students. Faculty using the project in thefall should prepare for some time at the beginning of the semester during which the
and Students. 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 14-17, Seattle, WA.[10] Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N.J., Hart, J., & Diller, K.R. (2005). Teaching for Adaptive Expertise in Biomedical Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 11(2), pp. 257-276.[11] McKenna, A. F., Colgate, J. E., Olson, G. B., & Carr, S. H. (2006). Exploring Adaptive Expertise as a Target for Engineering Design Education. In ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 963-968), ASME Digital Collection.[12] Martin, T., Baker Peacock, S., Ko, P., & Rudolph, J. J. (2015). Changes in Teachers’ Adaptive Expertise in an
Paper ID #38822Board 419: Students use their Lived Experiences to Justify their Beliefsabout How they Will Approach Process Safety JudgmentJeffrey Stransky, Rowan University Jeffrey Stransky is a PhD candidate in the Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) Department at Rowan University. His research interests involve studying engineering ethics and decision making and using digital games as safe teaching environments. He has published in the overlap of these topics by integrating digital games into chemical engineering curriculum to help students build an awareness of the ethical and practical implications of their
Paper ID #37086Board 299: Funds of Knowledge and Intersectional Experiences ofIdentity: Graduate Students’ Views of Their Undergraduate ExperiencesProf. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica M. Smith is Professor in the Engineering, Design and Society Department at the Colorado School of Mines. Her research and teaching bring anthropological perspectives to bear on questions of social responsibility and engineering. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Her book Extracting Accountability: Engineers
and processes. • Communicates effectively across disciplines and cultures to influence decisions and lead activities in support of organizational goals and objectives. • Works collaboratively as both a member and leader of cross-functional and inclusive teams comprised of members with varying experience levels, organizational backgrounds, positions, and geographic locations. • Demonstrates ethical standards in designing and implementing innovative systems or processes taking into account social responsibility, global responsibility, and overall benefit to organizational constituents. • On a continual basis, pursues professional development and inquiry via graduate study, continuing education
Control Systems Thermodynamics Electrical Energy Utilization Reliability of Electrical Networks Practical ElectricityYear 4 Ethics and School Administration Thermal Modeling and Control Didactic Electric Networks and Installation Practice English Language and Environmental Organization and Industrial Legislation Protection Professional Practice EntrepreneurshipWhile the students have an introductory course in their second year that introduces the concepts ofrenewable energy, the course is very basic and
by other characteristics of the employees,their research, or the spaces; with the possible exception of race, which they were not able tomeasure [9].Finally, there is an ethical motivation to investigate, as disparities between such packages (whichare often valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars or more) along lines of marginalization aftercontrolling for other factors would constitute a material injustice in need of correction. Sege,Nykiel-Bub, and Selk found that among early-career biomedical researchers, men received higher-value start-up packages than women across the board. The difference was statistically significantamong PhDs, basic science researchers (as opposed to clinical), and employees of institutions inthe top quartile of
transformative nature [19]. We employedfour tenets of duoethnography – currere, polyvocal and dialogic, difference, and ethical stance.Currere, our lives and lived experience are the lens with which we use to self-interrogate themeanings we each hold [18] with regards to negotiating educational structures, navigating systems,and developing our professional identities. With polyvocal and dialogic, our stories are specific,and our individual voices, dialogues and opinions are made explicit so that the reader can makeconnections of meaning and understand the context of the conversation [18][20]. Differencehighlights the difference in our journeys and career stages, articulating each person’s unique lifehistory [21] [22] [18] Finally, ethical stance enables
well-established accreditation programs such as EUR-ACE in Europeand ABET in North America. Both EUR-ACE and ABET include requirements for engineers to contributeto sustainable or green development.ABET student outcomes 1 and 2 below are directly related to the sustainability education requirement: [7] 1. an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 2. an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic
the program made me more confident I 8.50 10 2.18 can work on a multi-disciplinary team. I learned about identifying, formulating, and solving 8.17 10 2.30 engineering problems. I learned about engineering ethics. 7.42 10 3.20 I learned about engineering's impact on the economy, 7.33 10 3.52 ecology, and society(ies). The material discussed was relevant to the present day. 9.0 10 1.87 The activity made me more interested in completing a 8.58 10 2.78 science, tech, math and/or engineering major or minor. The activity made me more interested in majoring or
movement that theorizes that thewell-being of individuals is best advanced by institutional freedom, deregulation, privatization,and competition [6], [7]. Neoliberalism champions free market exchange. It values competitionand self-interest as the ethics that should be used to guide all human actions [8]. Embracingneoliberalism, the focus of higher education has shifted from the pursuit of knowledge to theproduction of revenue.A culture of productivity has been previously characterized as the pervasive attitude thatengenders the result of labor as a commodity and values labor efficiency over an individual’sneeds, preferences, and well-being [9], [10]. The STEM academic culture of productivityprioritizes output, efficiency, and competition [11], [12
STEMresearch experiences in defense relevant research areas and to teach the participants about careeropportunities in the Naval civilian research enterprise, as well as other research career pathswithin the defense industry. In addition to gaining hands-on research experience and mentoring,the students received training from each university's Office of Undergraduate Research in topicsrelated to the nature of research, the ethics of researchers, and the mechanics of writing andpublishing research.Initially the program also included travel for both the student veterans and their faculty mentorsto the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington D.C., to meet their NRL mentors in person, andto present on their summer research. COVID-19 prevented these trips
, as we each brought our own disciplinarybiases and (mis)understanding/(mis)perception of writing and thinking. These disciplinary andconceptual differences were also reflected in our assessment expectations and rubric design. 4However, despite the challenges encountered, our meetings did serve as a space in which weentered critical dialogue with one another about what writing means, what thinking entails, themulti-dimensions of engineering problems, ethical decisions in problem solving, and anawareness of student limitations as well as our own limitations. We asked each other questionssuch as: is it ethical to expect our students to find solutions in a “writing,” non-technical, non
University of Virginia. He is the principal investigator at University of Virginia on the ’4C Project’ on Cultivating Cultures of Ethical STEM education with col- leagues from Notre Dame, Xavier University and St. Mary’s College. His research focuses on wicked problems that arise at the intersection of society and technology. Rider holds a Ph.D. in Sustainability from Arizona State University, and a Master’s degree in Environmental Management from Harvard Uni- versity and a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science from University of New Hampshire. Before earning his doctorate, he has worked for a decade in consulting and emergency response for Triumvirate Environmental Inc.Andrew LiRebecca Jun, University of Virginia
during times of educational disruption.IntroductionOpportunities to develop professional skills happen within and outside of engineeringclassrooms. While different operationalizations exist for professional skills, the NationalAcademy of Engineering and ABET generally agree that students’ development should focus onfive specific areas: teamwork and shared leadership, effective communication, creative problem-solving, business and management principles, and professional and ethical responsibility. Inengineering education, skills development often happens within courses like cornerstone andcapstone design [1], as well as in cocurricular activities such as professional organizations andstudent design teams [2]. Specifically, professional
teaming; Engineering in Society, exploring the implication of engineeringsolutions on environmental, ethical, and social aspects of society; and Engineering Design,featuring an engineering design process. Each engineering design follows an engineering designprocess, including evaluation based on stakeholder analysis. The curriculum is designed to beoffered as a yearlong high school course. It consists of eight units, designed with the idea ofspiraling complexity. Concepts are introduced and are reinforced through later lessons andactivities, allowing increasing autonomy and creativity throughout the course. The first two unitsfocus on a true introduction to engineering, including social, ethical, and environmentalramifications of engineering
intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) are rapidly changing our civilization andwill be critical tools in many future careers. AI/ML can analyze large amounts of data sets in ashort time; it will support a lot of fields to solve problems in a highly efficient way. It isincreasingly important to introduce basic AI/ML concepts to students to build familiarity withthe technologies they will interact with and make decisions about. Ideally, all students graduatingfrom high school should have some understanding of AI, the ethical issues associated with AI,and the potential strengths and weaknesses of a society built on top of computer intelligence [3].Although AI is increasingly used to power instructional tools for K-12 education, AI conceptsare not