Accessibility Caucus, Purdue’s Student ASEE Chapter, andGeorgia Institute of Technology’s Lean In Chapter will present their ideas on what helps create asuccessful graduate community. The common findings of all organizations are consolidated intocategories of funding, recruitment, evaluation of success, and best practices for graduate studentorganizations.Tulane University: Women+ in Science and EngineeringBackground and DevelopmentTulane University’s Women+ in Science and Engineering (WISE), a graduate student andpostdoctoral fellow initiative, will conclude its first full year in June 2017. At the ASEE 2016conference, two graduate students and a Tulane Assistant Professor identified a critical need forgraduate student and postdoctoral peer
, student-organization offices, informal spaces, etc. — should be thoughtof in terms of whether they allow students, no matter their focus within engineering,to develop boundary-spanning abilities like experimenting, writing, speaking, andcollaborating. Then they should be connected in a way that maximizes these functions.At Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, commonly known as VirginiaTech, the SmithGroupJJR-designed Institute for Critical Technology and AppliedScience II is organized expressly around the concept of interdisciplinary research. The42,189-square-foot building completed in 2010 includes state-of-the-art laboratoriesand auxiliary spaces that support both applied and fundamental research. Oakland University School of
needs in their areas.BackgroundCreating a wellness culture, connection, community, and professional sense of belonging arevital elements to all graduate students from the most well-adjusted and engaged to the mostdisenfranchised and fragile. Sense of belonging includes fit in the academic discipline, beingrespected and valued by peers, in the research group, by the faculty, and program representatives.Wellness initiatives not only lead to more engaged and productive students, the initiatives areassociated with increased retention and completion rates (Okahana, H., Allum, J., Felder, P.P., &Tull, R.G. 2016). Creating a thriving culture also enhances recruitment and increases enrollment.Mind, body, and spirit are integral to both health and
. Page 24.1387.2The AIChE Concept Warehouse was designed to lower one of the biggest barriers that preventsinstructors from using concept-based instruction: access to high quality conceptquestions. Construction of good concept questions is often difficult and time-intensive4. TheConcept Warehouse alleviates this barrier by giving instructors access to a variety of conceptquestions in the core chemical engineering curriculum along with providing a variety of ways toutilize these questions in their courses. Instructors can either assign these questions as homeworkor use them in class as part of active learning pedagogies (e.g. peer instruction). If using conceptquestions in class, the instructor can have students respond using their clickers
in line and watch to see how quickly other questions are being answered (Figure 1C).While a student is waiting, she will see her nickname moving up in the queue and then willreceive a notification when she is next in line. This is useful when the student needs to come tothe designated location, like an advising office or instructor office, to see the instructor oradvisor in person. Once the student’s question has been answered, the question is marked doneand it is removed from the list.Use Cases for the QueueOffice HoursTraditionally, office hours of large courses consist of many students packing into one or morerooms and writing their name on a list to receive help from a Teaching Assistant (TA) or anothercourse expert (“course staff”). In
discussion rent sessions sections, managing laboratory classes, or handling office hours. 55 min each In the second session, participants choose one of the following topics: teaching problem solving, grading, or handling office hours. Undergraduate Teaching Orientation Graduate Teaching Orientation Practice In small groups (5-7), participants take turns delivering a five-minute explanation on a Teaching topic of their choice. Peers and one trained facilitator act as students during the lesson, 2 hrs then provide written and oral feedback on the teaching.Table 1: Engineering teaching orientations during the Fall of 2017.As seen in Table 1, the new instructor
to studentsLarge classes can improve the student experience in at least four ways.1 The ASEE Engineering Technology listserv, ETD-L@listproc.tamu.edu; SIGCSE-members@listserv.acm.org, forComputer Science educators; and discussion@podnetwork.org, from the Professional and OrganizationalDevelopment NetworkThe first is community. A large class can grow into a supportive learning community. Studentshave more opportunity to partner with, and learn from, other students. Questions are answeredmore quickly on Piazza or a message board. Students can learn from their peers. Clicker-stylepolling provides immediate feedback, regardless of class size. It can even work better in a largeclass, since there is bound to be a critical mass of students who have
coaching system we implemented. Finally, section 5 reports the observation andanalysis of the experiment and our plans for future experiments with the model.Section 1: The OR Course StructureThe course is divided into ten topics. These topics are mostly what majority of the textbooksconsider as essential elements of OR curriculum for an undergraduate OR class. Each topic isbuilt on knowledge and skill gained in prior topics while building the foundation skill andknowledge set for succeeding topics. Page 24.696.2These topics are: Finding Feasible Regions Extreme Points, LP and Its Standard Form Writing LPs from Feasible
as agroup before we show the video. The students are told to bring the completed questions with Page 9.189.3them to the next class. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationClass two begins with a discussion of the homework assignment. We discuss the answersthemselves and then discuss how they approached the assignment. After concluding thisdiscussion, we hand out the “Team Functioning Assessment Tool”. This tool has threecomponents: Team Members and the Project, Team Functioning, and Peer
of the pumphouse. They attach a chinamarker nearby on a string. They also write out the details of each task and laminated theresulting two pages to the same wall. A sample of the “annual” portion of the tasks is shown inFigure 8. Then thestudents perform the tasks Every Twelve Months Date Completed Date to be Completedwith the homeowner, to 1. Check Batteriesinsure that everything is 2. Battery Equalizingunderstood. A year later, Chargethe system performs 3. Give Wind Generatorreliably. The customer, Complete Mechanicalon her own initiative, Checkseeks out the university 4. Check Concentration of Coolantpresident
-onexperience valued by employers, and serves to fill in any gaps in understanding from thestudents’ classroom education. Page 25.325.4The first major retention issue the solar boat project targets is the lack of a well-defined studentsupport system. Numerous studies have shown that students who are involved in small groupsretain more than students who work alone8. Isolation of a student from his or her peers can causestress beyond that imposed by an already formidable field of study. At the beginning of eachschool year, the solar boat project falls under the responsibility of a group of students who opt tobecome members of the University’s Solar Boat
character- ization for therapeutic applications. His current research areas are: externally tunable nanostructures for targeted delivery and axon-regeneration after nervous system injury, hydrogel encapsulated quan- tum dots for single molecule imaging, magnetically controlled micro- and nano-fluidics for lab-on-a-chip applications. So far, he has published 25 peer-reviewed articles in reputed journals and international conference proceedings. He serves as a reviewer for the National Institute of Health (NIH), American Chemical Society (ACS), and many internationally reputed journals. He is the recipient of the following awards: ”Cottrell College Science Award” for young faculties- Research Corporation for Science Ad
. Throughout the semester, students engaged in consistent practice of positive teamwork.Table 1. Student learning outcomes of the Chemical Engineering Reaction Kinetics Course. 1. Students can write and apply appropriate balance and constitutive equations for a given reactor scheme. 2. Students can obtain a functional rate law for a given chemical reaction from experimental data for the reaction.3. Students can obtain an optimal design of a reactor scheme from among possible alternatives.4. Students can use Excel spreadsheets to obtain solutions to problems in which analytical solutions are not possible.3. Activities for Integrating Problem-Solving Studio into 75-minute Chemical ReactionKinetics Sessions.3.1 Introduction
with their faculty mentors toinvestigate new UAV applications as well as to create new UAVs. Students’ work resulted in anumber of internal posters and PowerPoint presentations at university-wide STEM researchsymposia, four senior project reports with posters and presentations, and one MS thesis. Students’designs involving a novel octocopter with overlapping propellers were also used in writing anexternal grant application. Furthermore, all students engaged in this vertically integrated project(VIP) were retained or graduated. In addition, 20% of the students obtained MS degrees. It is hopedthat this work will add to the VIP body of knowledge and will inspire readers to implement similarprojects in their own institutions.Introduction
engineering and specific development within one discipline.earth sciences soils course. The project provides both The new pyramid begins with a foundation level thatindependent and peer learning through the process as studentswork together and in teams in the different phases of this tiered requires learners to remember facts. Bloom defined thisapproach. The project begins as students choose a unique facet of level as the Knowledge base and as undergraduate studentssoils science to learn about as an individual and evolves into a explore new areas of their engineering discipline,group project where students create a
have been well documented. A study conducted in 1998 suggestedthat as few as 8.5% of students leave engineering studies due to poor academic performance.1An oft-cited study conducted by Vincent Tinto reported that student involvement in learningcommunities promoted student retention. Tinto writes that, “For some students, especially thosewho, in the past, had struggled in school, the collaborative environment of the learningcommunity provided a safe place, a smaller knowable place of belonging, in which they werevalued and in which they discovered they could learn.”2 In subsequent evaluations, Tinto alsoidentified academic and social support networks as crucial components of student retention.3Laboratory projects can provide students with both
laboratorysession. The semester at Penn State consists of 15 weeks. The course outline is providednext.IV. Introduction to Local Area Networks course outline1. PC Fundamentals Review2. MS-DOS operating system fundamentals3. Fundamentals of Windows 954. Local Area Networks Fundamentals • Networking Standards and the OSI model • Communication Protocols • Networking components5. Types and topologies of Local Area Networks (LANs) • Type of LANs: Peer-to-peer, Client-Server. • Network topologies (star, ring, bus, etc.). Advantages/disadvantages6. Introduction to Windows NT: Windows NT specific network planning Page 4.192.2 • Computer hardware
Science Program and Information Systems Program. In addition, he is a guest editor for a journal, associate editor and serving on editorial boards for four international journals. He has also served as Chair and Co-Chair of numerous conferences, workshops, tracks and panels, in addition to serving on the program committee for around 30 international conferences. Dr. Wyne has given invited talks on numerous occasions and published number of articles in peer reviewed international journals and peer reviewed international conferences.Anil Kumar Domakonda, National University, San Diego, USA I have an undergraduate degree in Computer science and Information Technology from Jawaharlal Nehru
. Page 24.1129.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Student-led Mentoring Program Fostering Retention of Female Undergraduate Students in STEM FieldsABSTRACT: This paper describes the mentoring program for female students in STEM fieldsdeveloped by the collegiate section of the Society of Women Engineers at the New JerseyInstitute of Technology (SWE-NJIT). The uniqueness of this mentoring program stems from thefact that it has been led by students since its inception, integrates peer and professional mentors,and is rooted to the geographical area surrounding our university. We believe other universitiesmay find this model of mentoring useful for partnering with as well as
) Par Amigo InitiativeEngineering programs throughout the world have accepted the challenge of educating the globalengineer. The required standards in technical, communication and social skills for globalengineers must be integrated into the cultural context of engineering programs in differentcountries. Internationally recognized accreditation is an important way for programs to not onlyguarantee quality, and contribute to regional capacity building and economic development, butalso to develop the continuous improvement and assessment tools that strengthen engineeringprograms. These tools are essential in the development of engineering programs that can educatethe global engineer of the future. The Par Amigo (Peer Mentor) Initiative developed
from any college involved in the pilot study.Section enrollments were set between 25 and 26 students to allow for personal attention and theability to make connections with peers, faculty and staff who share similar interests, majors orclasses.These FYS sections were led by a diverse group of eight engaging, inspirational and energeticfaculty. Moreover, it is expected that this college-wide shared experience will immerse studentsin a growing support network of friends and people to assist with questions and provide supportthroughout their studies. Some CECS programs also come back together again with advancedtechnical electives, shared minors and certifications, and multidisciplinary senior design andcapstone projects at the end of students
Education. Her research interests center on the concept of sense of belonging, peer and faculty interactions, and graduate education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Scoping Review on Non-Majority Students’ Sense of Belonging in Engineering and Computing Education: Uncovering the Barriers, Supports, and Contexts AbstractThis work-in-progress theory paper discusses the preliminary findings of a scoping literaturereview on non-majority students’ sense of belonging in engineering and computing education,focused on barriers, supports, and contexts. A substantial body of research underscores thesignificant impact of sense of belonging on
, writing, andcommunication skills that are vital to successful careers in science and engineering [29].Student participation in REU programs was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and raisedconcerns related to REU learning outcomes. Several REU programs over the past few years wereheld remotely or virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research on the impacts of virtual orremote REU programs is limited. One study by Nyarko and colleagues highlighted how, despitechallenges encountered during a virtual REU, students demonstrated gains in knowledge,confidence, and communication skills [30]. Even as many REUs return to in-person experiences,research into the impacts of virtual or remote REUSs can be useful as developers and hosts ofREUs and other
acquiring the technical knowledge and skills taught in the courses (learning objectives 1-4 for CSC 448 and 1-3 for BIO 441). 2. Are life sciences students acquiring computational skills? The key computational skill presented in BIO 441 was the ability to convert a biological problem into a set of software requirements (learning objective 4 for BIO 441). 3. Are students learning to work effectively with their peers within and outside of their discipline? In particular, is there evidence that cross-disciplinary collaboration within the in-concert teaching framework is beneficial for the students? (learning objective 5 for both courses). 4. How did students perceive in-concert
], and felt that they learned the material better thanthey otherwise would have [2, 9, 11]. They found it very helpful in identifying their errors [9].They felt that they were more engaged in the dual-submission process [5]. What they liked bestwas self-grading [5]. Their attitudes toward the methodology improved from early in thesemester to later on [4]. Students who completed homework wrappers [13] said they made themmore likely to think about what confused them about a problem. In the Harvard peer-instructionapproach, they “greatly value[d] the team discussions in improving their skills.” The onlyreactions that were less than glowing came from the UMBC students [12], who had just a slightpositive perception of writing their reflection
Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. She is an Associate Research Professor and the Assessment and Instructional Support Specialist in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. Her primary research interest include faculty development, the peer review process, the doctoral experience, and the adoption of evidence-based teaching strategies. She is currently serving as the ASEE Educational Research and Methods division Vice Chair of Programs for ASEE 2022.Sam Spiegel Dr. Spiegel is Assistant Vice President for Online Education and was the founding Director, Trefny Innovative Instruction Center at the Colorado School of
University of Technology Hanna Niemel¨a received the M.A. and PhD degrees in translation studies from University of Helsinki in 1993 and 2003, respectively. She is currently working as an associate professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering at Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT, Lappeenranta, Finland. Her professional experience ranges from translating to teaching and language consulting. Her interests include electrical engineering, scientific writing, and special languages.Dr. Heikki J¨arvisalo, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology Heikki J¨arvisalo received the M.Sc. degree in electrical engineering and the D.Sc. degree in electronics from the Lappeenranta University of Technology
… he has a Ph.D.! Or, ifthe TA is an international graduate student, they assume, All international students are good atscience. But if they see another undergraduate who can explain the work to them, they realize,Hey, if she can do the problem, so can I! Such a TA is a “peer model,” and peer models areeffective in promoting “self-efficacy,” the belief that, by performing in a certain manner, one canachieve certain goals.There is also an advantage to hiring the best student you can find who has taken the course fromyou. This is because that student understands the material as you have taught it, and thus isbetter able to answer student questions on your lectures and assignments. As a TA, (s)he is alsoqualified to grade papers; if the student’s
-Centered Designclass has been very rewarding for Dalrymple, especially after overcoming the initial discomfortin critiquing Whiteness as a Black immigrant. She especially enjoys having her experienceworking with communities valued in an engineering context.S. M. Lord is a White woman with over two decades of teaching experience. Her interest insocial justice stems from experiences of marginalization as a woman in Electrical Engineering inthe 1980s. During graduate school, she took several courses in Feminist Studies in response toher male peers constantly asking, “What do women think?” These courses gave her invaluableexperiences and some language and theoretical understanding of concepts such as privilege,sexism, racism, structural inequality and
reflection process, which we hope will be of interest to otherengineering educators developing and/or teaching interdisciplinary programs. We followBorrego and Newswander in using the term “interdisciplinary” when collaborators work togetherto create something new as opposed to a “multidisciplinary” collaboration where colleaguescome together momentarily but then split apart “unchanged by the experience.”5Course objectives were outlined for the specific courses the program would encompass; Table 1shows a list of objectives for each of three courses. Students earned twelve credit hours for theprogram (four in science, four in engineering, and four in technical writing and communication).Throughout this paper the word “program” refers to the full