2006-403: A LOOK AT THE PROGRAMS IN MULTIDISCIPLINARYENGINEERING AREAS FOR WHICH ASEE IS NOW THE LEAD SOCIETY FORABET ACCREDITATION REVIEWJames Farison, Baylor University Dr. Jim Farison is currently professor and chair of the ECE Department at Baylor University, and is also administratively responsible for Baylor's B.S. in Engineering program. He currently serves as chair of ASEE's Multidisciplinary Engineering Division, and is a member of the ASEE Accreditation Activities Committee. He received his B.S.E.E. from the University of Toledo and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University, before returning to serve on the faculty at UT in the EE and then the Bioengineering departments, and including
2006-426: FROM "HOW STUFF WORKS" TO "HOW STUFF WORKS": ASYSTEMS APPROACH TO THE RELATIONSHIP OF STS AND"TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY"Kathryn Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is a Virginia Engineering Foundation Faculty Fellow and an associate professor in the Department of Science, Technology, and Society in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. She is a former chair of the Liberal Education Division of ASEE. Page 11.652.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 From “How Stuff Works” to “How STUFF Works”: A Systems
2006-903: TEACHING CONCEPTS ON SOFTENING: OBSERVATIONS FROMACTIVE VERSUS PASSIVE INSTRUCTION IN AN UNDERGRADUATE AND AGRADUATE LEVEL COURSECyndee Gruden, University of ToledoDefne Apul, University of ToledoMaria Diaz, University of Toledo Page 11.1204.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Teaching concepts on softening: Observations from active versus passive instruction in an undergraduate and a graduate level courseIntroductionCurrently, engineering course content is a delicate balance between theory, problem-basedlearning, and hands-on experience. Controversy continues to exist regarding the merits ofteaching mostly theory as opposed to incorporating
2006-947: THE DO’S AND DON’TS OF STUDENT PROJECT COLLABORATIONBETWEEN COLLEGES: A HINDSIGHT VIEW FROM TWO COMMUNITYCOLLEGESNikki Larson, Edmonds Community College Ms. Larson is currently an assistant professor in the engineering technology department of Western Washington University. Before this appointment, she was an instructor in the materials science technology program for Edmonds Community College. There she is developed the coursework and laboratory experiments necessary to make the new program a success. She has 6 years of industry experience implementing lean manufacturing techniques, managing development projects, and leading cross-functional teams to assess technical capability of
2006-526: STUDENT-GENERATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A RESEARCH INSTRUMENT USED TOCAPTURE STUDENT, FACULTY, AND INDUSTRY PARTNER PERSPECTIVESAND EXPECTATIONSCraig Silvernagel, University of North Dakota Craig Silvernagel is Entrepreneurship Director at the University of North Dakota (UND) College of Business and Public Administration. Craig came to UND from the University of Minnesota-Crookston (UMC), where he helped develop a new program emphasis in entrepreneurship while serving as a marketing faculty member. For the eight years prior to his time at UMC, Craig owned a full-service advertising agency he co-founded in 1994. The agency served several regional and
2006-534: CONVERSION OF AN OBSOLETE MANUALLY OPERATEDUNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINE INTO A HYDRAULIC HOT-PRESS WITHCOMMUNICATIONS CAPABILITYAkbar Eslami, Elizabeth City State University Dr. Akbar Eslami is a professor and chair of the Department of Technology at Elizabeth City State University. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Old Dominion University. His research interests are in computer aided manufacturing and design, composite materials and automation.Mehran Elahi, Elizabeth City State University Dr. Mehran Elahi is an assistant professor in the Department of Technology at Elizabeth City State University . He received his PH.D. in Engineering Science and Mechanics from Virginia
2006-559: A REMOTELY CONTROLLED AND ISOLATED COMPUTERNETWORK TEST BED FOR ATTACK UNDERSTANDING BASEDINFORMATION ASSURANCE DISTANCE EDUCATION COURSESPhilip Lunsford, East Carolina University Phil Lunsford received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from North Carolina State University. He is a registered professional engineer and is currently an Assistant Professor at East Carolina University. His research interests include system simulation, telemedicine applications, and information assurance.Lee Toderick, East Carolina University Lee Toderick received a B.S. in Computer Science from
2006-561: A COMPARATIVE OBSERVATION OF FULL-TIME VERSUSPART-TIME ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS WITH RESPECT TOATTITUDES, PERFORMANCE, RELIABILITY, MATURITY, AND GENERALPROFESSIONALISMJerome Tapper, Northeastern University Professor Tapper is an Associate Academic Specialist in EET at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. He holds a BSEE and a MSIS, both from Northeastern University. Jerry is a Registered Professional Engineer in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with over twenty-five years of industrial experience. He is also the author of a tool-kit based text for electrical engineering technology students, Electronics for Engineering Technology and has authored more than 25 papers
business concepts into a petroleum engineering curriculum.AbstractThe interdisciplinary course, PET 4460 – Petroleum Project Evaluation, offered at MontanaTech, was a direct result of the changing landscape in the petroleum engineering field. Thecourse combined engineering concepts that students learned in other courses withentrepreneurship and other business concepts that entry-level petroleum engineers must possessin order to be successful. Faculty from the Business and Petroleum Engineering departmentsdeveloped the course over a two-year time span with input/feedback from the PetroleumEngineering Department’s industrial advisory board as well as input from upper-levelmanagement from many of the businesses operating in the petroleum arena. The
2006-2656: THE 2005 WORLD NUCLEAR UNIVERSITY SUMMER INSTITUTE: ANEW FOCUS ON INTERNATIONAL ISSUES IN NUCLEAR ENERGYEDUCATIONMary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, Idaho State University Dr. Dunzik-Gougar is an Assistant Professor in the Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering at Idaho State University. She holds a joint appointment with the Idaho National Laboratory as an Affiliate Research Scientist. She was part of the Idaho organizing team for the Summer Institute and had key responsibility for the Summer Institute Proceedings.Michael Lineberry, Idaho State University Dr. Lineberry is Director of the Institute of Nuclear Science and Engineering for Idaho State University, University of Idaho and Boise
2006-1321: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE ENGINEERINGMECHANICS-STRENGTH OF MATERIALS COURSE IN THE ENGINEERING,AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS AT PENN STATELucas Passmore, Pennsylvania State UniversityAiman Kuzmar, Pennsylvania State University-Fayette Page 11.26.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Comparison Between the Engineering Mechanics-Strength of Materials Course in the Engineering, and Engineering Technology Programs at The Pennsylvania State UniversityAbstractStrength of materials is a critical and essential course for both engineering and engineeringtechnology students with a mechanical focus such as those in the mechanical
2006-1467: OFFERING A BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY DEGREE PROGRAM ON ACCELERATED EIGHT-WEEKTERMS: EXPERIENCES, CHALLENGES, AND ADVANTAGES FOR STUDENTSJohn Blake, Austin Peay State University JOHN W. BLAKE is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He served as the chair of the department from 1994 to 2005. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. Page 11.967.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
2006-1510: ARE CONCEPTS OF TECHNICAL & ENGINEERING LITERACYINCLUDED IN STATE CURRICULUM STANDARDS? A REGIONAL OVERVIEWOF THE NEXUS BETWEEN TECHNICAL & ENGINEERING LITERACY ANDSTATE SCIENCE FRAMEWORKSCathi Koehler, University of Connecticut CATHERINE KOEHLER is a Ph.D. candidate in the Neag School of Education at the University of Connecticut. Her field of study is curriculum and instruction concentrating in science education under the direction of David M. Moss. Her dissertation work explores a pedagogical model of teaching the nature of science to secondary science teachers. She has taught Earth Science, Physics and Forensic Chemistry in public high school for 7 years prior to her graduate
2006-1738: EFFECT OF SUPPORTING COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTIONWITH A PAPER-BASED WORKSHEET ON THE PERFORMANCE OF 5THGRADERSOmolola Adedokun, Purdue UniversityRoger Tormoehlen, Purdue University Page 11.513.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Effect of Supporting Computer-based Instruction with a Paper- based Worksheet on the Performance of 5th GradersAbstractThe use of computer-based instructional technologies in educational settings has created adebate on the possibility of computer technology completely replacing traditional methods ofteaching and learning. While supporters of this notion have based their arguments on theeffectiveness of
2006-1967: INITIAL DEVELOPMENT OF A NEEDS-DRIVEN COURSE ONCALCULATION METHODS AND PROBLEM SOLVING FOR ENGINEERINGTECHNOLOGY STUDENTSJohn Blake, Austin Peay State University JOHN W. BLAKE is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He served as the chair of the department from 1994 to 2005. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. Page 11.764.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006
2006-2149: STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPORTANCE OF FACULTYTEACHING TECHNIQUES FOR THEIR LEARNING/SUCCESS IN ATECHNOLOGY BASED BACCALAUREATE PROGRAMAhmed Khan, DeVry University-Addison Ahmed S. Khan, Ph.D. is a senior Professor in the EET dept. at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE from Michigan Technological University, and an MBA from Keller Graduate School of Management. He received his Ph.D. from Colorado State University. His research interests are in the areas of Fiber Optics Communications, faculty development, and outcomes assessment, and, Internet and distance education. He is author of “The Telecommunications Fact
2006-1747: ENABLING A STRONG U.S. ENGINEERING WORKFORCE FORLEADERSHIP OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION ININDUSTRY: THE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER OF SKILL-SET DEVELOPMENTFOR ENGINEERING INNOVATION AND LEADERSHIPJoseph Tidwell, Boeing Co. JOSEPH P. TIDWELL, formerly of the Boeing Company, is director, of the joint alliance of companies managing education for technology JACMET, and community liaison, college of technology and applied sciences at Arizona State University Polytechnic, and chair-elect College Industry Partnership Division, ex-officio member of the Corporate Members Council of the American Society for Engineering Education.Albert McHenry, Arizona State University ALBERT L. McHENRY
2006-1451: PROGRESS OF THE ASEE ACCREDITATION ACTIVITIESCOMMITTEE (ASEE/AAC)Joan Gosink, Colorado School of Mines Joan Gosink is an Emerita Professor and former Director of the Engineering Division at CSM, the largest department or division in the School. Under her direction, the Division received various accolades, including designation as a Program of Excellence from the Colorado Commission on Higher Education. The program also expanded to include Masters and Doctorate degrees and an undergraduate specialty in environmental engineering. Dr. Gosink twice served as a Program Director at NSF, and is an experienced ABET evaluator.Sherra Kerns, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering
2006-656: DIVERSITY IN ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: THE GOOD ANDBADTim La para, MinnesotaAlok Bhandari, Kansas State UniversityDonna Fennell, Rutgers UniversityKristen Tull, Lafayette CollegeLee Clapp, Texas A&M University-KingsvilleSharon Jones, Lafayette College Page 11.491.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Diversity in Environmental Engineering: The Good and BadAbstractEngineering diversity remains a problem in the USA despite ongoing efforts by government,academia, and the private sector. A committee of the Association of Environmental Engineeringand Science Professors (AEESP) is characterizing diversity within the environmentalengineering
2006-1610: EMBEDDING INNOVATION PROCESS AND METHODOLOGY INENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT ANDMARKETING COURSESW. Andrew Clark, East Tennessee State University W. ANDREW CLARK is a nutritional biochemist with diverse experience in academics and industrial research. He received his Ph.D. in Nutrition from North Carolina State University in 1980 and served as Assistant Professor on Nutrition at South Dakota State University (1980 - 1983). From 1983 to 2001 he held various positions in research, management and business at Eastman Chemical Company. Dr. Clark is an Associate Professor of Entrepreneurial Business at East Tennessee State University.J. Paul Sims, East Tennessee State
a v e b e e n d i s
numerical order of their 2006 ratings (and, hence, rankings), with capital lettersused to distinguish programs with the same rating (and, hence, ranking). For example, therewere three programs tied at a rating of 3.9 for fourth ranking in the 2006 report and are labeled as4(A), 4(B) and 4(C). No ranking or rating distinction is implied by these letters. Interestingly,two of the 31 programs, 14(F) and 21(D), rated 3.2 and 3.1, respectively, in 2006 did not appearon the list in the three prior years. These therefore show as blanks for those years in Table 1 andTable 2 and as missing points in the figures that follow.Ratings for 2006The top 31 ratings reported by U.S. News for the most recent rating year are shown in Figure 1.These 31 programs ranged
explaining the fabrication andoperation of a MOSFET to the K-12students in way that is simple andexciting. An NMOS (n-channel MOSFET) wasselected for explaining the transistor Figure 3 NMOS demo chip overview (a) and explanation ofconcepts. Fig. 3 shows a Lego-baseddemo testchip along with 2 demos for fabrication and principle of operation of micro (b) and nano (c)NMOS assuming micro and nano sizes . NMOS devices.In addition to a number Lego pieces, Page 11.1240.4there are two motors, a breadboard, a K-12 chip, and a number of other electronic devices on the demochip. Fig. 3(a) shows a layout of a
reliability of the Fall 2005 LO post-test was higher than that of Page 11.240.3the pre-test, due to the removal of the questions from the assessment. The removal of questionswas based on Item Analysis, which indicated how the internal stability of the section wouldchange with respect to the removal of that specific question. The following question was asample question that was confusing to most of the students and was therefore removed from theassessment tool:A project manager makes a narrative description of the work that must be done for his/herproject. This is called a: a. Project plan b. Control chart c. Statement of work d. Project
this kind are called infinite.2. Bijection. Next we define the notion of bijection. Given two arbitrary sets, A and B, afunction f is a rule that associates a unique element b=f(a) of B to each element a of A. Instead ofsaying "a function", we may use the term: "mapping f: A 1 B" between A and B, or from A toB. A mapping f: A 1 B is said to be one-to-one if different elements of A are mapped intodifferent elements of B. A mapping f: A 1 B is said to be onto B if for each element b of B thereis an element a of A such that b=f(a). Informally speaking, a mapping f: A 1 B is onto B, if Bcan be covered by the elements of A, using the rule b=f(a). A mapping that is not onto B, is saidto be into B. Finally, a mapping f: A 1 B is called bijective (or
ABS as the building material. Meanwhile, the ABSplastic frames (Figure 1-B) inside provided an easy–to-make (by using a 3-D fastprototyping machine with ABS as material) yet high strength structure to support the hull Page 11.295.3and onboard equipment. (A) (B) Figure 1: The first generation probe on dock (A) and the internal skeleton made from ABS plastic (B). Internally, twenty 11-Amp Hour D-cell Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMh) batteries wereused to power the probe. On top of the boat, an aluminum lid sealed with adhesiveweather stripping was installed
% Yes B. Organization or Group 24 %2. Quantitative / Methodical 11% 11% 12% 14% 0% 17% 0-17 16 18% Yes A. Quantitative %2. Quantitative / Methodical 22% 11% 12% 14% 17% 0% 0-22 13 10% Yes B. Methodical %3. Accounting/Finance/Econ. 11% 11% 0% 0% 34% 17% 0-17 7% 9% Yes A. Accounting / Finance3. Accounting/Finance/Econ. 11% 11% 12% 14% 17% 17% 11- 14 12% Yes B. Economics
elementsin the underlying set.The declaration of a relation within a signature means the relation consists of tuples whose firstelement is an atom from the signature’s underlying set. Thus known is a binary relation mappingeach book to those persons recorded in the book, and dates is a ternary relation, whose tuplesconsist of a book, a person known in that book, and that person’s birthday. Or at least that’s whatwe intend: without further constraints there is nothing to ensure the persons known in a book areexactly those whose dates are recorded.To create the needed constraints we add “facts” – predicates that must hold in any legal state ofthe system. In our case, we can state our constraint in one fact:fact { all b : BirthdayBook | b.known
: wr * N r + ws * N s = w pc * ( N r + N s ) (15)2.1 Single Planetary Gear SetThe stick diagram for a single planetary gear set is illustrated in Figure 3(a) and the leverreplacement is shown in Figure 3(b). Using lever diagram, the torque equations are derived fromEquations (16) to (18), and angular speeds in Equations (19) and (20). The justification for thesesubstitutions may not be obvious, but it can show that the horizontal force and velocityrelationship of the lever are identical to the torque and rotational velocity relationship of the gearset. For an example shown in Figure 4, when the carrier of a simple gear set is grounded, thering and sun rotate in opposite directions at relatively speeds inversely
elements or tasks. Being exposed to such problems students build the ability to critical thinking. Students are asked to present their suggestions and questions to solve each problem. The logic behind each suggestion and/or question is discussed by the TAs in a way that motivates the students to follow the same logic in solving a problem. Conclusions and interpretations of the results obtained for each problem are presented such that the Page 11.179.3 objective of the problem becomes clearer. 2 B- Extra credit and/or bonus