Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Darby Riley, Rowan University; Jacob Troutman, University of Texas at Austin

minds network dataset,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2019.[2] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282– 284, 2018.[3] N. S. Bekkouche, R. F. Schmid, and S. Carliner, “‘Simmering Pressure’: How Systemic Stress Impacts Graduate Student Mental Health,” Performance Improvement Quarterly, pp. 1–26, 2021.[4] M. Schmidt and E. Hansson, “Doctoral students’ well-being: a literature review,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, vol. 13, no. 1, 2018.[5] V. Gewin, “Mental Health: Under a cloud

Conference Session

Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiangxiong Kong, Coastal Carolina University; Alex Fegely, Coastal Carolina University; Wout De Backer, University of South Carolina; Monica Gray, The University of Texas Permian Basin; George Hitt, Coastal Carolina University; Ryan Kerns

presence and embodied affordances, unique opportunities to achieve learning outcomes,added by the use of gesture and manipulation in the 3rd dimension [65].3. Methodology Figure 1. Flowchart for VR story production that includes (a) digital media collection; (b) VR story production in VIAR360; and (c) user experience.The flowchart for the VR story production of this study is illustrated in Figure 1. Briefly, digitalmedia is first collected in situ to serve as the raw materials for virtual content creation. Dependingon the demand, the digital media could be 360-degree images and videos, traditional 2D imagesand videos, sounds, 3D objects, or others. Next, such media is uploaded to VIAR360, a webbrowser-based online VR editing platform, for virtual

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Athena Lin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

process,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1076–1091, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1992609.[4] A. Gardner and K. Willey, “Academic identity reconstruction: The transition of engineering academics to engineering education researchers,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 234–250, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1162779.[5] K. Moore, C. E. Wright, E. M. Stone, and A. Pawley, “Visualizing arguments to scaffold graduate writing in engineering education,” in 2021 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Virtual, 2021, p. 21.[6] M. R. Lea and B. V. Street, “The ‘academic literacies’ model: Theory and applications,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 368

Conference Session

ERM: Mental Health and Wellness

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corin Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Lizabeth Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Gustavo Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Christina Nazar, California State University, Los Angeles

colleagues at Cal State LA she recently received an NSF grant called Eco-STEM which aims to transform STEM education using an asset-based ecosystem model. She is also a Co-PI on an NSF S-STEM grant called ENGAGE which is working to make a more robust transfer pathway for local Community college students. Dr. Thompson is a Co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE grant called KIND with other universities within the CSU. She is a co-advisor to Engineers without Borders, Critical Global Engagement, and oSTEM at Cal Poly.Gustavo B Menezes (Professor)Christina Restrepo Nazar © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work-in-Progress: Measuring

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #11

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Quamar Niyaz, Purdue University Northwest; Jansen Tan, Purdue University Northwest; Divya Ravindra, Purdue University Northwest; Sidike Paheding, Michigan Technological University; Ahmad Javaid, The University of Toledo

) and enabled ASLR (b).specifier is also written into the user/printf.cprogram to help with printing permission bits.3.3 Memory randomization moduleThis module allows students to implement a basic version of Address Space LayoutRandomization (ASLR) technique into xv6. In this module, a student will create a random numbergenerator. The student will then modify the executable file loader. Two memory segments withina process will be modified. The program text segment will be modified to have a random offsetfrom the beginning of the virtual address space. The stack segment will be modified to have arandom offset from the end of the program text and data segments. The changes made to the useraddress layout can be seen in Figure 1 (b) and compared to

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joan Wawire, University of Houston; Jerrod Henderson, University of Houston; Brian McGowan, American University; Kristin Schaefer, University of Houston; Le Shorn Benjamin

Pseudonym Phonetic Spelling Engineering Major Gender Race/ Ethnicity Anjali Aan-juh-lee Chemical Female Asian Chagatai Chah-guh-tahy Chemical Male Asian Frances Frahn-sess Chemical Female Other (mixed) Tuvok Two-vok Electrical Male LatinoData SourcesWe collected data via four methods: (a) pre and post-surveys; (b) a participant orientationmeeting; (c) photovoice focus group interviews; and (d) semi-structured individual interviews.Of note, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, participants had the option of attending meetings,focus groups, and interviews virtually or in person. We

Conference Session

EMD Technical Session 1: Captstone, Ethics, and Statistical Methods

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Venkat Allada, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Clair Kueny, Missouri University of Science and Technology

within the team and the project sponsors, project management and control, interpersonalskills, and patience. The lessons learned by the instructors and the project sponsors were helpfuland are being used to refine the future offerings of the capstone course. It is hoped that thelessons learned may also be helpful to the senior design instructors’ community at large.References[1] ABET, Accessed February 2, 2022, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-technology-programs-2021-2022/#GC5[2] A. Modenbach and M. Peterson, “Lessons learned from a Covid-impacted capstone,” in Proceedings of Annual ASEE Conference, 2021.[3] M. Phelan, A. Guha, B. Harrison, G. Moukarzel, A. Tetteh, Y. Har-el

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Luthi, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Worldwide; Mohua Kar; Lisa Macon, Valencia College

goals of the grant, as compared to the students who did not participate in thePLTL activities. Of the items related to STEM pedagogy, students more often reportedexperiencing them as compared to students that did not participate in the activities. The five mostoften reported experiences were: (a) feel comfortable using the tools needed for studies; (b)staff/faculty members making connections‐course content and real-world (i.e. community); (c)access to the tools needed for studies; (d) learned steps necessary for safety in the class or inlabs; (e) learned ways to make a difference through a career in STEM.Almost all of these items showed a positive increase in the students who participated in thePLTL activities compared to the students who did

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isabel Hilliger, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile; MARIA de los RIOS, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile; Gabriel Astudillo, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile; Jorge Baier, Pontificia Universidad Catholica de Chile

thesesubgroups and the overall student population, this engineering school has different types ofsupport strategies and extracurricular initiatives to connect students with peer, staff, and faculty,such as student tutors, school counselors, and faculty mentoring. Still, we decided to focus ongender differences in mattering due to the institutional interest to attract women students andfaculty. In these lines, Figure 1 shows the cohort and gender distribution of survey responses,showing a slightly overrepresentation of freshmen and female students (39% instead of 35% at aschool level). Figure 1. Cohort (a) and gender (b) distribution of survey responses In line with the above, we performed an Exploratory Factor Analysis to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Van Treuren, Baylor University; Cynthia Fry, Baylor University; Bradley Norris

Paper ID #36575The Importance of Research in Student FormationKenneth W. Van Treuren (Professor and Associate Dean for Research andFaculty Development) Ken Van Treuren is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University and serves as the Associate Dean in the School of Engineering and Computer Science. He received his B. S. in Aeronautical Engineering from the USAF Academy in 1977 and his M. S. in Engineering from Princeton University in 1978. He completed his DPhil in Engineering Sciences at the University of Oxford, United Kingdom in 1994. He then taught at the USAF Academy until his

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mariana Silva, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Geoffrey Herman, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Yucheng Jiang; Seth Poulsen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Yueqi Jiang, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

rectangle represents the click-stream data from a different GA, and thex-axis represents the first 180 minutes that any member of the team worked on a GA. Each dotrepresents a submission by a team member and each member of the team is shown consistently ona different row. These visualizations show that students often made submissions during the sametime intervals, indicating that students were working at the same time as hoped for. Some studentsdid not submit anything on some GAs. These lack of submissions may or may not indicate (a) Asynchronous course offering (b) Synchronous course offeringFigure 1: Visualization of click-stream data. Each subplot represents a different assessment (5,6,7),each dot inside a subplot

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ying Wang, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joy Harris; Janece Shaffer

fact thatdrives individuals to learn and know [23]. Given that students enrolled in the course would learnthe knowledge related to entrepreneurship, we selected the subscale of the epistemic curiosityintentionally as it fits the learning context students are in. Specifically, the epistemic curiositysubscale included 10 items. Students rated each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging fromNever to Always. A sample item is I enjoy exploring new ideas. See Appendix B for all items.Creative mindsetsThe creative mindsets were developed according to the theory of growth and fixed mindset [24].To measure students’ entrepreneurial mindset, we administered the creative mindsets scales tomeasure the extent to which students hold fixed or growth mindsets

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ariana Riccio; Wendy Martin

: Routledge), 2016, pp.183–195.[2] B. Bevan, J. J. Ryoo, A. Vanderwerff, M. Petrich, and K. Wilkinson, “Making deeperlearners: a tinkering learning dimensions framework,” Connect. Sci. Learn. 7. 2018.[3] M. South, S. Ozonoff, and W. M. McMahon, “Repetitive behavior profiles in Aspergersyndrome and high-functioning autism,” J. Autism Dev. Disord. vol. 35, pp. 145–158, 2015, doi:10.1007/s10803-004-1992-8[4] X. Wei, J. W. Yu, P. Shattuck, M. McCracken, and J. Blackorby, “Science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) participation among college students with an autismspectrum disorder,” J. Autism Dev. Disord, vol. 43, pp. 1539–1546, 2013, Doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1700-z[5] P. T. Shattuck, S. C. Narendorf, B. Cooper, P. R. Sterzing, M. Wagner, and

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Jackson, University of Georgia; Beshoy Morkos, University of Georgia; Fred Beyette; Amy Ragland, University of Georgia; Dominik May

. K. Faulconer and A. B. Gruss, "A review to weigh the pros and cons of online, remote, and distance science laboratory experiences," The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 19, no. 2, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3386.[12] D. May et al., "Switching from hands-on labs to exclusively online experimentation in electrical and computer engineering courses," in Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021: American Society for Engineering Education. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/37795. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/37795[13] D. May, B. Morkos, A. Jackson, N. Hunsu, A. Ingalls, and F. R. Beyette

Conference Session

ERM: New Research Methods and Tools

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Vohra; Eileen Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

of engineering identity,” in proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, Jun. 2016.[6] M. C. Howard. “A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve?” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol 32(1), pp. 51-62, 2016.[7] M. W. Watkins. “Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice,” Journal of Black Psychology, vol 44(3), pp. 219-246, 2018.[8] L. L. Thurstone, “Multiple-factor analysis; A development and expansion of The Vectors of Mind,” University of Chicago Press, 1947.[9] A. B. Costello, and J. Osborne, “Best practices in exploratory factor

Conference Session

Pedagogy in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori Howe, University of Wyoming; Joseph Holles, University of Wyoming

, N., R. Cammino, B. Haferkamp, P.R. Anderson, E.M. Brey, J. Mohammadi, and F. Teymour. ENGR497 – An Introduction to Research Methods Course. in 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2016. Seattle, WA.7. Rodenbusch, S.E., P.R. Hernandez, S.L. Simmons, and E.L. Dolan, Early Engagement in Course-Based Research Increases Graduation Rates and Completion of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Degrees. CBE-Life Sciences, 2016. 15(1-10): p. 15:ar20, 1 - 15:ar20, 10.8. Hannaford, S. Biology 392 Syllabus, Introduction to Biological Research. 2014 [cited 2019 3/21/19]; Available from: http://www.pugetsound.edu/files/resources/bio392s14sh.pdf.9. Fairley, J., J. Auerbach, A. Prysock, L. Conrad, and G

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Qudsia Tahmina, The Ohio State University at Marion

engineeringstudents during the transition to and from distance learning approaches, b) share some of theresults from the assessment of student attitudes during this transition, and c) share some of thebest practices adopted by the instructors during these uncertain times.The first-year engineering curriculum usually involves fundamental concepts and provides anopportunity for students to explore several engineering disciplines. In a normal learningenvironment, engineering courses tend to be challenging due to higher expectations for problem-solving, mathematics, and scientific concepts, and adding external factors such as the pandemicadds more complications. Since the pandemic began in early 2020, students and instructors havebeen under constant pressure to

Conference Session

How Communities and Systems Influence Equity: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marissa Tsugawa, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Brady Webster; Sakshi Solanki, Utah State University; Autumn Cuellar; Catherine Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Education Journals,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 2014, doi: 10.1353/csd.2014.0006.[6] E. J. Hutcheon and G. Wolbring, “Voices of ‘disabled’ post secondary students: Examining higher education ‘disability’ policy using an ableism lens,” J. Divers. High. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 39–49, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1037/a0027002.[7] L. Ben-Moshe, A. J. Nocella, and A. J. Withers, “Queer-cripping anarchism: Intersections and reflections on anarchism, queer-ness, and dis-ability,” Queering anarchism, pp. 207–220, 2013.[8] T. Armstrong, “The Myth of the Normal Brain: Embracing Neurodiversity,” AMA Journal f Ethics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 348–352, 2015, doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504.[9] H. B. Rosqvist, N. Chown

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lotanna Ezeonu, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Wei Li; Gail Baxter; Woo Lee, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)

structureand properties of synthetic vs. natural polymers. The student noted that, while there is littlehuman behavioral adjustment associated with its implementation, significant economic issuessuch as capital and labor must be addressed for building production capacity. In comparison,Student B proposed the use of polybutylene succinate-based fishing line since the mechanicalstrength and transparency of polybutylene succinate are well suited for this application and thematerial readily decomposes in a typical earth environment with the aid of microorganisms.Student B’s idea has the advantage of being more economically viable with fewer technical andeconomic challenges.For contact lens, Student D came up with an idea of replacing silicone hydrogels

Conference Session

Issues Facing STEM Programs at Rural Two-Year Colleges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lesley Strawderman, Mississippi State University; Mahnas Mohammadi-Aragh, Mississippi State University; Umar Iqbal; Alta Knizley, Mississippi State University; Jenna Johnson, Mississippi State University; Rani Sullivan, Mississippi State University; Shane Brauer, Mississippi State University

. Ellison, “Without a map: College access and the online practices of youth from low-income communities,” Comput. Educ., 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.001.[13] Arizona State University, Introducing FOH: Faculty Office Hours. Vimeo, 2016.[14] B. K. Townsend and K. B. Wilson, “The academic and social integration of persisting community college transfer students,” J. Coll. Student Retent. Res. Theory Pract., 2008, doi: 10.2190/CS.10.4.a.[15] V. Tinto, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. ERIC, 1987.[16] B. K. Townsend, “Community College Transfer Students: A Case Study of Survival,” Rev. High. Educ., 1995, doi: 10.1353/rhe.1995.0022.

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Bahar Memarian, University of Toronto

they can beinfused in all types of co-curricular activities and b) what interpersonal, intrapersonal, andstructural factors, particularly for what populations and under what circumstances, come toinfluence student engagement in co-curricular activities.Our between measures analysis at a cross-section of time reveals what portion of the populationended up engaging in what type of co-curricular activities. One key factor to consider is that thedata reveals what the students turned out to participate in, not what they wished or had initiallyintended to engage in. For example, we may find that more students wanted to take part intechnical work experiences but did not have the resources or skills to land a technical or researchjob and so had to

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeff Brown, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Leroy Long, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Taylor Mitchell, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach; Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach

engineering,particularly weapons development, and thus address our first research question. Students are alsorequired to consider what their professional responsibility might be in relationship to innovationsand inventions. After Haber’s death, pesticide chemicals developed through his research institutewere used by the Nazis in gas chambers.References1. ABET. (2019). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. Retrieved Feb. 27, 2020, from https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for- accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/2. Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath3. Bloom, B. et al. (1956

Conference Session

Computers in Education 11 - Modulus 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Brown, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Mesbah Uddin, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Erfan Al-Hossami, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Daniel Janies; Samira Shaikh, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Zhuo Cheng, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

3 1 Math 4 2 Criminal Justice 2 (a) Reported Race (b) Reported Area of Study Freshman 6 Sophomore 1 1 Senior Junior

Conference Session

International Division Technical Session 1: Looking at Study Abroad through an enhanced lens

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jemal Bedane Halkiyo, Arizona State University

and instructional designframework were explored. In addition, by considering the EGR 598 Topic: Innovation andDesign of Engineering Academic Settings course’s project goals, which involved adapting to thenew education culture in the learning classroom, I employed eight comprehensive andinterrelated procedures to design an effective instruction lesson: a) analyzing the needs of targetaudiences, which means identifying the problems that we are dealing with, b) conductinglearners’ characteristics analysis, c) setting instructional goals, d) task analysis and contentsequencing, e) designing instructional objectives, f) designing instructional strategies andassessments, g) developing instructional materials, and h) evaluating instruments [9], [26

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Jeongjin Park, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Bhavana Kotla, Purdue Polytechnic Graduate Programs

. Williamson Shaffer, "A novel paradigm for engineering education: Virtual internships with individualized mentoring and assessment of engineering thinking," Journal of biomechanical engineering, vol. 137, p. 024701, 2015.[8] R. Mia, A. H. Zahid, B. C. D. Nath, and A. S. M. L. Hoque, "A Conceptual Design of Virtual Internship System to Benchmark Software Development Skills in a Blended Learning Environment," in 2020 23rd International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2020, pp. 1-6.[9] J. Bay, "Training technical and professional communication educators for online internship courses," Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 26, pp. 329-343, 2017.[10] P. C. Franks and G. C

Conference Session

CPDD Technical Session 2 - Trends in Student and Faculty Support

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veronica Jara-Troncoso, Universidad Andres Bello; Cristian Saavedra-Acuna, Universidad Andres Bello; Monica Quezada-Espinoza, Universidad Andres Bello

third quarter of 2020, and the first quarter of 2021.B. Analysis of resultsThe research considers academic results based on Asynchronous and Synchronous studymodalities, including a report per modality, axis, and period for each of the 27 subjectsstudied. Data was obtained from the university's management and academic registryplatform under reference. Data were first analyzed using an inferential statistical analysisusing SPSS software. Subsequently, a descriptive analysis was made using PowerBIsoftware, a business intelligence tool. Finally, data on academic results were gathered andconverted into graphics and visually simple tables to process. The following section showsthe results obtained from the analyses mentioned above.III

Conference Session

Project Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Derek Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University; Sura Alqudah, Western Washington University

size is small, we provide a qualitative analysis of the responses, the common themes, and the lessons-learned from this feedback. For this analysis, we will refer to the teams as A, B, C, and D. i. Meeting modality (face-to-face (F2F), virtual, hybrid): 1. Team A always met F2F with their sponsor (the team got the clearance to physically be at the sponsor's facility for the full duration of their project). 2. Team B never met F2F with the sponsor; all their meetings were conducted virtually. 3. Team C met only once during an initial tour with the sponsor; the rest of the meetings were virtual. 4. Team D had a hybrid meeting style between F2F and virtual. ii. Project scope modification: Two of the

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Manuel Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nayda Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Aidsa Santiago-Roman, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Oscar Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Pedro Quintero; Sonia Bartolomei-Suarez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Nelson Cardona, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Carla Lopez Del Puerto, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Anidza Valentin, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus; Manuel Rodriguez Martinez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

scored high in our subjects, creating a positive expectation of the outcomes in laterstages. However, the effect of the shaping process in the formative and growth levels could onlybe assessed in later years of the student’s development; through their performance and theconcrete actions taken by them to define their profiles as future professionals. Figure 1reproduces, for convenience, the conceptual structure of the L-CAS model. Figure 1: LIAT college access and success model [9]. B. Academic SettingThe UPRM is a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) with an academic offering grouped in fourcolleges: Agriculture, Arts & Sciences, Business Administration, and Engineering. Being part ofthe University of Puerto Rico

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 11 Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rockwell Clancy, Colorado School of Mines; Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines; Diana Martin, Eindhoven University of Technology; Gunter Bombaerts

Paper ID #36917From Value- to Norm-sensitive Design? An Empirical andIntercultural FrameworkRockwell Franklin Clancy (Research Assistant Professor) Rockwell F. Clancy conducts research and teaches courses at the intersection of moral psychology, technology ethics, and Chinese philosophy. He explores how education and culture affect moral judgments, the causes of unethical behaviors, and what can be done to ensure more ethical behaviors regarding technology. Central to his work are insights from and methodologies associated with the psychological sciences and digital humanities. Rockwell is a Research Assistant

Conference Session

ERM: Student Professional Development: Professional Skills and Moving Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Leidig, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); William Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Eric Holloway, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

/10.1061/9780784415221[4] A. Johri and B. Olds, “Situated engineering learning: Bridging engineering educationresearch and the learning sciences,” Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 151–185, 2011.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x[5] S. R. Brunhaver, R. F. Korte, S. R. Barley, and S. D. Sheppard, “Bridging the gaps betweenengineering education and practice,” In R. Freeman & H. Salzman (Eds.), Engineering in aglobal economy. University of Chicago Press, 2018.[6] A. R. Bielefeldt, K. Paterson, and C. Swan, “Measuring the value added from servicelearning in project-based engineering education,” International Journal of EngineeringEducation, 26(3), 535-546, 2010.[7] K. Litchfield, A. Javernick-Will, and A. Maul, “Technical