highlight theepistemologies that relate to learning rather than teaching. For this paper, we accumulated 200articles in an initial database search of the ASEE conference proceedings.Data AnalysisWe analyzed this data with secondary and tertiary rounds of exclusion based on the followingcriteria: 1. The paper was published between 2016 and 2021. 2. The paper was a peer-reviewed conference paper. 3. The paper focused on women engineering students as a population, either a. Exclusively b. Or along with other populations (e.g., male students, faculty, or administrators). 4. The paper addressed epistemologies or epistemic ideas in the main body of text (i.e., epistemology was not just acknowledged in references).The
Paper ID #37718Engineering Learning Community Introduction to ResearchAbroad A 5 year AssessmentMaria Claudia Alves (Senior Director, Halliburton Engineering GlobalPrograms) Dr. Maria Claudia B. Alves serves as Senior Director for Engineering Global Programs at the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. In this position since July 2012, she developed and implemented a multi-year strategic plan on global education programs that led to measurable outcomes such as increase in student participation and learning, as well as faculty engagement in global programs in the College of Engineering. Some of her most
do is take the corresponding course and if she gets a grade of B or above, she’s satisfied that requirement." I went to the Chairman and said, "That’s what has to be done." Sure enough, she took the course and made an A. She got her PhD in four years. If I had not been in the department they would have washed her out. … When we knew we had other mechanisms for keeping her in the program, nobody else was saying anything. Of course, I was the only Black faculty person at that time. Even the person with whom she was working [with] did not speak up for her.As described above, despite their being pre-established policies for graduate students to remainin their programs, John experiences instances where he
Paper ID #38443Virtualizing Hands-On Mechanical Engineering Laboratories- A Paradox or OxymoronKimberly Cook-chennault (Associate Professor)Ahmad Farooq (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Virtualizing Hands-On Mechanical Engineering Laboratories - A Paradox or Oxymoron?AbstractIn physical sciences and engineering research, the study of virtual labs (VL) has generallyfocused on case studies about their implementation into classrooms or engineering designprocess and elements. However, few (if any) studies
. The short lecture was designed based on elements of interpersonal and intercultural communication being taught in the Engineering Economics with Social and Global Implications course.I. University of South Florida Program Methods/Implementation a. Courses b. The Foundations of Engineering Lab (EGN 3000L) is a mandatory first-year engineering three- credit hour course offered to all incoming freshmen and transfers in the college. Total enrollment every semester ranges from 500 to 700 (Figure 2). Between seven to eight sections of the course are taught each semester by an interdisciplinary instructional team from each department in the engineering college. Undergraduates who have passed the
-discrimination-in-the-workplace/ [2] U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Diversity in high tech,” 2014[Online]. [Online]. Available: https://www.eeoc.gov/special-report/diversity-high-tech [3] “2019 taulbee survey: Total undergrad cs enrollment rises again, but with fewer new majors; doctoral degree production recovers from last year’s dip,” Jun 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cra.org/crn/2020/05/2019-taulbee-survey/ [4] J. Peckham, L. L. Harlow, D. A. Stuart, B. Silver, H. Mederer, and P. D. Stephenson, “Broadening participation in computing: Issues and challenges,” in ITiCSE 2007: 12th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - Inclusive Education in Computer Science, 2007, pp
, as illustrated in Figure 1 (Saad, 2020; Bloom, Englehart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl, 1956). Figure 1. Contributing pre‐requisite knowledge Like the ACCE, the National Architectural Accreditation Board (NAAB) (NAAB, 2014) requires several student performance criteria (SPC) that share a likeness to ACCE requirements. In particular, the following NAAB SPCs require architecture programs to demonstrate student achievements: 3 B.10: Understanding of the fundamentals of building costs, which must include project financing methods and feasibility, construction cost estimating, construction scheduling, operational costs, and life‐cycle costs
evaluation of the course and the tools that it uses. A stronger emphasis onstudent and lecturer feedback will be sought.Acknowledgements The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the invited lecturers and teaching assistants whohave contributed to the Introduction to Medical Imaging course over many years. The authors would alsolike to acknowledge the Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences for graduate studentfunding.References[1] H. N. Mok, "Teaching Tip: The Flipped Classroom," Journal of Information Systems Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 7-11, 2014.[2] E. C. Lemly, B. Jassemnejad, E. Judd, B. P. Ring, A. W. Henderson, and G. M. Armstrong, "Implementing a Flipped Classroom in Thermodynamics," presented
learningCollaborative learning is an evidence-based instructional practice that has been adopted by manyinstructors in STEM courses in higher education. Research indicates that engaging students incollaborative activities is associated with increased student persistence and improved student Figure 3: Example of a coding question from PrairieLearn.learning outcomes and retention [8, 9]. Successful and productive collaborations are rarelyguaranteed, but they can be greatly improved by (a) careful design of the task [10, 11], (b)assignment of team roles [12] and (c) the use of available technologies to both promotecollaborations among students and support the instructors implementing these activities[13, 14].(a) Careful design of tasks. We
gate’s functionality, and from an aestheticsperspective, which is a personal opinion. Next, they compare their novel symbols with theaccepted symbols and comment on why they are more (or less) sensible or aesthetically pleasing.Finally, they reflect on how they have taken ownership of (and expressed interest in) logic gatesymbol representation through this exercise. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) Figure 3: Novel Play-Doh logic gate symbols provided by the instructors (a) NOT gate, (b) AND gate, (c) OR gate, (d) NAND gate, (e) NOR gate, (f) XOR gate, and (g) XNOR gate. (a) (b
Paper ID #36835Student Learning and Confidence in a TechnologyManagement Graduate Statistics CourseJames David Kribs (Assistant Professor) James Kribs received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University in 2013. He is an Assistant Professor in the Applied Engineering Technology department at North Carolina A&T State University, where he teaches courses in Automotive Engineering Technology. He is a member of the American Society of Engineering Education, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Combustion Institute. © American Society for
Trails to attract more people to the trails. By developing two differentsanitation facilities, the students were allowed to come up with design ideas that cater to the overallcomfort and convenience of the diverse set of population that these facilities would serve. Sitemaps for each project area are shown in Figure 1. (a) (b)Figure 1. (a) Aerial overview of Turkana, Kenya, (b) Aerial view of Buff TrailsSustainable Sanitation Facility in Kenya (Turkana)For the Kenya project, the students produced two independent designs and finally a “merged”design that took into consideration the advantages of the two designs were chosen. In this
development line followed line Average Weight 3 2 1 0 Number of 4 1 0 1 2.33 robots Robot A, B, D, E F - C - designationAssessmentThe students in the undergraduate microcontroller course were asked if they would like to be co-authors for this paper. The student co-authors provided data on their line follower robots that theydeveloped. At the time of the final draft of this paper, the course was still in progress. Thus, someof the line following robots were
; Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.10.18260/1-2—3827[2] Will, J., & Stone, W. (2004, June), “Optimizing The Structure For A MultidisciplinarySenior Design Experience,” ASEE 2004 Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2—13506[3] Bailey, M., & DeBartolo, E. (2007, June), “Using The Experiential Learning Model AndCourse Assessment To Transform A Multidisciplinary Senior Design Course Sequence” Paperpresented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10.18260/1-2—2484[4] Miller, R.L., Olds, B. M., “A Model Curriculum for Capstone Course inMultidisciplinary Engineering Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, October 1994,https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1994.tb00124.x[5] Kaplan, A., &
security or functionality during the semester.Survey and Feedback ResultsThe analysis of whether the new system had a positive impact and excited students in learningprogramming languages examines two different components: a survey and statistics from theclass online discussion forum. These components are discussed as follows.Survey ResultThe survey was conducted among a first-year programming course. Appendix B – surveyprovides a complete list of questions asked in the survey. Of the total participating students in thesurvey, 76% had no or very limited experience with programming when the term started. This,76%, is the exact percentage of the students who found the complexity of the Reversi projectchallenging. For the general feedback on the
scientific research more inclusive,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 602–606, 2014. [7] M. Estrada, M. Burnett, A. G. Campbell, P. B. Campbell, W. F. Denetclaw, S. Gutierrez, S. Hurado, G. H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C. M. Okpodu, T. J. Robinson, M. F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, and M. Zavala, “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in stem,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3, p. es5, 2017. [8] M. T. Jones, A. E. Barlow, and M. Villarejo, “Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 82–115, 2010. [9] K. N. Simmons, “High-impact education practices: What they are, who has access to
. New York: Routledge, 2012. 2. K. Rainey, M. Dancy, R. Mickelson, E. Stearns, and S. Moller, “Race and gender differences in how sense of belonging influences decisions to major in STEM,” International journal of STEM education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2018. 3. B. Levy, R. Morocz, R. Nagel, W. Newstetter, K. Talley, C. Forest, and J. Linsey, “University maker spaces: Discovery, optimization and measurement of impacts,” in 122nd annual conference & exposition of the American Society Engineering Education, Seattle, WA., June, 2015. 4. M. E. Andrews, M. Borrego, and A. Boklage, “Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, no. 1
, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundationReferences[1] R. D. Hardy, "A Sharing Meanings Approach for Interdisciplinary Hazards Research," Risk Analysis, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1162-1170, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13216.[2] J. Kendra and J. Nigg, "Engineering and the social sciences: historical evolution of interdisciplinary approaches to hazard and disaster," Engineering Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 134-158, 2014/09/02 2014, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2014.978335.[3] K. Sherman-Morris, J. B. Houston, and J. Subedi, "Theoretical Matters: On the Need for Hazard and Disaster Theory
tool (left) used in set #2 parameters versus smaller tool (right) usedin set#1 parameters.With the new tool, the code was run completely without any puncture in the sheet metal. Fig. 7 shows theformed cones using set#2 parameters.Figure 7: Conical shape produced using parameter set#2.8. SURFACE FINISH COMPARISONA Mitutoyo Surftest SV-3000S4 surface tester was used to measure and compare the surface parameters ofdeformed sheets. Fig. 8 shows the surface profiles for both cones. Using the bigger tool improved the averagesurface roughness from 12.7 microns (for set#1 parameters) to 4.5 microns (for set#2 parameters).Figure 8. a : Surface roughness testing results for set #1 parameters.Figure 8. b: Surface roughness testing results for set #2
. “Women on the two-year transfer pathway inengineering,” in 2020 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Virtual, June 2020.[10] L. Archer, E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, A. Seakins, and B. Wong. “‘Science capital’: Aconceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions ofcapital beyond the arts,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 52-7, pp. 922-948,September 2015.[11] L. Archer, J. DeWitt, and B. Willis. “Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: Masculinity,capital, and power,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 51-1, pp. 1-30, January 2014.[12] P. Bourdieu. “The forms of capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociologyof Education, J. G. Richardson, Ed., New York: Greenwood Press, 1986, pp
development model, without forfeiting theirinfluence in reducing their environmental impact by streamlining processes and reducing theconsumption of non-renewable materials [1].Implementing an adequate digital transformation strategy requires certain skills and abilities.These identifies the following: (a) non-digital key skills: entrepreneurial thinking and self-initiative, adaptability, creativity, problem-solving ability, and perseverance. (b) digital key skillsand competencies: digital literacy, digital interaction, collaboration, data literacy, digitallearning, digital ethics, agility. (c) Technologically Competent: Technological Skills, TechnicalTranslation, User Centered Design, Web Design, Complex Data Analysis, Network InformationTechnology
Experience in Teaching Structures in Aeronautical, Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Applying the Experimental Methodology,” 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Session 2526.6. M. Abdulwahed and Z. K. Nagy, Applying Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education, Journal of Engineering Education, July 2009, pp. 283-294.7. D. A. Wyrick and L. Hilsen, “Using Kolb’s Cycle to Round out Learning,” 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Montreal, Canada, June 17-19, 2002. Session 2739.8. T. S. Harding, H.-Y. Lai, B. L. Tuttle, and C. V. White, “Integrating Manufacturing, Design and Teamwork into a
physics career choice: A gender study",Journal of Research in Science Teaching, p. n/a-n/a, 2010. Available: 10.1002/tea.20363[Accessed 10 January 2022].[15] A. Godwin, "The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity", 2016 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings. Available: 10.18260/p.26122 [Accessed 10 January2022].[16] C. J. Dunst, M. Raab, “Interest-based child participation in everyday learning activities”,Encycl Sci Learn pp.1621-1623, 2012[17] P. Schreuders, S. Mannon and B. Rutherford, "Pipeline or personal preference: women inengineering", European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 97-112, 2009.Available: 10.1080/03043790902721488 [Accessed 4 January 2022].[18] V. Tinto, Leaving College: Rethinking
: 10.1007/s11948-009- 9148-z.[33] M. A. Selby, “Assessing engineering ethics training,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.23579.[34] W. R. Wilson, “Using the Chernobyl Incident to Teach Engineering Ethics,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 625–640, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9337-4.[35] E. A. Clancy, P. Quinn, and J. E. Miller, “Assessment of a case study laboratory to increase awareness of ethical issues in engineering,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 313–317, 2005, doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.842900.[36] D. F. Jennings and B. P
/word-entrepreneur-mean/ (accessed Mar. 28, 2022).[5] M. S. Kennedy, H. L. Cox, and S. K. Lanier, “Board # 71 : Tracking Research Self-Efficacy of Participants in an NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates Site,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2017.[6] A. K. T. Howard, Undergraduate Research for Composites in Extreme Environments, Second Year Study,” Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, March 4-6, 2018.[7] J. B. Hylton, D. Mikesell, J.-D. Yoder, and H. LeBlanc, “Working to Instill the Entrepreneurial Mindset Across the Curriculum,” Entrepreneurship Educ. and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 86–106, Sep. 2019.[8] “Expanded KEEN Student Outcomes (aka e
into and out of STEM fields”, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington D.C., NCES 2014-001, 2013.[2 J. G. Cromley, T. Perez, and A. Kaplan, “Undergraduate stem achievement and retention: cognitive, motivational, and institutional factors and solutions,” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2016.[3] M. Estrada, M. Burnett, A. G. Campbell, P. B. Campbell, W. F. Denetclaw, C. G. Gutiérrez, S. Hurtado, G. H. John, J. Matsui, R. McGee, C. M. Okpodu, T. J. Robinson, M. F. Summers, M. Werner-Washburne, and M. E. Zavala, “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 15, no. 3
Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, (1), pp. 60-85, 2020.[3] L. R. Lattuca, I. Bergom and D. B. Knight, "Professional Development, Departmental Contexts, and Use of Instructional Strategies," Journal of Engineering Education (Washington, D.C.), vol. 103, (4), pp. 549-572, 2014.[4] P. S. Ralston, T. R. Tretter and M. Kendall Brown, "Implementing Collaborative Learning across the Engineering Curriculum," The Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 17, (3), pp.89-109, 2017.[5] M. Cox, “Introduction to faculty learning communities,” New directions for teaching and learning, vol. 2004, no. 97, pp. 5-23, Apr. 2004.[6] M. Morin and R. Goldberg, “WIP: A Faculty Learning Community That Includes a
theMyowearable. Secondly, when the box is connected via USB-B cable to a laptop, it sends thevalues to the Arduino Serial Monitor, which can directly be read and plotted there in real-time.Thirdly, and most importantly, it sends the value via an output wire to the bluetooth modulewhere it is processed in Python for the corresponding application.The Bluetooth module used is the HC-05 Wireless Bluetooth Module by DSD Tech. Due to alimitation in the HC-05 model, the Bluetooth module was only able to send values from 0 to 255.Because of this, all raw values from the sensor are divided by 8 before passing through themodule. This number was determined experimentally as values read by the sensor range from 0to 1000. The final value is coded to be outputted as
J. Herzing, “Design Optimization of a Car-Truck Stand” Presented at ASEE 2012 Conference. 9. B. Shrivastava and R. Echempati, “Optimum Design of railcar truck stand”, presented virtually at MS&T 2021 Conference held in Columbus, OH, October 2021. 10. B. Shrivastava, A. S. Gone and K. P. Medishetty, Unpublished Final Project Reports of the Elective Course on Lightweighting and Joining Technologies of Body in White (BIW) Structures, Kettering University, Summer 2021. 11. A. Kumar, “Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of 2D and 3D Truss Structure” (https://www.mathworks.com/MATLABcentral/fileexchange/68337-finite-element- analysis-fea-of-2d-and-3d-truss-structure), MATLAB Central File Exchange
represent an equitableworld to our students, we must be able to imagine it.References[1] Haverkamp, A., Bothwell, M., Montfort, D., & Driskill, Q.-L. (2021). Calling for a ParadigmShift in the Study of Gender in Engineering Education. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2),55–70. DOI: http://doi.org/10.21061/see.34[2] Harbin, B. (2016). Teaching beyond the gender binary in the university classroom. Updatedby Roberts, L.M. et al., (2020). Vanderbilt Center for Teaching. Retrieved 1/30/2022 from:https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/teaching-beyond-the-gender-binary-in-the-university-classroom/[3] Barlow, R. (2014). BU Research: A Riddle Reveals Depth of Gender Bias. Accessible at:https://www.bu.edu/articles/2014/bu-research-riddle-reveals