Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hüseyin Sarper P.E, Old Dominion University; Nebojsa Jaksic, Colorado State University - Pueblo

Paper ID #37566HORIZONTAL PROPULSION USING MODEL ROCKETENGINES (PART B)Huseyin Sarper (Master Lecturer) HUSEYIN SARPER, P.E. is a master lecturer with a joint appointment in the Engineering Fundamentals Division and the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Old Dominion University. Earlier, he was a professor of engineering and the graduate program director at Colorado State University – Pueblo between 1988 and 2014. He was also a regional director of Colorado’s NASA Space Grant Consortium. His degrees, all in industrial engineering and operations research, are from the Pennsylvania State University (BS

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmad Fayed, Southeastern Louisiana University; Genesis Alegria Aguilar, Southeastern Louisiana University

Senior Design II) was assigned tothis project. The team use performed three major types of experiments for different settings andmaterials. The experiments ranged from simulation of a simple system to analyzing the output ofthe system under different conditions including the addition of a vibration absorber. Figure 1 Quanser Shake Table II (a) (b) (c) Figure 2 Accelerometer and data acquisition kit (a) Signal Conditioner, (b) accelerometer, (c) Coaxial cable1. First set of ExperimentsThe first set of experiments were to estimate the elastic properties of three different materials,namely Steel, Aluminum, and 3D printed Polylactic

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Johnson, Texas A&M University; Jay Porter, Texas A&M University; Emel Cevik, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Jennifer Whitfield, Texas A&M University; Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Maram Alaqra

SciTeacher Educ, vol. 25. no. 2., March, pp. 145-156, 2014.[4] B. Yalvac, O. A. Bewaji, M. E. Spier, G. M. Elizondo, C. T. Umah, T. Sherron,J, T. Lightfoot, C. L. Cannon, and R. S. Fuchs-Young, “Promoting the STEM pipeline andenhancing STEM career awareness through participation in authentic research activities (RTP,Diversity),” In Proc. of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018. Available: https://peer.asee.org/30908.[5] M. D. Johnson, E. Ozturk, L. Valverde, B. Yalvac, and X. Peng, "Examining the role ofcontextual exercises and adaptive expertise on CAD model creation procedures," in Human-Computer Interaction Part II vol. 8005 LNCS, M. Kurosu, Ed., ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corinne Mowrey, University of Dayton; Raymond Smith, East Carolina University; Henry Lester, University of Dayton; Khalid Zouhri, University of Dayton; Jacob Cress, University of Dayton; Carson Running, University of Dayton; Kayla Nulph, University of Dayton

0.8734752 Std Dev 14.310666 Std Dev 0.180566 N 325 N 325 (a) (b)Figure 1: Descriptive statistics for (a) student exam grades and (b) the proportion of time eachstudent used on their exams. Note that 10% of exam grades earned extra credit (>100%) and36% of exam times exceeded the allowed time (>1.0).Exam Questions and Effort MeasureThis study investigates

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin Asgill, Kennesaw State University; Eric Redding, Kennesaw State University

Paper ID #36980Automated Door System with Thermal ScanAustin B. Asgill (Professor) Dr Austin B. Asgill received his B.Eng.(hons) (E.E.) degree from Fourah Bay College, University of Sierra Leone, his M.Sc. (E.E.) degree from the University of Aston in Birmingham, and his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of South Florida. He is currently a Professor of Engineering Technology (Electrical) at Kennesaw State University (KSU). Prior to joining the faculty at KSU (formerly SPSU), he was an Associate Professor of Electronic Engineering Technology at Florida A&M University (FAMU), where he served as

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Osazuwa Okundaye, Texas A&M University; Malini Natarajarathinam, Texas A&M University; Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Francis Quek, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Sharon Lynn Chu, University of Florida; Qing Li; Shaoping Qiu, Texas A&M University

apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies,” Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, vol. 2, no. 2004, pp. 813–828, 2004.[11] B. Sen and N. Ford, “Developing reflective practice in lis education: The sea-change model of reflection,” Education for information, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 181–195, 2009.[12] V. P. Dennen, “Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies,” in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, pp. 804–819, Routledge, 2013.[13] Y. Engestr¨om and A. Sannino, “Studies of expansive learning: Foundations

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri III

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ahmad Fayed, Southeastern Louisiana University

. Y & Z axes).Results1. Tensile TestTensile test data for PLA and Tough PLA were collected for the different infill densities, andorientations. Data was used to plot the stress-strain curve, estimate Young’s Modulus, andultimate tensile strength for each print setting. A sample tensile test specimen is shown in Figure8 (a) after breaking. The gained experience allowed the student to get a full understanding of theprocess and create a user guide to use the vertical test stand as seen in Figure 8 (b). Figure 8 (a) Sample tensile test specimen (left), (b) Guide for test stand and extensometer (right).A sample Excel sheet for processed data appears in Figure 9. It represents the tensile test resultsand associated plots for the first

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samia Afrin, East Tennessee State University; Christopher Hudson, East Tennessee State University

/9781482278057.[6] B. Johnson, R. Ulseth, C. Smith, and D. Fox, “The impacts of project based learning on self-directed learning and professional skill attainment: A comparison of project based learning to traditional engineering education,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, Dec. 2015, vol. 2015. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2015.7344028.[7] D. Kokotsaki, V. Menzies, and A. Wiggins, “Project-based learning: A review of the literature,” Improving Schools, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 267–277, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1177/1365480216659733.[8] M. Umar and I. Ko, “E-Learning: Direct Effect of Student Learning Effectiveness and Engagement through Project-Based Learning, Team Cohesion, and Flipped Learning during the

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri III

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Luis Trueba, Texas State University; Anthony Torres, Texas State University

Management Course,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 463–480, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14327a.[4] T. Markham, “Project Based Learning,” Teacher Librarian, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 38–42, Dec. 2011.[5] J. A. Arantes do Amaral, P. Gonçalves, and A. Hess, “Creating a Project-Based Learning Environment to Improve Project Management Skills of Graduate Students,” Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 120–130, Jan. 2015.[6] L. M. B. Jespersen, “Problem Orientation in Art and Technology,” Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2018.[7] T. A. Keiper, “GIS for elementary students: An inquiry into a new approach to learning

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashish Hingle, George Mason University; Aditya Johri, George Mason University; Cory Brozina, Youngstown State University - Rayen School of Engineering

asked to provide justification based onthe specifics of their role for whether FRT should be used on campus and how it could beimplemented. The FRT case study and RPS activity explore topics related to communicating as aprofessional engineer and developing students’ understanding of both micro and macro-ethics. The role-play case scenario provided to participants can be found in Appendix A. Theroles assigned to participants can be found in Appendix B. Further details of the case, examplesof similar cases, and the application of role-playing for ethics are available in the followingrelated papers [20]–[22].4. Data Collection Data were collected from a first-semester course on engineering concepts at a largepublic university in the

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maiken Winther, Aalborg University; Henrik Routhe, Aalborg University; Jette Holgaard, Aalborg University; Anette Kolmos, Aalborg University

collaboration. The authors would like to givespecial thanks to the supervisors and students from energy and materials and production at AalborgUniversity for their time and effort given to this study.References[1] J. E. Holgaard, and A. Kolmos, “Progression in PBL competences,” in Proceedings SEFI 47th Annual Conference: Varietas delectat: Complexity is the New Normality, B. V. Nagy, M. Murphy, H. -M. Järvinen, and A. Kálmán, Eds. Budapest: SEFI; European Association for Engineering Education, 2019, pp. 1643–1652.[2] Euro-CASE, The European Council of Academies of Applied Sciences, Technologies and Engineering. Retrieved from: https://www.euro-case.org/wp- content/uploads/Eurocase

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; William Wild, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York

Medical Device Manufacturers,” U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Mar. 18, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/design- control-guidance-medical-device-manufacturers (accessed Feb. 02, 2022).[17] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x.[18] A. Olewnik, R. Yerrick, M. Madabhushi, and R. R. Ramaswamy, “Assessing the Impact of Engineering Problem Typology on Students’ Initial Problem-solving Trajectory,” In Proceedings of ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Decision Making, Problem-Based Projects, Role-Play, and a Nontraditional Project Theme

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Goldschneider; Benjamin Chambers, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Paper ID #37484Student Engagement with a Nontraditional First-YearEngineering Project ThemeBenjamin Goldschneider (Graduate Student) Benjamin Goldschneider is a PhD Candidate in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Industrial Engineering from Purdue University. His research interests include socialization, students' sense of belonging, interdisciplinary collaboration, and innovative teaching in First-Year programs.Benjamin Daniel Chambers (Associate Professor of Practice) Dr. Ben Chambers is an Associate Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marilyn Barger; Ron Eaglin, Daytona State College; Sam Ajlani

Paper ID #36716A.S. degree Career Pathway within the Florida State CollegeSystem that includes a Professional Engineering LicenseMarilyn Barger (Dr.) Marilyn Barger is the Senior Educational Advisor for FLATE and FloridaMakes, Inc.She has a Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering, a licensed Professional Engineer in Florida, and holds a licensed patent. Dr. Barger is a Fellow of ASEE, with over 25 years of experience developing engineering technology and engineering curriculum for K-12 through Graduate engineering programs.Richard Gilbert (Professor)Sam Ajlani © American Society for

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri III

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fredrick Nitterright, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Robert Edwards, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Leeann Reynolds

Paper ID #36444Using a Toaster Oven for a Transient Heat Transfer LabFredrick Nitterright Assistant Teaching Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology program at Penn State Behrend. Research interests in include manufacturing technologies and manufacturing cost analysis.Leeann Marie Reynolds © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Using a Toaster Oven for a Transient Heat Transfer LabAbstractAt Penn State Behrend, the heat transfer lab is part of a 4-credit heat transfer course for themechanical

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri I

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Anderson, Austin Peay State University

Paper ID #36777Innovative University-Based Regional WorkforceDevelopment ExperienceMatthew S. Anderson Assistant Professor - Engineering Technology Department Austin Peay State University in Clarksville, TN Professor Anderson's academic interests are in the field of Mechatronics, and he has completed up through Level 3 SMSCP training with Siemens. He has been a full-time faculty member at at Austin Peay State University since 2016 and is currently working towards obtaining tenure while serving as the Mechatronics concentration coordinator in the engineering technology department. Other research interests include Industry

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 3: Design of Novel Energy-Related Courses and Course Materials

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda Simson, The Cooper Union; Benjamin Davis

said that other courses did not address “sustainabilitymuch less the social/political/economic impacts of the work.” Figure 3: Average scores, measured on a 5-point Likert scale for how well the class inspired discussion (a.) and how comfortable students were working in groups (b.)In addition to Likert questions, students were solicited for open-ended feedback about the course,including how interdisciplinary it felt, how it was similar or different from other courses, andwhat aspects could be improved. Students responded that the course was different than othercourses due to the diverse cohort of students, the focus on working in groups mixed in major andyear, the diverse set of course topics, and the balance of some familiar and

Conference Session

Professional Skills and Community Building in Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Eva Chi, University of New Mexico; Abhaya Datye, University of New Mexico; Yan Chen, University of New Mexico; Sang Han, University of New Mexico; Catherine Hubka, University of New Mexico; Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Susannah Davis, University of New Mexico

Review, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 59-67, 1995.[7] G. M. Quan et al., "Designing for institutional transformation: Six principles for department-level interventions," Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 010141, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010141.[8] A. H. Van de Ven and K. Sun, "Breakdowns in implementing models of organization change," Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 58-74, 2011, doi: 10.5465/amp.25.3.zol58.[9] J. L. Buller, Change leadership in higher education: A practical guide to academic transformation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.[10] M. Uhl-Bien, R. Marion, and B. McKelvey, "Complexity leadership theory: Shifting

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 1: Online or Remote Teaching and Curricular Developments

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleanor Leung, York College of Pennsylvania; James Kearns, York College of Pennsylvania

: Mar. 25, 2022].[5] Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering: Future undergraduate students, ”What is Mechatronics Engineering?”, University of Waterloo. [Online]. Available: https://uwaterloo.ca/mechanical-mechatronics-engineering/undergraduate-students/future- students/what-is-mechatronics-engineering. [Accessed: Jan. 30, 2022].[6] J. G. Cherng, B. Q. Li and N. Natarajan, ”Development of a Senior Mechatronics Course for Mechanical Engineering Student”, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013.[7] M. Tomovic, C. Tomovic, V. M. Jovanovic, C. Y. Lin, N. Yao and P. J. Katsioloudis, ”Integrative Experiences through Modeling and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems”, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and

Conference Session

Computers in Education 8 - Video Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Pierre, University of Wyoming; Mohammad Sohorab Hossain, University of Cincinnati; Sanjay Hosur, Union College; Dongliang Duan, University of Wyoming; Robert Kubichek, University of Wyoming

. Simulink Model for FM modulation laboratory. (a) (b)Figure 2. (a) top trace is sinusoidal message signal, bottom trace is FM signal; (b) thecorresponding estimated spectrum for the FM signal.a wider bandwidth signal with the frequency deviation ratio increasing from 2 to 4. Theyimmediately see the wider transmission bandwidth in the spectrum.The next part of the lab exercise explores demodulating the FM signal using a derivativeoperator in combination with an envelope detector as shown in the bottom half of Figure 1. Thesignal parameters are set back to the values from the start of the lab exercise. Figure 3a showswhat the students see in Scope 1 in the Figure 1. From top to bottom

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Integrated Engineering and Interdisciplinary Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebecca Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Susan Lord, University of San Diego; Emanuela Tilley; Jenna Carpenter, Campbell University

. Chen and G. D. Hoople, “Contextualizing a New General Engineering Curriculum inthe Liberal Arts,” 2017 American Society for Engineering Education Annual ConferenceProceedings, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28073[7] L. A. Gelles and S. M. Lord, “Pedagogical Considerations and Challenges for SociotechnicalIntegration within a Materials Science Class,” International Journal of Engineering Education,vol. 37, no. 5, 1244 - 1260, 2021.[8] J. A. Mejia, O. Dalrymple, D. Chen, and S. M. Lord, “Revealing the Invisible: Conversationsabout –Isms and Power Relations in Engineering Courses,” 2018 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018.https://peer.asee.org/30937[9] B. Momo, G. D. Hoople

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #10

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joshua Gross; Kevin Coogan; Sarah Heckman, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Gabriel Silva de Oliveira, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

–57.[12] B. Y. Alkazemi and G. M. Grami, “Utilizing BlueJ to teach polymorphism in an advanced object-oriented programming course,” Journal of Information Technology Education, 2012, accessed: 2021-8-5.[13] M. Behroozi, A. Lui, I. Moore, D. Ford, and C. Parnin, “Dazed: Measuring the cognitive load of solving technical interview problems at the whiteboard,” in 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Technologies Results (ICSE-NIER). ieeexplore.ieee.org, May 2018, pp. 93–96.[14] M. Behroozi, S. Shirolkar, T. Barik, and C. Parnin, “Does stress impact technical interview performance?” in Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and

Conference Session

Instrumentation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bradley Kicklighter, University of Southern Indiana

) TrainingSystem for Use Outside of the Automation Laboratory” in International Symposium forEngineering Education, Dublin City University, Ireland, 2008.[6] “CLICK Series Programmable Controllers,” AutomationDirect. [Online]. Available:https://www.automationdirect.com/adc/overview/catalog/programmable_controllers/click_series_plcs. [Accessed: 28-Feb-2021].[7] B. Kicklighter, “On the Development of a Portable Programmable Logic Controller (PLC)Trainer” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021, p.37536. Available: https://peer.asee.org/37536. [Accessed: 03-Aug-2021].[8] B. Kicklighter, “On the Development of a Next-Generation Sensor/Actuator Module forAutomation Labs” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content

Conference Session

Engineering Economy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neal Lewis, University of Nebraska - Lincoln; Ted Eschenbach, University of Alaska Anchorage

Engineering Education, Indianapolis, Indiana.[6] Blank, L. and A. Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 8th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2018.[7] Newnan, D.G., T. G. Eschenbach, J. P. Lavelle, and N. A. Lewis, Engineering Economic Analysis, 14th edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.[8] Park, C.S., Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6th edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2016.[9] Sullivan, William G., E.M. Wicks, and C.P. Koelling, Engineering Economy, 17th edition, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Higher Education, p. 131-133, Sec. 4.9, 2019.[10] White, J. A., K. E. Case, and D. B. Pratt, Principles of Engineering Economic Analysis, 6th edition, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012.[11] White, J. A., K. S

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Hensel, West Virginia University; Katerina Goseva-Popstojanova, West Virginia University

-analysts.REDAed 11/07/2021.[2] Hughes, B. E., & Schell, W. J., & Tallman, B., & Beigel, R., & Annand, E., & Kwapisz, M.(2019, June), Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity onRetention Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida.10.18260/1-2--32674[3] Rand.org/education-and-labor/Grit Score, accessed 11/07/2021[4] A. Duckworth, C. Peterson, M. Matthews, and D. Kelly. “Grit: Perseverance and Passion forLong-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 92, no. 6, p. 1087– 2007.[5] Goseva-Popstojanova, K., & Hensel, R. A. (2021, July), Educating the Next Generation ofCybersecurity Experts Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Fernando Romero Galvao, University of Massachusetts Amherst; Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs

capstone levels, and prepare students for success in theconstruction industry. References[1] Hoffman, H. F. (2014). Engineering and the capstone course. In The engineering capstonecourse (pp. 1-5). Springer, Cham.[2] Lee, N., & Kim, S. J. (2020, October). A Systematic Course Design Approach to Guide theDevelopment of a Construction Engineering and Management Capstone Course. In 2020Annual Conference Northeast Section (ASEE-NE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.[3] Debs, L., Romero Moraes, F., & Benhart, B. (2022). A Review and Comparison ofAssociated Schools of Construction (ASC) Capstone Course Content. In 2022 ASC 58th AnnualSchools of Construction International Conference (pp. 577-585).[4] Cecere, J. (2002, June

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 3: Mixed - Research, Engineering Design, Design Thinking, and Curriculum Design

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julia Brisbane, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Jeremi London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Kingsley Reeves, University of South Florida

, there is a need to perform a face validity check and finalize thesurvey instruments before administering them to students. Thus, the focus of this paper is topresent the results of the face validity check t and outline next steps for the project overall.Tolerance of AmbiguityThe concept of tolerance of ambiguity (TA) was introduced by Frenkel-Brunswick [6] andduring the several decades following the concept and its measurement have evolvedconsiderably. Frenkel-Brunswick [13] defined TA as an “emotional and perceptual personalityvariable” [pg. 791]. TA has been defined many times, but MacDonald [14], whose modifiedscale was used in this study, states: “[P]ersons having high tolerance of ambiguity (a) seek out ambiguity, (b) enjoy ambiguity, and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arun Srinivasa, Texas A&M University; Rujun Gao, Texas A&M University; M Cynthia Hipwell, Texas A&M University; David Seets, Texas A&M University; Andreas Polycarpou, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson, Precise Advanced Technologies and Health Systems for Underserved Populations; Mindy Bergman

potential to address this change. Next, we helda summer workshop series to provide an “innovation mindset training” and a learning/sharingcommunity for the faculty who were selected. Rather than discuss the specific curricular change,a formal process for incremental innovation were taught to our faculty learning community basedon the idea of a hypothesized build-measure-learn-share-modify (B-T-L-S-M) Cycle. Theseworkshop sessions were led by former industry leaders experienced with culture change in abusiness environment. The faculty also enrolled in an online course on the innovation mindset.Much has been discussed and written about faculty development approaches for EngineeringFaculty [9, 10, 11, 12] and several successful strategies, some on

Conference Session

LEES 6: Writing & Communication

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Neeley, University of Virginia; Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University

7transferable align with the guiding principles that emerged in the wake of Engineering Criteria2000 and The Engineer of 2020 and allow us to establish both the commonality and the diversitywithin the ASEE engineering communication community. The changes in the distribution of thecategories over time allow us to see that integrative approaches (a) have become more commonand (b) correlate with an increase in the number of papers that render their conclusionstransferable by locating them within previous scholarship, assessing them rigorously, andarticulating the implications of their conclusions for other instructors and institutions. Thespecific features that correlate with the contribution of a paper (breadth of expertise and scope,depth in problem

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nancy Warter-Perez, California State University, Los Angeles; Daniel Galvan, California State University, Los Angeles; Jose Mijares, California State University, Los Angeles; Corin Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Gustavo Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Lizabeth Thompson, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Community college students. Dr. Thompson is a Co-PI on an NSF ADVANCE grant called KIND with other universities within the CSU. She is a co-advisor to Engineers without Borders, Critical Global Engagement, and oSTEM at Cal Poly.Gustavo B Menezes (Professor)© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Work In Progress: Developing a Faculty Community of Practice to Support a Healthy Educational EcosystemWe STEM educators often hear that so many of our students fail because they are not collegeready. But interventions at various levels, despite the hard work of implementation, have notresulted in dramatic improvements. What if, instead, the problem is that the institutional system