Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Narges Norouzi, University of California, Berkeley; Carmen Robinson, University of California, Santa Cruz; Kip Tellez, University of California, Santa Cruz

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

thetangible impacts of our program on academic success metrics, psychosocial well-being, anddepartment-level goals.Moreover, we looked into the transformation in participants’ perspectives concerningnon-academic indicators to determine whether this transformation varies across the two programmodalities: online and in-person. To achieve this, we employed A/B testing and a thoroughevaluation of pre- and post-program score distributions 13,14 . In particular, we focused on two keyresearch questions:RQ1) The overall effect of the program on students’ non-academic indicators.RQ2) The differential impacts of online versus in-person program modalities.Our preliminary results indicate that the summer bridge program positively influenced manynon-academic

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Walter C. Lee, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Malini Josiam, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

-b y-the-Numbers-cover-combined.pdf[2] W. C. Lee, J. L. Hall, M. Josiam, and C. M. Pee, “(Un)equal demands and opportunities: Conceptualizing student navigation in undergraduate engineering programs,” J. Eng. Educ., p. jee.20543, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20543.[3] W. C. Lee, M. Josiam, T. Johnson, J. Hall, C. M. Pee, and A. Turner, “Board 378: Responsive Support Structures for Marginalized Students in Engineering: Insights from Years 1–3,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Jul. 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-378-responsive-support-structures-for-marginalized-students-in-e ngineering-insights-from-years-1-3[4] M. Ong, N. Jaumot-Pascual

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Siobhan Rigby Oca, Duke University; Blake Hament, Elon University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

these processes for instructors and students andmaking sure students have access to sufficient computational power to run simulations is ahuge barrier for teaching and implementing ROS.3 Review of ROS Implementation ApproachesThere are several different options for running ROS regarding operating systems (OS). Theseoptions are discussed in-depth below and illustrated in Fig.1 and Fig.2.Figure 1: The various configurations for ROS installation include: a. directly installingLinux, b. dual-booting with Linux and Windows or Mac, c. running ROS via a Linux VMon a Windows or Mac machine, or d. running the new ROS for Mac or ROS for Windowspackages directly on the appropriate OS..3.1 Linux via Dual Boot / Local Installation3.1.1 Overview of

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 17

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University ; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

Management and Self-regulated Learning Processes,” presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2023. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/undergraduate-student-experience-with-research- facilitated-by-project-management-and-self-regulated-learning-processes[5] M. C. Linn, E. Palmer, A. Baranger, E. Gerard, and E. Stone, “Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities,” Science, vol. 347, no. 6222, p. 1261757, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1126/science.1261757.[6] K. W. Bauer and J. S. Bennett, “Alumni Perceptions Used to Assess Undergraduate Research Experience,” J. High. Educ., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 210–230, 2003.[7] A.-B. Hunter, S. L. Laursen, and E. Seymour, “Becoming a

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD) Technical Session 5

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Ball, University of Waterloo; Rachel Figueiredo, University of Waterloo; Kate Mercer, University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries Division (ELD)

Waterloo, “University of Waterloo rankings and reputation,” UndergraduatePrograms, https://uwaterloo.ca/future-students/university-of-waterloo-ranking (accessed Jan. 18,2024).[2] University of Waterloo, “Student Full-time Equivalents (FTE),” Institutional Analysis andPlanning, https://uwaterloo.ca/institutional-analysis-planning/university-data-and-statistics/student-data/student-full-time-equivalents-fte (accessed Jan. 18, 2024).[3] C.L Dym, P. Little and E.J Orwin, Engineering design: a project-based introduction, 4th Ed.Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley, 2014.[4] B. Friedman and D.G. Hendry. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping Technology with MoralImagination. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2019.[5] C. Titus, C. B. Zoltowski, and W. C. Oakes, “Designing

Conference Session

Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 1

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashley Habig, Purdue University ; Caroline K. Marete, Purdue University ; Debra Henneberry, Purdue University ; Cheng Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace Division (AERO)

students. The interviews were conducted virtually using Zoom® platform and transcribed usingZoom® transcribe. The transcripts were stored in a safe folder per the IRB requirements andwere only accessible to the research team. Transcripts were then uploaded to NVIVO® softwarefor analysis. Two researchers read each transcript twice to verify accuracy. The first read helped theresearchers familiarize themselves with the participant responses. In the second read, theresearchers developed preliminary codes (Appendix B) based on the research questions. Thecodes were revised to develop the final themes. The following seven themes emerged from thecoding process.Theme 1. Motivation for pursuing aviation as a career Motivation for

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Research Investigations in the Context of Design Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samantha Butt, University of Toronto; Elizabeth DaMaren, University of Toronto; Alison Olechowski, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

. Schar, S. Gilmartin, B. Rieken, S. Brunhaver, H. Chen, and S. Sheppard, “The Making of an Innovative Engineer: Academic and Life Experiences that Shape Engineering Task and Innovation Self-Efficacy,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28986.[3] D. P. Kelly and C. D. Denson, “Reliability and Validity for a 3-D Modeling Self-Efficacy Scale for Pre-College Students,” J. Technol. Stud., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 44–51, 2020.[4] A. R. Carberry, H. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring Engineering Design Self‐Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01043.x.[5] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy

Conference Session

Engineering Equity: Challenging Paradigms and Cultivating Inclusion in Technical Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nrupaja Bhide, Purdue University; Yash Ajay Garje, Purdue University; Siddhant Sanjay Joshi, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

.[7] N. W. Sochacka, J. Walther, J. R. Rich, and M. A. Brewer, “A Narrative Analysis of Stories Told about Engineering in the Public Discourse: Implications for Equity and Inclusion in Engineering,” Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 54, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.55.[8] H. Siegel, “Epistemological Diversity and Education Research: Much Ado About Nothing Much?,” Educational Researcher, vol. 35, pp. 3–12, 2006.[9] “The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 259–261, 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2006.tb00900.x.[10] A. Katz, J. B. Main, A. Struck Jannini, and D. Knight, “Special report: The research topics addressed

Conference Session

International Division (INTL) Technical Session: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jemal Bedane Halkiyo, Arizona State University; Sultan Bedane Halkiyu, Bule Hora University; Abdisa Bedane Halkiyu, Bule Hora University; Roma Bedane Halkiyu, Arba Minch University; Demitu Geda, Bule Hora University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2011.[6] J. B. Halkiyo, “Enhancing the Equity and Inclusivity of Engineering Education for Diverse Learners through an Innovative Instructional Design, Delivery, and Evaluation: International Students in Focus,” In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/41209[7] N. Dasgupta, M. M. Scircle, and M. Hunsinger, “Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering,” PNAS Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. Am., vol. 112, no. 16, pp. 4988–4993, 2015, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1422822112.[8] S. J. Ceci, D. K. Ginther, S. Kahn, and W. M. Williams, “Women in Academic Science: A Changing

Conference Session

Advancing Online and Hybrid Learning in Engineering Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mona ElHelbawy, University of Colorado Boulder; eric bogatin, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)

curriculum.References[1] Digilent Inc., Analog Discovery 2 https://digilent.com/reference/test-and-measurement/analog-discovery-2/start[2] Donald A. Neamen, “Microelectronics Circuit Analysis and Design,” McGraw-Hill, 4thedition, September 3, 2009, Chapter 9, pp. 621-686.[3] Giorgio Rizzoni, “Principles and Applications of Electrical Engineering,” McGraw-Hill, 3rdedition, September 3, 2001, Chapter 12, pp. 531-580.[4] Ron Mancini, “Op Amps for Everyone – Design Reference,” Texas Instruments, August 2002.[5] B. Verdin and R. V. Borries, P. A. Nava, and A. C. Butler, “An Experiment to Enhance Signalsand Systems Learning by Using Technology Based Teaching Strategies,” 2014 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. June 2014.[6] R

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division WIPS 2: Students and Peer Mentors

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Tan, Michigan Technological University; Amber Kemppainen, Michigan Technological University; Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University; A.J. Hamlin, Michigan Technological University; Matt Barron, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

comments suggest a need for varied andengaging activities to maintain motivation and interest throughout the unit. (a) (b)Figure 5. EML Results for ENG1101 Students during S09Quadrant III (Negative affect and un-learning):The comments in this quadrant highlight a decline in both mood and learning effectiveness overtime. A student expresses frustration and confusion, stating, "My mood and learning started todrop off as we kept going on with the same thing for a long time." Another student points out theonset of burnout, noting, "Burnout started to set in, and frustration built up to the point where Ifelt that my brain could not process information anymore." These experiences

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Case Studies in Design Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Lepe, University of California, Irvine; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine; Jacqueline L. Huynh, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

supporting modules designed to assist themwith their project. Figure 2. Sample drag project plot deliverables where (a) models the parasitic, induced, and total drag trend versus velocity and (b) represents the lift to drag ratio behavior defining the operating condition at 𝑳/𝑫𝒎𝒂𝒙 .Development of Course ModulesEach module was designed to support students through a scaffolding process such that relevantexamples and methods were presented, but students had to apply this knowledge to their ownproject. The creation of these materials was done using backwards design development [13] suchthat the learning objective and end goal was used to determine critical information, assessments,and evaluation. The learning objectives outlined

Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED) Technical Session 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia Kay Pickering, Arizona State University; Erik Fisher, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)

work and career self-efficacy developed across the three studies.5.1 Study 1: Improving a technical solution using Spanish Translation as a Cultural AssetStudy 1 took place at local 2-year HSI 1, where paid student interns engaged in lab-based,hands-on projects to test digital divide equipment configurations. After introductory training,each intern was assigned a piece of equipment which was a solution component within theoverall system to be deployed at a local Title I high school district and its feeder schools.In Study 1, an example of SocioTechnical Learning by participant B, a Hispanic male, standsout: Spanish translation of instructions to setup equipment. This example occurred during thehands-on project to test “WiFi” devices and create

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ashley Y. Tran, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Debapratim Ghosh, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Samuel Harford, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Houshang Darabi, The University of Illinois at Chicago; Jennifer R Amos, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. Theinterview questions were designed to explore each participant’s specific major selection process.These questions focus on three overarching themes; participants’ personal experiences of theirmajor, specific factors that influenced their choice, and what sources were used to help informtheir decision. Occasionally, follow-up questions were asked to elicit further details or to clarifyresponses. At the end of each interview, the students were asked if there was any additionalinformation they would like to add about their respective major choice. Table 1. Interview questions broken out by category. a. Personal experience b. Influential factor questions c. Informative source questions

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3: Student Experiences and Support

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Herman Ronald Clements III, Purdue University; Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

Paper ID #44464Encountering Axiology: Engineering Graduate Students’ Experiences withValues in an Engineering Research CenterMr. Herman Ronald Clements III, Purdue University H. Ronald Clements is an engineering graduate student at Purdue University.Alexander V Struck Jannini, Purdue University Alex is a Ph.D. Candidate in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He is interested in furthering the use of motivational theory in engineering education research, and investigating how departmental culture can affect students’ persistence. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Encountering

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 10: Special Topics and Innovative Methods in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zahra Pournorouz, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

specifications. b. Simulation Results: Analysis and optimization results from simulation tools, demonstrating the performance and efficiency of the components. c. Design Documentation: Technical reports detailing the design process, methodology, and outcomes, including AI integration strategies and simulation methodologies. (A report template was provided on Canvas)Week 16: Project Due DateStudents will create a professional presentation summarizing the project objectives,methodology, findings, and recommendations, highlighting the innovative features andperformance enhancements achieved through their project.Results:The integration of EVs and AI has significantly transformed the course on AutomotiveEngineering. Students engaged in

Conference Session

Virtual and Augmented Reality Application in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Devi Kalla, Metropolitan State University of Denver

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

about a physical system, which should include all information regardingthe system asset that could be obtained from its thorough inspection of the physical system. ADT model comprises three main parts: a) the real world, b) the virtual world and c) theconnections of information associating the virtual with the real world, with the digital twinserving as a digital controller of the real-world manufacturing system [5]. Besides DT, anotherkey technology for improving the performance in manufacturing systems is ArtificialIntelligence (AI). As AI technology becomes more mature and affordable, new applications canbe introduced in production systems to support manufacturers on complex decision-making andin their business processes. Fig. 1 shows the

Conference Session

Diverse Pathways: Exploring Inclusive Practices and Outreach in Engineering Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lexy Chiwete Arinze, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Jacqueline E McDermott, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Janet M Beagle

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

year. While graduate schooltransition and support programs exist at institutions across the country [6], [7], [8], this studyexplores whether GradTrack stretches between the silos of a) undergraduate preparation forgraduate admissions and b) graduate school support and success, due to its unique structure ofengaging both undergraduate student mentees and graduate student mentors.The purpose of this study is to understand how undergraduate focused programs, like GradTrack,help set students up for success in graduate school. This study’s longitudinal approach followsparticipants into their graduate studies, providing much needed insight into the longer-termimpacts of this program. Through focus groups and survey data, this study assesses the

Conference Session

Homer's Handy Homework: STEM Adventures from Sofa to School, Mmm... STEM

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Turhan K. Carroll, University of Georgia; Jessica R Hoehn, University of Colorado Boulder; Noah D Finkelstein, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

students (grades 3-6) in PISEC across the two semesters.The student body at Site A is 83.4% Hispanic/Latino, 12.5% white, and 80% economicallydisadvantaged. Site B is a middle school that enrolled 26 unique students (grades 6-8) in PISECacross the two semesters. The student body at Site B is 52.5% Hispanic/Latino, 40.5% white, and53% economically disadvantaged. Site C is a middle school that only ran PISEC in the secondsemester; they enrolled 10 students (grade 7). The student body at Site C is 63.9%Hispanic/Latino, 31.2% white, and 76% economically disadvantaged. Due to current schooldistrict policies, we are unable to collect demographic information from students and families.We report the demographics of the schools and are confident that the

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 6: Belonging

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlyn Pope, Utah State University; Cassandra McCall, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student Division (STDT)

,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD: ASEE, 2023.[4] C. McCall, L. D. McNair, and D. R. Simmons, “Advancing from outsider to insider: A grounded theory of professional identity negotiation in undergraduate engineering,” J Eng Educ, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 393–413, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1002/jee.20383.[5] R. Stevens, A. Johri, and K. O’Connor, “Professional Engineering Work,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 1st ed., A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 119–138. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.010.[6] H. Tajfel, “Social identity and intergroup behaviour,” Social Science Information, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 65–93, Apr. 1974

Conference Session

Student Engagement in Construction Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rubaya Rahat, Florida International University; Mohamed ElZomor P.E., Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

, pp. 1–8, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-5740.2003.00071.x.[2] A. P. de Moura, L. M. Cunha, U. M. Azeiteiro, L. Aires, P. Graça, and M. D. V. de Almeida, “Food consumer science post-graduate courses: Comparison of face-to-face versus online delivery systems,” Br. Food J., vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 544–556, 2010, doi: 10.1108/00070701011043781.[3] A. Khan, O. Egbue, B. Palkie, and J. Madden, “Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 107– 115, 2017.[4] D. Allen and K. Tanner, “Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex,” Cell Biol. Educ., vol. 4, no. WINTER, pp

Conference Session

MECH - Technical Session 7: Assessment and Evaluation in Engineering Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Simon Li, University of Calgary; Yves Pauchard, University of Calgary; Ahmad Ghasemloonia, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

gradinginstruments include examinations and technical reports. When a grading approach is perceived as“traditional,” we characterize three possible features associated with this perception.#1: Judgemental. Traditional grading scales tend to have medium (e.g., A / B / C / D / F) to high(e.g., percentages) levels of granularity, which may not be effectively mapped to the learningoutcomes. For example, it could be difficult to articulate the difference of two students who get75% and 80%, respectively, in view of their learning outcomes. As a result, the received gradescan be associated as personal values (e.g., how good am I as a student) and competition (e.g., Iam better than another student). The classical study by Butler [3] has shown that the ego-involving

Conference Session

Programming Education 2

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Dillon, Morgan State University; Krystal L. Williams, University of Georgia; Ashley Simone Pryor, Morgan State University; Theodore Wimberly Jr., Morgan State University; Mariah McMichael, Morgan State University; Abisola Mercy Arowolaju; Donald Bernard Davis, Morgan State University; Toluwanimi Ayodele, Morgan State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education Division (COED)

thestudents’ experience with command line tools. From an assessment standpoint, it is the plan toconvert the virtual assessments to in-person assessments to control for any confounding factorsrelated to outside resources these students could lean upon to assist them during these case studyinteractions. From a scalability perspective, it is also the plan to expand this work and seekcollaborations with colleagues at other institutions who value the importance of this work,especially those with interests in programming pedagogy, computational learning, and technicalskill development in the classroom.AcknowledgementsThis current work is funded by the National Science Foundation NSF-EDU 2011793.References[1] R. Brown, J. Davis, S. A. Rebelsky, and B

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nyna Jaye DeWitt, University of Georgia; Animesh Paul, University of Georgia; John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

adapted from “Engineering InstructionAction Team (E-IAT): Improving Teaching Methods in Engineering” [1] Flipped Classroom Instrument Lecture-Based Classroom Instrument Section A: Prior to classroom observations Section A: Prior to classroom observations The observer reviews the course material on The observer reviews the course material on the course LMS, meet with the instructor to the course LMS, meet with the instructor to discuss the approach to the course, student discuss the approach to the course, student challenges and issues, and plan for observed challenges and issues, and plan for observed lessons lessons Section B: Flipped Classroom

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi M Sherick, University of Michigan; Valerie N Johnson, University of Michigan; Heather Wagenschutz, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

abundance gaps. This sixth session also featured a well-receivedpositive leadership card game, in which class participants presented real-life requests for helpand other players shared cards to recommend particular strategies.Figure 2: Timeline and content for Michigan Engineering Positive Leadership ProgramA sizable chunk of learning occurred outside of the formal sessions, in accordance with thepattern of learning, experimentation, and reflection. From the outset, each participant receivedthe entire purchased curriculum with links to videos, articles, and reflection questions to allowfor self-paced learning and further dissemination. (See Appendix B for reflection questions.)Prior to each session, the faculty developers invited participants to

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jelena Trajkovic, California State University, Long Beach ; Lisa M Martin-Hansen, California State University, Long Beach; Anna Bargagliotti, Loyola Marymount University; Christine Alvarado, University of California, San Diego; Cassandra M Guarino, University of California, Riverside; Janel Ancayan, California State University, Long Beach; Joseph Alex Chorbajian, California State University, Long Beach; Kent Vi, California State University, Long Beach

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

likely than their male counterparts to leave CS programsafter receiving a “B” grade [50]. Therefore, the perception of success (grade, and test scorepercentage) differs significantly across genders and might be a significant indicator of retentionand graduation. Additionally, Panic and Clarke-Midura [45] found that despite the unequalrepresentation of genders in computer science, gender is not a significant predictor of a student’sability to perform well in computer science. Interviews with females revealed a mix of opinionson whether gender was a problem in CS [51]. Some agreed gender was a problem, some wereneutral, and some were frustrated with the focus on gender [51]. We want to explore the impact ofGender and Race/Ethnicity using updated

Conference Session

Project/Problem Based Learning (PBL) in Construction Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohsen Garshasby, Mississippi State University; Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University; Mohsen Goodarzi, Ball State University; Ali Garshasbi, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

. Abdul-Aziz, “Anoverview of the construction industry,” Build. Maint. Process. Pract. Case Fast Dev. Ctry., pp.9–32, 2015.[4] B. Becerik-Gerber, D. J. Gerber, and K. Ku, “The Pace of Technological Innovation inArchitecture, Engineering, and Construction Education: Integrating Recent Trends Into theCurricula,” 2011, Accessed: Oct. 22, 2021. [Online]. Available:https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/92598[5] Z. Torbica, “Design and Implementation of an Integrated Curriculum: A Case Study,”Proc. Int. Conf. Future Teach. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Aug. 2023, doi:10.33422/icfte.v2i1.59.[6] W. Wu, A. Tesei, S. Ayer, J. London, Y. Luo, and V. Gunji, “Closing the Skills Gap:Construction and Engineering Education Using Mixed Reality

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ibrahim H. Yeter, Nanyang Technological University; Xue Jia Xie, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Jeffrey D Radloff, The State University of New York at Cortland; Michael Jin Khoo

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

, published inEnglish between 2011 and 2023, and relevant to the research question. A content analysismethod was applied to examine the articles (n = 27) that satisfied the inclusion criteria. PSTs'perceptions of integrated STEM education were influenced, according to preliminaryfindings, by the following variables: (a) prior knowledge and experiences with STEMeducation; (b) beliefs about STEM education; (c) perceived benefits and challenges ofintegrated STEM education; (d) available support and resources; and (e) professionaldevelopment opportunities. The paper also addresses the theoretical and educationalimplications of the results for the planning and implementation of integrated STEMprofessional development programs for policymakers and

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

JAMES WANLISS, Anderson University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)

deeplearning. It is likely that the integration of deep learning courses into undergraduate engineeringprograms will be a growing trend in response to the increasing importance of AI and ML indiverse engineering disciplines.AcknowledgmentThis research was partially funded by National Science Foundation Award AGS-2414513 and theNIH R-25 Program.References[1] J. Clerk Maxwell, “On governors,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Vol. 16 (1867-1868), pp. 270-283.[2] Mayr, O., 1971. “Victorian physicists and speed regulation: An encounter between science and technology.” Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 26(2), pp.205-228.[3] Edwards, P. A.; McKay, B. J.; Sink, C. W. First year chemistry laboratory calculations on a

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 3 - Courses: development, logistics, and impact

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meghana Parameswarappa Jayalakshmamma, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

, skilled, andmotivated workforce ready to address future technological challenges. Hence,encouraging educators and policymakers to reconsider the traditional separationbetween research and education, fostering a more agile and responsiveengineering workforce prepared for the challenges of the future.5. References[1] J. E. Froyd, "Evidence for the efficacy of student-active learning pedagogies," Project Kaleidoscope, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64-74, 2007.[2] J. Lucena, G. Downey, B. Jesiek, and S. Elber, "Competencies beyond countries: the re‐organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America," Journal of engineering education, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 433-447, 2008.[3] N. Spinks, N. Silburn