communicates with the Bluetooth USBmodule on Computer-A. The Bluetooth USB module driver software on Computer-A creates alocal virtual COM port. The TCP-COM software installed on Computer-A in the server modetakes the serial data from virtual COM port and retransmits it to Computer-B over the Ethernetnetwork by using the TCP/IP network protocol. Another instance of the TCP-COM softwareinstalled on Computer-B in the client mode, converts the data received using TCP/IP protocol toa local virtual COM port on Computer-B. The Hyperterminal communication program onComputer-B receives and transmits serial data through the local virtual COM port, therebyestablishing a two way communication channel with the PIC micro-controller as seen in thefollowing Figure 2
indeterminate problem. Using the load-displacement relationship, aswell as the fact that the relative displacement between the bone and nail is 0, the followingrelationships can be developed:where F is force, L is the length, A is the cross-sectional area, % is the percent of bone loss, E isthe elastic modulus, and σ is the stress. The subscript B represents values of the bone, and thesubscript N represents values of the nail. Synthes, the producer of the nail and screws, uses atitanium alloy Ti–6Al–7Nb.[6] Therefore, the elastic modulus used for the nail was 114GPa,[7]and the elastic modulus for the bone was 18.6GPa.[8.9] Due to their complex geometries, thearea of the nail was calculated as an area formed by 2 concentric circles, while the area of
should be investigated throughexperimentation, and pointed toward the laboratory equipment they will need to conduct theexperiments. In this project, students were responsible for: (a) identifying the input parametersthat would be investigated, (b) identifying existing analytical methods for characterizingdependent variables, (c) developing new analytical methods for characterizing behavior where anexisting formalized approach did not exist, (d) creating an experimental matrix that summarizedthe key parameters under evaluation during each run of the experiment, and (e) developingsuitable datasheets, lab notebooks, and other data storage methods for collecting and preservingthe results of experimentation. Because students are typically unfamiliar
. Students are evaluated on their performance in answering metrics contained in the assignment and rubric. Student performance is divided into four categories: exceptional (A-‐level), effective (B-‐level), acceptable (C-‐level) or unsatisfactory (D-‐F level). Students are also given a survey to examine their perception of their understanding and confidence in answering the learning goals. Test Sites The research team is actively recruiting test sites. The learning modules have been implemented at the University of Texas – Pan American and will implemented in the Spring 2011 semester at Texas Tech University. Acknowledgements Initial funding for
: Page 22.144.2LIBRARY IEEE;USE IEEE.STD_LOGIC_1164.ALL;USE STD.TEXTIO.ALL;Example of ENTITY part for a three inputs OR gate with inputs A,B, C and output D is:ENTITY OR ISPORT(A, B, C :IN STD_LOGIC; D :OUT STD_LOGIC);END OR;Example of Architecture part for a three inputs OR gate with inputs A, B, C, and output D is:ARCHITECTURE OR OF OR ISBEGIND <= A OR B OR C;END OR;Following is an example of 32KB SRAM (Static Random Access Memory) with active low read,write, and chip select inputs. Memory has 15 address lines and 8 data lines.LIBRARY IEEE;USE IEEE.std_logic_1164.ALL;ENTITY sram is PORT ( nCS: in STD_LOGIC; nOE: in STD_LOGIC; nWE: in STD_LOGIC; addr: in STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (14 downto 0); data: inout
digitaldatabase, the Engineering Village, or the Compendex, which provides a comprehensive coverageof literature in all engineering fields. Unsupported assertion or claims were a basis of rejectionor grade reduction of the project grade.A wide range of topics were covered, including medical applications, sports, hydraulic machines,weather, and flow measurement devices. The topics covered included: A. Lab on a Chip: Principles, Functionality, and Operation of Various Components B. Man-Made Non-Newtonian Fluids: Study of the development of different types of fluids to understand blood flow, heart related, and cancer treatment C. Liquid Jet Cutting Technology and Applications D. Deteriorating Dams E. Dams structures F. Wind flow effects on
. In 2008, students in the pre-freshmen engineering program did not receive the critical thinking intervention, and thereforewere part of the control group, Group B. Group A consisted of 50 students while Group B had atotal of 40 students participate in the study. The total number of students participating in thestudy was 90, which provided an adequate sample of students out of the 500 students enrolled inEngineering at Morgan State University. Qualitative data were gathered from participants inGroup A since they were part of the experimental group who participated in the critical thinkingintervention. The Cornell Critical Thinking Test Level X was designed by Ennis, Millman, and Tomko(2005). The authors claimed the standardized test
. Coelho and G. Murphy. ClassCompass: A software design mentoring system. ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 7(1):Article 2, Mar. 2007. [3] M. Dahm. Grammar and API for Rational Rose petal files. http://crazybeans.sourceforge.net/CrazyBeans/doc/grammar.pdf, 2001. Retrieved January, 2011. [4] C. R. B. de Souza, H. L. R. Oliveira, C. R. P. da Rocha, K. M. Gonc¸alves, and D. F. Redmiles. Using critiquing systems for inconsistency detection in software engineering models. In SEKE, pages 196–203, 2003. [5] A. Egyed. UML/Analyzer: A tool for the instant consistency checking of UML models. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 793–796. IEEE Computer Society, 2007. [6] M
interest in evaluating the progress of our program underABET criterion 3 through the Engineering Senior Design Program. ABET criterion 3 specifiesthe following outcomes: (a) An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b) An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; (c) An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability; (d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams; (e) An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems; (f) An understanding of professional and
] Prince, M., and M. Vigeant (2006). Using inquiry-based activities to promote understanding of criticalengineering concepts. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, Chicago, IL.[13] Steif, P.S. (2004). An articulation of concepts and skills which underlie engineering statics. Proceedings of the34th Frontiers in Education Conference, Savannah, GA.[14] Miller, R.L., Streveler, R. A., Olds, B. M., Nelson, M. A., & Giest, M. R. (2005). Concept inventories meetcognitive psychology: Using beta testing as a mechanism for identifying engineering student misconceptions.Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR.[15] Streveler, R
. Volunteering, community service Employee Group A and engagement Pre-college engagement, Employee Group B Corporations recruiting for the engineering field University engagement, Employee Group C recruiting engineering majorsFigure 1: Corporate Engagement Models Students graduating and being hired into corporations EPICS Program
AC 2011-1889: FLUID DYNAMICS ART EXPLORATION: AN UNDER-GRADUATE RESEARCH COURSERobyn Akemi Nariyoshi Recently graduated in 2010, with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pacific, Robyn now works as a private math and physics tutor and volunteers her spare time at the Exploratorium.Said Shakerin, University of the Pacific Said Shakerin has been with the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of the Pacific since 1986. He was department chairman in the mid 1990s but stepped down due to a medical condition. He is a professional engineer in the state of California and he received his education from Arya-Mehr (now Sharif) University of Technology in Iran, Portland State University
discussion we would have in class about it. Q3. I found that the online preparation assignments and the discussions we had in class about them helped me learn the course material better. Q4. When an answer I submitted was discussed by the class I felt: excited, embarrassed, apprehensive, interested, I don't think my answers were presented to the class Q5. In your opinion, which of these options would motivate students to prepare for class by doing the reading assignments? A. Daily quizzes over the reading B. Pop quizzes over the reading C. Online preparation assignments (as done in this course) D. Nothing, just
can be applied to other science and engineering courses. The authorsplan to extend this strategy to 2 other courses over the next three years. The method presented inthis study may be used elsewhere in the nation with appropriate modifications in order to helpour students acquire the knowledge they need to make informed decisions about technology. Page 22.577.5Bibliography1. Ollis, D. (2008). ―Technology Literacy as A Path to ‗Engineering Solutions in A Global and Societal Context‖.2. Wright, G., Boss, B., Bates D., and Terry, R. (2010). ―Assessing Technology Literacy and The Use ofEngineering and Technology Curricula by Utah K-12
No response Clear/positive Unclear/negative No response response response response response (a) (b) Q3. How are robots and math related? Q4. Where can you use mathematics? Pre-activity Post-activity Pre-activity Post-activity 54.5 45.5 95.5
calculusperformance, it does suggest a positive effect in several areas. Firstly, although the freshmanclass of 2009 appears to have the same single semester drop-out rates as years previous, the twosemester drop rates imply a decrease. It is possible that this is within variance between classesbut it also may be the result of improved calculus performance. Secondly, it can also be inferredfrom the analysis of the data presented in Figure 1 that, although D’s and F’s in the course do notdecrease the course mainly helps B students become A students.Modifications and SummaryFor the fall 2010 offering of ENGR-1113 Foundations of Engineering Math several alterationswere made to the existing original class model in an attempt to further increase the
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2011, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 2. How CATME displays student feedback.The average for each team member for each criterion for the two times the CATME tool wasused is shown in Table 2.Student’s Responses to their Peer’s AssessmentAfter the first students took the first CATME survey, they students were asked to respond to thequestions below. a. Compare and contrast your self evaluation to the evaluation of your peers. Discuss any differences. b. How will you improve your performance in the future? The Catme.org website gives specific information on improving your
Page 22.1005.2group. NRC observed that all new learning involves transfer based on previous learning5.Transfer is a degree of understanding beyond memorization; it indicates the ability to processinformation and integrate knowledge in new contexts. Three influences for successful transferinclude (a) the degree of mastery of the original matter, (b) transfer, and (c) time to learn.Without an adequate level of initial learning, transfer cannot take place. It was also observedthat the time to learn is proportional to the amount of material being learned. Bandura observedsimilar developmental stages in his social learning theory6. He suggested three stages thatprogresses from the preparatory stage, through play stage, to the game stage. At the
separated by courses. Studygroup attendance was broken into 5 categories: frequent (9 or more out of 13 study groupsattended), regular (6-8), infrequent (3-5), minimal (1-2), and none (0). Grades were divided byrange: “A” consists of all A and A- grades, “B” consists of all B+, B, and B- grades, “C” and“D” are similar to the “B” designation, and “F/WD” contains all grades of F and mid-semesterwithdrawals from the course. These were done to avoid having the data parsed into groups toosmall for reasonable analysis. Even with this breakdown, it is clear that data from future yearsare needed before definitive conclusions on the effectiveness of the study groups can be drawn.Furthermore, secondary future impacts such as improved retention and graduation
research method allows the collection, analysis, andinterpretation of information by a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods within thesame study (Creswell 19993; Morgan 19984). This method uses qualitative data that may becollected and analyzed separately from the quantitative data, giving diverse perspectives of thecollected information and a better understanding of a phenomenon of study. Two sequentialstages define the methodology of the study: a) an initial phase in which qualitative data on thekey requirements for re-designing the course syllabus and instruction strategy was collected andanalyzed, and b) a second phase in which the effectiveness of the proposed instruction approachwas evaluated and statistically validated with
thee land develo opment desiggn professionn.”The CCE EC is chairedd by a professsional enginneer not otheerwise affiliaated with thee University, andis compriised of otherr practicing engineers e an nd Universityy faculty. AAmong the w ways the CCE EC isimprovinng land development dessign educatio on at the Uniiversity are: 1) ensuring that landdevelopmment design is accepted by b the facultty as a “speccialty” area w within the CE EE curriculuum,2) expandding the Uniiversity’s off ffering of lan
% 18% 15% 13% 10% 9% 5% 4% 1% 0% 0% A or A+ A- (3.5-3.8) B+ (3.2- B (2.9-3.1) B- (2.5-2.8) C+ (2.2- C (1.9-2.1) C- or lower (i.e., 3.9 or 3.4) 2.4
that shoould be incluuded in Research R h quuality/processs managemeent course taaught as a paart of graduaate EM S Stages cuurriculum • (B B) Prioritizinng the identiffied topics too assess theirr relative criiticality Research R h • A list of idenntified and prrioritized sett of topics thhat might aid d the E program EM m directors annd course deevelopers to designd and F Findings
-effective conversion project would inspire other students andeducators to pursue development of similar projects not only for saving money but also to gainan educational experience that would make the live a little greener. Page 22.381.14References 1. Leitman, S. and Brant, B.; Build Your Own Electric Vehicle, McGraw Hill, 1993. 2. Johnson, C.; “Physics In an Automotive Engine,” http://mb-soft.com/public2/engine.html 3. Carr, B.; “Are Electric Cars the Answer to the Growing Environmental Problems?”, March 30th, 2007. http://www.dailyfueleconomytip.com/gas-saving-innovations/are-electric-cars-the- answer-to-the-growing
the coil. Asimplified schematic of the prototype design is shown in Figure 3 (Note: Figure 3 was drawnwith only 12 coil/magnet pairs for clarity). (a) (b) Figure 3 – (a) Wind Turbines: Common Blade-Type Wind Turbine (left) versus FloDesign Compact Shrouded Wind Turbine (right) (Image reproduced with permission from FloDesign, Inc.); (b) Simplified diagram of the FloDesign solutionChallenge 3: Cape Cod Cranberry PartnersThe Cape Cod Cranberry Partners Challenge brought together partners from three organizations
are: a) students can write down mathematics ina programming-like way, using symbolic notations; b) less time spent with calculations leavesmore time for physical analysis; c) geometric visualization of results; d) learning and becomingproficient in a high-level programming language; and e) there availability of free softwareapplications, using well-documented algorithms. Derive and MathCAD are already implementedon a pocket calculator, and more extensive packages, such as Mathematica and Maple, run onany desktop computer. In several branches of mathematics, physics and engineering, computeralgebra systems have been increasingly popular as a tool for constructing proofs, solutions andvisualizing the results. Also in introductory mathematics
some excuse as to why he has beenunable to complete his assignment. J. T.‟s lack of follow-through has placed the group seriouslybehind schedule on at least two sub-components.In your analysis of this case, discuss the impact that J. T.‟s behavior is having on the group.What factors may be impacting J. T.‟s ability to complete his tasks? Below are several optionsfor how the group might deal with J. T.‟s behavior. Discuss the pros and cons of each. Describewhat you feel might be the most effective approach and provide justification. a) Complain to the project manager about J. T.‟s behavior and ask her to talk to J. T. b) Ask that the project manager replace J. T. on the team. c) Ignore J. T.‟s behavior and reassign his work to another
Work (SOW) a. Period of performance; minimum 8-14 weeks b. Research & development requirements c. Statement of Work agreed to by Corporate Partner, University Engineering Page 22.882.4 Department, and the Student d. Cost and Schedule requirements3 e. 2-3 presentations at corporate partner facility f. 1-2 presentations to university representative(s) g. Sr. Project Work log to indicate effort during paid time and personal time associated with Senior Project effort. h. A final presentation of work done and/or product demonstration i
collegestudents can aid in answering that question. Consider two college students independentlystudying for an exam; each student has an entire day that can be used for studying. Student Xstudies for three hours and ultimately earns a B- on the exam. That was fairly efficient – smallamount of resources (time) was used for an acceptable grade – but not necessarily very effectiveas the desired outcome is an A. Student Y studies for ten hours and ultimately earns an A on theexam. That is very effective but could be viewed as inefficient. In this scenario, the amount ofresources used is not so important as each student had an entire day available. The importantthing is getting to the desired outcome. In the same manner, efficiency is not a worthwhilemeasure
Page 22.847.3emphasis on mathematics and science, as well as other traditional EE courses. However, itindeed has a heavy hands-on learning component comprising the core PBL courses. Table 1: Eight-semester course plan for B.S.E.E degree Electrical Engineering ‐ B. S. Degree – Western Carolina University Suggested Course Plan Fall Semester Hours Spring Semester Hours ENGL 101 Composition I 3 ENGL 102 Composition II 3 MATH 153 Calculus I