categories and has highlighted the key lessons learned that they believe are Page 22.402.11transferable to other projects and institutions seeking to exchange students. Appendix A. Faculty Mobility Application !"#$%#&'#$&()*+#),'&-*./0('(&-* 1232454*6&'#$&(%*5!7*.#%&8"9%*:"/;8)&*!* ?"/@(A8%* :,"A,8B* 2:C* #$A* D7!* =#),'&-* E* E(%*A8@8'/?>8$&*#$AH/"*/&<8"*"8'8@#$&*#)#A8>()* #$A* %)'#"'-* #)&(@(&(8%B* #$* /??/"&,$(&-* &/* ?"/?/%8* %,)?'8&8A*=/">%*&/*D"4*J#"8&#&(/$4*O
: The most common system used in the late 1800s and early 1900s consisted of a roof tank(s) combined with constant-speed pumps that operated by a level switch in the tank. When the level in the tank would approach a pre-determined height, the pumps would either turn on to fill the tank(s) or turn off when the tank is full (Larson, 2007). Water storage was also required for fire protection, and tanks provided for both needs. The water is distributed using gravity downfeed arrangement. b. Multiple zones: High zone tank and low zone tank: If multiple zones were required, multiple tanks were used. An air gap creates a pressure break between the upper and lower zones. The tanks must be
the outcome variable explained by the addition of eachblock.Qualitative Case Study Methods. The P360 study, designed as a companion study to thequantitative P2P study, used case study techniques to examine exemplary engineering educationpractices at six four-year U. S. institutions of higher education. Cases were selected based upona) empirical identification (using data from another study) of the institutions “out-performing”others in producing graduates with at least some of the attributes of “the engineer of 2020;” b)number of engineering degrees awarded in selected fields with particular reference to womenand/or underrepresented minority groups and c) input from a national advisory board. Teams ofeducational researchers, engineering
Technology Source Archives at the University of NorthCarolina, November/December 2003[9]- Balancing the Learning Equation: Exploring Effective Mixtures of Technology, Teaching, and Learning byBonnie B. Mullinix and David McCurry , The Technology Source Archives at the University of North Carolina,September/October 2003[10]- Classroom Assessment Techniques in Asynchronous Learning Networks by Tom Henderson, The TechnologySource Archives at the University of North Carolina, September/October 2001[11]- Creating Online Courses: A Step-by-Step Guide by William R. Klemm, The Technology Source Archives atthe University of North Carolina, May/June 2001[12]- Distance Learning and Synchronous Interaction by Joel Foreman, The Technology Source Archives at
design and application.City Tech students will benefit tremendously through these integrated concurrent engineeringand mechatronic product design activities. In addition, by introducing the Learning ProductsDesigns through Hands-on Robotics Projects, the impact of NYC public high school and NYCindustry partners will be significant.9. AcknowledgementThe work is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation Advanced TechnologyEducation Division. The award number is NSF ATE No DUE-1003712. The authors appreciategreatly the support from the NSF.10. References1. David G. Alciatore and Michael B. Histand, “Introduction to Mechatronics and Measurement Systems”, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill Company, 2007.2. W. Bolton, “Mechatronics
additional cost.4.0 assessmentEvaluation of student projects is based on pedagogical criteria that assess achievement oflearning objectives – (a) objective lighting criteria and (b) subjective achievement of both designgoals and consumer education. Data is obtained in two phases: preliminary data from the lightinglab pilot and succeeding data from the Habitat for Humanity design component. Data in bothphases includes student feedback and evaluation by the instructor, as well as student achievementdata.Pilot project data has dual value: 1. for evaluation to design improvements to light source experimentation in the lighting lab, and Page
of robotics education: The design and creationof interactive notebooks for teaching robotic concepts. IEEE International Conference on Technologies forPractical Robotic Applications. Woburn, MA.13. Kolodner, J., Camp, P., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M.(2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom:Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Science, 12(4), 495-547.14. Duckworth, E., Piaget takes a teacher’s look. Learning, 2(2), 1973, pp. 22-27.15. Hynes, M., Crismond, D., Danahy, E. (2010). Using RoboBooks to teach middle school engineeringand robotics. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education
the UNL-COE system, transferstudents will be better prepared to learn and work with others at UNL and the college to beoutstanding engineering students. Through diverse teaching strategies such as lecture, groupdiscussion, individual assignments, and team learning, students are exposed to the followingtopics: (a) academic accountability, (b) introduction to UNL academic online systems, (c)developing relationships with advisers and faculty, (d) ensuring transfer of credits, (e) careerdevelopment strategies and goals, (f) campus involvement activities, (g) graduate school andresearch opportunities, (f) study abroad and international internships, (g) introduction to transfershock, and (h) development and implementation of long and short-term
Teachers to Teach Engineering”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 89, No. 1, pp. 31-38, 2000.15. Dennis, N. D., “ExCEEd Teaching Workshop: Taking It on the Road”, 2001 ASEE Conference & Exposition: Peppers, Papers, Pueblos, and Professors; Albuquerque, NM, pp. 24-27, 2001.16. Kislenko, K, and Grevholm, B., “The Likert Scale used in Research on Affect – A Short Discussion on Terminology and Appropriate Analysing Methods” Page 22.824.14
, NY. T2G 17-21 3. Chen, J.C. and Huang, B., 2007, “Customers Voice based Manufacturing Curriculum Development using Quality Function Deployment (QFD)”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology Education, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 5-14. 4. David L Hallowell, “QFD: When and How Does It Fit in Software Development?” Available on iSixSigma LLC’s website (URL: http://software.isixsigma.com/library/content/c040707b.asp) 5. Glenn H. Mazur, 1996, “The Application of Quality Function Deployment (QFD) To Design A Course In a Total Quality Management (TQM) at the University of Michigan College of Engineering”, International Conference on ICQ 1996, Yokohama 6. Kenneth Crow, 2002, “Customer focused
. Evans, "The Use of Elluminate Distance-Learning Software in Engineering Education," Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June, 2007.6. M. Plett, D. Peter, S. Parsons, and B. Gjerding, "The Virtual Synchronous Classroom: Real Time Off-Campus Classroom Participation with Adobe Connect," Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, June, 2008.7. Dale N. Buechler, “Can Pen Tablets be used to improve the Performance of Place-Bound Engineering Students?,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASEE Annual Conference, Louisville, KY, June, 2010.8. Mark Holdhusen, “A Comparison Of Engineering Graphics Courses Delivered Face To Face, On Line, Via Synchronous Distance Education, and In Hybrid Formats
and Hearing a Freshman Engineering Student Think. 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.3. Grigg, S., Bowman, D. and Benson, L. (2011). Technology Adoption Behaviors in a First Year Engineering Classroom. 2011 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.4. Jonassen, D.H. and Tessmer, M. (1997). An outcomes-based taxonomy for instructional systems design, evaluation, and research. Training Research Journal 2:11-46.5. Wong, R.M.F., Lawson, M.J. and Keeves, J. (2002). The effects of self-explanation training on students’ problem solving in high-school mathematics. Learning and Instruction 12: 233–262.6. Olszewski, B., Macey and Lindsrom (2006). The practical work of coding: An ethnomethodological inquiry. Human Studies 29:363-380
AC 2011-1064: TOWARDS MORE EFFECTIVE TEACHING STRATEGIESOF ITERATION AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT IN SPACECRAFT DE-SIGNHadi Ali, Purdue University Hadi Ali is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He holds a B.S. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University and a B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Jordan. He earned his Masters degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Purdue University majoring in aerospace systems design. He is also pursuing a Masters degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue. Hadi is a student member of AIAA, IEEE, ASME, and SAE.Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Assistant Professor in
. Page 22.346.16References1 Roy S. Czernikowski, Margaret B. Bailey, David A. Borkholder, Matthew M. Marshall, Alan H. Nye, and N.Richard Reeve. (2007) RIT’s Engineering Honors Program: Product Innovation in a Global Economy. 37thASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. T2A9-T2A152 William E. Lee III. (2002) Humanities Awareness: A Comparison Between Honors Program and TraditionalUndergraduate Engineering Students. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference & Exposition.3 Gregory Tonkay, E.Zimmers. (2007) Migration from a Leadership Honors Program to an Engineering LeadershipMinor. American Society for Engineering Education.4 Kathleen A.K. Ossman. (2005) Enhancing the Education of Engineering
. Although the fractionof retained students (Figure 3 (a)) in each of the groups who enrolled in Calculus I varied widely(from 37.6% for COE to 100% for FORCES), the pass rates were essentially the same for thethree groups (around 55%). For students who were not retained (Figure 3(b)), there was alsowide variation in the fraction enrolled in Calculus I (from 27.0% for COE to 100% forFORCES); however 30.2% of COE students who left engineering within the first year passedCalculus I, while none of the FIG students who left the program passed the course. Forcomparison, the pass rate for all students enrolled in Calculus I in Fall 2009 was 35.7%.Students who enrolled in Calculus I or higher were retained through the first year at higher ratesthan
] R.R. Schaller, "Moore's law: past, present and future", IEEE Spectrum, Vol. 34, Issue 6, pp. 52-59,Jun. 1997.[3] Microprocessor quick reference guide, URL: http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/quickreffam.htm.[4] ITRS (International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2009 Summary, URL:http://www.itrs.net/Links/2009ITRS/Home2009.htm[5] M. Haselman, M.; S. Hauck, "The Future of Integrated Circuits: A Survey of Nanoelectronics",Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 98, Issue 1, pp. 11-38, Jan. 2010.[6] R. Tang, F. Zhang, Y-B. Kim, "QCA-based nano circuits design", Proceedings of IEEEInternational Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS 2005), Vol. 3, May 23-26, 2005, pp. 2527-2530.[7] K. Uchida, "Single-Electron Transistors and Circuits for Future
implications on any engineeringproblem they encounter, they must learn to address a range of ethical problems in theiracademic preparations. Our future research will address the effects of ethical problemsolving across multiple problem sets. References 1. Fleddermann, C. B. (2008). Engineering Ethics, 3rd Ed.. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 2. Haws, D.R. (2001). Ethics Instruction in Engineering Education: A (Mini) Meta-Analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90 (2), 223-229 3. Jonassen, D.H., Shen, D., Marra, R.M., Cho, Y.H., Lo, J.L., & Lohani, V.K. (2009). Engaging and supporting problem solving in engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering
understanding ofmechanics were very small, almost negligible (the difference between the groups’ pre-testaverage values is trivial; t = 0.58, p = 0.36). In Table 2 the normalized gains of the studentstaking each of the lab-courses are summarized (and compared with those taking other courses)and in Figure 1b the data are presented for different conceptual domains. In Table 1 somenumerical data for students achievements in the pre- and post-tests are presented.a. b.Figure 1. a) Absolute pre- and post-course FMCE-test results for students participating in theconceptual and non-conceptual lab-courses. b) Comparison of the achievements of the twogroups of students, using normalized gain.The differences in results
to tackle increasingly complex technical challenges. With support fromthe ocean STEM community and its regional partners, the MATE Center will continue to growthe competition program and provide students from around the world with opportunities to enterand continue along a career pathway that leads them to ocean STEM careers. Page 22.1043.6Bibliography1. Sullivan, D., T. Murphree, B. Ford, J. Zande. 2006. OceanCareers.com: Navigating your way to a better future.Marine Technology Society Journal. V. 39, n.4, p.99-1042. Butz, W., T. Kelly, D. Adamson, G. Bloom, D. Fossum, and M. Gross, 2004. Will the Scientific and technicalWorkforce Meet the
whichgovern the direction of the given programs. At the center of the NIU Department of Technologyprogram are the following core educational Outcomes and Objectives.ATMAE and ABET (TAC) Learning Outcomes: An engineering technology program mustdemonstrate that graduates have: Designator Outcome A An appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines. B An ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology. C An ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes
/acquisitionworkforce, April 2010. 2. The Defense Acquisition University provides a full range of basic, intermediate, and advanced certification training, assignment-specific training, applied research, and continuous learning opportunities for DoD personnel. Information can be found at http://www.dau.mil/default.aspx . 3. Bloom B. S., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc., 1956. 4. Anderson, L.W., and D. Krathwohl (Eds.), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York, 1956. 5. Information regarding graduate programs at the Air Force Institute of Technology can be found at
AC 2011-66: INVESTIGATING THE VALIDITY OF STUDENTS’ SELF-ASSESSMENTS OF THEIR ABILITY IN STATICSJeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering Technology at Western Washington University. He received B.S. (1988) and M.Eng. (1989) degreesin Aeronautical Engineering, a M.S. in Science and Technology Studies (1993), and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (1994) from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is engaged in research to improve instruction and assessment in engineering, with an emphasis on engineering fundamentals such as mechanics Page
science students. Thiscourse is designed to introduce student basic knowledge and skills necessary to understand thenature of environmental problems, raise awareness and concerns for contemporaryenvironmental issues, identification of sources for environmental pollutions, design and analysisof the current technologies for environmental pollution control. The objectives of this course areas follows: a) To understand the principles of Chemistry and Microbiology used in environmental engineering. b) To perform preliminary design and analysis of treatment processes for water and air pollutions and hazardous waste. c) To recognize and understand contemporary environmental issues. d) To understand professional and ethical
AC 2011-2169: SURVEY BASED COMPARISON OF PERCEPTIONS AMONGCURRENT INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING GRADUATE STUDENTSAND ALUMNI AT US UNIVERSITIESAnurag K. Srivastava, Washington State University Anurag K. Srivastava is working as Assistant Professor in School of Electrical Engineering and Com- puter Science at Washington State University since 2010. He received his Ph.D. degree from Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), Chicago, in 2005, M. Tech. from Institute of Technology, India in 1999 and B. Tech. from Harcourt Butler Technological Institute, India in 1997. He was working as Assistant Research Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Mississippi State University during 2005-2010. His research
, concrete durability, and contemporary is- sues of engineering education, in general, and those of the Middle East in particular. He is presently a geotechnical consultant in Ames, Iowa. Page 22.811.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Implementation of Cooperative Learning Strategies in the Arab Gulf States: What? How? When?AbstractEngineering education in the Arab Gulf States (the Region) faces significant challenges as itseeks to meet the demands on the engineering profession in the twenty first century.This paper focuses on classroom-based pedagogies
new budget line for providing anexpedient near term solution to the “Gathering Storm” Challenge in the FY 2013 budget. Asuggested budget for Year 1 is $0.88 Billion, increasing to $2.16 B, $3.83B, and $5.80B over afour year period. Year four is a full funding level for an intake of 320,000 Freshmen SEEPstudents nationwide. Future year intake would remain constant at 320,000 students annually andthe projected steady state graduation would be 128,000 additional engineers/computer scientistsannually reached in May 2020. This is an increase of 172.6% over the estimated US productionin 2009 of 74,170 [16]. The program would produce an additional 128,000 engineers (andcomputer scientists) annually by 2020 starting with an increase of about 32,000
significantly improve our ability to providethe kind of training that industry is looking for in the mechatronic product design andapplication. City Tech students will benefit tremendously through these integrated concurrentengineering and mechatronic product design activities. In addition, by introducing the LearningProducts Designs through Hands-on Robotics Projects, the impact of NYC public high schoolsand NYC industry partners will be significant.8. AcknowledgementThe work is partially funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation AdvancedTechnology Education Division. The award number is NSF ATE No 1003712. The authorsappreciate greatly the support from the NSF.9. References1. David G. Alciatore and Michael B. Histand, “Introduction to
schedule, and if the student was the first person in theirfamily to attend university.ReferencesBlack student college graduation rates inch higher but a large racial gap persists. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, Winter 2007. Retrieved August 11, 2010 from http://www.jbhe.com/preview/winter07preview.htmlGuay, R.B. (1976). Purdue Spatial Visualization Test – Visualization of Rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2009 (NSF 09-305). Arlington, VASorby S., Wysocki, A.F, & Baartmans. B. (2003). Introduction to 3D visualization: An active
positions.References1. Joseph Bordogna, “Diversity in the Professions…A New Challenge for Societies”, October 29, 2004, Presentation to ABET Annual Meeting, http://www.nsf.gov/news/speeches/bordogna/04/jb041029_abet.jsp, last visited on 03/01/11.2. Monastersky,R. (2007) The real science crisis: bleak prospects for young researchers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54 (4):A1-A13.3. Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist: Cambridge University Press.4. Sandelowski, M. (1994). Focus on qualitative methods. Research in Nursing & Health, Vol. 17, Issue 6, p 479- 484.5. Cohen D. Crabtree B, “Qualitative Research Guidelines Project,” July 2006, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, http://www.qualres.org/HomeDisp-3831.html , last
evaluated from theory. 3. Open Loop Response to Actuation of Controls: In this topic, students are presented with the effect of control surface deflection on the motion of the aircraft. Specifically, the effect of the step response of elevators and throttle on the longitudinal motion and the rudder and aileron deflection required to obtain specific lateral steady states are discussed. 4. Closed Loop Control: The final topic in the undergraduate aircraft dynamics and control course is a brief introduction to closed loop flight control. Some of the specific flight controllers discussed are a. Phugoid Suppression Controller b. Speed Controller c. Lateral Control