, leads to improvements in the students’ designs, implementationplans, marketing strategy, etc.In anonymous responses to the prompt, “What elements of the course and instruction did youfind most helpful for accomplishing the course’s learning goals?”, students provided commentssuch as:“Having two different projects and the ability to move around was helpful. It allowed me to takerisks and if a business idea turned out to be a bad idea after spending time on it, we were notstuck with it.”“The freedom to pursue an idea and learn about entrepreneurship in context.”“The professors continued motivation and drive that kept our group moving forward.”“The class was extremely open-ended, allowing students to fully develop their ideas and businessplans
that few students-even those who have had some priorexposure to engineering-know what engineers do, and this affects their commitment to theengineering major5. Changes in the economy and workforce needs have led many engineeringschools to consider offering entrepreneurship education to their students. Connecting the fieldsof engineering with business and entrepreneurship in higher education has yielded a wide rangeof innovative and useful outcomes, products, and organizations. A previous study exploredengineering students’ levels of interest and involvement in entrepreneurship, their perceptions ofits impact on self-efficacy, and the characteristics of students who participate7. Students who hadtaken one or more entrepreneurship courses showed
innovation in our capstonesenior design classes (SDI and SDII) and elaborated on the mechanism of entrepreneurship inour Professional Practice course, but they all agreed that the department was missing a dedicatedcourse on innovation and entrepreneurship.This information encouraged us to conduct a survey to assess the true level of intensity. Twofaculty from the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department interviewed students from themost recently completed Senior Design capstone course sequence to assess their perspectives oninnovation and entrepreneurship. The faculty evaluated students ideas, compared the data fromstudents who participated solely in industry supported projects versus students who worked onfaculty sponsored projects. They
Paper ID #10389Quantitative Assessment of All-Class Project-based Undergraduate Courseon Graduates CareerDr. Emil H Salib, James Madison University Professor in the Integrated Science & Technology Department at James Madison University. Current Teaching - Wire-line & Wireless Networking & Security and Cross Platform Mobile Application Devel- opment. Current Research - Mobile IPv6 and Design for Motivation CurriculumMr. Eric Vincent Walisko, James Madison University Page 24.1028.1 c American
In this study, two groups of people, instructors who taught entrepreneurial focusedclasses (N = 46) and students enrolled in entrepreneurial classes (N = 138) were asked to defineentrepreneurship. The responses were coded into general categories and the categories werecompared across groups. Student responses were also analyzed based on several otherdemographic variables including gender, relationship to entrepreneurial parents, priorentrepreneurial experiences, and major. Results highlight some of the different perceptions andgoals that students and faculty hold regarding entrepreneurship.Introduction Many different definitions of entrepreneurship exist in various academic and businessdisciplines and discourses. In some ways the
Electronic Design and Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems27. The analysis and design of propulsion systems course was a team-oriented course that included three lessons devoted to creativity and innovation and requests for proposals. The teams’ request for proposal projects’ presentations were evaluated by a panel of professors while the written proposal was evaluated by the class instructor on the bases of creativity as well as communication skills. The project presentation and written report had equal weight in the students’ grades, which also included in-class and final examinations. Another course pertaining to engineering entrepreneurship, but targeting first-year engineering students, was offered by the School of
Paper ID #10735An Implementation of Innovative Thinking in The Entrepreneurship Cur-riculum for EngineersDr. S. Jimmy Gandhi, California State University, Northridge Dr.S. Jimmy Gandhi is an assistant professor at California State University, Northridge and is also The Director of The Ernie Schaffer Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Dr.Gandhi teaches classes and has research interests in entrepreneurship, lean thinking, quality management, six sigma, project management and sustainability. Prior to coming to Cal State University, Northridge, Dr. Gandhi taught at The City University of New York and also at The Stevens
, illustrates that the design of the course did not offer a sufficientlymeaningful course tot the students. Students felt that the assignments were carefully chosen(Question 18) and that grading criteria were articulated clearly (Question 14). Students alsocomplained that some of the classes were redundant with other courses in the program (Question12) and some were unhappy with the format of the final project (the choice of an SBIR proposalwas not, in retrospect, the best choice for non-US citizens).Another challenge to this course is that not all students have the same level of experience withentrepreneurship. While all students hold an engineering background not all have experiencewith business concepts, much less entrepreneurship. This course is
Education, 2014Engineering Virtual Studio: KEEN Modules to Foster Entrepreneurial Mindset in an Integrative, First/Second Year Online Course1. AbstractEngineering is a field that interacts with its surroundings by applying science to practicalproblems. In developing future engineers, teaching the technical fundamentals is only part of thetask; engineering programs must also develop engineers that are able to apply those skills intothe real world. Example problems are sometimes shown in classes, but lack the interactivitynecessary to instill the skill in students. Introducing students to entrepreneurship directlypromotes creativity and marketplace connection while indirectly instilling connection to realworld problems and promoting scholarly and
Penn State. Theunique inter-college minor consists of several clusters that center on entrepreneurship andinnovation in relation to different majors, industries, and contexts. An assessment plan wasdeveloped in conjunction with the minor and initial results will be reported. The overall goal ofthe assessment is to track the students’ progress, knowledge, skill development, and attitudinalchanges as the students proceed through the minor and begin their careers. As the first step inthis process, students from the core classes of the minor were asked to complete a survey nearthe beginning and end of the semester to capture their attitudes toward entrepreneurship andinnovation. A vast majority of the students who completed the survey were
Paper ID #9305Leveraging MOOCs to bring entrepreneurship and innovation to everyoneon campusDr. James V Green, University of Maryland, College Park Dr. James V. Green leads the education activities of Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute (Mtech) as the Director of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for designing and teaching undergrad- uate and graduate courses in entrepreneurship and technology commercialization, leading seed funding programs, and managing residential entrepreneurship programs for students. In 2011, he earned first prize in the 3E Learning Innovative Entrepreneurship Education
entrepreneurship education and understand how to address it intheir classes for true transformation to occur. Over the years, engineering scholars have workedto established a pedagogical justification for including in engineering curricula both courses andmaterial related to entrepreneurship. Nichols & Armstrong explored whether “engineeringentrepreneurship” is consistent with the educational mission of an engineering college byexamining the strategic plans of both the College of Engineering and the Department ofMechanical Engineering at the University of Texas Austin. They identified components of thedepartment’s strategic plan that aligned with entrepreneurship including: creativity, novelapplication of fundamental engineering science
Student performance: individual vs. group-basedThe Engineering-Business Integration Experiment The course instructors have received a small grant from Ontario’s Ministry of Education topromote entrepreneurial activities among the youth segment of the population (16-24 year olds).It allowed to support an educational experiment in which an undergraduate business class on Page 24.912.13Principles of Entrepreneurship and the Engineering Management & Globalization class describedin the paper, were carried out jointly for a period of the first 4 weeks of the semester. The class sizes differed (231 students in engineering and 55 students in
isdivided into four thematic areas: New Venture Creation, Best Practices Tour, EntrepreneurialResources, and Classroom Experience. It includes coverage of conceptual entrepreneurial skillsneeded to create a business that is globally competitive. Emphasis is on creation of a plan for apotential world-class venture. A Program Fee to offset costs of travel and participation in variousoff campus events is required.Global Entrepreneurship (BUS 482): This program course includes a trip outside of the UnitedStates to give participants the opportunity to experience how new businesses are created in othercountries. Particularly in today’s global business environment, entrepreneurs contributesignificantly to the creation of wealth and welfare in every nation
we did during our whole university life. In everycourse there is always a professor or Doctor who tells you how the future is going to be andwhat we should be ready to handle but unfortunately they do not implement it. It’s very hard tolearn by words but easy to learn by experience. In this class ‘design and manufacturing lab’ weactually learned what team work and time management means. We learned how to compromiseand discuss matters as if we were all company division managers. We learned to get over many Page 24.464.12of the different challenges. We learned what is entrepreneurship in a systematic way.”6 ConclusionsThe first and foremost
Innovation Challenge Activities possible, and oversaw a group of upper-class undergraduates who help lead the community to success. He is a member of ANS, ASME, INMM, and IEEE.Mr. Juan Carlos Folgar-LopezDr. Stephanie Nicole Lewis, Virginia Tech Page 24.892.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Measuring Innovative Thinking Skills in Innovation Challenge ActivitiesIntroductionSeveral recent reports have highlighted the need for innovative thinking skills as the U.S. looksto maintain a viable national economy [1, 2]. These skills include the
greater appeal to those students who may beunengaged with a lecture format that concentrates on facts and content rather than thedevelopment of higher-order, and critical thinking skills[11, 12] which are essential in theapplication of innovation theory. By integrating case studies into the curriculum, engineering andtechnology students can contextualize the content of innovation and entrepreneurship theory andview these subjects through a more pragmatic paradigm.Best practices in case-based instruction for engineering and technology educationAlthough the research listed in this review suggests case-based instruction contributes to greater Page
developeda basic 6-step AHP-based creativity process, shown in Table 2, to teach design creativity toundergraduate engineering students. Table 2. The Proposed AHP-based Creativity ProcessStep 1. Knowledge CollectionThe mission requirements for the targeted design question will be introduced to the class. The reference materialsof the domain knowledge and technology should be made available to students.Step 2. Concept GenerationStudents are encouraged to discuss as a team and propose possible design concepts to fulfill the missionrequirements. Students are encouraged to record their discussions and make the sketches of the proposed designs.Step 3. Criteria GenerationPossible criteria used to weight and select the best design
, construct a prototype circuit, perform the tests detailed in the test planon the prototype, and report results of the tests in an attached specifications sheet for the device.By requiring the students to include the cost of materials, services, and other expenses, the factorof cost was made explicit.After submitting the written proposal, there was a two-stage evaluation process for selecting thewinning bid. In the first stage, each team within each class section was given five minutes topitch their proposal using a PowerPoint poster in an effort to convince the customer (in this casethe section instructor) that their design was the best within the section and should be selected towin the bid. This pitch was aimed to improve the students’ ability to
critical thinking/problem solving course inscience and technology taken by the science, technology and engineering majors during a specialundergraduate honors science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educationexperience. The target competencies are further applied throughout the students’ subsequentacademic major program of study. This sequence also incorporates opportunities specifically forentrepreneurially spirited honors students to provide them with an early experience in developingsolution entrepreneurship. The sequence was built on the premise that collaboration by a varietyof entities from across the spectrum of government, business, and social enterprise is needed tosolve society’s critical problems—particularly if we seek
the class as a whole was divided in terms of their learning goals in this regard (QID 14).The pitch day (described in Section V.A) at the University provided a synergistic avenue for ourstudents to “pitch” their apps and gain impartial feedback from both internal and external judges.Evaluation criteria were provided to all judges. The three selected evaluation criteria thatspecifically evaluated entrepreneurship-related learning outcomes are listed in Table 2 and werebased on the concepts outlined by Stevenson.9 Table 2: Sample Pitch-Day Evaluation Criteria for Entrepreneurship Prototype How mature is the concept? Is the key functionality complete; has it been demonstrated? Evaluation Is the product tested
, conducted acomparative analysis of ethics courses taught at several US business schools in which the casemethod was utilized. Colby and Sullivan (2008) reported that that in almost all schools theystudied, the primary goal of the ethics course was to teach the professional codes of ethics, whichinclude: public safety, health and welfare, and protection of environment; loyalty to bothemployer and customers; fairness; intellectual properties of others; conflicts of interest; anddiscrimination and unfair competition. Chan et al. (2012) describe entrepreneurship,professionalism, and leadership as three key aspects of today’s engineering careers which areincreasingly becoming “boundaryless”.Leadership education has also garnered immense attraction
of two of these will be shared in alater section of this paper.Notes from the field: Implementing the Innovation CanvasTechnical Entrepreneurship classes: These notes are from two courses that are bothintroductions to entrepreneurship for engineers and scientists that have been taught for manyyears. The mantra for these courses is that everyone should “think like an entrepreneur.” Thatis, they should learn to identify opportunities and to consider all the necessary aspects ofeffective execution to take advantage of those opportunities. The IC is introduced a few weeksafter they have learned about the traditional business plan and the business model canvas. TheIC is a tool for showing how all of its themes must be considered in dynamic
Doctor of Management with George Fox University.Dr. Donald Ken Takehara, Taylor University Don Takehara was Director of the Center for Research & Innovation (CR&I) and Associate Professor at Taylor University for 9 years. With responsibility for leadership and overall success of the CR&I, Don developed/implemented an integrated program of research, entrepreneurship, and business assistance. During these years, research grant funding tripled, over 20 new companies were launched/assisted, and consultant services were provided to 100+ companies/organizations. Don also taught classes in engi- neering, physics, and chemistry and performed research in STEM Education (high altitude ballooning), biomass
, combined classeswith their business schools or adding entrepreneurial classes to their core curriculums 1. The lackof standardization when it comes to helping engineering students develop these skills is notnecessarily a bad thing, but it certainly highlights the need for a deeper understanding on how thecreative process works and how to foster an entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students.Understanding biassociationThe term biassociation was first coined by Arthur Koestler in 1964 as “a distinction between theroutine skills of thinking on a single ‘plane’ as it were, and the creative act,” or in other words“collision of two apparently unrelated frames of reference” 2. Hitt et al. divides innovativeactions as either “equilibrating” or
name. While these types of changeswere considered, the Western Michigan University faculty also wished to focus on the strengthsand needs of the local community. One key strength identified was the historical and vibrantculture of innovation and entrepreneurship in regional start-ups and established industries. This Page 24.411.3moved the investigation of current programs in a different direction and identified the uniquechanges that had occurred at the University of Illinois. The University of Illinois had recentlychanged its IE department name to Industrial and Enterprise Systems Engineering(http://ise.illinois.edu/) and had developed a
Paper ID #9947The Innovation Competencies - Implications for Educating the Engineer ofthe FutureProf. William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Bill Kline is Dean of Innovation and Engagement and Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman. He joined Rose-Hulman in 2001 and his teaching and professional interests include systems engineering, design, quality, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, his industry experience includes roles as cofounder and Chief Operating Officer at Montronix and development manager at Kennametal. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois
sensing skills altogether and included activities like manual testing anduse of various tools towards that. The focus, however, considering the profile of the class, wason developing creativity competency. More detailed description of different activities of thecourse is provided in the following sub-sections.WikiEducation in general, and engineering education in particular, has steadily adopted newerparadigms of student-centered learning as opposed to traditional lecture-oriented learning 42-43.The new paradigms are well supported by Web 2.0 technologies that allow development ofstudent-centered personalized learning environments 44 around blogs, wikis, and discussionforums. A special and perhaps the most popular instance of wiki is the online
Graduate and Professional Studies,and Dr. Skipper assumed the program leadership responsibilities of marketing, recruiting, coursedevelopment, and operations. In Academic Year 2011-2012, the program continued to grow,reaching 180 course enrollments across the fall, spring and summer semesters. A secondgraduating class of 16 students completed their studies in May 2012. Students and employerscontinued to find great value in this program resulting in 285 enrollments in AY 2012-2013 and27 MSPM graduates in May 2013.At this time, The Citadel’s Master of Science in Project Management (MSPM) is the only suchprogram in the State of South Carolina. In recognition of the continued growth of this uniqueprogram, and to provide a clear path for future
. The researchers coded a discovery whenever the text used a word or phrase thatdescribed an action related to the skill (See Table 2). For example, the text on page 90 of TheInnovator’s DNA, “He noticed a lower-middle class man riding a scooter with an older childstanding in front, behind the handle bars,” was coded as observation.Table 2. Coding ProtocolSkills Examples Book ExamplesAssociation Connecting, Creativity, Cross- Marc Benioff came up with the idea for pollinate, Combining salesforce.com “It’s basically enterprise software meets Amazon.”1. (pg. 42)Experimenting Making