Template and Scoring VIThe leader robot is also programmed inside a template, as shown in the Figure 3. This templatealso includes the scoring measurement of the total radians of movement of the leader robot. Thefinal score is calculated by multiplying the radians of movement by the percentage of the timethe follower was over the silver tape. This final scoring metric determines the amount ofmovement where the robots were “synchronized” (within the desired range of distance of eachother).Figure 3: Phase 1 Leader Robot Template and Scoring VI B. Competition RulesThe robots have 30 seconds to build up their score by traveling back and forth across a roundblack panel that has an approximate diameter of 4’ with 2” white ring around the outside
. Page 24.375.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Designing a Stage of “Romance” for Programs in Technological Literacy.AbstractIn previous paper in these proceedings* it was argued (a) that a liberal education that takes no account ofengineering and technological literacy cannot be by definition liberal, and (b) that programs of engineering andtechnological literacy can be designed to bridge the academic-vocational divide inherent in reports such as thatundertaken for the National Governors Association. In support of this argument a model curriculum based on theepistemologies of Macmurray and Newman was presented. It was necessarily integrated and trans-disciplinary, andit was argued that it
. Hagenberger, M, Engerer, B, & Tougaw, D (2006). Revision of a First-Semester Course to Focus on Fundamentals of Engineering. Proceedings of the 2006 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Chicago, IL.7. Huettel, L, Gustafson II, M, Nadeau, J, Schaad, D,, & Barger, M (2013). A Grand Challenge-based Framework for Contextual Learning in Engineering. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA.8. Vasquez, H & Fuentes, A (2013). Integration of Sensors and Low-Cost Microcontrollers into the Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Design Sequence. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education
experiences abroad, research collaborations with colleagues abroad, dual and joint degree programs with partner universities abroad (e.g. University of Rhode Island Dual Degree Masters and Doctoral Programs, NSF PIRE and IREE projects).In addition, the programmatic components of such programs may significantly vary. Seeking toclassify the relative nature of one program versus another, Grandin and Maher define thefollowing parameters: (a) short-term versus long term; (b) English language or non-Englishlanguage; (c) degree of cultural exposure/immersion; (d) degree of curricular integration; (e)degree of cultural/linguistic preparation for experiences abroad; (f) degree of engineeringspecificity; (g) degree of institutional
systems is shown inFigure 2. This present value payback estimate includes an inverter replacement at year 15,lengthening the payback period. Manufacturer-estimated maintenance is included. By year 19,the 50kWh/day system pays itself off; By year 25, $20,000 annually will be saved, almost half ofthe acquisition cost. Conversely the 10kWh/day/ system pays itself off by year 23 and savesabout $1000 by year 25. Available space for installation of solar panels strongly influences thisdecision.1,2,3,4,5,6 (a) (b) Figure 2: Payback Period for (a) 50kWh/day and (b) 10kWh/day Solar Power Systems. Hydro – Hydroelectric generation is considered to be a very efficient source of
industrial engineer in the aeronautical industry. Ann is a licensed professional engineer. Page 24.1134.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Students' selection of topics for a professional development courseIntroductionTo be successful in their careers, engineers need to be proficient in both technical andnontechnical skills. ABET's student outcomes reflect both of these categories. Five of theeleven a-k student outcomes1 can be considered predominantly technical: (a) an ability toapply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; (b
and solution taken by the group (the video that you are watching). a. Comment on the steps and modifications that you think align with your team’s process–were these steps justified in a similar way? b. Comment on the steps and modifications that you do not think align with your team’s process – do you agree with their justifications?2. Suggest changes for the solution that students are watching.Phase III: Revisiting Solution and Sheet Metal Forming Design ProcessStudents were instructed to turn in an individual report with the following:1. Student’s proposed final design - with sketches (students can use the provided drawing and mark the changes on it or provide hand sketches.)2. The step
generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal. (Teachers College Press, 1992).18. Yinger, R. J. Can we really teach them to think? New Dir. Teach. Learn. 1980, 11–31 (1980).19. Paul, R. W. Critical Thinking: Fundamental to Education for a Free Society. Educ. Leadersh. 42, n1 (1984).20. Walsh, D. & Paul, R. W. The Goal of Critical Thinking: from Educational Ideal to Educational Reality. (1986). at 21. Mason, M. Critical thinking and learning. Educ. Philos. Theory 39, 339–349 (2007).22. Ennis, R. H. A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. (1987). at 23. Watson, G. B. & Glaser, E. M. Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal: Manual. (Psychological Corporation, 1980).24. Beyer, B
the tires. For a slower driver, the water will spread out giving them less feedback. b. Filling the fire hose with cement. This option is less dynamic and will treat fast and slow drivers alike. However, it will be more durable. c. Filling the fire hose with sand/dirt. This option, while it would be more dynamic than cement, would have trouble regaining its shape. This method would most likely be suited for temporary speed reduction, such as at a concert or sporting event for a day. The concept we’re working with here is sound, but the physical limitations for this ideawould be too costly to overcome. This idea was not
. Page 24.683.7 Table 1 – Symbol Library for FEASYExamplesFigure 2 shows an example of a bracket being modeled in FEASY and the deformation results inANSYS.Figure 4 shows an example of a two-dimensional cantilever beam with a point-load applied at itsend illustrating the sketching process. The user sketches a rectangle with one input stroke ingeometry mode (black ink) as shown in Fig. 4(a). The sketch beautified by the system is shownin Fig. 4(b). The user then switches to „symbol‟ mode to select the boundary conditions, loads,and dimensions (shown in red). On pressing the „process‟ button, the system processes the inputand the result is shown in Fig. 4(c). The user selects material properties as required to
Engineering Student Identity. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(6),1550-1560.[4] Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education,25, 99-125.[5] Kittleson, J. M., S.A. Southerland. (2004). The Role of Discourse in Group Knowledge Construction: ACase Study of Engineering Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 267-293.[6] Allie, S., M.N. Armien, N. Burgoyne, J.M. Case, B.I. Collier-Reed, T.S. Craig, A. Deacon, Z. Geyer, C.Jacobs, J. Jawitz, B. Kloot, L. Kotta, G. Langdon, K. le Roux, D. Marshall, D. Mogashana, C. Shaw, G.Sheridan, N. Wolmarans. (2009). Learning as acquiring a discursive identity through participation in acommunity: Improving student learning
. Page 24.35.6 Distribution of Grades A B C D F Withdraw/Incomplete Traditional Calculus 1, Non-Engineering Students 39 58 108 42 99 26 Traditional Calculus 1, Engineering Students 9 29 54 23 223 Engineering Calculus 1 8 14 11 7 8 1 Traditional Calculus 2, Non-Engineering Students 36 53 95 46 82 24 Traditional Calculus 2, Engineering Students 16 29 36 25 59 7
multi-hopcommunication to connect two nodes that might be distant as depicted in Figure 8 as comparedto a direct communication between A and B [17]. Page 24.59.6 A B Figure 8. Multi-hop Communication [17]Thus each node in the WSN will communicate with its neighbor for node A to communicate withnode B. Each node in the communication link, however, will consume energy to receive the dataand there will be communication overhead to handle the message at eachnode [17]. The WSN energy consumption and communication
. Bourji and A. Winstead, Optimizing an Organic Rankine Cycle, Chemical Engineering Progress,January 2013, 35-39.2. J.D. Barry, Eliminate Iteration from Flow Problems, Chemical Engineering Progress, March 2008, 36-41.3. R.L. Shilling, Selecting Tube Inserts for Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers, Chemical EngineeringProgress, September 2012, 20-25.4. W. Tanthapanichakoon, Saving Energy in Multilevel Steam Systems, Chemical Engineering Progress,January 2012, 27-32.5. R. Marshall and B. Scales, Reduce Your Compressed Air Costs, Chemical Engineering Progress, October2011, 28-33.6. T.G. Lestina, Selecting a Heat Exchanger Shell, Chemical Engineering Progress, June 2011, 34-38.7. The University of Tulsa’s Protection of
notlimited to, the following learned capabilities: a. an ability to select and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools of the discipline to broadly-defined engineering technology activities; b. an ability to select and apply a knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering, and technology to engineering technology problems that require the application of principles and applied procedures or methodologies; c. an ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments; and to apply experimental results to improve processes; d. an ability to design systems, components, or processes for broadly-defined engineering
Engineering Education, 2014 A Cross-Discipline, Project-Based Approach to Teaching Engineering Economy Heath LeBlanc Bryan Boulanger ECCS Department Civil Engineering Department Ohio Northern University Ohio Northern University Ada, OH 45810 Ada, OH 45810 h-leblanc@onu.edu b-boulanger@onu.eduAbstractIn this paper, we describe a project-based approach to teaching Engineering Economy. Thesemester-long project has been designed to foster cross-disciplinary interactions betweenElectrical and
were significantly lower than the meanresponse for all mechanical engineering courses.This evaluation also included space for free-form responses related to (a) strengths of the course,(b) weaknesses, and (c) suggestions for improvement. Of the twelve responses in part (a), sevenindicated a perceived increase in problem solving ability by the student. Two of the commentsalso mentioned the relationship between the assignments and knowledge gained in previouscourses. Of the nine responses in part b, three indicated that the workload was too heavy, threesuggested that the lectures should be more closely aligned with the analysis problems, and onesuggested more guidance on problem validation. Of the seven responses in part c, three werepositive or
the top lessons learned by the Dual-Use Ferry student teams. Atthe end of the design effort, a design solution was provided to the customer. The customer wasvery pleased with the resulting effort and stated that future marketplace design efforts would bewelcomed and supported.AcknowledgmentsWe thank the Department of Defense for financial support of the capstone marketplace projectand for technical and logistical support in providing mentors and sponsors. We thank the mentorsand sponsors of the Dual-Use Ferry project for their generous support and guidance. Finally, wethank the students at Stevens Institute and UAH for their hard work on this challenging project.Bibliography 1. B. McGrath, S. Lowes, A. Squires and C. Jurado, SE Capstone
studentswere exposed to robotics and engineering design concepts via a) two elective consecutiverobotics courses, b) college and high school mentorship opportunities, c) leadership roles duringthe robotics club and outreach day activities, and d) involvement with the IEEE Region-5robotics design contest. The traditional robotics lectures were transformed into project-basedhands-on design and implementation experiences in classroom and laboratory environments byteams of 3-5 students with the highest level of diversity. The open-ended robotics design contestprovided a challenging environment to effectively ensure superior engineering design skills andenhanced critical and creative thinking, communication, teamwork, and project management.Robotics-I
were reached with respect to the graduate student’s performance onthe project and with respect to the efficacy of the Ike Dike concept. (1). The following graduate student results and conclusions were obtained. (a). Valuable experience was gained working on a real world very high visibility Page 24.25.13 engineering project (a rare opportunity at the M.S. level). (b). Students performed the following tasks: • Set up input data for the CFD simulation. • Analyzed the CFD results (with professorial guidance). • Performed the comparison of Hurricane
electronics prototyping platform. 7. Develop creativity and innovation skills. 8. Work effectively on a team and negotiate group dynamics. 9. Communicate effectively through written reports and oral presentations.The two projects and their implementation are discussed in this section with the course timelinedetailed in Appendix A. The bills of materials for both Projects 1 and 2 are presented in theAppendices B and C, respectively. At the beginning of the semester, I spent four lectures anddiscussions on the design process – a five-stage prescriptive model (problem definition,conceptual design, preliminary design, detailed design, and design communication), managingdesign process, team work, and engineering notebook (the textbook used in
: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.11. Jesiek, B., Borrego, M., & Beddoes, K. (2010). Advancing global capacity for engineering education research: relating research to practice, policy and industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2), 117-134.12. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S., (2010). Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99 (3), 185-207.13. Hazen, B.T., Yun, W., &Sankar, C.S. (2012). Factors that influence dissemination in Engineering Education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55(3), 384-393
supported by a National Science FoundationAdvanced Technological Education3 (ATE) Grant. The goals of the grant project are to: a) createand implement a new Associate of Applied Science Photonics and Laser Technology (AAS PLT)program; b) fully equip an Optics and Photonics Laboratory for education and training; c) trainfaculty to teach core courses in the AAS PLT program; d) perform outreach activities to localhigh schools to promote the new program; e) educate 30 or more students or workers by the endof the project.The paper discusses the efforts and activities performed towards achieving the project goals, andthe results and outcomes obtained in the first year of the grant. Activities included convening anAdvisory Board with industry
courses at otherinstitutions was difficult to find. “Construction-based” is the operative term here. The vastmajority of text books, courses and educational opportunities are associated with innovation as itrelates to product development. One notable exception was a course designed by renownedconstruction industry researchers C. H. Nam and C. B. Tatum. Nam and Tatum published theirdevelopment and implementation of a construction innovation class for civil engineeringstudents at Stanford University.9 They approached the topic from two perspectives. First, thecourse involved analyzing innovation fundamentals, specifically the process of innovation,including theories, human interaction, cultural influences, and governmental policies. Second,the
results for dispersion for the source near the duct centerlineby comparison with the exact solution. Discuss the importance of gravity andBrownian forces for different size particles. Also evaluate the deposition rate ofpanicles for point sources, which are very near the wall (about a=1 mm). (UseFLUENT as well as your own program and compare the results.)b) Uniform Inlet Concentration: For a uniform inlet concentration of particles insize range of 0.01 to 10 micron, evaluated the deposition rate for laminar flowsbetween two parallel plates. Plot the results in term of Schmidt number. (UseFLUENT as well as your own program and compare the results with thoseobtained from the diffusion analysis.)c) Electromagnetic Forces: For the cases studied in
incommunication, leadership, and teamwork skills; liberal arts; social and health sciences;economics and business; and cross-cultural studies, having attributes such as “strong analyticalskills, creativity, ingenuity, professionalism, and leadership.” Since engineering is a deeplycreative process and the creative process can be categorized into five levels2: (a) utilize oneexisting object without considering others, (b) choose one out of many objects, (c) make partialchanges to a selected object, (d) develop a new object or completely modify the chosen one, and(e) develop an entirely new intricate system; each of these levels is further subdivided into sixstages ranging from choosing the task to practical implementation2. Transformativetechnological
surveys are available in Appendices A and B. Additionally, hardcopy surveys werealso provided to students who did not take the new course (45% of EE/CpE seniors). All juniorstook the course during their sophomore year. The seniors had not had the opportunity to take thecourse by the time of our survey. The results showed that goals 3, 4 and 5 of the course were Page 24.16.11met.Survey responses reveal that both juniors and seniors are more comfortable troubleshootinghardware than software. Because they have more experience, seniors reported being slightlymore comfortable reverse engineering than juniors. Figure 3 shows that juniors reported
engineering graduate students. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 15(1), 2013. 8 Johannes Strobel, Justin Hess, Rui Pan, and Carrie A. Wachter Morris. Empathy and care within engineering: qualitative perspectives from engineering faculty and practicing engineers. Engineering Studies, 5(2):137–159, 2013. 9 C.P. Titus, Carla B. Zoltowski, and William C. Oakes. Work in progress - assessing moral decision making skills in the engineers of 2020. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010 IEEE, pages S3E–1–S3E–2, 2010.10 Donia R Baldacchino. Teaching on spiritual care: the perceived impact on qualified nurses. Nurse education in practice, 11(1):47–53, 2011.11 Peter Salovey and David J Sluyter. Emotional
engineering, where a master’s degreeis already a common requirement for employment.Curricular TransitionA side-by-side comparison of previous and revised curricula including the co-terminal option canbe found in Appendix B. The previous BS program satisfied accreditation requirements andserved the needs of students taking the FE exam prior to Spring 2014. The Oregon Tech generaleducation requirements were satisfied: three credits of college-level algebra or higher, nine Page 24.336.6credits of humanities, 12 credits of social science, 18 credits of communication and six credits ofmath/science electives. The faculty referenced the ASCE Body of
quality due to the interaction and reflection of design groups11.In addition to coupling a simplified DSM illustrates areas where tasks have to be run in series orhave the opportunity to be run in parallel. In Figure 4 tasks B and C have to be run in seriesbecause task C is dependent on task B; however, tasks A and K can be run in parallel becauseneither is dependent on each other, nor are their prerequisites dependent on the other. Theopportunity to run tasks in parallel is used to help speed production rate, a primary task of the Page 24.893.6DSM11.Smith and Eppinger propose an evolution of the DSM called the Sequential Iteration Model14(SIM