, ethics and values, and action/involvement—that can beapplied to many forms of literacy (Cheek, 1992). A later study (Gagel, 1997) definedtechnological literacy as being able to: “(a) accommodate and cope with rapid andcontinuous technological change, (b) generate creative and innovative solutions fortechnological problems, (c) act through technological knowledge both effectively andefficiently, and (d) assess technology and its involvement with the human lifeworldjudiciously.” Generally STS-derived definitions of technological literacy address the need toeducate individuals for living in a technologically mediated world and are system oriented,involve elements of the ethical and moral dimensions of society, and are both critical andintegrative
, 142). Carol Stream, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc.[2] Kardaras, N. (2016, August 27). It’s ‘digital heroin’: How screens turn kids into psychotic junkies. New York Post.[3] Jones, T. H. and Paolucci, R. (1998). The learning effectiveness of educational technology: A call for further research. Educational Technology Review, (9), 10 – 14.[4] Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., and Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862 – 864.[5] Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., and Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323, 122 – 124.[6] Mazur, E. (1997
larger impacts with non-course basedproject based learning experiences. However due to the very fact they present opportunities toexplore concepts free from grading makes direct correlation with course based models a bit morechallenging and difficult. The assessment strategies must differ to capture skills learning not directlyfocused on final grade and thus as well only creates more challenges to correlation with course basedwork.REFERENCES1 C.H. Major, B. Palmer, “Assessing the Effectiveness of Problem‑ Based Learning in Higher Education: Lessons fromthe Literature”, Academic Exchange Quarterly, Spring 2001: Volume 5, Issue 12 E. Coyle, L. Jamieson and W. Oakes, "EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service," International Journal
. Significantanticipated challenges have been described related to the prospect of teaching and assessing thisnew aspect of the science curriculum. Two of the primary challenges are that (a) few science andgeneral education teachers have the knowledge and skill to guide students in engaging in designactivities that integrate engineering and science and (b) assessments currently being used in theK-12 arena do not measure engineering design and cannot easily be adapted to do so. In thispaper, I describe research efforts to inform the development of assessments that engage studentsin a design process. The focus here is on the use of student engagement in a paper-based designactivity with the students’ design goal being to suggest improvements to a solar still such
in the way the question was posed. Group A consisting of 20 students wassimply asked to solve the pipe flow problem without any guidance as to how the solution shouldproceed. For Group B consisting of 18 students, the question was posed in two steps: the firstasked the students to solve algebraically for the unknown, and second asked the students tosubstitute in particular values along with their units to determine the solution. Forty percent ofGroup A had no units issues, while 44 percent of Group B had no units issues. There wasvirtually no difference in the average quiz score, with Group A averaging 7.7/10 and Group Baveraging 7.6/10. These results show a slight improvement in units treatment for those “forced”to follow the procedure, but
adjacent entries in the map. Students were asked to share their solutions on thewhiteboard as they finished, allowing the entire class to see the wide range of approaches (figure1(b)). Rather than simply presenting the correct solution, time was spent reviewing the variousmistakes made before finally discussing the correct answer. Activities such these proved to bevery beneficial to student learning, as students were able to learn from their own mistakes andtheir classmates’ mistakes in real-time. Furthermore, such high-payoff activities required verylittle preparation time on the part of the instructor, but rather just a simple modification inapproach. In addition, the instructor had no issues with covering the necessary or desired contentin the
(FTK), http://accessdata.com/solutions/digital-forensics/forensic-toolkit-ftk/.[3] Farmer, D., and Venena, W., Forensic Discovery, Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series, 2004.[4] Gee, J., What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy, Palgrave Macmillan, NY, 2003. 2.[5] Mathrani, A., Christian, S., and Ponder-Sutton, A., PlayIT: Game Based Learning Approach for Teaching Programming Concepts. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 5-17.[6] NetworkMiner, http://www.netresec.com/?page=NetworkMiner.[7] Pan, Y., Mishra, S., Yuan, B., Stackpole, B., and Schwartz, D., Game-based Forensics Course For First Year Students, Proc. of 13th Annual ACM Special Interest Group for Information Technology
use that information to develop and testinterventions that may accelerate student development of engineering intuition.References1 Raskin, P. Decision-Making by Intuition--Part 1: Why You Should Trust Your Intuition. Chemical Engineering, 100 (1988).2 Gigerenzer, G. Short cuts to better decision making. (Penguin, 2007).3 Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. (Macmillan, 2011).4 Elms, D. G. & Brown, C. B. Intuitive decisions and heuristics–an alternative rationality. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 274-284 (2013).5 Dreyfus, S. E. & Dreyfus, H. L. A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition (1980
support the core value of technical writing, which is that “writingis for learning.”AcknowledgementThe authors would express their sincere appreciation to the Director of Writing and FacultyDevelopment from Old Dominion University, Remica Bingham-Risher, who inspired the verymuch rewarding work reported in this paper.References 1. Ernst, E.W. (1983), “A New Role for the Undergraduate Engineering Laboratory,” IEEE Transactions on Education, E-26(2), 49–51. 2. Feisel, L. and Peterson, G. D. (2002), “A Colloquy on Learning Objectives for Engineering Educational Laboratories”, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. 3. Herrington, D. G. and Nakhleh, M. B. (2003
Applied Psychology, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 1353-1385, 2016.[3] "Frequently Asked Questions", Major League Hacking, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://mlh.io/faq#what-is- a-hackathon. [Accessed: 30- Jan- 2017].[4] G. Briscoe, C. Mulligan, Digital Innovation: the Hackathon Phenomenon, London, UK. [Accessed: 30- Jan- 2017].[5] N. Linnell, S. Figueria, N. Chintala, et al, Hack for the Homeless: A Humanitarian Technology Hackathon, GHTC 2014. [Accessed: 30- Jan- 2017].[6] B. J. Zimmerman, “Models of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement,” Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement Springer Series in Cognitive Development, pp. 1–25, 1989.[7] I. Cornford, "Learning-to-learn strategies as a basis for
how theprototype will be constructed.Students were also assessed for their application of the design process on a 5-point scale. Facultyassessors looked for effective development of (a) specifications, (b) explanation about themanufacturing process, (c) testing methods, (d) needs, (e) comparison to state-of-the-art, and (f)how the prototype would be validated or verified. The assessment awarded points as follows: (1point) Less than 2 of the above components are present in a meaningful way, (2 points) 2-4 ofthe above components are present in a meaningful way, (3 points) 2-4 of the above componentsare present in a meaningful way and 2 are explained in adequate detail, (4 points) 3-4 of theabove components are present in a meaningful way and 3
requiredroughly 45 minutes and participants received a $10 gift card for their time. The InstitutionalReview Board approved the study. All of the results presented in this paper come from thesubset of questions shown in Figure 1. The complete set of questions are in Appendix B Duringthe interview, there were some other questions between the four listed in Figure 1. 7) Did you participate in any projects in your engineering classes in your first semester? If so, tell me about the projects. What kinds of activities did you do to complete the project? 8) Is there anything (in or out of class) from the first semester that affects how you approach design now? 12a
Professor of English in the Department of English at Carnegie Mellon. His current research interests include pedagogy of communication and design for students and professionals in the technology/engineering disciplines, and computer-aided rhetorical analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Making the Invisible Visible in Writing Classrooms: An Approach to Increasing Textual Awareness using Computer-Aided Rhetorical AnalysisIntroductionWriting requires countless composing decisions that are typically beyond the writer’s consciousgrasp. For students, writing can feel like a process that they have little control over, and a skillthat only a certain few possess. Much of the skill in being
team-based projects. Given that research in studentlearning consistently shows that active learning and higher student participation leads to betterlearning outcomes [1][2], we have recently modified the course to increase student participationby requiring that students: a) do MATLAB reading and exercises in advance of the lecture time,b) utilize an in-class interaction system, c) use MATLAB on their laptops for in-class exercises,and d) attend programming labs. Given that ECE 102 does not deal with programming alone, wehave faced a problem of students passing the class without learning basic programming skills - acommon problem in any course in which students can collect partial credit. We are attempting toaddress this through pass/no-pass
because they all share the samecontrol signals. Inductive instruction, particularly active learning techniques and demonstration-based learning, are employed to improve student’s learning. Specifically, we enrich the lecturesabout LED time-multiplexing circuit of S3 board with images to first illustrate how human beingeyes are often tricked and then followed by hardware demonstrations. To demonstrate theillusion of our eyes, Fig. 2 (a) (b) are borrowed online to test students’ eyes [10, 11]. Students areasked the intersection dots are white or black in Fig. 1 (a). It seems like we saw some black dots,but actually they are all white. Another example we introduce in class is Fig. 1 (b). Students areexcited to guess which monster looks bigger. The
science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educators in an easily accessible and compelling form:that of an online forum student usage model. Recent work in engineering education providesprecedent for the use of personas to communicate research findings [10-12]. Moreover, incommunicating our findings using personas with contextualized scenarios that describe how thepersonas choose to actively engage (or not engage) with the online forum, we anticipate (a)improved transfer of contextual findings to a broad audience of STEM education stakeholdersand (b) heightened motivation and confidence among STEM educators toward implementingonline forums in order to increase participation of diverse, nontraditional undergraduates.Prior Use of
questionresponse will be categorized according to the codebook developed previously. New themes willbe generated for the responses that do not fit within the themes defined in the codebook. Thepersonal interviews will be audio recorded so that they can be transcribed verbatim. A matrixwill be built for each question consisting of the themes and corresponding responses from all thetranscripts.The qualitative data obtained from surveys and personal interviews will be analyzed to answeradditional research questions:• What are the students’ habits regarding completing the various course aspects?• What modifications can be made to the UOEC to improve student learning?References1. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation
assert that, as in the field of medicine, it is critical to discuss the issues and complications sothat the intervention can contribute to the educational experience. Future work may involve thestudy of more cases with engagement of the community at ASEE.References 1. ABET, General Criteria 3. Student Outcomes, www.abet.org, 2017. 2. Bergiel, B., Bergiel, E. and Balsmeier, P. (2008) ”Nature of virtual teams: a summary of their advantages and disadvantages.” Management Research News, 31/2: 99-110. 3. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. F., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 34(1), 103–120. 4. Dörnyei, Z. (2005) The
through design courses—to solve problems and execute thosesolutions. But designing for disability benefits from a broader perspective: “A richer balancebetween problem solving and more playful exploration could open up valuable new directions”(pg. xv)1. This paper describes the design of an interdisciplinary course to be taught beginning inMarch 2017, Introduction to Disability Studies, that integrates Liberal Arts and STEMperspectives with the goal of creating precisely the balance that Pullin describes.In the sections that follow, we first describe the design of the course, focusing on the humanitiesperspectives and assignments that inform the theoretical disability studies framework. Thissection also addresses our approaches to breaking down
design project through ROS mayassist us in conducting a rudimentary evaluation of the TCK integrated multi-lab method. Thequestionnaire covers the seven questions below. The outcomes specified in the parentheses are inaccordance with the ABET standards. Figure 2 Generated ROS navigation environment • Question 1 - “I can apply formal engineering design methodology to carry out the design, experiments and construction of labs and project based on ROS data and interpretation.” (Outcome b: An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data relating to electrical systems.) • Question 2 - “I understand the fundamental algorithms on ROS and software/hardware co
are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] J. S. Shippmann, R. A. Ash, M. Batjtsta, L. Carr, L. D. Eyde, B. Hesketh, J. Kehoe, K. Pearlman, E. P. Prien, and J. I. Sanchez, "The practice of competency modeling," Personnel psychology, vol. 53, pp. 703-740, 2000.[2] B. J. Brummel, D. E. Rupp, and S. M. Spain, "Constructing parallel simulation exercises for assessment centers and other forms of behavioral assessment," Personnel Psychology, vol. 62, pp. 137-170, 2009.[3] D. E. Rupp, A. M. Gibbons, A. M. Baldwin, L. A. Snyder, S. M. Spain, S. E. Woo, B. J. Brummel, C. S. Sims, and M. Kim, "An Initial Validation of Developmental Assessment
EngineeringEducation to the New Century. National Academies Press: Washington, DC.[3] American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2008) 2028 Vision for Mechanical Engineering.http://files.asme.org/ICOMES/News/15876.pdf[4] Klein-Gardner, S. S. and Walker, A. (2011) Defining Global Competence for EngineeringStudents, Paper presented at 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BritishColumbia, Canada.[5] Continental AG (2006) In Search of Global Engineering Excellence: Educating the NextGeneration of Engineers for the Global Workplace. Continental AG: Hanover, Germany.[6] Downey, G. L., Lucena, J. C., Moskal, B. M., Parkhurst, R., Bigley, T., Hays, C., Jesiek, B.K., Kelly, L., Miller, J., Ruff, S., Lehr, J. L. and Nichols-Belo, A.. (2006) The
items (see Pollitt,2012b for a discussion of the Rasch statistical methods in ACJ). The misfit statistics can be usedas a reliability check for judges and the final rank order of items with further analysis andassessment of problematic judges or items.In addition to the measures covered, this method of assessment has demonstrated strongstochastic transitivity (if A usually beats B, and B usually beats C, then A will mostly beat C),furthering strengthening the reliability of the findings (Pollitt, 2004). Pollitt (2004) pointed outthat the strong reliability findings connected with ACJ account for possible unreliability betweengraders as well as lack of internal consistency within the assignment itself—an uncommoncharacteristic as most
), 114- 127. APPENDIX:Sample Pre and Post Assessment from Science Says Safer SportsLesson Title: Protecting fragile objects in sports Unit #: Lesson #: Activity #: Worksheet:Activity Title: Force and Motion Basics 3 1 1 aWorksheet Title: Pre-Test Part 1: CER There are many forces acting on this car. Two of them are shown. What is the net (resulting) force? 1. Which claim is correct? The net force is… a. 30 N to the right b. 30 N to the left c. 70 N to the right d. 70 N to the left 2. What evidence from the data supports your claim? a
-17/the-new-stem-index-2016. [Accessed: 11–01-2016].[3] “Free and Reduced School Lunch Data.” [Online]. Available: http://www.arkansased.gov/divisions/fiscal- and-administrative-services/e-rate/free-and-reduced-school-lunch-data. [Accessed: 11–01-2016].[4] “The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016,” 2016.[5] D. St. John and E. Specking, “From College to K-12: Adapting Industrial Engineering Classroom Exercises for Outreach Purposes,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015.[6] E. Specking, P. E. Kirkwood, and L. Yang, “Perceptions and Misconceptions of Industrial Engineering from First-Year Engineering Students,” in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.[7] B. M. Capobianco, H. A. Diefes-dux, I
EducatingEngineers about Nanotechnology: End-of-Life Management of Nanomaterial-ContainingWastes. Proc. 121st Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 8 p.Pierce, C.E., Berge, N., Flora, J.R.V., Matta, F., Petrulis, R., and Washam, E. (2016). A Two-Step Program for Undergraduate Students to Gain Authentic Experience in the Research Process.Proc. 123rd Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 12 p.Pierce, C.E., Caicedo, J.M., Flora, J.R.V., Berge, N.D., Madarshahian, R., and Timmerman, B.(2014). Integrating Professional and Technical Engineering Skills with the EFFECTsPedagogical Framework. International Journal of Engineering Education, v. 30, n. 6(B), pp.579-589.Pierce, C.E., Caicedo, J.M., and Flora, J.R.V. (2012
this lab is to not overwhelmstudents with material since a graphical user interface (GUI) requires concepts not covered in thelecture. To mitigate this, students are given a reference framework implementing more of thecomplex graphical components but with blank sections for students to complete. The framework for the C++ section of the course uses the Simple Fast Multimedia Library(http://www.sfml-dev.org) while the MATLAB section uses the built-in graphical user interfacemodule. These frameworks create a blank window, allow the user to control the mouse andkeyboard, and provide a graphical component to draw in (see Appendix A and B for examples).Note that students do not need to necessarily understand the framework to complete
of more standardprogramming languages. It is possible to teach the most basic of computer science concepts—simple sequential instructions—up to Boolean logic, iteration, and even recursion by usingScratch. (a) A recursive Fibonacci Algorithm in Scratch. (b) An interactive animal cell in Scratch . Figure 1: Photos of Math and Science Scratch sample projects. .However if Scratch were only a useful pedagogical tool for introducing older students to theconcepts of computer programming, its utility would be limited. Scratch is not limited in itsusefulness as a tool that can be used only for this purpose. Students are learning with Scratch
– that becomes the hunt for möjligheterfor us as engineering educators.Works Cited1. Sfard, A. On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educ. Res. 27, 4–13 (1998).2. Frezza, S. T. A knowledge basis for engineering design. Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE 2015–Febru, (2015).3. Eris, O. Effective Inquiry for Innovative Engineering Design. (Kluwer, 2004).4. Chi, M. T. H. in Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (eds. Ward, T. B. & Smith, S. M.) 209–234 (American Psychological Association, 1997).5. Robinson, K. Out of Our Minds: Learning to be Creative. (Wiley Capstone, 2011).6. Amabile, T. M. Creativity in Context: Update to the social
and successfulpre-engineering program, creates a vibrant win-win situation.Future research is required into the requirements for entry into 300 engineering courses. Byinvestigating the pre-requisite requirements in the various engineering programs at FloridaUniversities the viability of an AS degree in pre-engineering can be determined. The culminationof this study is expected to lead to a detailed pre-engineering curriculum proposal.References[1] Florida Department of Economic Opportunity, "Employment Projections," 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.floridajobs.org/labor-market-information/data-center/statistical- programs/employment-projections. [Accessed 25 01 2017].[2] Ashby, A. M. Cohen and F. B. Brawer, The American Community