,” Review of educational Research, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 249-276, 1998. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [12] A. M. Langan, C. P. Wheater, E. M. Shaw, B. J. Haines,This material is based upon work supported by a Miller Grant W. R. Cullen, J. C. Boyle, D. Penney, J. A. Oldekop, C. Ashcroft, and L. Lockey, “Peer Assessment of Oralfrom Iowa State University. Presentations: Effects of Student Gender, University
strong pre-college background inmath and science, so many students from low-income backgrounds enter collegeunderprepared to begin engineering curriculums. When coupled with a lack of familiarity with theculture of higher education and rising tuition costs, the result is a much higher attrition rate forthese students. Ohland et al. (2012) found that economically disadvantaged studentsmatriculate and graduate from engineering programs at lower rates than students fromhigher-income backgrounds.In this paper, we will discuss a model for improving the inclusion and retention ofhighly-motivated but underprepared students in engineering. Evidence from the EngineeringGoldShirt Program at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU-B) and the Washington
-studentrelationships, benefits of underrepresented student organizations, problems with advising, lackof communication of School of Engineering policies, procedures, and initiatives, and finally,excessive expectations of student organizations to improve the student experience.The six recommendations of the report highlighted concrete steps the school could enact toimprove the environment for all students. 1. Create a Center for Engineering Diversity – dedicated to working with minority engineering students. The goals of the center would include: a. Increase the diversity of students who apply, enroll, and graduate from the School of Engineering, b. Increase awareness of engineering careers by underrepresented groups
Paper ID #241982018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29A Systemic Approach to Recruiting and Retaining Women in UndergraduateComputingDr. Gretchen Achenbach, National Center for Women and Information Technology Gretchen Achenbach is a research scientist in the Department of Engineering and Society at the Uni- versity of Virginia and with the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT). She earned her Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Her interests focus on the communication of scientific information and
Paper ID #242602018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29First-Year Experience (FYrE@ECST): Pre-Physics Course (WIP)Ni Li, California State University Los AngelesDr. Gustavo B Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles Menezes is an Associate Professor in Civil Engineering Department at CalStateLA. His specialization is in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering. Since becoming part of the faculty in 2009, Menezes has also focused on improving student success and has led a number of engineering education projects. He is currently the PI
experiencescontributed to understanding how we might think to make the teaching of engineering, andspecifically problem definition, in K-12 settings more inclusive. Overall, these findings add tothe growing conversation inclusive classroom environments, that make more explicit connectionbetween youths’ out of school knowledge and practices in school settings.Works Cited[1] S. Sismondo, An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, 2 edition. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. ; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.[2] G. Goggin, Cell Phone Culture: Mobile Technology in Everyday Life. Routledge, 2012.[3] B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage, 1986.[4] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L
identity and improved 21st Century skills? b) Is there adifference in outcomes for girls in a mixed gender environment versus an all-girls environment?LITERATURE REVIEWIn order to develop a contextual framework for the research, the authors conducted a review ofthe current literature. Areas of interest included: the theoretical pros and cons of single-sexlearning environments, the efficacy of informal STEM outreach programs in increasing STEMinterest or STEM identity, and the importance of the development of 21st Century learning skillsin today’s educational paradigm.Single-gender education pros/consThe literature related to the effect of single-gender education is conflicting. While many of thestudies show some type of positive outcome for women
/publications/tracking-transfer-institutional-state-effectiveness.html, 2016.6. T. Bailey, “Can community colleges achieve ambitious graduation goals?”, in Getting to Graduation: The Completion Agenda in Higher Education, A. P. Kelly & M. Schneider Eds. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012, pp. 73-101.7. B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.8. Bureau of Labor Statistics: U.S. Department of Labor, “Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity,” 2015. Available: http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm.9. National Science Foundation, “How many S&E graduates attended community college?”, 2016. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb
in their undergraduate career. STEM programs shouldconsider the intersectionality of their women participants and how to foster their voices ofpositive change through analysis of disenfranchised experiences at the university and withinsociety.A WiSE approach: Examining how service-learning impacts first-year women in STEM 15 ReferencesBeede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation (ESA Issue Brief No. #04–11). U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration.Britt, L. L. (2012). Why we use service-learning: A report outline a typology of three approaches to this form of
recruitment and retention” was revealed in a total of 3different reports and called upon various stakeholders, as seen in Appendix B, Table B5.Next, the list of recommendations was printed and clustered to identify emergent themes. Thefirst round of coding was done by one researcher. Two researchers then reviewed thepreliminary codes to identify larger themes and reach agreement on the sorting and clustering.Next, the themes for the recommendations were applied to the Excel sheet to search for anyrelationships that may exist between themes, stakeholders, and/or decades. Table 1: Codebook with descriptions and examples of codes. Codebook Code Description
examining issues of social justice and educational equity. Currently, she is on a research team examining the impacts of an out-of-school STEM summer program for racially underrepresented youth.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the assistant director for research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David Knight is Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in the De- partment of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagement in Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with
experience," Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 896-918, 2002.[5] J. M. Trenor, S. L. Yu, C. L. Waight, K. S. Zerda, and S. H. A. Ting Ling, "The Relations of Ethnicity to Female Engineering Students' Educational Experiences and College and Career Plans in an Ethnically Diverse Learning Environment," Journal of Engineering Education, Article vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 449-465, 2008.[6] S. R. Harper, R. M Karini, B. K Bridges, and J. C Hayek, "Gender Differences in Student Engagement Among African American Undergraduates at Historically Black Colleges and Universities," Journal of College Student Development, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 271-284, 2004.[7] D. Sparks, "An Exploration of the
, "Engineering by the Numbers," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2012.[7] OIE, "Retention and graduation rates dataset," Fresno State Office of Institutiona . Effectiveness, (http://fresnostate.edu/academics/oie/data/) Accessed on Jan 2, 2018[8] NCES, "National Center for Education Statistics (dataset)," (https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_325.45.asp) Accessed on Jan 2, 2018[9] B. Nosek, M. Banaji, and A. Greenwald, "Project Implicit," (https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/) Accessed on Jan 2, 2018 7. List of AbbreviationsFresno State: California State University, FresnoCSU: California State UniversityOIE: Office of Institutional EffectivenessLCOE: Lyles Collge of EngineeringCMS
,support, and retain those who are from the underrepresented groups. However, even withincreased recruitment, those from underrepresented groups still make up incredibly smallpercentages of the engineering workforce (U.S. Department of Education, 2016).There are many reasons why, once recruited into engineering, diverse talent does not persist(Seron, Silbey, Cech, & Rubineau, 2016; Singh et al. 2014). For example, several researchershave documented dysfunctional team behaviors that are particularly problematic for femaleengineers, such as: (a) men relegating women to helping roles (Seron, Silbey, Cech, & Rubineau,2016), (b) men creating team environments in which women do not speaking up when they are inthe minority (Dasgupta, Scircle &
social cognitive career theory. Professional School Counseling, 91–97.Godwin, A. (2016). The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity. 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 15. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26122Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving Engineering: A Multi- Year Single Institution Study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.Pierrakos, O., Beam, T. K., Constantz, J., Johri, A., & Anderson, R. (2009). On the development
] Hurtado, Sylvia, et al. "Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project." New Directions for Institutional Research 2010.148 (2010): 5-15.[7] Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). “We do science here”: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 553-579.[8] Eagan, M. K., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2010, October). What matters in STEM: Institutional contexts that influence STEM bachelor’s degree completion rates. In annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education
. W. Lowe, and S. E. Walden, "Racial Inequality Exists in Spite of Over- Representation: The Case of Asian-American Students in Engineering Education," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009.[7] S. E. Walden and R. L. Shehab, "Where Successful Latino/a Engineering Undergraduates find Community at a Predominately White Research University," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, 2009.[8] B. Mann. (2014, 11/4/17). Equity and Equality Are Not Equal. The Equity Line. Available: https://edtrust.org/the-equity-line/equity-and-equality-are-not-equal/[9] D. A. Trytten, A. Wong Lowe, and S. E. Walden, "'Asians are good at math. What an awful stereotype:' The Model Minority
Paper ID #242412018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Erasing a Gender Gap in Performance in a Multidisciplinary IntroductoryEngineering CourseDr. Nancy K Lape, Harvey Mudd College Nancy K. Lape is an Associate Professor of Engineering at Harvey Mudd College. Her previous re- search in engineering education examined the effectiveness of flipped classrooms as compared to more ”traditional” active learning in a controlled study. In addition to educational research, she also runs un- dergraduate research programs in gas separation membranes and
) I can succeed (earn an A or B) in an advanced engineering 5.66 (1.30) course.C. Participants Participants in the study were students who identified as engineering majors in theirjunior or senior year of study at the urban research institution. The majority of participantsidentified as male (81%) and nearly three-quarters of participants identified as White (74%);these proportions are reflective of the engineering student population at the institution. Transferstudents comprised a little over half of the sample (55%), with a plurality of students reportingthat neither parent had obtained a college degree (38%). Based on lack of racial/ethnic diversityin the sample, researchers did not examine differences in
individuals working to advance gender equity in science, technology, engineering and math fields. Berry received her B.S. Chemical Engineering degree from the University of Texas, Austin in May 1993 and her M.B.A. from the University of Houston, Clear Lake in May 1999. She has been a member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) since 2001, most recently serving on the WEPAN Board as President Elect, President and Past President from 2007 - 2010. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018A Leadership Collaborative Model:Fostering Community ThroughDiverse Student OrganizationCollaborations Tricia Berry Women in Engineering Program
Paper ID #221082018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Afrofuturism: Catalyzing a Pathway to more Inclusive Engineering DesignDr. Woodrow Wilson Winchester III, Robert Morris University WOODROW W. WINCHESTER, III is an Associate Professor of Engineering Management and Coordi- nator of Graduate Engineering Programs at Robert Morris University, Moon Township, US-PA. He has over twelve (12) years of teaching and course development (online and on-ground) experiences within the disciplines of industrial & systems engineering (ISE) and engineering
Paper ID #242332018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Advancing the College of Engineering Strategic Goal of Becoming a NationalModel of Inclusivity and CollaborationMichelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Padma Akkaraju, College of Engineering, Oregon State University Padma Akkaraju is the
Paper ID #213292018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Social Enterprise Model for a Multi-Institutional Mentoring Network for Womenin STEMDr. Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College Dr. Sara A. Atwood is an Associate Professor and Chair of Engineering at Elizabethtown College in Penn- sylvania. She holds a BA and MS from Dartmouth College, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. Dr. Atwood’s research interests are in creativity, engineering design, first-generation and low-income students, internship
Paper ID #241682018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Work in Progress: Will looking ”over the fence” of academic challenges to afuture as a successful engineer, support the persistence the WiE students needto succeed?Ms. Olga Maria Stavridis, Ohio State University Olga Stavridis is the Assistant Director for Diversity, Outreach and Inclusion’s Women in Engineering Program. She served as Senior Lecturer for six years for the College of Engineering at The Ohio State University. She has taught Fundamentals for Engineering I and II for the Freshmen
Paper ID #216972018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Exploring the incorporation of diversity and inclusion curriculum in engi-neering living and learning community programs: A work in progressDr. Elizabeth R. Kurban, Women in Engineering, University of Maryland College Park Elizabeth Kurban serves as the Assistant Director of Retention for the Women in Engineering Program at the University of Maryland Clark School of Engineering. Elizabeth’s professional and research interests broadly surround STEM-field access and persistence for women and
Paper ID #241222018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Too Black to be Woman and Too Much Woman to be a Man: Black WomenAttempting to Reconcile Their Multiple Identities in Academic and Profes-sional Engineering SpacesDr. Stacie LeSure, American Society for Engineering Education Dr. LeSure is a Program Director and Senior Researcher in the College of Engineering at Howard Uni- versity. She manages various research projects focused on the academic perceptions and persistence of students in STEM, particularly those students who are traditionally
Paper ID #21493Examining the Computing Identity of High-Achieving Underserved Comput-ing Students on the Basis of Gender, Field, and Year in SchoolMs. Atalie GarciaDr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida In- ternational University, holds a doctoral degree in engineering education from Purdue University. Her research interests are focused on broadening participation in computing and engineering through the ex- ploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity; and 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform
Director for International Student and Scholar Services at the University of Alabama. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Technology and Gendered Spaces: Examining Equity and AccessA workshop-style presentationPowerPoint Presentation Outline: I. Introduction to Topic: Technology and Gendered Spaces II. Examining the Current Landscape a. Brogramming Culture: define the concept and share examples b. Sexual Harassment in Technology Spaces: share recent examples of sexual harassment allegations in technology spaces; provide an overview of the larger #MeToo movement c. Data: share data regarding CS and CSE graduation numbers both at the
achieve a grade of “C-” at a far greater percentage thanstudents in the traditional classes. 78.3% of students received a “C-” or greater in the flipped classroom,as compared to 64.4% for the traditional classes. Headcount % Students Cumulative % Flipped Traditional Flipped Traditional Flip Traditional Flip + A 4 64 17.4% 16.6% 17.4% 16.6% 0.8% B 3 89 13.0% 23.1% 30.4% 39.7% -9.3% C 8 89 34.8% 23.1% 65.2% 62.9% 2.4% C- 3 6 13.0% 1.6
provide our students with practice in using media reports they will encountereveryday in a manner that influences their day to day practice.The structure students are presented with to guide their investigation and work toward addressing theissues of each case follows a rubric based on the social-justice theories of John Rawls [39] (seeAppendix A). To help familiarize students, a fictionalized example of issues of inclusion, diversity andsocial justice in computer science education is used as a warm-up, to (a) show what is to be identifiedand how it can be encoded, (b) apply key vocabulary and conceptual relationships, and (c) demonstratehow they can proceed through subsequent case examples in the course (see Appendix B).These cases are