ASEE Conference Location Vancouver 2011 2011-2013 Bevlee Watford San Antonio 2012 Atlanta 2013 2013-2014 Teri Reed & Adrienne Minerick Indianapolis 2014 2014-2015 Teri Reed Seattle 2015 2015-2016 Adrienne Minerick New Orleans 2016 2016-2017 Stephanie Farrell Columbus 2017 2017-2018 Eric Specking Salt Lake City 2018 2018-2019 Rebecca Bates
. Livingston, and S. M. Misak, “Finding a Passion and Making It Happen: A Program’s Approach to Promoting Entrepreneurship, Making, and Innovation through Hands-On Projects that Benefit Society,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[40] J. Larson, M. Lande, S. Jordan, and S. Weiner, “Makers as Adaptive Experts-in-Training: How Maker Design Practices Could Lead to the Engineers of the Future,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2017.[41] A. Wigner, M. Lande, and S. S. Jordan, “How Can Maker Skills Fit in with Accreditation Demands for Undergraduate Engineering Programs?,” presented at the 2016 ASEE Annual
). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2018-2019/[22] D. Riley, Engineering Thermodynamics and 21st Century Energy Problems: A Textbook Companion for Student Engagement (Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, no. 3). 2011, pp. 1-97.[23] L. L. Schiebinger. (2012, January 10). Engineering Checklist. Available: http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/methods/engineering_checklist.html[24] P. J. Clarkson, R. Coleman, S. Keates, and C. Lebbon, Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium and 2016 New Faculty Fellow for the Frontiers in Engineering Education Annual Conference. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2015 Outstanding Doctoral Research Award.Thaddeus Milton Thaddeus is a junior majoring in Civil Engineering with a concentration in Transportation at Purdue University. He works with Dr. Godwin
Civil Engineering. Currently she is pursuing an M.S. in Engineering and is due to graduate in May 2019. She has been actively involved within the Department of Engineering Education & Leadership as a recruitment leader and administra- tive assistant. Currently she serves as the graduate advisor for the American Society for Engineering Education student chapter and is a research team leader in the Center for Research in Engineering and Technology Education where she focuses on the success of students in science, technology, engineering and mathematics of two post-secondary educational institutions based in El Paso.Miss Crystal Fernandez-Pena, University of Texas, El PasoMr. Mike Thomas Pitcher, University of Texas, El
Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019 | ABET. N.p., Apr. 2017. Web. 02 Feb. 2018.2. Kai, J. C., & Turpin, A. “Improving Students' Technical Writing Skills: Abstracts in Introductory Solid Mechanics.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2015), Seattle, WA.3. Trellinger, N. M., Essig, R. R., Troy, C. D., Jesiek, B. K., & Boyd, J. “Something to Write Home(work) About: An Analysis of Writing Exercises in Fluid Mechanics Textbooks.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2015), Seattle, WA.4. Timmerman, B. E. C., Strickland, D. C., Johnson, R. L., & Payne, J. R. “Development of a ‘universal’ rubric for assessing undergraduates’ scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing
. 3. ABET. (2017). Approved Revisions to Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs for implementation in the 2019 -2020 accreditation cycle. ABET, Baltimore, MD. 64. Basha, E and Lee, L.S. “Sensors and Structures: Outcomes From A Project- Based Multi-Disciplinary Graduate Course”, in proceedings of 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 10-13, 2012.5. Frank, M.P. et al. “Expanding and Improving the Integration of Multidisciplinary Projects in a Capstone Senior Design Course: Experience Gained and Future Plans”, in proceedings of 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15- 18, 2014.6. Dettman, M.A. and
Battle Damage Repair Engineer for B-1B aircraft. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Transitioning to the New ABET Student Outcomes: Architecture Development for a Systems Engineering Degree ProgramAbstractSystems engineering degree programs are accredited by the Engineering AccreditationCommission (EAC) of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). Theaccreditation process includes evaluation of a program’s development and assessment of definedstudent outcomes (SO) (i.e. Criterion 3). These outcomes were recently revised by ABET forprograms seeking accreditation in 2019 and later. The systems engineering degree program atthe United States Air Force Academy has been
time of this writing, the course described in still in development but we anticipate that thecontent will be complete by the ASEE Annual Conference. Decisions still to be made include thesoftware used to offer group student chats and as instructor office hours, as well as other itemsdescribed in this paper. In the first offering of the course in Fall 2018-Spring 2019, a key objectivewill be to validate content choices, ensure that the material is presented at the right level of detailand pace for students enrolled in the course, and determine the efficacy of any improvements tothe online interface students use in the course. It is hoped that feedback from ASEE attendees willhelp identify appropriate assessment methods toward these goals.One
to effective teamwork.References 1. Ritter, Barbara A., Erika E. Small, John W. Mortimer, and Jessica L. Doll. "Designing Management Curriculum for Workplace Readiness: Developing Students’ Soft Skills." Journal of Management Education 42.1 (2017): 80-103. 2. ABET. "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019." Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018 – 2019 | ABET. N.p., Apr. 2017. Web. 05 Feb. 2018. 3. Loignon, Andrew C., David J. Woehr, Jane S. Thomas, Misty L. Loughry, Matthew W. Ohland, and Daniel M. Ferguson. "Facilitating Peer Evaluation in Team Contexts: The Impact of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training." Academy of Management Learning & Education 16.4 (2016
, “Pedagogies of liberation in an engineering thermodynamics class,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 22-25, 2003, Nashville, Tennessee. American Society for Engineering Education, 2003. 10. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2018-2019," [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2018-2019/#program. [Accessed: January 30, 2018].
in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confi- dence, their influence upon womens’ performance in school and the workplace, and their presence in the media and consequences for viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Mrs. Marissa A. Tsugawa-Nieves, University of Nevada, Reno Marissa Tsugawa is a graduate research assistant studying at the University of Nevada, Reno in the PRiDE Research Group. She is currently working towards a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. She expects to graduate May of 2019. Her research interests include student development of identity and motivation in
emotion? The retrospectivethink-aloud interview was be audio recorded.Since I am using CVT as a framework for various stages of my study, I will use a theoreticalthematic analysis [15] to analyze the transcripts of the interviews (both the follow-up andretrospective think-aloud) using a codebook that I have designed [16]. As I analyze the data, thesample codebook will evolve by adding new codes.4. Current Status and Future DirectionsThis research study has been designed for the purpose of a PhD dissertation. The immediatefuture directions include conducting the analysis in the summer and fall of 2018, and defendingthe dissertation in the spring of 2019.AcknowledgementsThis work would not have been possible without the support of many people, some
codes, and generating themes fromcategories [23]. The authors have identified that over 50 percent of veterans who enter the college ofengineering at Kansas State University are dismissed or discontinue enrollment. Approximately34 percent of the discontinued/dismissed students leave after their first semester and another 31percent leave after their first year. Therefore, the results of the survey will be directly linked tothe retention of students following their first semester in fall 2018 and spring 2019. If there is apositive relationship between veteran student retention and social responsibility, the final surveyand interview results will be used to propose an intervention.References[1] President's Council of Advisors on Science and
; control. He is a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio and affiliated with ASME, ASEE, SME and TAP. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Planning of Curriculum Modules for Teaching of Fluid Power ConceptsAbstractHydraulic fluid power is a technical field that has gone through the cycle of being a primaryoption for power transmission, to having a substantial drop in its use, and now in becoming onceagain a preferred technology. There is no doubt that hydraulic fluid power is a maturetechnology, and the new applications present numerous challenges, but it is evident that there aresignificant benefits. Therefore, there is a growing need to have
theirassigned projects during the Engineering Expo and scored the oral presentations. We felt it wasimportant to include the Documentation competency, so it was added to the three taken from thecapstone design rubric. Table 1 below shows how each competency maps to both the currentABET student outcomes under Criterion 3 and to the student outcomes set to take effect duringthe 2019-2020 accreditation cycle.Table 1. Mapping of design competencies to current and future ABET student outcomes Competency Current ABET Student Outcomes 2019-2020 Student Outcomes System Design (c) An ability to design a system, (2) An ability to apply component, or process to meet engineering design to produce
. 60 50 Number of Students 40 30 20 10 0 3D Printing Machining Tools Electronics Robotics Students participated in technical lectures Students obtained the certificates Fig. 10: Data statistics of students' participation in technical lecturesFig. 11 shows Makerspace activities in 2017 and the expected goal in 2019. Thisdemonstrates SCUPI Makerspace has already achieved a great number of
Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 105–115, Apr. 2004.[5] S. Ferguson and R. W. Foley, “Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and ABET Accreditation: A Pilot Study of Fourth-Year Engineering Students using Longitudinal Concept Maps,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, 2019.[6] ABET, “Rationale for Revising Criteria 3 and 5,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-alerts/rationale-for- revising-criteria-3/. [Accessed: 19-Dec-2016].[7] R. W. Foley, L. M. Archambault, A. E. Hale, and H.-K. Dong, “Learning Outcomes in Sustainability Education Among Future Elementary School Teachers,” Journal of
is the local coordinator for the 2019 ASEE-SE conference, which is being hosted by Auburn University. John’s teaching and research interests are in control systems applications.Dr. Victor P. Nelson, Auburn University Victor P. Nelson is a professor and Assistant Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Auburn University. His primary research interests include embedded systems and computer-aided design and testing of digital systems and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). He is co-author of the textbook Digital Logic Circuit Analysis and Design and a tutorial book on fault-tolerant computing. He has been Chair of the ECE Curriculum Committee, Coordinator of the ECE Graduate Program, and served
claims, such adocument must be updated on a regular basis [4], [5], [6]. ASCE published the second version ofthe body of knowledge in 2008 (CE-BOK2) and now is in the final stages of preparing the thirdversion (CE-BOK3), which is scheduled to be published in the spring of 2019. Current plans callfor the CE-BOK to be revisited every eight years.Civil engineering work has evolved to encompass the distinctive and complementary roles of notonly engineering professionals, but also technologists and technicians. Such segmentation is notunlike that encountered in other learned professions, such as medicine or law, and it is critical tothe efficiency and success of the civil engineering workforce. ASCE, through Policy Statement535 [7], views the core of
the rigorous approval process and will beeffective for the 2019-20 academic year. This paper analyzes the differences between theexisting criteria and the proposed changes. Through a specific detailed example, thepaper illustrates how an existing assessment system can seamlessly be adjusted for thenew criteria. Most of the embedded indicators and direct measures of attainment can stillbe used. The results simply need to be organized differently.IntroductionProposed changes to certain sections of the Criteria for Accrediting EngineeringPrograms have been approved by the ABET Engineering Area Delegation as of October20, 2017 for implementation in the 2019–20 accreditation review cycle. The changedsections are the Introduction and Definitions
findings may be redeployed for learning andteaching purposes.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the National Science Foundation for support of this research (Award 1348530:Large-Scale Research on Engineering Design Based on Big Learner Data Logged by a CADTool). The views expressed herein are solely the authors’.Cited work 1. ABET. (2018). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019. Retrieved from: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering -programs- 2018-2019/ 2. Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380–1400. 3. Baepler, P., & Murdoch, C
role of corporate responsibility in employee recruitment and retention. Before coming to IUPUI, Brandon ran the day-to-day operations of the Indiana STEM Resource Network where he co-founded the Indiana Science Initiative which provides research based science materials and professional development to approximately 2200 teachers impacting over 50,000 students each year. .Dr. Mary F. Price, Indiana University-Purdue University of Indianapolis ASEE Presentation Mary F. Price (price6@iupui.edu ) is an anthropologist and Director of Faculty Devel- opment at the IUPUI Center for Service and Learning. Mary works with scholar-practitioners, students and community members to strengthen practice, deepen learning and facilitate
at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Edu- cation. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011
Paper ID #23622CLEAR Scholars in Engineering: Academic, Career, and Leadership Devel-opment to Help Students with Financial Challenges Achieve their Full Aca-demic PotentialDr. Karen D. Alfrey, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis Karen Alfrey is a Clinical Associate Professor in Biomedical Engineering at IUPUI. After serving as the Associate Chair and Director of the Undergraduate Program in Biomedical Engineering, in 2018 she transitions to the role of Associate Dean for Undergraduate Academic Affairs and Programs in the School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. She has been a member of ASEE since 2003
are used toassess the effectiveness of program objectives in attaining student outcomes. The followinglearning outcomes based on the ABET criteria 3 (ABET- ETAC, 2018-2019) [3] have beenestablished to assess the student learning in this program. These student outcomes are asfollows: a) Graduates will demonstrate an ability to apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and modern tools used in manufacturing engineering technology program. b) Graduates will demonstrate an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering principles to analysis and design. c) Graduates will demonstrate an ability to conduct standard tests and measurements; to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments
engineering, also addresses the need for engineering leadership intheir most recent syllabus update [6, p. 69]. The Canadian book, Fundamental Competencies forthe 21st Century Engineers, has also recognized this need, and has added leadership as anessential competency for engineers in their most recent edition [7]. The attribute of leadershiphas also been included in the new student outcomes for ABET (Accreditation Board for 1Engineering and Technology), which will become effective in the 2019-2020 accreditation cycle(replacing the “a-k” outcomes). Students must be able to “function effectively on a team whosemembers together provide leadership, create
Academies Press.2. ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2018-2019. 2018 February 5, 2018; Available from: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs- 2018-2019/.3. Warnock, J.N. and G. Melnychuk. Strategies for Increasing Student Participation in International Programs. in ASEE International Forum, New Orleans, LA. 2016.4. Deborah Besser, P., C.M. George, E.A. Kern, and J. Laleman. Board# 21: Intercultural Competence at the Intersection of Engineering and Study Abroad. in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2017.5. Berger, E.J. and R. Bailey. Designing Short-Term Study Abroad Engineering Experiences to Achieve Global Competencies. in
robotics, automation, and nanotechnology engineering education and research. He is a licensed PE in the State of Colorado, a member of ASEE, a senior member of IEEE, and a senior member of SME.Dr. Bahaa I. Kazem Ansaf, Colorado State University, Pueblo B. Ansaf received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering /Aerospace and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Baghdad in 1992, 1996 and 1999 respectively. From 2001 to 2014, he has been an Assistant Professor and then Professor with the Mechatronics Engineering Department, Baghdad University. During 2008 he has been a Visiting Associate professor at Mechanical Engineering Department, MIT. During 2010 he has been a Visiting Associate
]. # leadership-focused papers at ASEE 40 35 30 Annual Conference 25 20 15 10 5 0 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 YearFigure 1. Number of ASEE Annual Conference Papers focused on Leadership over TimeThe revised ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) Criterion 3 outcomes forimplementation in 2019 include