Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 1 - 30 of 36 in total
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeffrey Buckley, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Lena B. Gumaelius, KTH Royal Institute of Technology; Tomás Hyland, University of Limerick; Niall Seery, Athlone Institute of Technology; Arnold Neville Pears, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
a member of the Technology Education Research Group (TERG). His main research interest is in how people learn. He is particularly interested in how cognitive abilities such as spatial ability affect students capacity to learn, and how levels of prior knowledge impact on further learning. Jeffrey is also interested in inclusivity in engineering and technology education, particularly in relation to stereotypes and misconceptions that people may have about technical subject areas.Dr. Lena B. Gumaelius, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Dr Lena Gumaelius has a background as a researcher in Biotechnology, in which field she still teaches undergraduate students at KTH. (Lena got her Master of Science in chemistry 1993 and
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sagit Betser, University of California, Davis; Lee Michael Martin, University of California, Davis; Rebecca Ambrose Ph.D., University of California-Davis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Archer, J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, B. Wong.”“Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science”, Science Education, 96(6):967-89, Nov 2012.[2] C. Hill, C. Corbett, A. St Rose. “Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics”, American Association of University Women, 1111 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, 2010.[3] E. Smith. “Women into science and engineering? Gendered participation in higher education”, STEM subjects. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6):993-1014, Dec 2011.[4] Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017. Available: www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd.[5] A. Johnson, J. Brown
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kristina Rigden, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Mariappan Jawaharlal, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona; Nicole Gutzke, Cal Poly Pomona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
-framework [Accessed December 11, 2019].[4] J. Dewey, “How we think,” 1910. [Online]. Available: http://rci.rutgers.edu/~tripmcc/phil/dewey-hwt-pt1-selections.pdf [Accessed December 7, 2019].[5] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman, 1956.[6] Resource Area for Teaching, “Bridging the engagement gap with hands-on teaching,” 2013.[Online]. Available: from http://www.raft.net/public/pdfs/case-for-hands-on-learning.pdf [AccessedDecember 8, 2019].[7] P. Goertz, “10 signs of a 21st century classroom,” Edutopia: George Lucas EducationalFoundation, February 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.edutopia.org/discussion/10-signs-21st-century-classroom [Accessed December 7, 2019].[8] K. Gary, “Project-Based Learning,” IEEE
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chaoyi Wang; Michael Frye, University of the Incarnate Word
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, andthe UIW Autonomous Vehicle Systems Laboratory. The author would like to give specialthanks to all miniGEMS staffs and Dr. Sharon Herbers for their invaluable support duringthe research. References[1] Bishop, A. (2015). Career aspirations of high school males and females in a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics program. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.[2] Christensen R., Knezek G., Tyler-Wood T, & Gibson D. (2014). Longitudinal analysis of cognitive constructs fostered by STEM activities for middle school students. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 6(2), 103-122.[3] Reinking, A., & Martin, B. (2018). The Gender Gap in STEM Fields
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jing Wang, University of South Florida; Dmitry Goldgof, University of South Florida; Ken Christensen P.E., University of South Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #25846WiCSE: Impact of a Women’s Support Group on Increasing the Percentageof Women Students in a Department of Computer Science and EngineeringDr. Jing Wang, University of South Florida Dr. Jing Wang is an Instructor II in the department of Computer Science and Engineering at University of South Florida. Dr. Wang is the faculty advisor of the student organization Women in Computer Science and Engineering (WiCSE). WiCSE focuses on gathering together female students who are majoring, or interested, in computer science and engineering to provide support, career guidance, opportunities to discuss relevant topics
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Educ., vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 225–252, 2011.[5] A. L. Pawley, C. Schimpf, and L. Nelson, “Gender in engineering education research: A content analysis of research in JEE, 1998–2012,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 508–528, 2016.[6] R. A. Layton, M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and G. D. Ricco, “Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria,” Adv. Eng. Educ., 2010.[7] M. W. Ohland et al., “The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self- and peer evaluation,” Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 609–630, Dec. 2012.[8] B. Williams, B. Brian HE, D. F. Elger, and B
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Jennifer J. VanAntwerp, Calvin College; Joanna Wright, University of Washington; Lauren Summers, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Wood, and M. E. Layne, “The Impact of Work/Life Balance Policies on Faculty Careers,” presented at the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26.1550.1-26.1550.10.[15] E. A. Cech and M. Blair-Loy, “Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers,” Work Occup., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 86–110, Feb. 2014.[16] B. Bagilhole and J. Goode, “The contradiction of the myth of individual merit, and the reality of a patriarchal support system in academic careers: A feminist investigation,” Eur. J. Womens Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 161–180, 2001.[17] M. C. Skewes et al., “Absent autonomy: Relational competence and gendered paths to faculty self-determination in the promotion and tenure process
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
H. Paige Brown, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Pawley, “Social Justice and Inclusion,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 335–356.[23] M. Ross, “A unicorn's tale: Examining the experiences of Black women in engineering industry,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Engineering Education, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2016.
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University; Dongyang Deng, North Carolina A&T State University; Cheryl Monique Stevens, North Carolina A&T State University; Kayla Gore; Iyshea Borders-Taylor, North Carolina A&T State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
[Accessed July 4, 2018] 7. J. O. Choi, P. P. Shrestha, J. Lim, & B. K. Shrestha, “An investigation of construction workforce inequalities and biases in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) Industry,” Construction Research Congress: Sustainable Design and Construction and Education, 2018. [Online] Available doi:10.1061/9780784481301.007 [accessed July 10, 2018] 8. H. Blackburn, “The status of women in STEM in higher education: A review of the literature 2007 – 2017,” Science and Technology Libraries, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 235 – 273, 2017. 9. A. Furnham, E. Reeves, & S. Budhani, “Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: Sex differences in parental
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cristina Poleacovschi, Iowa State University; Scott Grant Feinstein, Iowa State University; Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University; Meghan Berger M.A., North Carolina A & T State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #27363Board 136: An Intersectional Perspective to Studying Microaggressions inEngineering ProgramsDr. Cristina Poleacovschi, Iowa State University Dr. Poleacovschi is an Assistant Professor at Iowa State University. She researches issues of diversity and focuses on intersectional aspects of microaggressions.Dr. Scott Grant Feinstein, Iowa State University Dr. Scott Feinstein is an expert in research design and comparative and identity politics.Dr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Stephanie Luster-Teasley is Professor and Chair of the Department of Civil, Architectural, and En
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bradley Joseph Priem, Northeastern University; Caroline Ghio, Northeastern University; Hannah Boyce, Northeastern University; Sydney Anne Morris, Northeastern University; Emma Kaeli, Stanford University; Tyler Byrne Cole, Northeastern University; Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
interest to explore possible differences andsimilarities of these findings for underrepresented minorities as well as socio-economic and otherpersonal attributes that might contribute to the decreased retention and GPAs of males lackingpre-matriculation college credit. Further attention towards programs designed to impact retentionbeyond the first and second years of study in engineering programs also may be warranted.References[1] T. B. Cole, E. Kaeli, B. J. Priem, C. Ghio, P. A. DiMilla, and R. Reisberg, “The influence of preconceptions, experience and gender on use of supplemental instruction and academic success in a freshman chemistry course for engineers,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2018 Annual
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer A Gatz, Stony Brook University; Angela M. Kelly, Stony Brook University; Monica F. Bugallo, Stony Brook University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Paper ID #25688A Mixed Methods Analysis of Goals and the Impact of Peer Mentoring forParticipants in the WISE Honors ProgramDr. Jennifer A Gatz, Stony Brook University Public STEM education teacher of AP Biology and AP Research for Patchogue-Medford School District. Ph.D. in Science Education from Stonybrook University, 2017. Research affiliate at Stony Brook Univer- sity’s Institute for STEM education evaluating persistence, motivation, social and academic integration of women in science and engineering at the undergraduate level.Dr. Angela M. Kelly, Stony Brook University Angela M. Kelly is an Associate Professor of
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Underserved Students in the CSU Moving Beyond Race and Economic Status to Close Equity Gaps. Rethinking the Gap. [online] Long Beach, CA: CSU, pp.1-12. Available at: http://www.dashboard.csuprojects.org/rethinkingthegap/Historically-Underserved-Student- Factor-Model.pdf [Accessed 30 Jan. 2019].[4] French, B. F., Immekus, J. C., & Oakes, W. (2003, November). A structural model of engineering students’ success and persistence. In Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual (Vol. 1, pp. T2A-19). IEEE.[5] Lichtenstein, G., McCormick, A. C., Sheppard, S. D., & Puma, J. (2010). Comparing the undergraduate experience of engineers to all other majors: Significant differences are programmatic. Journal of Engineering
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Naomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Dante Fratta, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Elizabeth C Harris, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Wayne P. Pferdehirt, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Heidi-Lynn Ploeg, Queens University at Kingston; Barry D. Van Veen, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
of improved peerevaluation of teaching proposed here addresses key limitations of the most current peerevaluation processes and may lead to more inclusion of best practices of teaching by instructorsof engineering.References[1] Stark, P. B. and Freishtat, R. (2014), An Evaluation of Course Evaluations, Science Open Research, DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-EDU.AOFRQA.v1.[2] Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., and Stark, P. B. (2016), Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness, Science Open Research, DOI: 10.14293/S2199- 1006.1.SOR-EDU.AETBZC.v1.[3] MacNell, L., Driscoll, A., and Hunt, A., N. (2015), What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching, Innov High Educ, 40: 291-303, DOI
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jiahui Song, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Douglas Eric Dow, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Joseph F. Santacroce P.E., Wentworth Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
of autonomous vehicleSurvey QuestionsA survey was conducted to collect data right after students completed the workshop to evaluatethe content of the workshop. 169 female students participated in the Girl Scouts STEM DayElectrical and Computer Engineering workshops in the past two years and all of them took thesurveys. Following are the questions we asked students in the survey: Table 1: Survey Questions Computer Workshop Electrical Workshop 1. Did you learn something new during this 1. Did you learn something new during this activity? activity? (a) I learned a lot (a) I learned a lot (b) I learned some
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Courtney S. Green P.E., University of North Carolina in Charlotte; Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; April C Smith, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
another career of study mightadd to the depth of exploration of experiences.Students’ experiences from this study suggest that professors should be mindful when assigninggroup work, to ensure women, and women of color in particular, are not relegated toadministrative tasks. Institutions should be more inclusive of their representations of “whois/can be an engineer” in all courses and academic clubs, not just affinity based ones. It isimportant for all students, especially White males, to be exposed to an academic engineeringenvironment that is diverse and inclusive.References1. M. Estrada, M. Burnett, A. G. Campbell, P. B. Campbell, et al., “Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM,” CBE- Life Sciences Education
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eddie Jacobs P.E., University of Memphis; Amy L. de Jongh Curry, University of Memphis; Carmen Astorne-Figari, University of Memphis; Russell J. Deaton, University of Memphis; Wesam M. Salem, University of Memphis; Yonghong Jade Xu, University of Memphis; Shelby G. Roberts, University of Memphis
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
following criteria: a) traditional track students,b) self-identified as female; and c) enrolled in an undergraduate program at the University ofMemphis. The researchers utilized a campus information system available to advisers to create adata set from the pool of traditional undergraduate students according to the three identified focusgroups (i.e., engineering majors, non-STEM related majors, engineering majors who left to enrollin non-STEM related majors). Accordingly, the researchers sent a recruitment email inviting theundergraduate students on the generated list to participate in the focus groups. A total of tenparticipants, divided over three focus groups, accepted the invitation to participate in the focusgroups. The participants were
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alexa Rihana Abdallah, University of Detroit Mercy; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Stephanie G. Wettstein, Montana State University; Maryam Darbeheshti, University of Colorado, Denver; Karinna M. Vernaza, Gannon University; Christina Keenan Remucal, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. 100 100 Counselors (n = 30) (a) Small (n = 32) (b) Advisors (n = 40) Medium (n = 26) Percentage in each category Percentage in each category 80 Both (n = 6) 80 Large (n = 18) 60
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jia G. Liang, Kansas State University; Rick Evans, Cornell University; Stacey E. Kulesza, Kansas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, while others weremore. However, what empowered these women in those environments are the abovequalities/features of their experiences in ESPTs. In one way or another, these women wereempowered to respond in a way that transformed that environment, despite the pervasiveness ofsexism. Although the results herein present three stories from one university, we are expandingour study. We are currently interviewing women leaders in ESTPs from Kansas State University,a four-year land-grant institution in the Midwest. The preliminary results highlight many of thesame themes in the thematic passage presented herein.References[1] P. Meiksins, P. Layne, K. Beddoes, B. Acton, M. Lewis, A. Masters, and M. Roediger, “Acompendium of the SWE annual literature
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Keith J. Bowman, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Sue Rosser, California State University System, Office of the Chancellor
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
for all.References[1] S. Reges. “Why Women Don’t Code,” Quillette, June 19, 2018 [Online]https://quillette.com/2018/06/19/why-women-dont-code/ [Accessed January 14, 2019].[2] B. Oakley. “Why do Women Shun STEM? It’s Complicated,” Wall Street Journal, July 13,2018 [Online] https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-do-women-shun-stem-its-complicated-1531521789 [Accessed January 14, 2019].[3] J. Steinke. "Adolescent girls’ STEM identity formation and media images of STEMprofessionals: Considering the influence of contextual cues." Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017):716.[4] K. H. Collins. "Confronting Color-Blind STEM Talent Development: Toward a ContextualModel for Black Student STEM Identity." Journal of Advanced Academics 29.2 (2018): 143-168.[5] S. L
Conference Session
PANEL: After #MeToo: What’s next for Women in the Engineering Workplace?
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer J VanAntwerp, Calvin College; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Sandra D. Eksioglu, Clemson University; Joanna Wright, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Engineering vs. Humanities Fields (b) Within Engineering Figure 2: Women in tenure track/tenured academic positions in the U.S. [25], [31], [32]Women in the Engineering WorkplaceHistorically speaking, women have already made significant progress in the U.S. engineeringworld. Although the first bachelor’s degree was earned by a woman in 1876 [33], manyengineering schools refused to enroll women prior to the passage of Title IX in 1972 whichrequired
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Quiles-Ramos, Virginia Tech; Ellen K. Foster, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Donna M Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
engineering education practices through interdisciplinary research and scholarship. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 6.Bennett, J. B. (1998). Collegial Professionalism: The Academy, Individualism, and the Common Good. Oryx Press: Phoenix, AZ.Cech, E. A. (2013). Ideological wage inequalities? The technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering. Social Forces, 91(4), 1147-1182.DiMaggio, P. & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 93-118.Faulkner, W. (2000). Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering. Social studies of science, 30(5), 759-792.Faulkner, W. (2007). Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John M. Mativo, University of Georgia; Uduak Z. George, San Diego State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
bright and dark sides of leadership: Transformational vs. non-transformational leadership in a non-Western context," Leadership, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 107-133, 2013.[12] B. M. Bass and P. Steidlmeier, "Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior," The leadership quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 181-217, 1999.[13] M. Dellaert and S. Davydov, Influencing: The skill of persuasion - Building commitment and getting results: White Paper: Center for Creative Leadership, 2017.[14] J. French and B. n. Raven, "Understanding Power," ed. https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_56.htm, (nd).[15] C. G. Murphy and T. Hicks, "Academic Characteristics among First-Generation and Non-First
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ona Egbue, University of South Carolina Upstate; Arshia Khan, University of Minnesota Duluth; Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, facing female faculty of color in engineering and computerscience. Some of these issues have been identified in broader STEM studies as few studies onfemale faculty of color experiences in engineering and computing fields exist. Therefore, thisstudy serves as the first step in the development of comprehensive survey tool for a more in-depth analysis of the current state of the workplace climate for female faculty of color inengineering and computing. An in-depth understanding of the climate and associated issues willaid in the development of measures aimed at offering a better climate so that female faculty ofcolor in engineering and computing can thrive in their careers.References[1] C. B. Leggon, “Women in Science: Racial and Ethnic
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christina K. Lam , Arizona State University; Samantha N. Cruz, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
, G. McKittrick, B. Khan, M.E. Doms, “Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation,” U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington D.C., ESA Issue Brief #04-11, 2011.[4] C.R. Forest et al., “The invention studio: A university maker space and culture,” in 121st American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE 2014, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15 – 18, 2014.[5] T. Barrett et al., “A review of university maker spaces,” in 122nd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, ASEE 2015, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14 – 17, 2015.[6] C. A. Moss-Racusin, J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. J. Graham, and J. Handelsman, “Science faculty’s subtle gender
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Leslie Potter, Iowa State University; Richard Stone, Iowa State University; Devna Fay Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Science Career Decisions andActive Learning,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol 6, pp. 297-306, Winter 2007.[12] Overath, R., Zhang, D., and Hatherill, J., “Implementing Course-based Research IncreasesStudent Aspirations for STEM Degrees,” Winter 2016 CUR Quarterly, Volume 37, Number 2.[13] Mendoza, B. and Brown, P.A., “Incorporating Undergraduate Research Experience in anEngineering Technology Curriculum, 2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic Section Spring Conference,Baltimore, MD, April 7, 2017.[14] Fyock, A., Potter, L., Stone, R., and Popejoy-Sheriff, D., “Filling the Graduate Pipeline ViaCourse-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs),” 2018 IISE National Conference,Orlando, Florida, May 2018.
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Renee M. Desing, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Training for Employment, College of Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 1997.[28] D. M. Domenico and K. H. Jones, “Career aspirations of women in the 20th century,” J. Career Tech. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2006.[29] K. G. Schaefers, D. L. Epperson, and M. M. Nauta, “Women’s career development: Can theoretically derived variables predict persistence in engineering majors?,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 173–183, 1997.[30] N. Dasgupta, M. McManus Scircle, and M. Hunsinger, “Female peers in small work groups enhance women’ s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 112, no. 16, pp. 4988–4993, 2015.[31] J. L. Rosenbloom, R. A. Ash, B
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Maral Kargarmoakhar, Florida International University; Monique S. Ross, Florida International University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Cordesman, Saudi Arabia Enters the Twenty-first Century: The political, foreign policy Econimic, and Energy Dimensions Anthony H. Cordesman. 2003.[11] G. Siann, “Muslim Women in the Workplace,” J. Work. Learn., 1992.[12] A. M. El-Sherbeeny and H. D. Alsharari, “Assessing engineering disciplines with expected success for females in Saudi Arabia,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018–June, no. since 2010, 2018.[13] S. M. Chance and B. Williams, “Preliminary findings of a phenomenological study of middle eastern women’s experiences studying engineering in Ireland,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2018– June, pp. 2009–2012, 2018.[14] S. Lindsay, A. Taylor, B. Woodward, and M. Milligan, “A MALE THING
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Otilia Popescu, Old Dominion University; Carol L. Considine, Old Dominion University; Karina Arcaute, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa; Stephanie G. Adams, Old Dominion University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
Further and Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 85-95, 2001/02/01 2001.[13] S. E. Shadle, A. Marker, and B. Earl, "Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments," International Journal of STEM Education, journal article vol. 4, no. 1, p. 8, April 13 2017.[14] K'Nex. (2018). Available: https://www.knex.com/[15] J. I. Glickman and M. F. Doepner, "Offset matrix adapter for toy construction sets," ed: Google Patents, 2010.[16] J. Glickman and M. F. Doepner, "Construction toy component," ed: Google Patents, 2007.[17] K. P. Hussa-Lietz, "Method of constructing a three-dimensional structure with a multi- part construction toy set
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lalita G. Oka, California State University, Fresno; Kimberly Stillmaker P.E., California State University, Fresno; Constance Jones, California State University, Fresno; Arezoo Sadrinezhad, California State University, Fresno; Maryam Nazari, California State University, Fresno
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
with the other ethnicities, which included primarily African American andHispanic. Figures 1(a) and 1(b) describe the ethnicity distribution of participating faculty sortedby gender. These figures indicate that the women faculty group was more racially diverse than themen, as none of the men were African American nor Hispanic. It is important to note that mostCSU campuses are designated as an HSI, but that ethnicity was not very well represented in facultyresponding to the survey. (a) (b) Figure 1: Racial distribution among the participating facultyAs far as ranks of the faculty are considered, the number of tenure-track faculty (N = 40) washigher than tenured