. Year 2. Nationality 3. Gender (Male, Female, Prefer not to answer) 4. High school type (International/Private or Independent) 5. Religion Questions on perspectives 1. Would you choose courses based on the gender of your professor? 2. Do you feel comfortable approaching a professor of the same gender? 3. Do you think the gender of professor affects his/her teaching style? 4. Do you feel the need for more female professor at your program? Appendix B Interview Questions 1. Do you believe that your childhood upbringing affects your perception on gender preferences on professors? Explain. 2. Do you believe the schools you have attended affects your professor’s gender
analysis indicates that this trend has been consistent for atleast the last three decades [24]. b. Testing Bias. Maeda & Yoon added that some of this research was influenced by other factors beyondspatial skills such as testing procedure and measurement bias against females such as providingtest time limitations [17]. In an earlier study, they recognized that testing affected the magnitudeof the gender difference gap. They noted that the gender difference increases in favor of malestudents if there was time pressure due to the testing instrument as compared to no time. Thus,the testing results would include a measurement error due to procedural bias [17]. The procedural impact on gender differences is of
FFF printing, we must A) determine the OH = “OverHead” costs hard to determine how much of the machine cost goes into one rollquality of reclaimed plastics, B) determine the achievable consistency of the reclaimed 3) Consistency of Pulverized Plasticplastics, C) use this data to calculate the scalability of this process and its entrepreneurial
Paper ID #28576How to Be a Graduate Student (Before I Forget): A Collection ofExperiential WisdomDr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International Univer- sity. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on engineering and education, including courses on engineering design, systems in society, and learning theories. Stephen’s research interests include equity, culture, and the sociocultural dimensions of engineering
Paper ID #29699Hands-on Engineering Experience, a Liberal Arts CaseDr. Niloofar Kamran, Cornell CollegeMr. Qingbao Wang, Cornell CollegeMr. Andy GroveWilliam Nitschke Dragon II, Cornell College c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Hands-on Engineering Experience, a Liberal Arts Case Will Dragon, Qingbao Wang, Andy Grove, Niloofar KamranAbstractOur project was a part of the 2019 Cornell College Summer Research Institute (CSRI), whereCornell College students and faculty work in close collaboration on a research project for eightweeks during summer. The program includes one faculty
ofthe 45 CFR 46.101.(b) by the U-M Institutional Research Board (HUM00135376).References ¨ Eris, and N. Tatar. Work in progress—taking one for the team: Goal orientation [1] B. Linder, M. Somerville, O. and gender-correlated task division. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pages F4H–1, Oct. 2010. [2] L. A. Meadows and D. Sekaquaptewa. The influence of gender stereotypes on role adoption in student teams. Proc. 120th ASEE Annual Conf. Exposition, pages 1–16, Oct. 2013. [3] E. A. Strehl and R. Fowler. Experimental evidence regarding gendered task allocation on teams. Proc. 126th ASEE Annual Conf. Exposition, pages 1–14, Oct. 2019. [4] E. Scanlon. How gender influences learners working
Paper ID #28658I graduated, now what?: An overview of the academic EngineeringEducation Research job field and search process.Dr. Erin J McCave, University of Houston Erin is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Houston. She joined the University of Houston after completing a postdoctoral/lecturer position split between the General Engineering program and the Engineering & Science Education Department and a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. Erin’s research interests include preparing students for their sophomore year, minority student engineering
andprobability in team settings. Specifically, only one of the five prompts demonstrated significantlydifferent interpretations across the age and student status demographic. This finding, however,does not encapsulate the extreme levels of variation witnessed across demographic groups in thevarious prompts within this study, as noted in Appendix B and C. The variation suggests thatambiguous terminology elicits extremely different interpretations in both collegiate andprofessional settings; however, interpretation cannot be predicted based on demographics.As a result, educators must take measures to teach students about ambiguous terminology andhow teammates can perceive both time and probability based vague language completelydifferent from one another
Intensity of Engineering Undergraduate Out-of-Class Activities,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 611–635, Oct. 2018.[5] Y. B. Kurata, R. Marie, L. P. Bano, and A. C. Matias, “Effects of workload on academic performance among working students in an undergraduate engineering program,” 2015.[6] S. Kolari, C. Savander-Ranne, and E.-L. Viskari, “Do our engineering students spend enough time studying?,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ. , 2007.[7] L. K. Son and N. Kornell, “Simultaneous decisions at study: time allocation, ordering, and spacing,” vol. 4, pp. 237–248, 2009.[8] B. Johnson and L. B. Christensen, Educational research : quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage Publications, 2008.
populations; (a) students whomatriculate in an Engineering field and persist within their field, (b) students who start in a non-engineering field and switch and graduate from an engineering major, and (c) students who startin an engineering major and opt out engineering and graduate from a non-engineering major. Inthis work-in-progress we will focus on main statistical analysis of these three groups.CategorizationThe dataset was categorized into groups of majors to allow comparison among different fields ofstudies. The breakdown of each groups of majors is shown in Table 1. The Major groupings usedin this study is based on National Science Foundation definitions [16].Term DefinitionArts & History, Communications, Journalism
ed., A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, Eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2010, pp. 505–530.[5] B. McKeown and D. B. Thomas, Q Methodology, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2013.[6] R. Stainton Rogers, “Q methodology,” in Rethinking Methods in Psychology, J. A. Smith, R. Harre, and L. Van Langenhove, Eds. London, UK: SAGE Publications, 1995.[7] R. L. Kajfez, C. M. Croyle, A. N. Snyder, and M. J. Mohammadi-Aragh, “Engineering education Ph.D. Students: Where are they now and what was the job search process like?,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2014.[8] Y.-L. Liu, H.-P. Yueh, T.-L. Chen, and H.-J. Sheen, “Identifying nanotechnology professional competencies for engineering
associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice,” J. Appl. Psychol., 2006.[6] M. A. Maher, J. A. Gilmore, D. F. Feldon, and T. E. Davis, “Cognitive apprenticeship and the supervision of science and engineering research assistants,” J. Res. Pract., 2013.[7] R. Hollander, “Mentoring: Supervision of Young Researchers,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2015.[8] B. E. Ann Salm, M. J. Bugenhagen, C. N. Deborah Watry, M. C. Klein, and E. Fond du Lac, “IMPACT OF UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH MENTORSHIP AFFECTS ON STUDENT DESIRE, CONFIDENCE AND MOTIVATION TO CONTINUE WORK IN SCIENCE,” 2015.[9] R. A. Parent, N. Kansky, and J
funding. The E3 initiative receivedfunding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Louis Stokes Alliances for MinorityParticipation (LSAMP) Grant. A budget proposal (see Appendix B) preceded full allocation of funds.Step two of the planning stage encompassed the recruitment of program participants. Recruitment wasan important aspect; seeking and motivating interest among African American high school studentsenrolled in schools surrounding the Richmond/Chesterfield and Norfolk/Virginia Beach areas.Application questions as well as general word usage was selective. As suggested in “Changing theConversation: Messages for improving public understanding of Engineering”; students’ lack ofknowledge and misconceptions of what the field of
. [Accessed April 29, 2020].[15] C. M. Saviz, A. A. Fernandez, E. A. Basha, A. P. Ellis, K. Hammarstrom, F. Leon, J. B. Hildebrand, and S. Ton, “Engineering internships in social entrepreneurship: Developing partnerships and student perspectives,” in Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June 2011. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/17877. [Accessed April 29, 2020].[16] A. G. Eggleston and R. J. Rabb, “Technical communication for engineers: Improving professional and technical skills” in Proceedings of 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 2018. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31068. [Accessed April 30, 2020].[17] M. Itani and I. Srour
learning environment," The Review of Higher Education, vol. 23,pp. 347-363, 2000.[6] A. Yadav, D. Subedi, M. A. Lundeberg and C. F. Bunting, "Problem-based Learning:Influence on Students ́Learning in an Electrical Engineering Course," Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 100, pp. 253-280, 2011.[7] D. W. Johnson and others, “Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty InstructionalProductivity,” ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1991., ERIC, 1991.[8] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne and S. S. Donovan, "Effects of small-group learning onundergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis," Reviewof educational research, vol. 69, pp. 21-51, 1999.[9] D. R. Garrison and J. B. Arbaugh, "Researching the community of
. 2, pp. 2–11, Mar. 1990.[8] A. Lieberman, “Practices that Support Teacher Development: Transforming Conceptions of Professional Learning.”[9] R. K. Cersonsky, L. L. Foster, T. Ahn, R. J. Hall, H. L. van der Laan, and T. F. Scott, “Augmenting Primary and Secondary Education with Polymer Science and Engineering,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 1639–1646, Nov. 2017.[10] Educators for Excellence, “Voices from the Classroom; A Survey of America’s Educators,” 2018.[11] N. J. Pelaez and B. L. Gonzalez, “SHARING SCIENCE: CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE SCIENTIST-TEACHER INTERACTIONS,” Adv. Physiol. Educ., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 158–167, Sep. 2002.[12] E. Caton, C. Brewer, and F. Brown, “Building Teacher
/15348431.2019.1648269[5] Palmer, R. & Gasman, M., “It takes a village to raise a child”: The role of social capital inpromoting academic success for African American Men at a Black College, Journal of CollegeStudent Development 49/1 (2008): 52-70.[6] Becker, H. & Carper, J. The development of an identification with an occupation, AmericanJournal of Sociology 61/4 (1956): 289-298.[7] Becker, H., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A., Boys in white: Student culture in medicalschool. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.[8] AAMC, Diversity in Medical Education. Report, 2016. Online.https://www.aamcdiversityfactsandfigures2016.org/. (Accessed 2/3/2020)[9] Sarah Appelhans
-Innovation-Benefits?redirectedFrom=fulltext. [Accessed Dec. 15, 2019].[16] Campbell, B. How to judge the value of innovation[J]. BMJ, 2012, 344 :1457-1457.[17] Gretschmann K, Schepers S. Revolutionising EU Innovation Policy [M]. London: Springer,2016: 978-1057.[18] Baldwin A, Betts M, School H O, et al. A Framework for Measuring It Innovation Benefits[J]. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 2000,5(6):1-7.[19] Sun Yan. Introduction into the Social Assessment of Science and Technology[J]. Studies in Philosophy of Science of Technology, 2012, 29(2):92-96.[20] Tohidi H, Jabbari MM. Providing a Framework for Measuring Innovation within Companies[J]. Procedia Technology, 2012, 1:583-585.[21
Paper ID #30107Mentoring Undergraduate Students in EngineeringDr. Jayanta K. Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Jayanta Banerjee is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez campus. Dr. Banerjee received Ph.D. from the University of Waterloo and M.Ed. from Queen’s University, both in Canada. He has worked in industries and taught at the universities in Germany, Canada, USA and Latin America. He has over hundred publications in refereed journals and conference proceedings and a few books to his credit. Jayanta is a member of ASEE, ASME and VDI (Germany
Paper ID #29623Work in Progress: The Impact of North Carolina State University’sStudent Council on the Grand Challenge Scholars ProgramMs. Rachel Figard, North Carolina State University Rachel Figard is an undergraduate majoring in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a minor in English Literature from North Carolina State University.Mr. Pippin Payne, North Carolina State University Pippin Payne is a junior double majoring in Mechanical Engineering and Religious Studies with a minor in Business Administration from North Carolina State University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
Paper ID #31738Augmented Reality for education (Diversity)Mr. Nima Shahab Shahmir, West Virginia University Institute of Technology Nima Shahab Shahmir is a first-generation college student expected to graduate from West Virginia Uni- versity Institute of Technology in May 2020 with Bachelor of Science in Information Systems and a minor degree in Business Administration. His research interests are in the fields of Biology, Computer Science, and Augmented Reality. His previous research, Future Fungi, LLC, was presented at the Commission for Environmental Cooperation conference and represented the United States. His recent
Paper ID #31967Critical Educational Theory: Applications in Engineering EducationMs. Corin L Bowen, University of Michigan Corin L. Bowen is a doctoral candidate in the aerospace engineering department at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. Her thesis research includes both technical and educational research. Her en- gineering education research focuses on the interactions between structural oppression and engineering systems. She holds a B.S.E. in civil engineering from Case Western Reserve University and an M.S.E. in aerospace engineering from the University of Michigan, both in the areas of structural engineering
Paper ID #29429Unlocking the Creativity PotentialDr. Robert M. Brooks, Temple University Dr. Brooks is the winner of the National Outstanding Teacher Award of the ASEE in 2015. Dr. Robert Brooks is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Temple University. He is a fellow of ASCE. His research interests are Engineering Education, Civil Engineering Materials and Transportation Engineer- ing.Mr. Sangram Shinde, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Jazan University, Jazan KSA Bachelor of Engineering (Production) from University of Pune, Pune, India. Master of Engineering (Mechanical-Production) from Shivaji University