AC 2009-2241: CROSS-CURRICULAR TOPIC INVENTORY: STRATEGIC TOPICPLACEMENT AND RESULTING STUDENT ACCOUNTABILITYAdrienne Minerick, Mississippi State University Adrienne Minerick is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State University. She received her PhD and M.S. from the University of Notre Dame and B.S. from Michigan Technological University. Since joining MSU, Dr. Minerick has taught the graduate Chemical Engineering Math, Process Controls, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Freshman Seminar, Heat Transfer, and Analytical Microdevice Technology courses. In addition, she is an NSF CAREER Awardee, has served as co-PI on an NSF REU site, PI on grants from NSF and
. Page 14.79.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 A Novel Paradigm for Training Graduate Students in Soft SkillsABSTRACTMost chemical engineering programs which offer masters and PhD degrees have a commonseminar series for all the graduate students. Typical seminar series includes presenters withexpertise in cutting edge topics are invited. Chemical engineering is expanding and manyresearch topics could address only a portion of the students. Further, conducting seminars for theentire duration of the semester may be cost prohibitive, leading to reduction in number ofseminars. Interestingly, there are very few seminars that introduce graduate students to non-technical content that could be paramount to their future success
sufficiency?RQ3. What ESI topics, teaching methods, and assessment methods are used in various types ofcourses for chemical engineering students: (a) first-year, (b) sophomore/junior engineeringscience/engineering, (c) capstone design, (d) undergraduate electives, (e) graduate courses.RQ4. To what extent do chemical engineering faculty educate students about ESI in co-curricularsettings? Do ESI topics and educational approaches vary among different types of co-curricularsettings?MethodologyTwo online surveys were developed to determine the what, where, and how of ESI education inengineering: one focused on courses (the curricular survey) and one focused on co-curricularsettings (the co-curricular survey). Chemical engineering faculty were directly
University, Devon Quick, JessicaBeck, Anita Hughes, and Jeff Nason. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. D. Koretsky, “Program Level Curriculum Reform at Scale: Using Studios to Flip the Classroom,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 49, pp. 47, 2015.[2] M. D. Koretsky, “Cognitive and Social Aspects of Engagement in Active Learning,” Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 51, pp. 198, 2017.[3] A. E. Austin, “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 73, pp. 94, 2002.[4] P. C
Automotive and Armaments Command (TACOM). • Michigan Economic Development Corporation. • United States Department of Education Graduate Assistantships in Areas of National Need grant numbers P200A010413 and P200A030192. • United States Department of Energy contract number DE-FG02-04ER63821 • Army Research Laboratory cooperative agreement W911NF-05-2-0048 • National Science Foundation grant number DMI-0456537Bibliography. 1. D. Stone, S. Sorby, M. Plichta, and M. Raber, “The Enterprise Program at Michigan Technological University,” International Journal of Engineering Education (2003). 2. M. Plichta, M. Raber, “The Enterprise Program at Michigan Tech University: Results and Assessment to Date,” ASEE
) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently co-Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributed to 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles. Page 26.1429.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Student Led Example Problems in a Graduate-Level Advanced Transport Phenomena CourseAbstract: Transport
AC 2007-1423: ACTIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING IN A GRADUATE COURSE ONMODELING AND NUMERICAL METHODSKaren High, Oklahoma State University KAREN HIGH earned her B.S. from the University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. High is an Associate Professor in the School of Chemical Engineering at Oklahoma State University where she has been since 1991. Her main research interests are Sustainable Process Design, Industrial Catalysis, and Multicriteria Decision Making. Other scholarly activities include enhancing creativity in engineering practice and teaching science to education professionals. Dr. High is a trainer for Project Lead the Way
department initiated an independent research propositioncourse for all first year PhD candidates. Student performance in this spring semesterthree unit course was treated as a graduate qualifier exam, and both students and facultyhave been supportive of this requirement, as summarized earlier1. Over the last decade, our first year approach to research education hasbroadened. Peter Kilpatrick added a one unit fall course, Introduction to Research, aprofessional development course including research ethics, presentations, andpublications. While these two courses were satisfying as stand-alone efforts, recentfaculty and graduate student sentiment pushed for an earlier engagement of student withresearch advisor, PhD committee, and research itself
system (i.e., whereeveryone receives the same grade). For more details on the division of tasks as defined by thegrading rubrics, see Appendix A.Emphasis on Communication SkillsPreviously, students were required to complete short prelab assignments for each lab activitycontaining basic conceptual questions on the unit operation in question. Following the labactivity, students filled in a worksheet with the relevant data. For the demonstration-styleactivities, the students were given previously obtained data and required to write a reportanalyzing the data and the unit operation. All assessments were graded by graduate student TAs,but feedback was generally neither timely nor detailed. Writing skills were not assessed in anyformal or consistent
University Charles Glover is Associate Head for Undergraduate Studies in the Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering where he has served on the faculty since 1977. Previous educational efforts included development of a sophomore year engineering program founded on the integrating principles of the conservation laws framework. Page 12.153.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Web-based Complement to Teaching Conservation of Mass in a Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstractWeb-based instructional modules have been widely used to teach engineering topics. In manycases, the modules are developed for a chosen topic at a specific
mechanics or mass transfer) andare not typically addressed thoroughly in the design course. The contribution of this paper is inselecting the topics, demonstrating the principles for each topic, integrating the topics to showmultiple effects for a design decision, and demonstrating their importance through numerousprocess examples. The intension of this paper is twofold; the first is to encourage greatercoverage of operability topics, and second to begin collaboration among educators that will resultin a consensus on the key operability topics and the development of essential resources to assistinstructors in tailoring the topics to their courses. This paper begins with learning goals and proceeds to design project definition thatexplicitly
is due to studies on diversity-related issues being targeted to otherjournal sources that are more relevant to this field. We plan on investigating the reasons for thisdrop in the future, but this trend certainly presents a matter of concern – especially since JEE isconsidered to be the premier engineering education journal within the United States and is alsohighly regarded internationally.The European engineering education community (based on papers published in EJEE) haspublished a larger number of papers on diversity-related topics in the years before 1995 – a littleover twice the number that was found within JEE. This was followed by a steep drop in thenumber of articles to 4 published studies in the decade between 1995 and 2004, unlike
she will be conducting bio-fuels research with Dr. French at Mississippi State University after attending the Global Renewable Energy Education Network study abroad in Costa Rica in January 2014. Her research interests include renewable and sustainable energy sources. Her intended undergraduate graduation date is December 2015.Niraj Kashinath Palsule, Mississippi State University Niraj Palsule is a Junior majoring in Chemical Engineering at Dave C. Swalm School of Chemical En- gineering, Mississippi State University. He originally hails from India and completed his high school education there itself. He holds a Energy Innovation and Emerging Technologies Certificate from Stan- ford Center for Professional
existing courses or toadd an independent course. His conclusion was that both could be beneficial because theindependent course could introduce the concepts and then the concepts could be practiced in thecore courses [7]. More recently, in 2015, Dee et al. reviewed US Chemical Engineeringprograms and reported that these programs are using a variety of ways to meet the ABET safetycriteria including incorporating the content into core courses, adding special topics and/orrequiring students to complete the online SAChE Certificate Program [8, 9]. Dee et al. also notedthat while elective process safety or environmental courses may address safety outcomes, ABETrequires that all chemical engineering students receive safety education, so the outcomes
question in mind of “where do our students goto work after graduation?” This was done because it does not serve the students well to preparethem for generic nanotechnology jobs that may not exist; instead, we have designed thisemphasis based on jobs that have already been offered and occupied by our recent graduates inthe materials, microelectronics, bio-nano (e.g., proteins and enzymes), and complex fluids (i.e.,colloids) areas. The courses selected for the nano emphasis are described below: CHE 487 Nanotechnology and Nanoscale Engineering Through Chemical Processes Focus: Chemical engineering fundamentals and engineering science Topics: Properties of materials on the nanometer scale, probes capable of visualizing
chemical engineering from the University Wisconsin - Madison. At the University of Maryland, she has taught Separations, Unit Operations, and Protein Engineering and enjoys mentoring students of all levels in research focused on protein and peptide design.Dr. Christopher James Barr, University of Michigan Dr. Christopher Barr is the Instructional Laboratory Supervisor in the Chemical Engineering Department at University of Michigan. He obtained his Ph.D. at University of Toledo in 2013 and is a former Fellow in the N.S.F. GK-12 grant ”Graduate Teaching Fellows in STEM High School Education: An Environmen- tal Science Learning Community at the Land-Lake Ecosystem Interface”. His main responsibilities are supervising and
Page 14.1249.3encompass all areas of research of interest, they are flexible enough to incorporate a variety ofresearch questions. For example, research questions about student motivation can be framedwithin areas 2 through 5.Each area can easily include a number of research questions that are very specific to chemicalengineering education. Examples of chemical engineering specific research topics in each of thefive areas are: Area 1- Epistemologies. What skills and knowledge will chemical engineers need to be successful 2-4 years, 10- 12 years, and 25-30 years after graduation? What roles will chemical engineers take in different industries a specified number of years from now? Is chemical engineering
electives” as courses offered by the chemical engineering department or faculty that may be taken by undergraduate students but are not specifically required in order to graduate. The word that best fits chemical engineering electives is “diverse”. It might be argued that the most clear differentiator among chemical engineering undergraduate programs is the areas highlighted by their elective offerings. Nearly 100 different elective course topics were reported by the 96 programs responding to the survey. The most popular topical offerings are Polymer Science, Bioprocess Engineering, Nanomaterials, and Advanced Transport. Typically, undergraduates
Paper ID #22958Computer Simulations vs.Physical Experiments: A Gender Comparison ofImplementation Methods for Inquiry-Based Heat Transfer ActivitiesDr. Katharyn E. K. Nottis, Bucknell University Dr. Nottis is an Educational Psychologist and Professor Emeritus of Education at Bucknell University. Her research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education, approached from the perspective of Human Constructivism. She has authored several publications and given numerous presentations on the generation of analogies, misconceptions, and facilitating learning in science and engineering education. She has
example, process safety information requires the compilation of information pertaining tothe chemicals involved in a process. Graduating students are expected to be able to read andcomprehend a Safety Data Sheet (SDS). Further, they should understand how to accessadditional information generally not available on a SDS but important to process safety (e.g.,chemical compatibility of elastomers and metals used in the Chemical Process Industries). Thegraduating student is expected to develop a process flow diagram, complete with material andenergy balance – a requirement of process safety information related to the technology of theprocess. A thorough review of PSM will reveal topics important to process safety that achemical engineering curriculum
world needs to be continuously made in classrooms across the curriculum.The class schedule is constructed to facilitate a weekly Kolb cycle. It is divided into ten topics,one for each week of the quarter. Class delivery includes a lecture, a laboratory and a recitation.All four laboratory sections are scheduled between the lecture and recitation. Each topic is thenorganized through a set of activities that correlate to each quadrant in Kolb’s learning cycle.Inspiration (quadrant 1) and new information (quadrant 2) are presented in the lecture. Thelaboratory allows active practice under controlled conditions (quadrant 3) and the recitationprompts reflection and generalization to the real world (quadrant 4). Engagement is promoted
several decades butonly recently begun to be utilized in STEM fields. The dramatic expansion in STEM comics throughindependent artists, book series, and video animation has illustrated the opportunity for the integrationof art into STEM to improve educational approaches. Despite a continued general perception that comicsare ‘childish’, comics have a unique and demonstrated potential for improving student enthusiasm,confidence, and understanding in complex concepts.The use of comics directly addresses one of the major obstacles to effective learning in chemicalengineering education, in that many core concepts have an abstract nature with no obvious visualrepresentation (such as fugacity) or have such complexity that the visual depiction is crucial
AC 2010-2415: SHIFTING GEARS: MOVING AWAY FROM THE CONTROLLEDEXPERIMENTAL MODEL WHILE IMPROVING RIGOR IN ENGINEERINGEDUCATION RESEARCHPaul Golter, Washington State UniversityBernard Van Wie, Washington State UniversityGary Brown, Washington State UniversityDavid Thiessen, Washington State UniversityBaba Abdul, Washington State University Page 15.1062.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010SHIFTING GEARS: MOVING AWAY FROM THE CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTAL MODELAbstract: The authors’ recent efforts in educational research have focused on implementation of variedand multiple pedagogies with introduction of a hands-on desktop learning module as the vehicle forintroducing
discipline (or, practically any STEMfield).An added factor driving the nature of our first year experience is the historically stronginvolvement our students have had in the co-operative education program through our university.Participation is not required, but approximately 65% of all chemical engineering Bachelors ofScience graduates from our School (spanning 15+ years of data) participate in the university co-op program (not including the significant number of students which participate in industrialsummer internships—not tracked by the university). Over 95% of B.S. graduates entertraditional industrial positions in regional industries.In light of these facts and given theopportunity for our freshmen to participate inco-operative education and
Paper ID #26946Work in Progress: Improving Undergraduate Engineering Education ThroughWriting: Implementation in the Classroom Alongside a Hands-on LearningPedagogyKitana M Kaiphanliam, Washington State University Kitana Kaiphanliam is a first-year doctoral student in the Chemical Engineering program at Washington State University (WSU). Her research interests include biomanufacturing for immunotherapy applications and miniaturized hands-on learning devices for engineering education. Kitana is an active member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) at WSU, and serves as their Graduate Student Chair for the
Paper ID #9339A Course in Problem Solving with Experimental DesignDr. Joshua A Enszer, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Page 24.39.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 A Course in Problem Solving with Experimental DesignAbstractTo address needs for accreditation and our university’s requirements for graduation, we haveimplemented a sophomore-level course on problem solving and experimental design. This coursereinforces problem-solving strategies from material and energy balances and requires students
graduate students inmanufacturing the prototypes.REFERENCES1. [blind], "Implementing and assessing interactive physical models in the fluid mechanics classroom," International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(6), pp. 2501–2516, 2016.2. [blind], “Engendering situational interest through innovative instruction in an engineering classroom: what really mattered?” Instructional Science, 45, pp. 789-804, 2017.3. Liu C., C. Chen, S. Chen, T. Tsai, C. Chu, C. Chang, and C. Chen, “Blood plasma separation using a fidget-spinner,” Analytical Chemistry, 91(2), pp. 1247-1253, 2019.4. Barnea, E. and Mizrahi, J., “A generalized approach to the fluid dynamics of particulate systems part I. General correlation for fluidization and sedimentation,” The
focus has been on improving self-regulation and motivation in both individual and collaborative environments, as well as the use of assessment data and processes to improve student learning outcomes and perceptions. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Direct and Indirect Assessment of Student Perspectives and Performance in an Online / Distance Education Chemical Engineering Bridging Course1. IntroductionThe authors have developed a two-semester online chemical engineering (ChE) “bridging”course module which implements different instructional methods to prepare students who haveBS degrees in non-ChE fields such as chemistry or biology for ChE graduate school. Therationale
after retirement. This topic will be discussedin more depth in Section 8.3b. What’s in It for Your Family?Some faculty might think that accommodating their family is problematic in taking a SAL.However, the opposite is quite true – SALs can greatly benefit everyone in your family. A SALhas to be an experience for one’s entire family that begins with the planning and then continueswith the daily accommodation to new surroundings, educational systems, culture, climate, etc.Evening meals for the author’s family often involved discussing the interesting aspects ofadapting to these new experiences.Do not think that your spouse cannot also get very much involved in the SL experience. Whenthe author took his first SL at ITU in Turkey during 1974-75
-19.Hill, J. W. & Petrucci, R. H. (1999, 2th edn.). General Chemistry: An Integrated Approach, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.James R., MacArthur and Loretta L. Jones (2008). A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 187-195.Kim B., Saalman E., Christie M., Ingerman A. & Linder C. (2008). SimChemistry as an active learning tool in chemistry education, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 9, 277-284.Kuo, K. (2009). The academic performances of senior and vocational high school graduate students in the department of Chemical and Material Engineering of Lunghwa University, Journal of Lunghwa University of Science and Technology, 28, 39-51.Lewis, R. (2004