, Optimizing Student Learning, and Leadership Skills. Dr. Ater Kranov is also adjunct associate professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University. Page 24.933.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 NEW MECHATRONICS CURRICULUM ON MULTI-AXIS INDUSTRIAL MOTION CONTROLAbstractOver the past couple decades, mechanical engineering programs have made significant advancesin developing educational materials and laboratory exercises in controls and mechatronics1-4.However, there is an important gap remaining between the
developing innovative approaches to biomedical engineering education.Dr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University (USA). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until 1998. Dr. Farrell has made contributions to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing on areas of pharmaceutical, biomedical and food engineering. She has been honored by the American Society of Engineering
Paper ID #6217Interconnecting the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Through An Inte-grated Multicourse Model Rocketry ProjectDr. Matthew J. Traum, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Matthew J. Traum is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE). He received a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology [2007] where he held a research assistantship at MIT’s Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN). At MIT he invented a new nano-enabled garment to provide simultaneous ballistic and thermal pro- tection to infantry soldiers. Dr. Traum
SPIRAL Design-Oriented Laboratories in the First-Year Mechanical Engineering CurriculumAbstractAs a primary part of realizing a Student-driven Pedagogy of Integrated, Reinforced, ActiveLearning (SPIRAL) throughout our Mechanical Engineering curriculum, we are implementingnew laboratory experiences in the first and second years of our program. This paper will focus onthe laboratories for our new, required first-year course sequence, in which the traditional topicsof design methodology and computer programming are taught in the context of robotic andmechatronic systems. The laboratories encompass engineering software, mechanical andelectrical hardware, and manufacturing, with content driven by the semester-long team
Curriculum: a Vertical and Horizontally Integrated Laboratory/Lecture ApproachBackground The field of Electrical and Computer Engineering is expanding at an exponentially increasingpace. In every aspect of modern life, the work of this profession is evident and even essential;areas as diverse as transportation, infrastructure, entertainment, health care, and energy are allfundamentally dependent on this foundational discipline, yet the basics of a typical curricularapproach have changed very little in the past decades. If we are to educate engineers for thecoming technical challenges as well as the capacity to work effectively in multidisciplinaryteams, new educational approaches must be considered1. The engineer of the
interaction, and improvelearning outcomes. This paper presents the learning theory that supports hands-on experience,the basic structure of the course, the implantation and logistics of the projects, and assessmentapplied to evaluate outcomes as a result of this hands-on addition.Introduction“The function of the engineering profession is to manipulate materials, energy, and information,thereby creating benefit for humankind. To do this successfully, engineers must have aknowledge of nature that goes beyond mere theory.” [1] Various forms of laboratory learningexperience are utilized in engineering curricula to assist students to gain this knowledge. Amongthese laboratory approaches, simulation based on computer software [2, 3] and hands-onexperiments
opinion is furthersubstantiated in our conversations and informal polls of our students who have gone intoindustry. They express a virtually unanimous opinion that the practical laboratory experience oftheir undergraduate curriculum was among the most beneficial, and that courses should focusmore heavily on it.We are addressing these concerns with a new core curriculum for electrical and computerengineers, the Fundamentals of Electrical Engineering Series, a 3-course sequence. Thesecourses replace our prior sequence of courses for 2nd and 3rd-year students: Circuits,Electronics, and Signals and Systems. Each of the courses in the new sequence takes a breadth-first approach to electrical engineering topics and is taught studio style, with the
applications. Page 13.92.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 A Project-Driven Approach to Teaching Controls in a General Engineering ProgramIn East Carolina University’s General Engineering program, a Sensors, Measurements, andControls course was developed to teach topics on industrial instrumentation and controls. Thechallenge for the development of this course was offering two traditional courses (feedbackcontrol systems and instrumentation) into one effective course to fit within the generalengineering curriculum. A project-driven approach was used to teach the two subjects, eachtaking approximately one half semester. This
Paper ID #9564CAREER: A Study of How Engineering Students Approach InnovationDr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette S¸enay Purzer an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. In 2011, she received a NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She is also a NAE/CASEE New Faculty Fellow. Purzer conducts research on aspects of design education such as innovation and information literacy.Mr. Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University, West Lafayette Nicholas D. Fila is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University
practices and building materials,building forms, and building systems, using BIM technology. The visualization approach usingBIM will enable students to implement high-performance green building strategies to explorehow the buildings would be “greened.”Implementation of Green BIM-Based Learning ApproachIn the spring of 2013, the writer developed the new teaching method proposed in the NSF TUESproject by integrating sustainability in a built environment into its existing curriculum, CEM 225Residential and Light Commercial Construction Practices and Estimating course. The course is amandatory introductory course in planning, design, and construction of residential and lightcommercial buildings including materials, equipment, construction and assembly
AC 2011-1392: TEMPERATURE ALARM LABORATORY DESIGN PROJECTFOR A CIRCUIT ANALYSIS COURSE IN A GENERAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMLoren Limberis, East Carolina University Dr. Limberis joined the Engineering faculty at ECU in August 2006. He earned his B.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in bioengineering from the University of Utah. Dr. Limberis taught for several years as an Assistant Professor at The College of New Jersey and was a research analyst with Southwest Research Institute prior to his academic career. His research interests focus on designing techniques to utilize nature’s highly complex and sophisticated biological systems to develop biohybrid devices for use in biotechnology applications.Jason Yao, East
and to a lesserextent in engineering.6-8Rationale for described workThis paper describes the development of two inquiry-based experiments in a mechanicalengineering curriculum aimed at providing students with the opportunity to design and performexperiments. The design and profile of the new experiments best fit the POGIL profile in ouropinion and are the first of its kind in our curriculum. The motivation behind the development ofthe laboratories was to incorporate learner-centered based approaches in the laboratory aspects ofthe curriculum, which historically has been focused on analyzing and interpreting data. The twolaboratory exercises were implemented in two junior-level core classes - one experiment relatedto system dynamics
Paper ID #10013Organ-izing the engineering curriculum with biomedically related learningmodulesDr. Stephanie Farrell, Rowan University Dr. Stephanie Farrell is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University (USA). She obtained her PhD in Chemical Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology in 1996. Prior to joining the faculty at Rowan in 1998, she was an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Adjunct Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University until 1998. Dr. Farrell has made contributions to engineering education through her work in experiential learning, focusing
AC 2012-3864: SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ACTIVE LEARNING (SEAL)SYSTEM: A NOVEL APPROACH TO CONTROLS LABORATORIESDr. Per Henrik Borgstrom, University of California, Los Angeles Per Henrik Borgstrom received the B.S. (2005), M.S. (2007), and Ph.D. (2009) degrees in electrical engineering from UCLA, where he received the prestigious Regent’s Scholarship and Chancellor’s Prize. His research interests include robotics, controls, and educational methods.Prof. William J. Kaiser, University of California, Los Angeles William J. Kaiser received a Ph.D. in solid state physics from Wayne State University in 1984. From 1977 through 1986, as a member of Ford Motor Co. research staff, his development of automotive sensor and
interest and, forthe first time, the initial EDP has been assigned as a “self-selected” design project inwhich the students themselves are required to focus on solving a problem of their ownchoosing. This novel approach has produced remarkably positive results in terms ofstudent enthusiasm and motivation to innovate, greatly enhancing the overall quality ofthe introductory design experience, which is targeted at reinforcing the conceptualfundamentals of the engineering design process presented in the classroom. The second EDP, a water bottle rocket design, introduces the concept of theapplication of a theoretical model to predict “real-world” results, while the third and finalEDP, a LEGO™ Mindstorms™ vehicle design, presents a complex
electronics area. She taught variety of underrated and graduate courses including capstone design in Electrical and Computer Engineering area. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Courses Using the Online Flipped Classroom Approach John Santiago, Jr., Ph.D. and Jing Guo, D.Eng. Colorado Technical University (CTU), College of Engineering, Colorado Springs, COIntroductionThe student body in the College of Engineering consists mostly of adult learners. These studentswork full-time, a majority coming from active-duty military and military veterans. The collegesuccessfully developed and implemented a
analyze the prediction algorithmthrough instantiating multiple instances of the system and investigating the prediction accuracyand performance tradeoffs.5. Evaluation and Future ConsiderationsThe computer architecture laboratory sequence discussed in this paper has been accepted as theofficial curriculum by the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and has beenadministered for one academic year. Unifying the digital systems and computer architecturelaboratory courses with the approach described in this paper has been proven successful9, whichvalidates the positive feedback provided by students that have completed ECE 371 and ECE 464.Though based on a limited sample space, student commentary indicated a higher appreciation oflecture
systems. Engineering education research includes curriculum and laboratory development of biomechanics and bio-signal processing concepts.Dr. Renee M. Clark, University of Pittsburgh Renee M. Clark serves as research assistant professor focusing on assessment and evaluation within the University of Pittsburgh’s Swanson School of Engineering and its Engineering Education Research Center (EERC), where her interests focus on active and experiential learning. She has 25 years of experience as an engineer and analyst, having worked most recently for Walgreens and General Motors/Delphi Automotive in the areas of data analysis, IT, and manufacturing. She received her PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of
projects with traditional wirelesscommunications courses to enhance teaching and student learning and to offer senior designprojects for students with different expertise to work together9. In this paper, we focus onreporting our work on developing a new SDR laboratory course for junior and senior levelwireless engineering students. CURRENT COURSE STRUCTURE AT AUBURNAuburn University offers a Bachelor of Wireless Engineering program, which is ABET-accredited and first-of-its-kind in the nation. The BWE curriculum has two formal options: (i)wireless engineering-hardware (WIRE), emphasizing a hardware design-oriented approach towireless engineering, and (ii) wireless engineering-software (WIRS), emphasizing a software-oriented
technology into the traditional engineering curriculum and familiarizestudents with this important technology and the pharmaceutical industry. The pharmaceuticalindustry employs one in eight chemical engineers, second only to the chemical process industry.The expanding role of chemical engineering in pharmaceutical production demands the inclusionof pharma-related concepts in chemical engineering courses throughout the curriculum.Successful curriculum improvement requires a new approach to integrating concepts of batchprocessing, solid-liquid separation techniques, solid-solid particulate processing, drugformulation and delivery, and technology at the nano-scale. Students must have a solid grasp ofchemical engineering fundamentals and the
the development of new technologies and engineering approaches to evaluate and improve engineering edu- cation, both in traditional classroom setting and in non-traditional on-line settings. Dugan holds a B.A. degree in Mathematics and Computer Science from La Salle University, and M.S. and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from Duke University. Page 24.470.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Embedded Computing Reinforces and Integrates Concepts Across the ECE CurriculumIntroductionAn examination of the Electrical and Computer
AC 2012-4257: PROCEDURE DEVELOPMENT OF THERMAL EVAPO-RATION PROCESS FOR INCORPORATION INTO UNDERGRADUATECURRICULUMMr. Jeffrey Corbet Johnson, Grand Valley State University Jeff Johnson, a current student in Grand Valley State University’s Electrical Engineering program, has previously earned a Bachelor’s degree in physics from GVSU. Presently, he is employed at Grand Valley’s School of Engineering under the auspices of a grant issues from the National Science Foundation to support the development of a nanotechnology curriculum.Dr. Nael Barakat, Grand Valley State University Nael Barakat is the mechanical engineering Program Chair at GVSU, a registered Professional Engineer in Ontario, Canada, and a fellow of the
Teams to Develop Undergraduate Laboratory ExperiencesAbstractThe technical information presented in many undergraduate engineering courses is emphasizedand solidified by using laboratory experiences. As new, interesting technology is introduced intoundergraduate courses or new courses introduced into the curriculum, some professors findthemselves wanting to provide new hands-on exercises for their students to support their courseobjectives. At the same time, they often find they are short on time, money, or resources neededto develop their ideas into meaningful, level-appropriate learning events meant to timely supporttheir students’ learning.In this effort, a senior-level mechanical engineering student group in a
, necessitating future engineers be educated to developenvironmentally sound end-of-life management strategies for these nanomaterial-laden items.Development of an appropriate end-of-life management strategy for these materials/wastesrequires integration of the fields of nanotechnology, waste management, and environmentalengineering. The synergy between these areas presents an excellent opportunity to providestudents with an interrelated educational experience. This paper describes the early stages of thedevelopment and implementation of an integrated undergraduate nanotechnology theme withinthe current CEE curriculum at the University of South Carolina. This integrated approach isreferred to as a Nanotechnology LINK, or Learning Integration of New
opportunity by adapting Louisiana Tech’sclasslab concept (integrating class and lab facilities at scale) and large portions of theirinnovative, NSF-funded LivingWithTheLab (LWTL) curriculum. The LWTL curriculumemploys hands-on, project-based instruction for first-year engineering design and demandsavailability of classrooms featuring equipment often restricted from wide student use byavailability and safety concerns. This adaptation included developing an updated interpretationof the classlab concept (where traditional lecture and laboratory activities are seamlesslyinterwoven into the same course, taught in two-hour blocks) and adding new supporting spacesdedicated to collaboration and access to equipment outside of class hours. As the
the CELT instrument was poor, with a KR-20 of 0.39 andvarying levels of item difficulty (p=.16 to .91) and discrimination indices (d= -.05 to .18). Thiswas not surprising given the range of information literacy skills targeted and the small number ofitems. To address the poor reliability, a second scenario was added to the assessment in the formof a letter to the editor regarding the public health and environmental concerns with the use ofgenetically engineered salmon versus traditional farm-raised salmon, and expanding the potentialaudience to the larger STEM community. The new scenario was accompanied by eight newselected response items, which included six multiple choice items and two select all that applyitems
. To train a new cadre of graduates who value experimentation as an essential and natural part of solving engineering problems; 4. To expose important measurement techniques and safety concerns in laboratory environment; 5. To develop good experimental skills.Hence, the controls engineering education becomes more attractive and meaningful to thestudents.Student Learning OutcomesThe fundamental student learning outcomes of the control laboratory course are to demonstratethe following: 1. An ability to design, build, or assemble a part or product that configures control systems especially adapted to automation applications; 2. An ability to conduct experiments for measurements and analysis of feedback controls
the new Introduction to Meteorology course wasdeveloped and served as a point of entry into the weather radar curriculum. Next, students arerequired to take Electromagnetic Fields or Introduction to Measurement Systems. Subsequentto this, students can enroll in Radar Engineering and/or Radar Meteorology. These classeswere taught and coordinated to ensure student success. Finally, students take the in-depthAdaptive Digital Signal/Array Processing or the Weather Radar Theory/Practice class – whichculminate all previous learning, concentrate on deep projects, and serve as a fantastic springboard into our advanced graduate level programs in both schools. These were always offered inthe fall. Two out-of-department assessment experts were
AC 2012-3742: FACILITATING GROUP WORK: TO ENHANCE LEARN-ING IN LABORATORY BASED COURSES OF ENGINEERING EDUCA-TION IN INDIADr. Sujatha J., Mission10X, Wipro Technologies Sujatha J. is academically qualified with a Ph.D. in signal processing, from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India, and has more than 24 years of academic and industry experience. Over the years, Sujatha has participated in not only academic teaching and research but also in academic counseling for students, professional development programs, curriculum development, industry-institution relationship activities, and prototype development and team building. Currently, Sujatha is a core member of Research Center, Mission10X, Wipro Technologies
the student to discover but should be explicitly taught due to therelatively complexity of the new problems. Learning these tools will help students diagnose andfix their own coding mistakes.Conclusions This paper presents an updated curriculum centered on problem-based learning and just-in-time teaching for a weekly, one-credit programming laboratory course. The class must supporta wide variety of engineering majors while reinforcing programming fundamentals from lecture.The labs were designed to peak student interest while forcing students to practice currentconcepts with questions that challenged their understanding. Assessments and student feedbackshow the changes are largely successful, with students strongly recommending the