Paper ID #8513Relationship of Final Grade and Use of On Line Course Materials for an En-gineering Economics CourseDr. Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University Paul J. Kauffmann is a professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. His industrial career included positions as Plant Manager and Engineering Director. Dr. Kauffmann received a BS degree in Electrical Engineering and MENG in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State and is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and North Carolina.Dr. Joseph Wilck IV, East
tables. This textbook became a best seller in its field and itdefined what material was important for considering the economic impact of engineeringprojects.Also in 1930 the Division of Mechanics was approved based on the high level of activityof the Mechanics Committee. Now, there were 4 Divisions in S.P.E.E. (EngineeringDrawing, Mechanics, Physics and Institutional).In 1931, at the Annual Meeting, it was proposed that the name of the Society for thePromotion of Engineering Education (S.P.E.E.); be changed to the Engineering EducationSociety (E.E.S.). No change occurred11 due to lack of support at the Council meeting.At the Annual Meeting during June, 1932 at Oregon State College there were now 5Divisions in the Society with the addition of the
case of nano-technologies. This broad category ranges from incremental CMOS developments tohighly speculative new materials with novel functionality. However, roadmaps forstrategic development need to be built on more than hype and promises. This paperdescribes a simple tool to measure the maturity of new technologies in many economic aswell as technical domains. It ascribes one of ten stages of maturity to fourteen differentparameters. A review of non-volatile memory technologies is used as a benchmark. Thetool has been used to demonstrate technology evolution within academic courses and ithas also been applied within short industry courses.Project rationale and scopeThe appeal of nanotechnology lies in the sheer breadth and potential impact
at the necessary depth as well as the required breadth. The subject matterstudied was engineering mechanics: statics. It was essential that the students acquired a verystrong foundation of the fundamental principles. Statics is used as a very important foundationcourse for a variety of subsequent topics such as strength of materials, dynamics, fluidmechanics, machine elements, machine design, manufacturing processes, etc. It is observedthat this category recorded the maximum possible score of 5 on the Likert scale. Thisindicates that the instructor did cover the material. The author is extremely pleased with thisresult. It must be reiterated that no new instructional technique should be introduced whilesacrificing needed course
engineeringcurriculums. The material taught through this class is also covered on the Fundamentals ofEngineering (FE) exam, which is the first step to be a Professional Engineer (PE). This courseteaches skills required to analyze profits, costs, and the time value of money through manydifferent methods and devices. The challenge for educators is that engineering economic analysisis primarily concerned with problem solving methods that seem to be non-intuitive for manystudents. There have been proposal for alternative teaching methods including Internetintegration with other courses1, and a mechanics analysis of the cash flows2. Another challenge isthat students have a misconception that Engineering Economics is not related to the field ofengineering. However
AC 2012-3013: ASSESSMENT OF TQM IN THE 21ST CENTURYDr. Mysore Narayanan, Miami University Mysore Narayanan obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Liverpool, England in the area of electrical and electronic engineering. He joined Miami University in 1980 and teaches a wide variety of electrical, electronic, and mechanical engineering courses. He has been invited to contribute articles to several ency- clopedias and has published and presented dozens of papers at local, regional, national, and international conferences. He has also designed, developed, organized, and chaired several conferences for Miami University and conference sessions for a variety of organizations. He is a Senior Member of IEEE and a
Paper ID #11134Development of ”Engineering Economics Career” Mobile AppProf. Weihang Zhu, Lamar University Weihang Zhu is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering, Lamar University, USA since 2005. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University (2003), USA and his M.S. (2000) and B.S. (1997) in Mechanical and Energy Engineering at Zhejiang University, China. His research interests include Engineering Education, Computer haptics, CAD/CAM, high performance computing, meta-heuristics, multi-axis NC surface machining.Dr. Alberto Marquez, Lamar UniversityProf. Julia Yoo
majors that include Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering,Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, MaterialEngineering, Management Engineering, and Nuclear Engineering. The goal to for the students isto gain an appreciation and understanding of uncertainties and the conditions under which theyoccur within the context of the engineering problem-solving pedagogy of measurements, models,validation, and analysis. MAU will be called the Level 1 course for the remainder of this paper.The second class involved in the experiment, Quality Control (QC), is an upper-class electivecourse for Industrial and Systems Engineers, with occasional enrollees from other engineeringdepartments. For this particular class, thirty
deviation, the opposite seems to be true, although not in any statisticallysignificant way.Description of the CourseThe course is required for all Civil and Mechanical Engineering students and an elective forstudents in Electrical and Computer Engineering. The class consisted of students from all ofthese departments. An in-depth description of the course is beyond the scope of this paper.Therefore this section will attempt to discuss those questions that are likely to arise ininterpreting the conclusions, understanding its limitations and avoiding generalizations. Atextbook can always add value to a classroom especially if it is used to augment classroominstruction material. Alternately, additional material can often be provided via the web
Paper ID #11778Comparison of Engineering Economics Learning Outcomes and Student Per-ceptionDr. Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University Paul J. Kauffmann is Professor Emeritus and past Chair in the Department of Engineering at East Car- olina University. His industry career included positions as Plant Manager and Engineering Director. Dr. Kauffmann received a BS degree in Electrical Engineering and MENG in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State and is a registered Profes- sional Engineer in Virginia and North Carolina.Dr. Joseph Wilck, East
, examine them from a broader systemic perspective toimprove how such systems are designed and managed going forward. Unfortunately, acomprehensive study of engineering management programs across the US, conducted by Gandhiand Pinto [7], revealed that less than 1/3 of all programs offered risk management courses. Toaddress this gap in current educational curriculum, the authors discuss existing approaches toinclude systemic risk management material in engineering management programs.Systemic risk and its importance to engineering managers According to Kaufman and Scott [8], systemic risk is thought of as a risk that originatesfrom multiple sources, affects multiple agents and propagates quickly among individual parts orcomponents of the
instructorswondered how it was impacting student exam performance.Literature ReviewHomework has long been thought to aid students in preparing for exams. Instructors assign andgrade homework to help students learn the material for better overall exam performance. This isthe conventional belief in most of the academic community. It is only logical to think thatpractice improves performance in academic studies as it does in many other endeavors.In 2002, Peters et al.1 studied the correlation between homework and exam performance in anOperations Management course. The study was designed with two treatments: one treatment wasassigned homework and it was collected while the other treatment was assigned the samehomework but it was not collected. This study
and successfully completing thecourses which utilize the IRAM lab, the number of under-represented students (women andminorities) who graduate with this new background has increased in the IE department at MSU.In addition, the readiness of these engineering students entering into graduate research programsand the engineering workforce has also increased.IntroductionRobotics is a technology that is concerned with the design, operation, and application ofindustrial and/or mobile robots. The official definition as provided by the Robotics IndustriesAssociation1 states that a robot is a reprogrammable, multifunctional manipulator designed tomove materials, parts, tools, or special devices through variable programmed motions for theperformance of
AC 2010-1477: INTEGRATION OF ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, STATISTICS,AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT: REINFORCING KEY CONCEPTSPaul Kauffmann, East Carolina University Paul J. Kauffmann is Professor and Chair in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. His industry career included positions as Plant Manager and Engineering Director. Dr. Kauffmann received a BS degree in Electrical Engineering and MENG in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State and is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and North Carolina.Stephanie Sullivan, East Carolina University Stephanie Sullivan is a visiting instructor in the Department of
education.Examples of How Case Studies Can Benefit Engineering Management EducationA simple Google search yields sources to numerous examples of case studies already utilized inengineering education. For example, MIT’s Engineering Systems Division is on the forefront ofeducating graduate students in complex and enterprise systems engineering. Many of their casestudies efforts are publically available.8 In addition, MIT’s System Design and Management(SDM) master’s degree program produces case studies.9 Similarly, doing a Google search forcase studies in engineering management yields another publically available resource.10 The Ste-vens Institute of Technology hosts a plethora of case studies and related material.11 There is moreon engineering case studies at
from 26 universities (sufficient data was not available for two of the universities in thereview) were reviewed to examine course topic areas and compare these to material included on Page 25.98.6the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) and Principles and Practice of Engineering (PE) exams.Key words and phrases from capstone course syllabi were mapped to the topic areas for eachexam. If a syllabus contained at least one key word or phrase for a topic area, the course wasdeemed to include coverage of the corresponding topic. If not, we deemed coverage unknownfor that topic in that course.The FE topic areas for the industrial engineering exam
Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a two-time recipient of the Shingo Prize for Manufac- turing Excellence. He works with leaders from industrial and service sector enterprises for sustainable system design and implementation through consulting, custom educational workshops, and system design evaluations.Prof. Makoto Kawada, Meijo University Makoto Kawada, Ph.D., is President, Meijo Process Management Institute, Co., LTD; Professor Emeritus, School of Business, Meijo University; and Special Researcher, Graduate School of Economics, University of Tokyo. Page
Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. He has served as Chair of the First-Year Programs Division and the Environmental Engineering Division and as President of the Southeastern Section of ASEE. He earned B.C.E and M.S. degrees from Auburn University and the Ph.D. from Virginia Tech. His interests include wastewater treatment and teaching and learning in engineering education.Dr. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ronald W. Welch, Ph.D., P.E. Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and
AC 2012-3470: ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL FORTHE CAUSES OF COST AND TIME OVERRUNS IN ENGINEERING PROJECTSDr. Syed Athar Masood, National University of Sciences & Technology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan Syed Athar Masood is working as Assistant Professor at the Department of Engineering, NUST College of E&ME, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. He did his doctorate at Loughborough University, U.K., in engineering management at Wolfson School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering and published a number of research papers in international journals. Page 25.184.1 c American Society for
.3Additionally, teacher-created videos are often marginal in quality and are time consuming tocreate.3 This may lead to videos creating more of a barrier to learning than a help indisseminating information to the students. Page 24.1253.3MethodBefore we added technology or changed how we delivered the material, we evaluated theprevious tests to determine what areas of the materials were not being retained by the students.Test 1 showed that the students who did poorly did not understand which components of theproblem were used as which variable. Test 2 showed that the same students who did poorly onTest 1 still did not understand the mechanics of the
often have difficulty with core concepts in their coursework. Withoutovercoming these difficulties to master the conceptual material, advancing in the course andlearning new material may be hampered. Economic concepts receive less focus in engineeringcurriculums and tend to be correspondingly less familiar to engineering students. While themathematics required is not particularly complex, the concepts of the time value of money,discounting cash flows, evaluating the worth of mutually exclusive alternatives, etc. do requiretime to absorb. This is exacerbated by the fact that such problems are often presented in textualformat (the dreaded “word problem” format) where a slight change in the wording candramatically alter the intended interpretation
extend them to realworld problems. Since assessment of student development in three of the above four categoriesis not an easy task, the majority of schools[6] that offer OR courses have their main focus on theimplementation of the third item (developing operational skills).Based on that, students learn how to perform the simplex method, its iterations, write the dualproblem, and perform sensitivity analysis with or without the use of software. An instructorspends many hours trying to teach the procedural steps which are tedious, repetitive, and requirecareful attention to the details, but it is easy to learn.The concepts, on the other hand, require a higher learning mechanism and instructorstraditionally find insufficient time for such
Paper ID #17486Implementation and Evaluation of Visual Algorithm to Teach Benefit-to-CostRatio AnalysisDr. Hector E. Medina, Liberty University Dr. Medina is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Liberty University (Lynchburg, Va.), where also he leads the development of the Mechanical Engineering Program. He obtained a B.Sc. in Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, and both M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering from the Virginia Commonwealth University. Prior to graduate school, he worked in indus- try and as a high school teacher for several years in his native Venezuela and Aruba
weight of commodity[4]. The average savings ofbarge transportation over other modes is about $9.00 per ton[3].Multiple natural and man-made events can lead to the disruptions of the Mississippi River suchas ice, droughts, or floods that can cause non-navigable water levels and earthquakes or terroristattacks that can destroy the infrastructure of the navigation system[5]. Other possible disruptioncauses include vessel allision or collision and mechanical vessel problems. In 2012, theMississippi River suffered a record-breaking low water level and was very close to beingcompletely shut down. Disruptions on the inland waterway system can have widespreadeconomic and societal impacts, and their consequences can be significant. For instance, the
partners. Dr. Wilck has held a faculty position at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. He is currently an assistant professor of Engineering at East Carolina University.Dr. Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University Dr. Paul J. Kauffmann is a professor and former chair in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University. His industry career included positions as Plant Manager and Engineering Director. Dr. Kauff- mann received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and MENG in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State and is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and North Carolina
AC 2012-4675: INTEGRATING STUDENT PROJECTS THROUGH THEUSE OF SIMULATION TOOLS ACROSS LOGISTICS ENGINEERING CUR-RICULUMDr. Pawel Pawlewski, Poznan University of Technology Pawel Pawlewski works as an Assistant Professor at the Department of Engineering Management, Poznan University of Technology. He holds a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering, with a specialization in organi- zation of production systems from the Poznan University of Technology. His research interests include organization of manufacturing systems, monitoring of operations management, reengineering and IT ap- plication for logistics, simulation, and modeling of processes.Dr. Zbigniew J. Pasek, University of Windsor Zbigniew J. Pasek is an Associate
see a purpose in finding the solution.It is hard to judge the effectiveness of a setting. I have been surprised at positive reception ofsettings about break dancing, the intellectual adventures of octopi, the trials of university life, andthe behavior of dysfunctional professors and students. Other useful types of settings are small-scalebut life-like civil and mechanical engineering problems (as in Ang and Tang10) and mathematicalmodels of scientific data (as in Olkin, Gleser, and Dynkin11).Scaffolding is material that the problem writer has included to help the solver. It takes severalforms. It may be a suggested sequence of steps that will lead to the solution, or a ladder of
noticeable in graduate students with a non petroleumengineering background. It is very common to have in petroleum engineering graduate programsstudents which original bachelor’s degree is mining, civil, chemical or mechanical engineering.Those students normally have no background on application of engineering economy topetroleum industry projects.The petroleum industry, as well as the mining industry, carries very high risk in its explorationand production projects. In addition to the inherent risky reserves quantification, external factorslike the always unstable oil and gas market, the constant changes in government regulations andthe political environment, make mandatory the use of economic and risk analysis for mostprojects under
unquestioned, yet there exists no formal mechanism for programs to share data and information on processes for the purpose of improving engineering higher education and student learning on the aggregate. As programs look at the “cost versus effort” tradeoff of assembling data for inclusion in their self study reports (SSRs) it makes sense to create as system whereby programs can share and access data. (2) Standardized, well understood and applied: ABET’s EC2000 general and program criteria are well vetted, articulated and utilized. For 20 years programs have produced evidence in support of compliance with the required criterion in program self-study reports2. These
Paper ID #14191DESIGN FOR COMMERCIALIZATION (DFC): A MULTI DOMAIN FEA-SIBILITY APPROACH FOR THE DIFFUSION OF RENEWABLE ENERGYTECHNOLOGYDr. Oscar M. Bonilla, Baruch College of the City University of New York Oscar Bonilla, Ph.D Dr. Oscar Bonilla has been working as a consultant for the insurance industry in the implementation of Lean Management and Operation Programs across Latin America and the U.S. He is also a Professor of Service Operations Management at Baruch College – Zicklin School of Business in the City University of New York. Prior to that, Dr. Bonilla worked on the financial analysis and cost control of