, Pennsylvania State University Sara Kern is an Engineering Librarian at Penn State University. She earned her MA in history from Penn State and her MSLIS at Syracuse University. Her research interests include inclusive library outreach and instruction. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Crafting a Library on Belonging in Engineering: An Initial Review using Textual AnalysisIntroductionWhat does it mean to belong in engineering? Who belongs in engineering? Where do libraries fitinto this conversation? Many scholars have explored the concept of outreach, inclusion,accessibility, and belonging in STEM fields. This project examines a collection of these works,using a library of literature as a corpus
named using colonial Tribal designations,with the community colleges all operated by the dominant culture. The two known exceptionsare Diné College, formerly Navajo Community College, and Tohono O'odham CommunityCollege which are under the direct control of those Nations. This initial research is lessinterested in where the work was done than on the discovery of the Indigenous engineeringterminology of the topics covered. We downloaded complete records so we are able to do aninstitution and granting agency analysis later.It was decided that for this research in engineering we would limit the use of the terms to thearticle title, abstract, and keywords to ensure that the term used was relevant to what we werelooking for. This is a common search
indicators of relevance theparticipants were looking for as they scanned the results list and then skimmed the full text ofarticles that helped them determine a source’s utility.Participants used several approaches for determining source relevance when reviewing searchresults lists. The more experienced researchers, not only faculty participants but also graduatestudents who had spent several years in their program, did not initially focus on the article titles,but instead were looking for authors they knew and respected as well as journals they valued. Forexample, after seeing an author they recognized in the results list, one participant made thiscomment, “I know this person's name and so he is a very good person in the civil engineeringdomain
and a B.A. from Emory University.Christina Sheley, Cornell University Christina Sheley is the Director of Business, Engineering, and Entrepreneurship at the Cornell University Library, where she leads strategic initiatives for several libraries on campus, entrepreneurship, and Cornell Tech/New York City programs and works with the College of Engineering’s Engineering Communications Program. Prior to Cornell, she was the Head of the Business/SPEA Library at Indiana University Bloom- ington and supported research and teaching in business, public affairs/administration, and economics. Christina has a B.S. in Communications and Psychology and an M.S. in Library and Information Science, all from Indiana University
Paper ID #40281Undergraduate Students Experience Cognitive Complexity in Basic Elementsof Library ResearchErin Matas, Michigan Technological University Erin Matas is the Director of the J. Robert Van Pelt and John and Ruanne Opie Library at Michigan Tech- nological University. She completed her MSI at the University of Michigan School of Information. Prior to her master’s work, she received B.A. degrees in History and Women’s Studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Before her selection as Library Director in 2020, she served as Michigan Tech’s faculty engagement and research support librarian since 2014. Her
difference being that the listdeveloped in class provides more explicit details. From this exercise, considerations aroundreproducibility were gradually introduced, starting with a new question: “How will you preserveyour progress along each step of the scientific method?” As a class, simple approaches werenoted. For research design and planning steps such as initial observations, research questions andhypotheses, here is an overall summary of the concepts noted: ● Write down ideas in digital documents such as Google Docs, where collaborators can share this information through email, social media, or other online locations, with varying permissions for viewing or editing. ● Write down ideas on physical paper to quickly draw visual
research topics to aid in strategic decision making, andimpact services and reputational management.In its 2020 report, ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee summarized that majortrends include: learning analytics, the influence of machine learning and artificial intelligence ontechnology, the impact of big deals cancellations on open access and transformative publisheragreements, research data maturation and the ethical need to incorporate the GO FAIR Initiative,social justice roles including critical librarianship and critical pedagogy, incorporating increaseduse and licensing of streaming media, and finally, library space as a place for supporting studentwell-being [1]. Earlier in a 2017 environmental scan by the same team, the concept of
have access to data collected on thepreviously implemented sessions. Moving forward, it will be important to collect this data sothat it can be used to evaluate the current approach and make future improvements.ConclusionThe plan to implement support for critical citation requirements for civil and environmentalengineering graduate research is still in its initial stages. Next steps include meeting with facultyin the CEE department to continue to develop this plan so that it can be rolled out as a pilot withgraduate students starting in fall 2023. Library support for critical citation practice will beessential for instruction and supporting students throughout their research process. As thesubject specialist for this department, I plan to
collaborations with the other deans; disseminatingplanning notes and soliciting feedback from their leadership team, faculty, staff and otherconstituents; and drafting initial unit-level strategic plans. The deans were asked to think paststatements including “this is how we have always done this” in formulating ideas and addressinglong-standing and perhaps weaponized traditions that stifle interdisciplinary creativity in highereducation. One major aspect of this is the role of a university research library. Often thought ofas a knowledge repository that is seldom used by faculty, staff and students, aside from book andjournal requests, there were no deep dialogues from the academic colleges with the library. Aspart of this new strategic plan, the
advanceopen scholarship” [21]. What services and supports are offered may also depend on an individuallibraries’ priorities.ConclusionThe initial intent for this study was to consider the tension engineers may experience when facedwith data deposit when they are working with industry partners. However, the literature andsurvey results reveal a more complex relationship between engineers and data sharing. Theliterature and survey found a willingness to share, but putting this into practice is quitechallenging. It is perhaps not too surprising to learn that researchers are comfortable informallysharing data by request, or more formally attaching it to a publication where the journal canmanage data access or provide a link to a supplementary file. Data
are often resolvedduring the initial chat session, more complex questions are routed to one of multiple queuesdepending on the chat operator’s assessment of the question. The queues are organized bydisciplinary area (e.g. STEM, Social Sciences, Humanities) and function (e.g. Data Science,Researcher Support). The students’ reported school affiliation may weigh into the assignment ofa queue, but is not dispositive.These chat transcripts are saved and retained by ASU Library, but they have not been analyzedother than as a quantitative count to illustrate the number of patrons serviced. This study usesthese previously unanalyzed chat transcripts to see if any insight into engineering students’information seeking behavior can be gleaned. It
Multidisciplinary Engineeringdepartment (MTDE) on campus. As a new department interested in breaking disciplinary silos inthe interest of effective scholarship and teaching, MTDE was highly receptive to bringing alibrarian on board as teaching faculty. In the initial discussions, the primary author proposed acourse that would fill in the gaps of the research lifecycle that the regular engineering curriculumleaves behind. As a new department on campus that sought to bring the benefits of a diversity ofdisciplines into engineering, it was the right place and time for a new multidisciplinary courseproposal. The department head expressed interest in a librarian-led course on scholarlycommunications for early engineering PhD students. The course became titled
and reuse practices within the Center for Embedded NetworkSensing (CENS), a National Science Foundation (NSF) Science and Technology Center, over aten-year period. At that time only a few domain areas mandated data deposition by funders orjournals, limited repositories were available for CENS research data, and sharing primarilyoccurred through interpersonal exchanges. The findings reveal that CENS researchers expressedwillingness to share their data, but the majority of participants were only willing to share undercertain conditions, which included getting credit, being allowed to retain initial publicationrights, sharing only if the effort to do so was minimal, or if the requestor is known to the group,or if mandated by funder or journal
represent a significant demand onlibrarian time. Numerous articles have delineated the level of engagement and responsibilitiesthat librarians conduct in the systematic review process and offered guidance for lessexperienced librarians to engage with researchers effectively [13, 14]. The initial literatureinterview, search and review phase can demand over 20 hours [15]. Engineering librarians willbe called upon to employ various strategies to bridge any gaps in domain expertise.In this paper, we explore a variety of innovative methods, supported by technological advancessuch as natural language processing (NLP) and generative AI, to investigate whether these toolscan enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of librarians' work in the systematic
students, transfer studentchallenges, approaches to classroom accessibility, and greater curriculum awareness. This datahas helped the library identify challenges unique to each discipline within the division, as well aspotential gaps in undergraduate and graduate student support prior to initiating service.Introduction The foundation of this case study rests in user-centered research with the primary goal oflearning more about the needs of engineering students at a R1 research institution. The studybegan during the Spring of 2022 when this researcher began working as a library liaison to theSchool of Engineering, filling a position that had been vacant for several years. During thoseyears, the School of Engineering (SoE) had grown and
-basedevaluation of factors like organization, description and critique of current state of the art,discussion of current debates, and recommendations for future research. An IL-related item isincluded for References, but the description is much higher level than the customized VALUErubric used for the study, since it is only one of many factors on which the students’ grades arebased. The full assignment prompt is included in Appendix B. Provided the reports and otherdata were gathered as part of regular class activities, and no student identifying information wasconnected to any of the results, IRB approval was not required for this study.The initial VALUE rubric for this project had previously been customized from AACU’soriginal version for a prior
implementations through the Massachusetts Health Information Exchange. At Wentworth, Dr. Feldman is focused on project-based instruction, hands-on simulations, experiential learning approaches, and first year curriculum. Dr. Feldman is one of the lead instructors for Introduction to Engineering courses, with enrollments in the hundreds each fall. His research and teaching interests, in addition to first year engineering, include telemedicine, health informatics, rehabilitation engineering, and medical robotics. Dr. Feldman has collaborated with researchers and engineers from organizations including Tufts School of Veterinary Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Vecnacares, and Restoreskills.Miss Callie Cherry, Wentworth
initial concern or opportunity. It ispossible to move between these steps repeatedly, if the observation step identifies a previouslyunknown underlying issue that needs to be resolved before a decision can be made one mightreturn to the pre-work stage. Or, if the results of observation do not provide evidence to supportimplementing a solution a new tool might be required for further study.There does not exist a one-size-fits-all approach for collecting data to aid in the decision-makingprocess. The intent of this paper is to explore some often used, but loosely defined, terms that areuseful in the pre-work stage and introduce a few designs for data collection. The researchers areplanning to use these instruments in a future user experience study
information literacy skills and research skills into the tertiary curriculum” [7, p.15].That the majority of these papers are published in library science journals, by librarians, speaksto the importance of collaboration to a librarian’s success [6]. It also speaks to how proactivelibrarians must be to engage with campus partners and sustain these relationships. Notably, theabove examples all focus on a librarian supporting teaching initiatives in mostly traditional ways.However, in recent years the literature has trended towards examples where librarians aresupporting students and faculty beyond the established norms: “Changing technologies,environments, and needs have shaped the role of the academic librarian into less about resourcesand more about
databases such as Scopus, Compendex, or Web of Science.In his article from 2001, Thompson offered general observations on the publication anddistribution of United States government technical reports, along with strategies for accessing thereports [7]. Since that time, we have seen important new initiatives that have aided the search forU.S. government-sponsored research, including the Technical Report Archive & Image Library(TRAIL) [15].Thompson reported on the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) as a distributor oftechnical reports. In 2016, NTIS re-launched the National Technical Reports Library (NTRL)site and made it freely open to the public. Previously it was only available through asubscription. NTRL indexes over three million
the Oregon Institute of Technology Library. Aja earned an MLIS degree from the University of Washington and a Bachelor of Arts and Sciences in French and Community and Regional Development from UC Davis. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Uncovering Information Behavior: AI-assisted Citation Analysis of Mechanical Engineering Technology Senior Capstone ReportsAbstractCitation analysis has been used by librarians and researchers to guide collection developmentdecisions, assess information literacy, and to gain insight into the development of scholarshipwithin a discipline. This project builds on this foundation by using citation
. When initially discussing what questions should be included in the pre-survey, wecame to the conclusion that we wanted to assess how critical a participant was of informationsources. But we also recognized that asking a direct question on this topic could influence theirbehavior during the observational session. As a workaround to this issue, we decided to ask thestudent about their previous engagement with research projects and their previous exposure tolibrary instruction. We feel that these questions will help us parse out students that have moreformal experience with information literacy and source evaluation in the final dataset. Thepost-survey questions are designed to provide both quantitative and qualitative data to betterunderstand
Paper ID #39180Board 93: Collection Management in Preparation for Building Restoration:University of Illinois Mathematics LibraryMrs. Kendall Morgan, Grainger Engineering Library and Information Center Kendall Morgan worked as a Graduate Assistant at the Grainger Engineering Library and Information Center (GELIC) while pursuing her MLIS from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is now the STEM Instruction Librarian at the University of Oklahoma. Kendall’s research interests lie in the communication of science to the public and ethics education in STEM disciplines.Mr. Elisandro Cabada, University of Illinois at
“collaborations between business faculty and business instruction librarians are strongand a significant factor in high-quality evidence-based research.” However, the author of thisstudy stated a “concerted initiative” is needed, moving forward, between business faculty andlibrarians.As both the Fiegen article, along with the Phillips, et al. paper and the others reviewed and cited,focused exclusively on information literacy instruction, it was anticipated that the papers wouldnot provide additional insight into how librarians support faculty teaching needs. Beyondinformation literacy and other library related instruction, there is very little literature that coversthe topic of how librarians can directly support faculty teaching needs. At the time of
& physicalsciences, engineering, and mathematics & statistics.Originally constructed in 1987, the first renovations of the library began in the basement in 2014and included the entry level floor. The renovations created new public spaces that includedcollaboration spaces, a visualization conference room, study rooms, and a makerspace. In 2017,the third floor of the library was renovated. As a result of these renovations, building trafficincreased from approximately 700,000 visitors each year to more than 2 million annual visitors.In 2018, when the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) initiated the Research LibraryImpact: Pilot Models for Scalable and Sustainable Assessment (https://www.arl.org/research-library-impact-pilots-2/), the
Class Types 2. Inspiration and Motivation 3. Authoring Design Choices 4. Authoring Support 5. Challenges and Barriers 6. Professional Impact 7. Advice and Looking ForwardThe final list of questions can be seen in Appendix 1.Survey Dissemination and Data Collection:The survey was administrated via Qualtrics, with the initial emails being sent out in December2023. The researchers used an initial group email invitation with personal follow-up emails abouttwo weeks later. Ultimately, the researchers had a 45% author response rate (35 of 77). Surveyresponses from the two authors of this paper are included in the set of 35 responses. The surveybegan with a consent statement, but as the survey was not distributed to students
UB learning managementsystem, it was provided without context. Nearpod allows the lesson slides and questions to beavailable to the student via the shareable link.DiscussionWhile our initial findings are anecdotal, they will shape the future research we plan to conduct inthese transfer seminar courses. The takeaways we have observed thus far pertain to two groups:the transfer engineering students who participated in the Nearpod lessons and the facultyinstructors who teach the various sections of the course. We will discuss both groups below.Adjusting the format from a front-loaded library overview to a session with active learningallowed for greater student engagement and discussion throughout the one-shot, similar to whatRomero Rodriguez
Paper ID #37021Mapping Graduate Student Workshops to Career Readiness FrameworksSeth Vuletich, Colorado School of Mines Seth Vuletich is the Scholarly Communications Librarian the Colorado School of Mines. Seth provides specialized support to graduate students through all stages of the research lifecycle. Prior to entering the field of librarianship, Seth was a professional woodworker and earned a bachelor’s degree in geology from the University of Colorado, Boulder. Seth earned his Master’s in Library and Information Science from the University of Denver in 2021.Ms. Brianna B. Buljung, Colorado School of Mines
, and resource conclusionscan help students understand the purpose and relevance of a source. Additionally, students canuse the context clues provided by where a resource lives to help them navigate the biases thatmay not be immediately apparent from an initial perusal of possible resources they seek out foruse in their own research. By reviewing the publisher (P), students can better understand theresearch landscape of their topic. They also can see the scholarly, popular, or commercialattributes and uses that a resource may have before getting attached to a particular resource.A key aspect of this tool is the use of lateral reading by its users. By including the step ofreviewing the list of sources (L), students can better appreciate and
public research university developed and piloted a suite of micro-learning informationliteracy modules with micro-credentialing for undergraduate students. The topics covered in themodules include (1) effective information-gathering strategies, (2) competitive analysis, (3)patent information, (4) industry standards, and (5) informed communication. The foundationalmodules, created with stakeholder feedback from industry professionals, entrepreneurs,instructors, and students, are designed for instructors to use in their classes without directlibrarian intervention. The micro-credentialing component allows students to share the digitalbadges they earn with potential employers via LinkedIn and other platforms. The modules andcontent are designed to