Paper ID #7341Modules for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Existing CurriculaJorge Rodriguez, Western Michigan UniversityDr. Alamgir A. Choudhury, Western Michigan University Alamgir A. Choudhury is an Associate Professor of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. His MS and PhD are in mechanical engineering from NMSU (Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, instrumentation & control, and fluid power. He is also a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Ohio
respondedto a questionnaire as a way of propping their learning gains and the effect the course had onbringing about awareness of the above skills and issues. Students’ awareness was enhanced inthe following areas: entrepreneurship, innovation, continued self-education, self-awareness in aprofessional environment and working in teams. Students’ responses in class discussions andtheir performance in quizzes indicated that they have learned the targeted skills and that thecourse was effective in helping them acquire the awareness of these issues.Acknowledgment Page 23.827.12The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Kern Family Foundation through
Merrill, J., 2009. Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in firstyear engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 98 (2), 145-156.[10] Sawyer, R. Keith. 2012. Explaining creativity: the science of human innovation. New York: OxfordUniversity Press.[11]Zhang, F. Kolmos & Graaf. E., 2013. Conceptualizations on innovation competency in a problem- andProject- based learning curriculum: from an activity theory perspective. International Journal ofEngineering Education, 29(1), 3-16.[12] Chapman, M., & McBride, M. 1992. Beyond competence and performance: Children's class inclusionstrategies, superordinate class cues, and verbal justifications. Developmental Psychology, 28, 319-327.[13] Forman, E. and Cazden, C
Paper ID #7975Designing an Introductory Entrepreneurial Thinking CourseMr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University and the recipient of NSF awards for research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes
Paper ID #7214User-Based Approach to Teaching and Learning Product DesignDr. Daniel Raviv, Florida Atlantic University Dr. Raviv is a Professor of Computer & Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Florida Atlantic University. In December 2009 he was named Assistant Provost for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. With more than 25 years of combined experience in the high-tech industry, government and academia Dr. Raviv developed fundamentally different approaches to ”out-of-the-box” thinking and a breakthrough methodology known as ”Eight Keys to Innovation.” He has been sharing his contributions with profession
. Thestudents develop a new product idea and carry it through to a physical prototype. Theymust also formulate a business plan, marketing strategy, and an appeal for funding. Webring in guest speakers with expertise in intellectual property issues and severalsuccessful entrepreneurs (including former students from this class). In this paper, wediscuss the three versions of this class, and how they have evolved. We also discuss ourstudents’ successes, and some of the problems they have encountered in trying tocommercialize their ideas.Index terms - Creativity, new product development, entrepreneurship, distance learningIntroductionThe first version of our course Creativity and New Product Development was developedby Henry Bolanos and Dave Lewis. Henry
AC 2011-873: TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP THROUGH VIRTUESCalvin C. Jen, Calvin College Cal Jen, M.Arch., is currently serving as an associate professor of business at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, MI where he has taught business full-time for the past 4 years. He has previously taught archi- tecture for 12 years as adjunct faculty at the University of Michigan and at Calvin College. He has 30 years of business experience in architecture and corporate management including 15 years as the founder and principal architect of AMDG Architects, and 9 years as the senior vice president of real estate and human resources for Domino’s Farms (global headquarters of Domino’s Pizza). Cal has also served on a wide variety of
Paper ID #34901 Center for Innovation and Commerce. His research focuses on college-level engineering education for entrepreneurship and leadership. He has authored or co-authored over 135 refereed publications and over $16 million in funded grant proposals.Dr. Cole Hatfield Joslyn, University of Texas at El Paso Cole Joslyn is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education and Lead- ership at The University of Texas at El Paso. His research emphasizes humanizing engineering education, particularly 1) increasing Latinx students’ sense of belonging in engineering by a) integrating holistic, socio-culturally responsive practices and Latinx cultural assets and values into educational
Paper ID #15493Developing Entrepreneurial Mindset in Industrial Engineering Classes: ACase StudyDr. Farnaz Ghazi Nezami, Kettering University Farnaz Ghazi-Nezami is an Assistant Professor in the Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Depart- ment at Kettering University. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering from Wichita State University. She also earned her masters and undergraduate degree in Industrial Engineering in Iran, Tehran. Dr. Ghazi-Nezami is a Certified Six Sigma Green Belt (CSSGB) from the American Society for Quality (ASQ), and received the Energy Assessment Certification from the
AC 2011-934: IPHONE ENTREPRENEURSHIP CLASS: BRIDGING THEGAP BETWEEN ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS TO CREATE AN EN-TREPRENEURIAL CULTUREGerald Nelson, Mississippi State University Gerald Nelson is an Industrial Engineering graduate of Mississippi State University who later went on to receive his MBA. Nelson’s career includes former positions as Plant Manager, Trinity Industries; Presi- dent and Chief Operating Officer of the Wear Resistance Group of Thermadyne Industries, Inc.; Executive Vice President of Operations, Viasystems Group, Inc.; and Chief Operating Officer of Deka Medical, Inc. In 2006, Nelson assumed responsibility as Director for the Thad Cochran Endowment for Entrepreneur- ship, which fosters funds and
industrial design, business and start up experience.The inspiration for High Technology Venture Start-up, came from the Stanford TechnologyVentures Program and The University of Michigan’s Program in Manufacturing. Both of theseprograms provide a blend of entrepreneurship, business, and engineering. Since our institution isa small four-year college with an undergraduate focus, providing the level of experience studentsat these schools get is impossible. We tried, however, to distill some elements into a three-hour,semester-long class. The most important elements for us to incorporate into the class were:working with a real company that designs, engineers and supports real products;multidisciplinary teams; and, developing a real product for real
graduatestudent.Approved in 2007, the Graduate Certificate in Entrepreneurship includes an introductory class(Foundations of Business for Entrepreneurs) that introduces non-business students to basicbusiness concepts as they apply to entrepreneurs. Following successful completion of this class,students take a two-course sequence (New Venture Development and Business Plan Project)with graduate business students. These classes address opportunity recognition and new venture Page 22.944.5development and funding. The fourth class in the Certificate program is an elective class thatcan be taken within or outside the student’s major classes.A key component of the
, leads to improvements in the students’ designs, implementationplans, marketing strategy, etc.In anonymous responses to the prompt, “What elements of the course and instruction did youfind most helpful for accomplishing the course’s learning goals?”, students provided commentssuch as:“Having two different projects and the ability to move around was helpful. It allowed me to takerisks and if a business idea turned out to be a bad idea after spending time on it, we were notstuck with it.”“The freedom to pursue an idea and learn about entrepreneurship in context.”“The professors continued motivation and drive that kept our group moving forward.”“The class was extremely open-ended, allowing students to fully develop their ideas and businessplans
Paper ID #7624Designing, Developing and Implementing an Entrepreneurship ProgramDr. Monique Fuchs, Wentworth Institute of Technology Monique Fuchs is Associate Vice President, Innovation + Entrepreneurship for Wentworth Institute of Technology in Boston, where she oversees student development and the launch of an innovation and en- trepreneurship center. Dr. Fuchs has experience in the profit and non-profit sector, in international settings and in a variety of industries including Consulting Services, IT, Higher Education, Publishing, Engineer- ing, Biotechnology, and Architecture/Design. Dr. Fuchs is the author of
higher education are frustrated withstudents who do not attend class, turn in assignments late or exhibit a lack of effort inclasses where they pay tuition and receive a grade. It is a challenge, therefore, to gain theinvolvement of students in social entrepreneurship efforts where the reward (grade, payor recognition) is not immediate or minimal and the trade-off (time management for theirschedule) may be more fun or financially rewarding. This paper discusses the evolutionfor the process of enlisting student involvement in two distinct social entrepreneurshipprograms at our university.The first program involves linking university skill sets in the arts, digital media,technology and project management to the planning, implementation and
students often identify software as possible solutions to market segment painpoints, the entrepreneurs usually lack the development skills to see their ideas to fruition.Accordingly, there is also emerging demand for entrepreneurship PBL to embraceinterdisciplinary teams that leverage specializations in different domains, including computerscience [6].In 2016, we adopted the Tech Startup model [7] of coordinating Entrepreneurship and SoftwareEngineering classes by collaborating on novel software ideas. Unlike toy projects, Tech Startupprojects leverage Entrepreneurship students to provide feedback and changing requirements asthey adopt Lean Startup methods. At the beginning of each semester, students from both classesparticipate in ideation
Paper ID #34202Introducing Entrepreneurship and Innovation in a Design CourseDr. Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at Illinois State University. He received his PhD in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2006), masters in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2003) and also a master’s in business administration from Indira Gandhi National Open University (2001). His research interests include advanced manufacturing, design methodologies, six sigma, lean manufacturing, and engineering education. He previously taught at Khalifa University (UAE),Indiana
Paper ID #12850Blending Entrepreneurship and Design in an Immersive EnvironmentDr. Bryan O’Neil Boulanger, Ohio Northern University Dr. Boulanger is an Associate Professor of Environmental Engineering in the Department of Civil En- gineering at Ohio Northern University. His academic interests include immersive learning, experiential learning, risk management, and surface chemistry.Prof. Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University Joe Tranquillo is an Associate Professor of Biomedical and Electrical Engineering at Bucknell University. Joe was the founder and inaugural chair of the Biomedical Engineering Society Undergraduate
AC 2011-974: ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE IRON RANGE ENGINEER-ING (IRE) MODELDan Ewert, Iron Range Engineering Dan Ewert is the Director and Professor of Iron Range Engineering, Virginia, MN – a program of Min- nesota State University – Mankato.Ronald R Ulseth, Iron Range Engineering Ulseth is an instructor of engineering at Iron Range Engineering and Itasca Community College both in northern Minnesota. He is the co-developer of both programs. For the past 20 years he has taught physics, statics, dynamics, fluid mechanics, and thermodynamics. He has successfully implemented engineering learning communities in first year programs. Recently, Ulseth began a new 100% project-based, industry- sponsored, engineering
% 44% 56% 65% 82%Beginning with the ESP class of 2004, all participants completed a pre-survey designed to assesstheir knowledge and comfort with engineering and entrepreneurship as a part of the registrationprocess. At the conclusion of the program, the students were asked to complete a post-surveywith questions identical to the pre-survey. The surveys from each respondent are linked and thechange in the responses is evaluated. Approximately 95% of the participants completed bothassessment surveys. Table 2 shows the survey topics, their association to the program objectivesof Table 1, the percentage of student
Paper ID #6408Assessing Student Design Work in Social Entrepreneurship ProjectsLindsey Anne Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Lindsey Nelson is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her work centers upon helping engineering students connect meaningfully with global problems. She received her BS in Me- chanical Engineering from Boston University and her MA in Poverty and Development from the In- stitute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex. Her research interests include engineering design for poverty alleviation, sustainable design, the public’s understanding of engineering
questionnaire 38. The EAO has been used in a number of other dissertations 35, 39 & 40 and research 41-46articles . The limitation of the EAO model is that it does not include risk perception andopportunity recognition, two other well recognized characteristics of entrepreneurs. Theadvantage is that it is a validated instrument with sound theoretical underpinning and that it takesa multi-factor approach with four subscales.Method Our inquiry seeks to determine whether the students become more entrepreneurial aftertaking these classes. We selected the EAO instrument 38 as our quantitative tool for severalreasons. It was developed to predict entrepreneurship, which fits with our research question. Itwas tested on students
capitalization table.During the last class period of the semester, the student executive teams deliver an investorpresentation to external entrepreneurs and investors (angels and venture capitalists) brought in bythe instructor. While mock investor presentations to outside professionals who “judge the resultsand declare a winner” are relatively common for entrepreneurship courses, in E4E the outsideinvestors deliver their judgment through valuations at which they “purchase” all outstandingshares of each company, within a valuation collar as determined by the instructor. This strategyhas two advantages over traditional approaches: 1. Student executive teams are provided with an external quantitative assessment of the perceived relative value of
a freshmen introduction to business class (n=14) populatedwith business and engineering students. The final class was a senior design capstone class(n=14) populated with mechanical engineering students. In a first round of data collection (n=44) students in four of these classes were asked tocomplete a 33 question survey. Participation was voluntary, and we explained the importance ofthis study as the university added course work in entrepreneurship. Questions include the 22items identified by Chen in their ESE construct, five items to measure “intention to start abusiness” (ITSB) and six items for demographics. The authors conducted a second round of datacollection in 2007 and 2008. With this round, the sample size grew to 129
device imagers, now used in digital cameras, camcorders, fax machines and numerous defense and medical applications. The Hinman CEOs Program, for which he is the Faculty Director, received the Stanford University Innovative Entrepreneurship Educators Award in 2002, and Dr. Barbe received the American Society of Engineering Education Outstanding Entrepreneurship Educators Award in 2003 and the Olympus Lifetime of Education Innovation Award in 2008.James Green, University of Maryland James V. Green is Mtech’s Director of Entrepreneurship Education with responsibilities for the Hinman CEOs Program, the Hillman Entrepreneurs Program, and the Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program. As a Senior
entrepreneurial decisions and interest in entrepreneurship of the engineeringstudents who took it. This compares with earlier studies that have focused on the impact ofentrepreneurship courses on career decisions of students with management or other non-engineering backgrounds. This research is based on a survey of 122 engineering students whotook an entrepreneurship class offered by the University during the last 25 years.Students were asked to provide their perspective on the impact this course had on their career.They were asked how the course impacted their understanding and interest in entrepreneurship, ifit raised their awareness of this career choice, if it impacted the career path they considered, if itaffected the career they chose, if they
possible context, as a processof creative change and concludes that entrepreneurial activity should not be a compulsory outcomeof an entrepreneurship education program. Basic socioeconomic forces will expand the scope ofentrepreneurial education because of changes routed in the belief that owning your own businessrepresents one of the few major pathways available to the lower economic class to build wealth asopposed for working for someone else. Today, the computer revolution is also presenting limitless 8opportunities for new ventures that have near-zero entry costs and other unavoidable start-upbarriers prevalent in many businesses. Education
in raising students’ CMD scores by promotingcognitive dissonance, as stated in Boyd, 1981; Candee, 1985; Goldman and Arbuthnot, 1985;Penn and Collier, 1985. 7This finding makes the case for creating opportunities to learn by promoting cognitivedissonance -- clearly modeled in the discipline of entrepreneurship, in which innovation is basedon disruption. One of our authors, June Ferrill, previously described using the Seven Layers ofIntegrity™ 8 to expose students to the ethical concerns of entrepreneurship. This system ispresently taught in undergraduate classes at Rice University and has been taught for CPE creditto the Texas Society of Professional Engineers. Several stages of moral reasoning development are recognized [in the CMD
, 157 of 237 (66%) chose the entrepreneurial project,compared to 98 of 201 (49%) in the previous cohorts which did not experience the white paper.Further, a survey was administered to the spring 2010 SEC II class, and the results aresummarized in Tables 4 and 5. Notable results include: ≠ 47% of Sophomore Clinic II students said that their experience with the White Paper made them more likely to choose the Entrepreneurial SEC II project; only 9% said that their experience with the White Paper made them less likely to select it. ≠ 50% of student reported choosing the Entrepreneurship project specifically because they liked the idea of doing something new and unique. ≠ Despite the inherent uncertainty in the
Paper ID #6971Reel Entrepreneurs: Illustrating Entrepreneurship with Feature FilmsDr. Zbigniew J Pasek, University of Windsor Dr. Pasek received his PhD from the University of Michigan (1993). He is currently an Associate Profes- sor in the department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Windsor, Canada. His interests include industrial automation, health care, service engineering and informal engi- neering education. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, SME and IEEE. Page 23.1029.1