content provides the disasters addressed both historical andcontemporary context, highlighting the relevance of the disaster to students but also concretizingthe engineering concept by linking it to broader social issues and goals that bear on it.Conclusions: Engineering as a Component of Liberal EducationThe analysis presented in this paper is part of a larger research initiative being carried out by theauthors, which interrogates a wider range of approaches to ELE integration with the goal ofidentifying the strategic and conceptual dimensions that drive them and some of their associatedunderlying assumptions.36, 37 The larger project seeks to provide a map of current and proposedengineering programs that explicitly highlight ELE integration
Initiative (WPSI). The acronym was changed from“WPSE” to WPSI. We dropped the “E” as our intent was never to be exclusive to non-engineering students or faculty members. At ASEE 2014, we presented preliminary results fromthe first WPSI iteration. Following the 2014 conference, we identified the need for a valid,reliable, and easily replicable assessment measure that could be used both within and outside ofWPSI to measure the attainment of a series of sustainability-related learning objectivesthroughout the engineering education research community.1 In this paper, we present the ongoingdevelopment and refinement of this measure, the Sustainability Skills and Dispositions Scale(SSDS). This instrument evaluates students’ attainment of learning
Paper ID #25325Impact of Student Mindfulness Facets on Engineering Education Outcomes:An Initial ExplorationDr. Tomas Estrada, Elizabethtown College Dr. Tomas Estrada is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at Elizabeth- town College, in Elizabethtown, PA. He received his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Universidad de Costa Rica in 2002 and his M.S. and Ph.D. (both in Electrical Engineering) from the University of Notre Dame in 2005 and 2009, respectively. His research interests include control systems, engineering education, technology-related entrepreneurship, and sustainable engineering
Paper ID #25605Sociotechnical Habits of Mind: Initial Survey Results and their FormativeImpact on Sociotechnical Teaching and LearningDr. Kathryn Johnson, Colorado School of Mines Kathryn Johnson is an Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science and is Jointly Appointed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center. She has researched wind turbine control systems since 2002, with numerous projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied experiential learning techniques in
Paper ID #22890The Distributed System of Governance in Engineering Education: A Reporton Initial FindingsDr. Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Atsushi Akera is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director in the Department of Science and Technology Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, NY). He received his M.A. and Ph.D. in the History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania. His current research is on the history of engineering education reform in the United States (1945-present). He is a the current Chair of the ASEE Ad Hoc Committee on Interdivisional Cooperation; Chair
studies were included as part of fiveof the six the fundamental units, including: U 1) New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy: Navigating the Changing Balance of Power, 2010, The Royal Society [2]; U 2) “The Lower Mekong Initiative,” announced by United States Secretary of State Hilary Clinton in 2009 [40]; U 3) “The Antarctic Treaty,” case study created by the Royal Geographical Society [41]; U 4) the French campaign to “Make the Planet Great Again,” by attracting climate change scientists to relocate and conduct research in France [42]; and; U 5) “The South Africa AIDS Controversy: A Case Study in Patent Law and Policy,” published by the Harvard Law School [43].As
Paper ID #8571The Wicked Problems in Sustainable Engineering (WPSE) Initiative: PilotResults of a Cross-Institutional Project-Based Course OfferingJustin L Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette Justin Hess is a Ph.D. candidate at Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his BS in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and hopes to receive his MSCE in December of 2014, both from Purdue University. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His disser- tation focuses on
, “Information-seeking behavior in Generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learningtheory,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 31, no. 1, 2004, pp. 46-53. [Online]. Available: SciVerse,http://www.hub.sciverse.com [Accessed: 8 Mar. 2013].[6] J. Buschman and D.A. Warner, “Researching and shaping information literacy initiatives in relation to the Web: Someframework problems and needs,” Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 31, no. 1, 2005, pp. 12-18. [Online]. Available:SciVerse, http://www.hub.sciverse.com [Accessed: 8 Mar. 2013].[7] P. Warnken, “Managing technology: The impact of technology on information literacy education in libraries,” Journalof Academic Librarianship, vol. 30, no. 2, 2004, pp. 151-156. [Online]. Available
Paper ID #15513The Socio-Technical Connection is Plastic, but Only When Design Starts fromNeed FormulationMs. Geetanjali R. Date, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Geetanjali Date is a doctoral research scholar at Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, T. I. F. R. India. There she is a part of the Learning Sciences Research Group led by Dr. Sanjay Chandrasekha- ran. Her research area is at the confluence of Engineering Design Education, Engineering Studies, and Cognition and Learning Sciences.Dr. Sanjay Chandrasekharan, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Cognitive Scientist working in Learning Sciences
. Wenger, Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.[4] D. Colbry and K. Luchini-Colbry, “STEM inSight: Developing a Research Skills Course for First- and Second-Year Students,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2013.[5] J. Fairley, J. Auerbach, A. Prysock, L. Conrad, and G. May, “Teaching research skills in summer undergraduate research programs,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2008.[6] H. H. Choi et al., “Integrative Engineering Leadership Initiative for Teaching Excellence (iELITE),” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[7] S. Laursen, A.-B. Hunter, E
) reductionand selection using the item-total correlation. A more stringent cutoff of 0.60 was used to selectthe items from all 94 ideas based on the rating. Most of the stakeholders found all items to beimportant and a cutoff of 0.60 ensured that items from all clusters were included. If there wereitems that had a correlation less than 0.60, but were regarded by stakeholders to be important,those items were retained. Qualitatively, items were added and deleted based on this criterion.As a result, the initial item pool was reduced from 94 to 48 items. The primary researcher andanother STEM education researcher reviewed the remaining 48 items for clarity as well as
classrooms.Dr. Arlene Ann RussellDr. Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University Warren N. Waggenspack, Jr. is currently the Associate Dean for Academic Programs in the College of Engineering and holder of the Ned Adler Professorship in mechanical engineering at Louisiana State University. He obtained both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from LSU M.E. and his doctorate from Purdue University’s School of Mechanical Engineering. He has been actively engaged in teaching, research, and curricula development since joining the LSU faculty in 1988. As Associate Dean, he has acquired funding from NSF to support the development of several initiatives aimed at improving student retention and graduation rates as well as
Paper ID #15524Disciplinary Specificity in Engineering Communication: Rhetorical Instruc-tion in an Undergraduate Engineering Research ClassDr. Jessie Stickgold-Sarah, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jessie Stickgold-Sarah received a joint B.S. degree in electrical engineering and computer science, and the Science, Technology & Society program, in 1997 from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and the Ph.D. degree in English and American literature in 2011 from Brandeis University. She is a lecturer in Writing, Rhetoric, and Professional Communication in CMS/W at MIT.Dr. Rebecca Thorndike-Breeze
, Berkeley and a master’s degree in Higher Education from the University of Chicago. Her research expertise is in twentieth century American history and focuses on issues of gender, education and juvenile justice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19800Jennifer Keating, Carnegie Mellon University Jennifer Keating, Ph.D. Assistant Dean for Educational Initiatives Special Faculty, Department of English Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences Carnegie Mellon University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 “Speak Up!” A
; Lopez& Chims, 1993). This body of work constitutes the foundational research that lays out theLGBTQIA+ student experience. This period of research is followed by works that discussLGBTQIA+ student identity development, which were initially positivistic and linear in nature(Bilodeau & Renn, 2005). Later, research on LGBTQIA+ students evolved to take on a moreintersectional lens, and identity development models became additive or cumulative in nature.The latest evolution of LGBTQIA+ research adopted a post-modern interpretation, which rejectsidentity as additive, and instead examines the experience of LGBTQIA+ individuals through thelenses of queer theory, critical theory, critical race theory, and feminism (Duran, 2019; Lange etal., 2019
challenges related to improving the writing skills of engineering students are common to any effort to promote pedagogical or curricular change. These challenges include identifying effective means of disseminating information to faculty, encouraging and supporting adoption and educational innovation within the context of a research university, effectively bridging disciplines to advance both writing studies and engineering education, achieving critical mass of supportive faculty in any particular department or college, and ensuring initial and ongoing buy-in and support from administrators.In our college, we believe that the most impactful short-term investment will be to educate ourengineering faculty about
AC 2011-2104: THREE DEADLY VENOMS: PHENOMENOLOGY, EXIS-TENTIALISM, AND PHILOSOPHICAL CONSTRUCTS TO EXPAND EN-GINEERING EDUCATION RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES AND PHI-LOSOPHYGeorge D Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette George D. Ricco is a doctoral student in Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. He previ- ously received an MS in Earth and Planetary Sciences studying geospatial imaging and an MS in Physics studying high-pressure, high-temperature FT-IR spectroscopy in heavy water, both from the University of California at Santa Cruz. He has a BSE in Engineering Physics with a concentration in Electrical Engineering from Case Western Reserve University. His academic interests include longitudinal
. Page 26.616.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Engineering Bait-and-Switch: K-12 Recruitment Strategies Meet University Curricula & CultureAbstractThis paper uses the metaphor of engineering bait-and-switch to characterize the misalignmentbetween educational approaches of major K-12 engineering initiatives and traditional higher-education engineering programs. We argue that this misalignment is the result of divergentunderlying educational logics. While K-12 engineering education is notably inclusive, “baiting”student interest with context-driven, open-ended problem solving, higher engineering education“switches” toward an exclusive, abstract fundamentals-first
. Beyond accepting students who are well-suited to their science-based engineering degree program, it was said that the DTU administration did not wish to expand enrollments. Research and Institutional Structure. Meanwhile, research, including PhD production, remains the main policy priority for DTU. While Danish universities appear not to have research incentive programs, such as the seed grant initiatives typically found in the United States, the DTU administration nevertheless appears to favor departments and
Paper ID #12165On an Upward Trend: Reflection in Engineering EducationMs. Lauren A. Sepp, University of Washington Lauren is a first year PhD student at the University of Washington, studying Human Centered Design & Engineering. As a research assistant in the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching, her research interests focus on engineering education and the importance of tactile learning.Mania Orand, Human Centered Design and Engineering Mania Orand is a researcher in the field of Human Computer Interaction at the University of Washington. Her research interests are on using reflection in designing web and
the National Science Foundation.The authors would like to thank the participants who volunteered their time in completing thesurveys described herein, along with the ASEE LEES division reviewers for their insights andhelpful comments on the initial draft. Page 26.740.11References1. Genco, N., Hölttä-Otto, K., & Seepersad, C. C. (2012). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 60-81.2. Duderstadt, J. J. (2010). Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of American Engineering Practice, Research, and
Figure 4: Computing Disciplines at CPSU (LSE total vs. LSE-‐Computing Disciplines vs. Fall 2013 incoming class)The rest of this paper identifies and explores possible explanations for this difference as part ofan effort to initiate a research agenda in this area.Discussion: Why So Many More Women in LSE Compared to Other ComputingDisciplines at CPSU? – Initiating a Research Agenda on B.A. Programs in EngineeringStudiesOne reason that we believe women students are both attracted to and more successful in LSE ascompared to other computing disciplines at CPSU is the size of the major. LSE is a small majorwith a high level of group and one-on-one advising. To compare, within the broader College ofEngineering, the typical college
what thiscareer path would look like in practice, but I’m committed to finding out.About half way through my freshman environmental seminar, my professor, Dr. Walther, askedme if I would be interested in working on a research project in engineering education. Hedescribed a study of media representations of engineering that he was working on with hiscolleague and told me that they were looking for a student who would like to help with dataanalysis. I agreed, and attended his research group’s next meeting. I was initially intimidated byworking with professors on a research project, but I quickly became comfortable after help andencouragement from my supervisors.My participation in this research group formed the context for the present
.1IntroductionConsiderations of diversity and inclusion have gained increased traction in science, technology,engineering and math (STEM) education broadly and in engineering education specifically overthe last several decades [1-3].2 Compared to the amount of scholarship and initiatives aimed atadvancing the representation and inclusion of women and racial/ethnic minority students andfaculty in engineering, issues of inclusion along the lines of sexual orientation and genderidentity/expression have received much less attention [4-5].Recent research has indicated that lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ)individuals face interactional and institutional processes of disadvantage in STEM, ranging froma lack of LGBTQ-inclusive benefits [6,7], to biases
Paper ID #18406Classical Engineering Education Revisited - Why it MattersProf. Claudio da Rocha Brito, Science and Education Research Council Dr. Claudio da Rocha Brito is Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Currently is the Pres- ident of IEEE Education Society, President of Science and Education Research Council (COPEC), Pres- ident of Fishing Museum Friends Society (AAMP), President of (Brazilian) National Monitoring Com- mittee of ”Internationale Gesellschaft f¨ur Ingenieurp¨adagogik” (IGIP), Vice President of International Council for Engineering and Technology Education (INTERTECH), Vice President of
local,long-time elementary school teacher. Students are provided with the following instructions: 1)Drawing on the strategies from the exercises and insights from Module 1, the engineer invites thevisitors to his office and initiates the conversation. 2) You ask questions to get a rich sense of thepersonal and emotional way in which the interviewee experiences the issue of food security andhow they feel about the project. You also try to learn more about the factual context of theirexperience to complement the research you have done on the issue. 3) Ask questions to get asense of the personal and emotional ways in which the interviewees experience food insecurityand gather information about the factual context of their experience. 4) To
Paper ID #17169As Purple is to Lavender: Exploring Womanism as a Theoretical Frameworkin Engineering EducationDr. Lauren D. Thomas, University of WashingtonDr. Danielle L. Watt, Center for Chemistry at the Space Time Limit (CaSTL Center) Danielle L. Watt, PhD. is the Director of Education, Outreach, and Diversity for the Center for Chemistry at the Space Time Limit (CaSTL) at the University of California Irvine. Prior to joining CaSTL, she was a Visiting Research Scientist at Ume˚a University, Ume˚a, Sweden and a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS.Dr. Kelly J
-LearningAnother salient context for empathic development is service learning, sometimes alternativelyreferred to as helping initiatives or community-engaged pedagogy. Researchers exploring thesecontexts do not always focus on empathic development, although when they do, they generallyemphasize that these educational contexts provide unique conditions (namely, repeatedinteractions with users) that support utilization and development of empathy among studentstoward a specific user group. Generally, the greater the extent or amount of interaction a designerhas with a user or user group, the better.51 For example, Zoltowski, Oakes, and Cardella52 foundthat students who immersed themselves into the world of a user were more likely to reach thehighest level of
Paper ID #15745From Undergraduates to Ambassadors: The Impact of Engineering Ambas-sador Network TrainingDr. Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University Dr. Garner is Associate Director for Program Development and a Research Associate Professor in The Center for Educational Partnerships at Old Dominion University, VA.Mr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University - University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (Springer-Verlag, 2013) and founder of the web- site Writing Guidelines for
Paper ID #16286In Their Shoes: Student Perspectives on the Connection between Empathyand EngineeringMr. Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University Nicholas D. Fila is a Ph.D. candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He earned a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and a M.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. His current research interests include innovation, empathy, and engineering design.Dr. Justin L Hess, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis Justin L. Hess received his PhD from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education